A partial success of trade cooperation within the '16+1' formula, the case of food exports to China:
Gespeichert in:
Beteilige Person: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Veröffentlicht: |
Warszawa [Poland]
Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia
2015
|
Schlagwörter: | |
Links: | https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=563565 |
Beschreibung: | When in 2012 China approached the countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) with a proposal of cooperation in the '16+1' formula, it declared it was willing to meet the needs of CEE countries. Beijing had been aware of the political importance of the problem of trade deficit (which has been ongoing for years) and launched cooperation with the governments of 16 CEE countries to boost imports from these states. The years 2011-2014 brought an improvement in the balance of trade between China and: Hungary, Latvia, the Czech Republic, Romania, Bulgaria and Croatia. The remaining ten CEE countries recorded an increase in their trade deficits. Changes in CEE countries' balance of trade with China resulted only slightly from political actions. Instead, they were due to the macroeconomic situation and to a deterioration of the debt crisis in the EU which, for example, caused a decline in the import of Chinese goods in some of these countries. Multilateral trade cooperation was successfully developed in the entire region only in the agricultural and food production sector - the area of greatest interest to China. The pace of bilateral cooperation with specific countries varied, with the fastest being Poland, Latvia, Romania, Hungary and Bulgaria. Actions by governments of CEE countries resulted in Chinese market opening up to hundreds of local companies which, in turn, translated into an increase in the volume of foodstuffs sold by 'the 16' to China from US$ 137 million in 2011 to US$ 400 million in 2014. The success achieved in the agricultural and food production sector has demonstrated the effectiveness of trade cooperation in the '16+1' formula. It is, however, insufficient to generate a significant improvement of the trade balance. At present, the sector's share in the total volume of goods sold to China by CEE states is a mere 3.7%, and any reduction of the trade deficit would require long-term and more comprehensive solutions still to be implemented by the governments of individual CEE states |
Umfang: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 9) |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV048260927 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220609s2015 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol563565 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1334018544 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048260927 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 | ||
084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
100 | 1 | |a Jakóbowski, Jakub |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a A partial success of trade cooperation within the '16+1' formula, the case of food exports to China |c Jakub Jakóbowski |
264 | 1 | |a Warszawa [Poland] |b Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia |c 2015 | |
264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2015 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 9) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a When in 2012 China approached the countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) with a proposal of cooperation in the '16+1' formula, it declared it was willing to meet the needs of CEE countries. Beijing had been aware of the political importance of the problem of trade deficit (which has been ongoing for years) and launched cooperation with the governments of 16 CEE countries to boost imports from these states. The years 2011-2014 brought an improvement in the balance of trade between China and: Hungary, Latvia, the Czech Republic, Romania, Bulgaria and Croatia. The remaining ten CEE countries recorded an increase in their trade deficits. Changes in CEE countries' balance of trade with China resulted only slightly from political actions. Instead, they were due to the macroeconomic situation and to a deterioration of the debt crisis in the EU which, for example, caused a decline in the import of Chinese goods in some of these countries. | ||
500 | |a Multilateral trade cooperation was successfully developed in the entire region only in the agricultural and food production sector - the area of greatest interest to China. The pace of bilateral cooperation with specific countries varied, with the fastest being Poland, Latvia, Romania, Hungary and Bulgaria. Actions by governments of CEE countries resulted in Chinese market opening up to hundreds of local companies which, in turn, translated into an increase in the volume of foodstuffs sold by 'the 16' to China from US$ 137 million in 2011 to US$ 400 million in 2014. The success achieved in the agricultural and food production sector has demonstrated the effectiveness of trade cooperation in the '16+1' formula. It is, however, insufficient to generate a significant improvement of the trade balance. | ||
500 | |a At present, the sector's share in the total volume of goods sold to China by CEE states is a mere 3.7%, and any reduction of the trade deficit would require long-term and more comprehensive solutions still to be implemented by the governments of individual CEE states | ||
650 | 4 | |a Governance | |
650 | 4 | |a Economic policy | |
650 | 4 | |a International relations/trade | |
650 | 4 | |a Geopolitics | |
912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
940 | 1 | |n oe | |
940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641129 | |
966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=563565 |l DE-12 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1818989530704773120 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Jakóbowski, Jakub |
author_facet | Jakóbowski, Jakub |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Jakóbowski, Jakub |
author_variant | j j jj |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV048260927 |
collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol563565 (OCoLC)1334018544 (DE-599)BVBBV048260927 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03303nam a2200409zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048260927</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2015 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol563565</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334018544</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048260927</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jakóbowski, Jakub</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A partial success of trade cooperation within the '16+1' formula, the case of food exports to China</subfield><subfield code="c">Jakub Jakóbowski</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Warszawa [Poland]</subfield><subfield code="b">Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia</subfield><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 9)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">When in 2012 China approached the countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) with a proposal of cooperation in the '16+1' formula, it declared it was willing to meet the needs of CEE countries. Beijing had been aware of the political importance of the problem of trade deficit (which has been ongoing for years) and launched cooperation with the governments of 16 CEE countries to boost imports from these states. The years 2011-2014 brought an improvement in the balance of trade between China and: Hungary, Latvia, the Czech Republic, Romania, Bulgaria and Croatia. The remaining ten CEE countries recorded an increase in their trade deficits. Changes in CEE countries' balance of trade with China resulted only slightly from political actions. Instead, they were due to the macroeconomic situation and to a deterioration of the debt crisis in the EU which, for example, caused a decline in the import of Chinese goods in some of these countries. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Multilateral trade cooperation was successfully developed in the entire region only in the agricultural and food production sector - the area of greatest interest to China. The pace of bilateral cooperation with specific countries varied, with the fastest being Poland, Latvia, Romania, Hungary and Bulgaria. Actions by governments of CEE countries resulted in Chinese market opening up to hundreds of local companies which, in turn, translated into an increase in the volume of foodstuffs sold by 'the 16' to China from US$ 137 million in 2011 to US$ 400 million in 2014. The success achieved in the agricultural and food production sector has demonstrated the effectiveness of trade cooperation in the '16+1' formula. It is, however, insufficient to generate a significant improvement of the trade balance. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">At present, the sector's share in the total volume of goods sold to China by CEE states is a mere 3.7%, and any reduction of the trade deficit would require long-term and more comprehensive solutions still to be implemented by the governments of individual CEE states</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Governance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economic policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International relations/trade</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Geopolitics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=563565</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV048260927 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-12-20T19:39:57Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641129 |
oclc_num | 1334018544 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-12 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 9) |
psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
publishDate | 2015 |
publishDateSearch | 2015 |
publishDateSort | 2015 |
publisher | Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Jakóbowski, Jakub Verfasser aut A partial success of trade cooperation within the '16+1' formula, the case of food exports to China Jakub Jakóbowski Warszawa [Poland] Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia 2015 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2015 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 9) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier When in 2012 China approached the countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) with a proposal of cooperation in the '16+1' formula, it declared it was willing to meet the needs of CEE countries. Beijing had been aware of the political importance of the problem of trade deficit (which has been ongoing for years) and launched cooperation with the governments of 16 CEE countries to boost imports from these states. The years 2011-2014 brought an improvement in the balance of trade between China and: Hungary, Latvia, the Czech Republic, Romania, Bulgaria and Croatia. The remaining ten CEE countries recorded an increase in their trade deficits. Changes in CEE countries' balance of trade with China resulted only slightly from political actions. Instead, they were due to the macroeconomic situation and to a deterioration of the debt crisis in the EU which, for example, caused a decline in the import of Chinese goods in some of these countries. Multilateral trade cooperation was successfully developed in the entire region only in the agricultural and food production sector - the area of greatest interest to China. The pace of bilateral cooperation with specific countries varied, with the fastest being Poland, Latvia, Romania, Hungary and Bulgaria. Actions by governments of CEE countries resulted in Chinese market opening up to hundreds of local companies which, in turn, translated into an increase in the volume of foodstuffs sold by 'the 16' to China from US$ 137 million in 2011 to US$ 400 million in 2014. The success achieved in the agricultural and food production sector has demonstrated the effectiveness of trade cooperation in the '16+1' formula. It is, however, insufficient to generate a significant improvement of the trade balance. At present, the sector's share in the total volume of goods sold to China by CEE states is a mere 3.7%, and any reduction of the trade deficit would require long-term and more comprehensive solutions still to be implemented by the governments of individual CEE states Governance Economic policy International relations/trade Geopolitics |
spellingShingle | Jakóbowski, Jakub A partial success of trade cooperation within the '16+1' formula, the case of food exports to China Governance Economic policy International relations/trade Geopolitics |
title | A partial success of trade cooperation within the '16+1' formula, the case of food exports to China |
title_auth | A partial success of trade cooperation within the '16+1' formula, the case of food exports to China |
title_exact_search | A partial success of trade cooperation within the '16+1' formula, the case of food exports to China |
title_full | A partial success of trade cooperation within the '16+1' formula, the case of food exports to China Jakub Jakóbowski |
title_fullStr | A partial success of trade cooperation within the '16+1' formula, the case of food exports to China Jakub Jakóbowski |
title_full_unstemmed | A partial success of trade cooperation within the '16+1' formula, the case of food exports to China Jakub Jakóbowski |
title_short | A partial success of trade cooperation within the '16+1' formula, the case of food exports to China |
title_sort | a partial success of trade cooperation within the 16 1 formula the case of food exports to china |
topic | Governance Economic policy International relations/trade Geopolitics |
topic_facet | Governance Economic policy International relations/trade Geopolitics |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jakobowskijakub apartialsuccessoftradecooperationwithinthe161formulathecaseoffoodexportstochina |