How government procurement measures can affect trade:
A number of countries used discriminatory government procurement policies as part of stimulus packages designed to alleviate the effects of the global economic crisis. This paper collates and updates the evidence related to the size of procurement markets, the level of home bias they exhibit, and th...
Gespeichert in:
Beteilige Person: | |
---|---|
Weitere beteiligte Personen: | |
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2017
|
Schriftenreihe: | OECD Trade Policy Papers
|
Schlagwörter: | |
Links: | https://doi.org/10.1787/d1ab07b8-en |
Zusammenfassung: | A number of countries used discriminatory government procurement policies as part of stimulus packages designed to alleviate the effects of the global economic crisis. This paper collates and updates the evidence related to the size of procurement markets, the level of home bias they exhibit, and the effectiveness of multilateral and bilateral procurement agreements in reducing that bias. The share of procurement in GDP has been increasing gradually since 1995 with clear spikes during 2000-2002 and 2008-2010, the latter in response to the global economic crisis. The analysis presents evidence of domestic bias in government procurement markets, bias which has been increasing over recent years. The analysis in this paper suggests that the results of international efforts to address home bias in government procurement have been mixed to date. The World Trade Organisation's Government Procurement Agreement (GPA) is found to reduce discrimination in procurement markets, although available -- but limited -- evidence does not indicate a significant effect for bilateral agreements. The evidence suggests liberalisation of investment barriers undertaken in parallel with trade agreements increases the ability of those agreements to reduce discrimination. This suggests that countries negotiating procurement agreements could also benefit from negotiating investment agreements in parallel |
Umfang: | 1 Online-Ressource (41 Seiten) |
DOI: | 10.1787/d1ab07b8-en |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV047934961 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220413s2017 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/d1ab07b8-en |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-13-SOC)061273252 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1312686882 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047934961 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-384 |a DE-91 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-29 |a DE-739 |a DE-355 |a DE-20 |a DE-1028 |a DE-1049 |a DE-188 |a DE-521 |a DE-861 |a DE-898 |a DE-92 |a DE-573 |a DE-19 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Gourdon, Julien |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a How government procurement measures can affect trade |c Julien Gourdon and James Messent |
264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2017 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (41 Seiten) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a OECD Trade Policy Papers | |
520 | |a A number of countries used discriminatory government procurement policies as part of stimulus packages designed to alleviate the effects of the global economic crisis. This paper collates and updates the evidence related to the size of procurement markets, the level of home bias they exhibit, and the effectiveness of multilateral and bilateral procurement agreements in reducing that bias. The share of procurement in GDP has been increasing gradually since 1995 with clear spikes during 2000-2002 and 2008-2010, the latter in response to the global economic crisis. The analysis presents evidence of domestic bias in government procurement markets, bias which has been increasing over recent years. The analysis in this paper suggests that the results of international efforts to address home bias in government procurement have been mixed to date. The World Trade Organisation's Government Procurement Agreement (GPA) is found to reduce discrimination in procurement markets, although available -- but limited -- evidence does not indicate a significant effect for bilateral agreements. The evidence suggests liberalisation of investment barriers undertaken in parallel with trade agreements increases the ability of those agreements to reduce discrimination. This suggests that countries negotiating procurement agreements could also benefit from negotiating investment agreements in parallel | ||
650 | 4 | |a Trade | |
700 | 1 | |a Messent, James |4 ctb | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/d1ab07b8-en |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033316455 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
DE-BY-TUM_katkey | 2631321 |
---|---|
_version_ | 1821940772682858498 |
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Gourdon, Julien |
author2 | Messent, James |
author2_role | ctb |
author2_variant | j m jm |
author_facet | Gourdon, Julien Messent, James |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Gourdon, Julien |
author_variant | j g jg |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV047934961 |
collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-13-SOC)061273252 (OCoLC)1312686882 (DE-599)BVBBV047934961 |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1787/d1ab07b8-en |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047934961</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220413s2017 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/d1ab07b8-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-13-SOC)061273252</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1312686882</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047934961</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1028</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1049</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-861</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-898</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gourdon, Julien</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">How government procurement measures can affect trade</subfield><subfield code="c">Julien Gourdon and James Messent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (41 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Trade Policy Papers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A number of countries used discriminatory government procurement policies as part of stimulus packages designed to alleviate the effects of the global economic crisis. This paper collates and updates the evidence related to the size of procurement markets, the level of home bias they exhibit, and the effectiveness of multilateral and bilateral procurement agreements in reducing that bias. The share of procurement in GDP has been increasing gradually since 1995 with clear spikes during 2000-2002 and 2008-2010, the latter in response to the global economic crisis. The analysis presents evidence of domestic bias in government procurement markets, bias which has been increasing over recent years. The analysis in this paper suggests that the results of international efforts to address home bias in government procurement have been mixed to date. The World Trade Organisation's Government Procurement Agreement (GPA) is found to reduce discrimination in procurement markets, although available -- but limited -- evidence does not indicate a significant effect for bilateral agreements. The evidence suggests liberalisation of investment barriers undertaken in parallel with trade agreements increases the ability of those agreements to reduce discrimination. This suggests that countries negotiating procurement agreements could also benefit from negotiating investment agreements in parallel</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Trade</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Messent, James</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/d1ab07b8-en</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033316455</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV047934961 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2025-01-11T15:45:50Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033316455 |
oclc_num | 1312686882 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
owner_facet | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (41 Seiten) |
psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
publishDate | 2017 |
publishDateSearch | 2017 |
publishDateSort | 2017 |
publisher | OECD Publishing |
record_format | marc |
series2 | OECD Trade Policy Papers |
spellingShingle | Gourdon, Julien How government procurement measures can affect trade Trade |
title | How government procurement measures can affect trade |
title_auth | How government procurement measures can affect trade |
title_exact_search | How government procurement measures can affect trade |
title_full | How government procurement measures can affect trade Julien Gourdon and James Messent |
title_fullStr | How government procurement measures can affect trade Julien Gourdon and James Messent |
title_full_unstemmed | How government procurement measures can affect trade Julien Gourdon and James Messent |
title_short | How government procurement measures can affect trade |
title_sort | how government procurement measures can affect trade |
topic | Trade |
topic_facet | Trade |
url | https://doi.org/10.1787/d1ab07b8-en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gourdonjulien howgovernmentprocurementmeasurescanaffecttrade AT messentjames howgovernmentprocurementmeasurescanaffecttrade |