Due Process As American Democracy:
Due Process as American Democracy provides a fresh view of the constitutional guarantee of due process, grounded in an original perspective on the nature of American democratic theory. Redish proposes radical alterations in current judicial approaches to the nature of due process in a variety of are...
Gespeichert in:
| Beteilige Person: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford
Oxford University Press, Incorporated
2024
|
| Ausgabe: | 1st ed |
| Schriftenreihe: | Theoretical Perspectives in Law Series
|
| Schlagwörter: | |
| Links: | https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/hwr/detail.action?docID=7385768 |
| Zusammenfassung: | Due Process as American Democracy provides a fresh view of the constitutional guarantee of due process, grounded in an original perspective on the nature of American democratic theory. Redish proposes radical alterations in current judicial approaches to the nature of due process in a variety of areas of judicial procedure and constitutional law |
| Beschreibung: | Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources |
| Umfang: | 1 Online-Ressource (321 Seiten) |
| ISBN: | 9780197747421 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV049871164 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240918s2024 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780197747421 |9 978-0-19-774742-1 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-30-PQE)EBC7385768 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-30-PAD)EBC7385768 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-89-EBL)EBL7385768 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1411837703 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049871164 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-2070s | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 347.7305 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Redish, Martin H. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Due Process As American Democracy |
| 250 | |a 1st ed | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford |b Oxford University Press, Incorporated |c 2024 | |
| 264 | 4 | |c ©2024 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (321 Seiten) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Theoretical Perspectives in Law Series | |
| 500 | |a Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a Cover -- Series -- DUE PROCESS AS AMERICAN DEMOCRACY -- Copyright -- Epigraph -- Dedication -- Contents -- Detailed Contents -- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS -- INTRODUCTION: DUE PROCESS AS AN OUTGROWTH OF AMERICAN DEMOCRACY -- 1. LIBERAL ADVERSARY DEMOCRACY -- 1.1 INTRODUCTION -- 1.2 (LIBERAL) ADVERSARY DEMOCRACY: A MARRIAGE OF OPPOSITES -- 2. DUE PROCESS AS LIBERAL ADVERSARY DEMOCRACY -- 2.1 INTRODUCTION -- 2.2 PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS AND SKEPTICAL OPTIMISM -- 2.3 PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS AND THE LEGITIMACY OF DEMOCRACY -- 2.4 APPLYING ADVERSARY DEMOCRATIC DUE PROCESS -- 2.5 PROPHYLACTIC NEUTRAL ADJUDICATION -- 2.6 MISGUIDED FAITH IN ADMINISTRATOR INTEGRITY -- 2.7 ELECTED STATE JUDGES -- 2.8 THE LAW OF JUDGMENTS AND THE "DAY-IN-COURT" IDEAL -- 2.9 CLASS ACTIONS -- 2.10 LEGISLATIVE DECEPTION -- 2.11 REBUTTING THE PRESUMPTION OF FAIR PROCEDURE -- 2.12 THE LIMITED OVERLAP BETWEEN MATHEWS AND ADVERSARY DEMOCRATIC DUE PROCESS -- 2.13 REJECTING ALTERNATIVE MODELS OF PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS -- 2.14 CONCLUSION -- 3. MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION, DUE PROCESS, AND THE DANGERS OF PROCEDURAL COLLECTIVISM -- 3.1 INTRODUCTION -- 3.2 HISTORY AND STRUCTURE OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION -- 3.3 THE MECHANICS OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION -- 3.4 MDL'S DUE PROCESS DIFFICULTIES -- 3.5 IS MDL CONSTITUTIONALLY SALVAGEABLE? -- 3.6 CONCLUSION -- 4. PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS AND THE DAY-IN-COURT IDEAL: RESOLVING THE VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION DILEMMA -- 4.1 INTRODUCTION -- 4.2 VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION IN THE COURTS -- 4.3 THE DAY-IN-COURT IDEAL IN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL AND POLITICAL THEORY -- 4.4 LITIGANT AUTONOMY, LIBERAL ADVERSARY DEMOCRATIC THEORY, AND THE DAY-IN-COURT IDEAL -- 4.5 LIMITATIONS ON THE DAY-IN-COURT IDEAL -- 4.6 INDIVISIBLE RELIEF, DUE PROCESS, AND VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION -- 4.7 THE DIFFICULTY OF INDIVISIBLE RELIEF -- 4.8 DEFINING ADEQUATE REPRESENTATION. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 4.9 RESOLVING THE VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION DILEMMA: A SUMMARY -- 4.10 SHAPING PROPHYLACTIC MEASURES TO AVOID THE VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION DILEMMA -- 4.11 INCENTIVIZING AVOIDANCE OF THE VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION DILEMMA -- 4.12 CONCLUSION -- 5. PRIVATE CONTINGENT FEE LAWYERS, PUBLIC POWER, AND PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS -- 5.1 INTRODUCTION -- 5.2 GOVERNMENTAL USE OF CONTINGENCY FEE ATTORNEYS: DEVELOPMENT OF THE PRACTICE -- 5.3 LIBERAL DEMOCRACY, STATE ACTION, AND THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE DICHOTOMY: IMPLICATIONS FOR PRIVATE CONTINGENCY FEE ARRANGEMENTS -- 5.4 THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE DICHOTOMY AND GOVERNMENT ATTORNEYS -- 5.5 CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE STATE'S USE OF PRIVATE CONTINGENCY FEE ATTORNEYS -- 5.6 CONCLUSION -- 6. DUE PROCESS, FREE EXPRESSION, AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE -- 6.1 INTRODUCTION: ADVERSARY DEMOCRACY AND THE DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO A NEUTRAL ADJUDICATOR -- 6.2 A TAXONOMY OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATORY BIASES -- 6.3 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION AND DUE PROCESS -- 6.4 AVOIDING THE MOST SERIOUS DUE PROCESS PATHOLOGIES OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE -- 6.5 THE SPECIAL CASE OF FIRST AMENDMENT DUE PROCESS -- 6.6 CONCLUSION: PROCEDURE AS THE HANDMAID OF JUSTICE -- 7. CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES AS DUE PROCESS OF LAW -- 7.1 INTRODUCTION -- 7.2 THE CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY OF CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES -- 7.3 CHALLENGING THE INTERSECTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL DIRECTIVES AND CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES -- 7.4 CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES AND CONSTITUTIONAL TEXT -- 7.5 THE INADEQUACY OF EXISTING SCHOLARLY THEORY -- 7.6 ANTICIPATING AND RESPONDING TO COUNTERARGUMENTS -- 7.7 THE INCOHERENCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW -- 7.8 CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES AND CONGRESSIONAL POWER TO CONTROL FEDERAL JURISDICTION -- 7.9 LAUF'S FUNDAMENTAL FLAW. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 7.10 STATUTORY ENFORCEMENT VS. CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION: SEPARATION OF POWERS AND LIMITS ON CONGRESS'S POWER TO CONTROL FEDERAL JURISDICTION -- 7.11 IMPLICATIONS OF CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES AS CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: CONSTRUING AND MISCONSTRUING BIVENS -- 7.12 IMPLIED STATUTORY REMEDIES -- 7.13 BIVENS AND IMPLIED CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES -- 7.14 IMPLIED STATUTORY REMEDIES VS. IMPLIED CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES -- 7.15 CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES AND ADVERSARY DEMOCRACY -- 7.16 CONCLUSION -- CONCLUSION -- NOTES -- INDEX. | |
| 520 | |a Due Process as American Democracy provides a fresh view of the constitutional guarantee of due process, grounded in an original perspective on the nature of American democratic theory. Redish proposes radical alterations in current judicial approaches to the nature of due process in a variety of areas of judicial procedure and constitutional law | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Due process of law-United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Democracy-United States | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |a Redish, Martin H. |t Due Process As American Democracy |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, Incorporated,c2024 |z 9780197747414 |
| 912 | |a ZDB-30-PQE | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035210639 | |
| 966 | e | |u https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/hwr/detail.action?docID=7385768 |l DE-2070s |p ZDB-30-PQE |q HWR_PDA_PQE |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1818992315780300800 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Redish, Martin H. |
| author_facet | Redish, Martin H. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Redish, Martin H. |
| author_variant | m h r mh mhr |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV049871164 |
| collection | ZDB-30-PQE |
| contents | Cover -- Series -- DUE PROCESS AS AMERICAN DEMOCRACY -- Copyright -- Epigraph -- Dedication -- Contents -- Detailed Contents -- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS -- INTRODUCTION: DUE PROCESS AS AN OUTGROWTH OF AMERICAN DEMOCRACY -- 1. LIBERAL ADVERSARY DEMOCRACY -- 1.1 INTRODUCTION -- 1.2 (LIBERAL) ADVERSARY DEMOCRACY: A MARRIAGE OF OPPOSITES -- 2. DUE PROCESS AS LIBERAL ADVERSARY DEMOCRACY -- 2.1 INTRODUCTION -- 2.2 PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS AND SKEPTICAL OPTIMISM -- 2.3 PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS AND THE LEGITIMACY OF DEMOCRACY -- 2.4 APPLYING ADVERSARY DEMOCRATIC DUE PROCESS -- 2.5 PROPHYLACTIC NEUTRAL ADJUDICATION -- 2.6 MISGUIDED FAITH IN ADMINISTRATOR INTEGRITY -- 2.7 ELECTED STATE JUDGES -- 2.8 THE LAW OF JUDGMENTS AND THE "DAY-IN-COURT" IDEAL -- 2.9 CLASS ACTIONS -- 2.10 LEGISLATIVE DECEPTION -- 2.11 REBUTTING THE PRESUMPTION OF FAIR PROCEDURE -- 2.12 THE LIMITED OVERLAP BETWEEN MATHEWS AND ADVERSARY DEMOCRATIC DUE PROCESS -- 2.13 REJECTING ALTERNATIVE MODELS OF PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS -- 2.14 CONCLUSION -- 3. MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION, DUE PROCESS, AND THE DANGERS OF PROCEDURAL COLLECTIVISM -- 3.1 INTRODUCTION -- 3.2 HISTORY AND STRUCTURE OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION -- 3.3 THE MECHANICS OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION -- 3.4 MDL'S DUE PROCESS DIFFICULTIES -- 3.5 IS MDL CONSTITUTIONALLY SALVAGEABLE? -- 3.6 CONCLUSION -- 4. PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS AND THE DAY-IN-COURT IDEAL: RESOLVING THE VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION DILEMMA -- 4.1 INTRODUCTION -- 4.2 VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION IN THE COURTS -- 4.3 THE DAY-IN-COURT IDEAL IN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL AND POLITICAL THEORY -- 4.4 LITIGANT AUTONOMY, LIBERAL ADVERSARY DEMOCRATIC THEORY, AND THE DAY-IN-COURT IDEAL -- 4.5 LIMITATIONS ON THE DAY-IN-COURT IDEAL -- 4.6 INDIVISIBLE RELIEF, DUE PROCESS, AND VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION -- 4.7 THE DIFFICULTY OF INDIVISIBLE RELIEF -- 4.8 DEFINING ADEQUATE REPRESENTATION. 4.9 RESOLVING THE VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION DILEMMA: A SUMMARY -- 4.10 SHAPING PROPHYLACTIC MEASURES TO AVOID THE VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION DILEMMA -- 4.11 INCENTIVIZING AVOIDANCE OF THE VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION DILEMMA -- 4.12 CONCLUSION -- 5. PRIVATE CONTINGENT FEE LAWYERS, PUBLIC POWER, AND PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS -- 5.1 INTRODUCTION -- 5.2 GOVERNMENTAL USE OF CONTINGENCY FEE ATTORNEYS: DEVELOPMENT OF THE PRACTICE -- 5.3 LIBERAL DEMOCRACY, STATE ACTION, AND THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE DICHOTOMY: IMPLICATIONS FOR PRIVATE CONTINGENCY FEE ARRANGEMENTS -- 5.4 THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE DICHOTOMY AND GOVERNMENT ATTORNEYS -- 5.5 CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE STATE'S USE OF PRIVATE CONTINGENCY FEE ATTORNEYS -- 5.6 CONCLUSION -- 6. DUE PROCESS, FREE EXPRESSION, AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE -- 6.1 INTRODUCTION: ADVERSARY DEMOCRACY AND THE DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO A NEUTRAL ADJUDICATOR -- 6.2 A TAXONOMY OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATORY BIASES -- 6.3 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION AND DUE PROCESS -- 6.4 AVOIDING THE MOST SERIOUS DUE PROCESS PATHOLOGIES OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE -- 6.5 THE SPECIAL CASE OF FIRST AMENDMENT DUE PROCESS -- 6.6 CONCLUSION: PROCEDURE AS THE HANDMAID OF JUSTICE -- 7. CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES AS DUE PROCESS OF LAW -- 7.1 INTRODUCTION -- 7.2 THE CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY OF CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES -- 7.3 CHALLENGING THE INTERSECTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL DIRECTIVES AND CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES -- 7.4 CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES AND CONSTITUTIONAL TEXT -- 7.5 THE INADEQUACY OF EXISTING SCHOLARLY THEORY -- 7.6 ANTICIPATING AND RESPONDING TO COUNTERARGUMENTS -- 7.7 THE INCOHERENCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW -- 7.8 CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES AND CONGRESSIONAL POWER TO CONTROL FEDERAL JURISDICTION -- 7.9 LAUF'S FUNDAMENTAL FLAW. 7.10 STATUTORY ENFORCEMENT VS. CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION: SEPARATION OF POWERS AND LIMITS ON CONGRESS'S POWER TO CONTROL FEDERAL JURISDICTION -- 7.11 IMPLICATIONS OF CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES AS CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: CONSTRUING AND MISCONSTRUING BIVENS -- 7.12 IMPLIED STATUTORY REMEDIES -- 7.13 BIVENS AND IMPLIED CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES -- 7.14 IMPLIED STATUTORY REMEDIES VS. IMPLIED CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES -- 7.15 CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES AND ADVERSARY DEMOCRACY -- 7.16 CONCLUSION -- CONCLUSION -- NOTES -- INDEX. |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-30-PQE)EBC7385768 (ZDB-30-PAD)EBC7385768 (ZDB-89-EBL)EBL7385768 (OCoLC)1411837703 (DE-599)BVBBV049871164 |
| dewey-full | 347.7305 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
| dewey-raw | 347.7305 |
| dewey-search | 347.7305 |
| dewey-sort | 3347.7305 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| edition | 1st ed |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>06038nam a2200457zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049871164</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240918s2024 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780197747421</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-19-774742-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-30-PQE)EBC7385768</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-30-PAD)EBC7385768</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-89-EBL)EBL7385768</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1411837703</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049871164</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-2070s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.7305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Redish, Martin H.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Due Process As American Democracy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1st ed</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford</subfield><subfield code="b">Oxford University Press, Incorporated</subfield><subfield code="c">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (321 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Theoretical Perspectives in Law Series</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cover -- Series -- DUE PROCESS AS AMERICAN DEMOCRACY -- Copyright -- Epigraph -- Dedication -- Contents -- Detailed Contents -- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS -- INTRODUCTION: DUE PROCESS AS AN OUTGROWTH OF AMERICAN DEMOCRACY -- 1. LIBERAL ADVERSARY DEMOCRACY -- 1.1 INTRODUCTION -- 1.2 (LIBERAL) ADVERSARY DEMOCRACY: A MARRIAGE OF OPPOSITES -- 2. DUE PROCESS AS LIBERAL ADVERSARY DEMOCRACY -- 2.1 INTRODUCTION -- 2.2 PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS AND SKEPTICAL OPTIMISM -- 2.3 PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS AND THE LEGITIMACY OF DEMOCRACY -- 2.4 APPLYING ADVERSARY DEMOCRATIC DUE PROCESS -- 2.5 PROPHYLACTIC NEUTRAL ADJUDICATION -- 2.6 MISGUIDED FAITH IN ADMINISTRATOR INTEGRITY -- 2.7 ELECTED STATE JUDGES -- 2.8 THE LAW OF JUDGMENTS AND THE "DAY-IN-COURT" IDEAL -- 2.9 CLASS ACTIONS -- 2.10 LEGISLATIVE DECEPTION -- 2.11 REBUTTING THE PRESUMPTION OF FAIR PROCEDURE -- 2.12 THE LIMITED OVERLAP BETWEEN MATHEWS AND ADVERSARY DEMOCRATIC DUE PROCESS -- 2.13 REJECTING ALTERNATIVE MODELS OF PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS -- 2.14 CONCLUSION -- 3. MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION, DUE PROCESS, AND THE DANGERS OF PROCEDURAL COLLECTIVISM -- 3.1 INTRODUCTION -- 3.2 HISTORY AND STRUCTURE OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION -- 3.3 THE MECHANICS OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION -- 3.4 MDL'S DUE PROCESS DIFFICULTIES -- 3.5 IS MDL CONSTITUTIONALLY SALVAGEABLE? -- 3.6 CONCLUSION -- 4. PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS AND THE DAY-IN-COURT IDEAL: RESOLVING THE VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION DILEMMA -- 4.1 INTRODUCTION -- 4.2 VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION IN THE COURTS -- 4.3 THE DAY-IN-COURT IDEAL IN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL AND POLITICAL THEORY -- 4.4 LITIGANT AUTONOMY, LIBERAL ADVERSARY DEMOCRATIC THEORY, AND THE DAY-IN-COURT IDEAL -- 4.5 LIMITATIONS ON THE DAY-IN-COURT IDEAL -- 4.6 INDIVISIBLE RELIEF, DUE PROCESS, AND VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION -- 4.7 THE DIFFICULTY OF INDIVISIBLE RELIEF -- 4.8 DEFINING ADEQUATE REPRESENTATION.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">4.9 RESOLVING THE VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION DILEMMA: A SUMMARY -- 4.10 SHAPING PROPHYLACTIC MEASURES TO AVOID THE VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION DILEMMA -- 4.11 INCENTIVIZING AVOIDANCE OF THE VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION DILEMMA -- 4.12 CONCLUSION -- 5. PRIVATE CONTINGENT FEE LAWYERS, PUBLIC POWER, AND PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS -- 5.1 INTRODUCTION -- 5.2 GOVERNMENTAL USE OF CONTINGENCY FEE ATTORNEYS: DEVELOPMENT OF THE PRACTICE -- 5.3 LIBERAL DEMOCRACY, STATE ACTION, AND THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE DICHOTOMY: IMPLICATIONS FOR PRIVATE CONTINGENCY FEE ARRANGEMENTS -- 5.4 THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE DICHOTOMY AND GOVERNMENT ATTORNEYS -- 5.5 CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE STATE'S USE OF PRIVATE CONTINGENCY FEE ATTORNEYS -- 5.6 CONCLUSION -- 6. DUE PROCESS, FREE EXPRESSION, AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE -- 6.1 INTRODUCTION: ADVERSARY DEMOCRACY AND THE DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO A NEUTRAL ADJUDICATOR -- 6.2 A TAXONOMY OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATORY BIASES -- 6.3 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION AND DUE PROCESS -- 6.4 AVOIDING THE MOST SERIOUS DUE PROCESS PATHOLOGIES OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE -- 6.5 THE SPECIAL CASE OF FIRST AMENDMENT DUE PROCESS -- 6.6 CONCLUSION: PROCEDURE AS THE HANDMAID OF JUSTICE -- 7. CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES AS DUE PROCESS OF LAW -- 7.1 INTRODUCTION -- 7.2 THE CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY OF CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES -- 7.3 CHALLENGING THE INTERSECTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL DIRECTIVES AND CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES -- 7.4 CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES AND CONSTITUTIONAL TEXT -- 7.5 THE INADEQUACY OF EXISTING SCHOLARLY THEORY -- 7.6 ANTICIPATING AND RESPONDING TO COUNTERARGUMENTS -- 7.7 THE INCOHERENCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW -- 7.8 CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES AND CONGRESSIONAL POWER TO CONTROL FEDERAL JURISDICTION -- 7.9 LAUF'S FUNDAMENTAL FLAW.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7.10 STATUTORY ENFORCEMENT VS. CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION: SEPARATION OF POWERS AND LIMITS ON CONGRESS'S POWER TO CONTROL FEDERAL JURISDICTION -- 7.11 IMPLICATIONS OF CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES AS CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: CONSTRUING AND MISCONSTRUING BIVENS -- 7.12 IMPLIED STATUTORY REMEDIES -- 7.13 BIVENS AND IMPLIED CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES -- 7.14 IMPLIED STATUTORY REMEDIES VS. IMPLIED CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES -- 7.15 CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES AND ADVERSARY DEMOCRACY -- 7.16 CONCLUSION -- CONCLUSION -- NOTES -- INDEX.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Due Process as American Democracy provides a fresh view of the constitutional guarantee of due process, grounded in an original perspective on the nature of American democratic theory. Redish proposes radical alterations in current judicial approaches to the nature of due process in a variety of areas of judicial procedure and constitutional law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Due process of law-United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Democracy-United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Redish, Martin H.</subfield><subfield code="t">Due Process As American Democracy</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford : Oxford University Press, Incorporated,c2024</subfield><subfield code="z">9780197747414</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-30-PQE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035210639</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/hwr/detail.action?docID=7385768</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-2070s</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-30-PQE</subfield><subfield code="q">HWR_PDA_PQE</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV049871164 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-20T20:24:13Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780197747421 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035210639 |
| oclc_num | 1411837703 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-2070s |
| owner_facet | DE-2070s |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (321 Seiten) |
| psigel | ZDB-30-PQE ZDB-30-PQE HWR_PDA_PQE |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publishDateSearch | 2024 |
| publishDateSort | 2024 |
| publisher | Oxford University Press, Incorporated |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Theoretical Perspectives in Law Series |
| spelling | Redish, Martin H. Verfasser aut Due Process As American Democracy 1st ed Oxford Oxford University Press, Incorporated 2024 ©2024 1 Online-Ressource (321 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Theoretical Perspectives in Law Series Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources Cover -- Series -- DUE PROCESS AS AMERICAN DEMOCRACY -- Copyright -- Epigraph -- Dedication -- Contents -- Detailed Contents -- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS -- INTRODUCTION: DUE PROCESS AS AN OUTGROWTH OF AMERICAN DEMOCRACY -- 1. LIBERAL ADVERSARY DEMOCRACY -- 1.1 INTRODUCTION -- 1.2 (LIBERAL) ADVERSARY DEMOCRACY: A MARRIAGE OF OPPOSITES -- 2. DUE PROCESS AS LIBERAL ADVERSARY DEMOCRACY -- 2.1 INTRODUCTION -- 2.2 PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS AND SKEPTICAL OPTIMISM -- 2.3 PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS AND THE LEGITIMACY OF DEMOCRACY -- 2.4 APPLYING ADVERSARY DEMOCRATIC DUE PROCESS -- 2.5 PROPHYLACTIC NEUTRAL ADJUDICATION -- 2.6 MISGUIDED FAITH IN ADMINISTRATOR INTEGRITY -- 2.7 ELECTED STATE JUDGES -- 2.8 THE LAW OF JUDGMENTS AND THE "DAY-IN-COURT" IDEAL -- 2.9 CLASS ACTIONS -- 2.10 LEGISLATIVE DECEPTION -- 2.11 REBUTTING THE PRESUMPTION OF FAIR PROCEDURE -- 2.12 THE LIMITED OVERLAP BETWEEN MATHEWS AND ADVERSARY DEMOCRATIC DUE PROCESS -- 2.13 REJECTING ALTERNATIVE MODELS OF PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS -- 2.14 CONCLUSION -- 3. MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION, DUE PROCESS, AND THE DANGERS OF PROCEDURAL COLLECTIVISM -- 3.1 INTRODUCTION -- 3.2 HISTORY AND STRUCTURE OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION -- 3.3 THE MECHANICS OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION -- 3.4 MDL'S DUE PROCESS DIFFICULTIES -- 3.5 IS MDL CONSTITUTIONALLY SALVAGEABLE? -- 3.6 CONCLUSION -- 4. PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS AND THE DAY-IN-COURT IDEAL: RESOLVING THE VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION DILEMMA -- 4.1 INTRODUCTION -- 4.2 VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION IN THE COURTS -- 4.3 THE DAY-IN-COURT IDEAL IN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL AND POLITICAL THEORY -- 4.4 LITIGANT AUTONOMY, LIBERAL ADVERSARY DEMOCRATIC THEORY, AND THE DAY-IN-COURT IDEAL -- 4.5 LIMITATIONS ON THE DAY-IN-COURT IDEAL -- 4.6 INDIVISIBLE RELIEF, DUE PROCESS, AND VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION -- 4.7 THE DIFFICULTY OF INDIVISIBLE RELIEF -- 4.8 DEFINING ADEQUATE REPRESENTATION. 4.9 RESOLVING THE VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION DILEMMA: A SUMMARY -- 4.10 SHAPING PROPHYLACTIC MEASURES TO AVOID THE VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION DILEMMA -- 4.11 INCENTIVIZING AVOIDANCE OF THE VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION DILEMMA -- 4.12 CONCLUSION -- 5. PRIVATE CONTINGENT FEE LAWYERS, PUBLIC POWER, AND PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS -- 5.1 INTRODUCTION -- 5.2 GOVERNMENTAL USE OF CONTINGENCY FEE ATTORNEYS: DEVELOPMENT OF THE PRACTICE -- 5.3 LIBERAL DEMOCRACY, STATE ACTION, AND THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE DICHOTOMY: IMPLICATIONS FOR PRIVATE CONTINGENCY FEE ARRANGEMENTS -- 5.4 THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE DICHOTOMY AND GOVERNMENT ATTORNEYS -- 5.5 CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE STATE'S USE OF PRIVATE CONTINGENCY FEE ATTORNEYS -- 5.6 CONCLUSION -- 6. DUE PROCESS, FREE EXPRESSION, AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE -- 6.1 INTRODUCTION: ADVERSARY DEMOCRACY AND THE DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO A NEUTRAL ADJUDICATOR -- 6.2 A TAXONOMY OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATORY BIASES -- 6.3 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION AND DUE PROCESS -- 6.4 AVOIDING THE MOST SERIOUS DUE PROCESS PATHOLOGIES OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE -- 6.5 THE SPECIAL CASE OF FIRST AMENDMENT DUE PROCESS -- 6.6 CONCLUSION: PROCEDURE AS THE HANDMAID OF JUSTICE -- 7. CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES AS DUE PROCESS OF LAW -- 7.1 INTRODUCTION -- 7.2 THE CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY OF CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES -- 7.3 CHALLENGING THE INTERSECTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL DIRECTIVES AND CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES -- 7.4 CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES AND CONSTITUTIONAL TEXT -- 7.5 THE INADEQUACY OF EXISTING SCHOLARLY THEORY -- 7.6 ANTICIPATING AND RESPONDING TO COUNTERARGUMENTS -- 7.7 THE INCOHERENCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW -- 7.8 CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES AND CONGRESSIONAL POWER TO CONTROL FEDERAL JURISDICTION -- 7.9 LAUF'S FUNDAMENTAL FLAW. 7.10 STATUTORY ENFORCEMENT VS. CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION: SEPARATION OF POWERS AND LIMITS ON CONGRESS'S POWER TO CONTROL FEDERAL JURISDICTION -- 7.11 IMPLICATIONS OF CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES AS CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: CONSTRUING AND MISCONSTRUING BIVENS -- 7.12 IMPLIED STATUTORY REMEDIES -- 7.13 BIVENS AND IMPLIED CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES -- 7.14 IMPLIED STATUTORY REMEDIES VS. IMPLIED CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES -- 7.15 CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES AND ADVERSARY DEMOCRACY -- 7.16 CONCLUSION -- CONCLUSION -- NOTES -- INDEX. Due Process as American Democracy provides a fresh view of the constitutional guarantee of due process, grounded in an original perspective on the nature of American democratic theory. Redish proposes radical alterations in current judicial approaches to the nature of due process in a variety of areas of judicial procedure and constitutional law Due process of law-United States Democracy-United States Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Redish, Martin H. Due Process As American Democracy Oxford : Oxford University Press, Incorporated,c2024 9780197747414 |
| spellingShingle | Redish, Martin H. Due Process As American Democracy Cover -- Series -- DUE PROCESS AS AMERICAN DEMOCRACY -- Copyright -- Epigraph -- Dedication -- Contents -- Detailed Contents -- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS -- INTRODUCTION: DUE PROCESS AS AN OUTGROWTH OF AMERICAN DEMOCRACY -- 1. LIBERAL ADVERSARY DEMOCRACY -- 1.1 INTRODUCTION -- 1.2 (LIBERAL) ADVERSARY DEMOCRACY: A MARRIAGE OF OPPOSITES -- 2. DUE PROCESS AS LIBERAL ADVERSARY DEMOCRACY -- 2.1 INTRODUCTION -- 2.2 PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS AND SKEPTICAL OPTIMISM -- 2.3 PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS AND THE LEGITIMACY OF DEMOCRACY -- 2.4 APPLYING ADVERSARY DEMOCRATIC DUE PROCESS -- 2.5 PROPHYLACTIC NEUTRAL ADJUDICATION -- 2.6 MISGUIDED FAITH IN ADMINISTRATOR INTEGRITY -- 2.7 ELECTED STATE JUDGES -- 2.8 THE LAW OF JUDGMENTS AND THE "DAY-IN-COURT" IDEAL -- 2.9 CLASS ACTIONS -- 2.10 LEGISLATIVE DECEPTION -- 2.11 REBUTTING THE PRESUMPTION OF FAIR PROCEDURE -- 2.12 THE LIMITED OVERLAP BETWEEN MATHEWS AND ADVERSARY DEMOCRATIC DUE PROCESS -- 2.13 REJECTING ALTERNATIVE MODELS OF PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS -- 2.14 CONCLUSION -- 3. MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION, DUE PROCESS, AND THE DANGERS OF PROCEDURAL COLLECTIVISM -- 3.1 INTRODUCTION -- 3.2 HISTORY AND STRUCTURE OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION -- 3.3 THE MECHANICS OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION -- 3.4 MDL'S DUE PROCESS DIFFICULTIES -- 3.5 IS MDL CONSTITUTIONALLY SALVAGEABLE? -- 3.6 CONCLUSION -- 4. PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS AND THE DAY-IN-COURT IDEAL: RESOLVING THE VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION DILEMMA -- 4.1 INTRODUCTION -- 4.2 VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION IN THE COURTS -- 4.3 THE DAY-IN-COURT IDEAL IN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL AND POLITICAL THEORY -- 4.4 LITIGANT AUTONOMY, LIBERAL ADVERSARY DEMOCRATIC THEORY, AND THE DAY-IN-COURT IDEAL -- 4.5 LIMITATIONS ON THE DAY-IN-COURT IDEAL -- 4.6 INDIVISIBLE RELIEF, DUE PROCESS, AND VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION -- 4.7 THE DIFFICULTY OF INDIVISIBLE RELIEF -- 4.8 DEFINING ADEQUATE REPRESENTATION. 4.9 RESOLVING THE VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION DILEMMA: A SUMMARY -- 4.10 SHAPING PROPHYLACTIC MEASURES TO AVOID THE VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION DILEMMA -- 4.11 INCENTIVIZING AVOIDANCE OF THE VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION DILEMMA -- 4.12 CONCLUSION -- 5. PRIVATE CONTINGENT FEE LAWYERS, PUBLIC POWER, AND PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS -- 5.1 INTRODUCTION -- 5.2 GOVERNMENTAL USE OF CONTINGENCY FEE ATTORNEYS: DEVELOPMENT OF THE PRACTICE -- 5.3 LIBERAL DEMOCRACY, STATE ACTION, AND THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE DICHOTOMY: IMPLICATIONS FOR PRIVATE CONTINGENCY FEE ARRANGEMENTS -- 5.4 THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE DICHOTOMY AND GOVERNMENT ATTORNEYS -- 5.5 CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE STATE'S USE OF PRIVATE CONTINGENCY FEE ATTORNEYS -- 5.6 CONCLUSION -- 6. DUE PROCESS, FREE EXPRESSION, AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE -- 6.1 INTRODUCTION: ADVERSARY DEMOCRACY AND THE DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO A NEUTRAL ADJUDICATOR -- 6.2 A TAXONOMY OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATORY BIASES -- 6.3 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION AND DUE PROCESS -- 6.4 AVOIDING THE MOST SERIOUS DUE PROCESS PATHOLOGIES OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE -- 6.5 THE SPECIAL CASE OF FIRST AMENDMENT DUE PROCESS -- 6.6 CONCLUSION: PROCEDURE AS THE HANDMAID OF JUSTICE -- 7. CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES AS DUE PROCESS OF LAW -- 7.1 INTRODUCTION -- 7.2 THE CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY OF CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES -- 7.3 CHALLENGING THE INTERSECTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL DIRECTIVES AND CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES -- 7.4 CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES AND CONSTITUTIONAL TEXT -- 7.5 THE INADEQUACY OF EXISTING SCHOLARLY THEORY -- 7.6 ANTICIPATING AND RESPONDING TO COUNTERARGUMENTS -- 7.7 THE INCOHERENCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW -- 7.8 CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES AND CONGRESSIONAL POWER TO CONTROL FEDERAL JURISDICTION -- 7.9 LAUF'S FUNDAMENTAL FLAW. 7.10 STATUTORY ENFORCEMENT VS. CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION: SEPARATION OF POWERS AND LIMITS ON CONGRESS'S POWER TO CONTROL FEDERAL JURISDICTION -- 7.11 IMPLICATIONS OF CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES AS CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: CONSTRUING AND MISCONSTRUING BIVENS -- 7.12 IMPLIED STATUTORY REMEDIES -- 7.13 BIVENS AND IMPLIED CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES -- 7.14 IMPLIED STATUTORY REMEDIES VS. IMPLIED CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES -- 7.15 CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES AND ADVERSARY DEMOCRACY -- 7.16 CONCLUSION -- CONCLUSION -- NOTES -- INDEX. Due process of law-United States Democracy-United States |
| title | Due Process As American Democracy |
| title_auth | Due Process As American Democracy |
| title_exact_search | Due Process As American Democracy |
| title_full | Due Process As American Democracy |
| title_fullStr | Due Process As American Democracy |
| title_full_unstemmed | Due Process As American Democracy |
| title_short | Due Process As American Democracy |
| title_sort | due process as american democracy |
| topic | Due process of law-United States Democracy-United States |
| topic_facet | Due process of law-United States Democracy-United States |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT redishmartinh dueprocessasamericandemocracy |