Debating the presidency: conflicting perspectives on the American executive
Gespeichert in:
| Weitere beteiligte Personen: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Washington DC
CQ Press
2020
|
| Ausgabe: | Fifth edition |
| Schlagwörter: | |
| Umfang: | ix, 302 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9781544390192 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a22000001c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047107543 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20210609 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 210127s2020 xx |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781544390192 |c paperback |9 978-1-5443-9019-2 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1256423498 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047107543 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Debating the presidency |b conflicting perspectives on the American executive |c Richard J. Ellis (Willamette University), Michael Nelson (Rhodes College), editors |
| 250 | |a Fifth edition | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Washington DC |b CQ Press |c 2020 | |
| 300 | |a ix, 302 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a Preface<br />Contributors<br />1. Resolved, the framers of the Constitution would approve of the modern Presidency<br /> Pro: -- David Nichols<br /> Con: -- Terri Bimes<br />2. Resolved, the unitary executive is a myth<br /> Pro: -- Richard J. Ellis<br /> Con: -- Saikrishna Prakash<br />3. Resolved, political parties should nominate candidates for the presidency through a national primary<br /> Pro: -- Michael Nelson<br /> Con: -- Andrew E. Busch<br />4. Resolved, the president should be elected directly by the people<br /> Pro: -- Burdett Loomis<br /> Con: -- Byron E. Shafer and Monica Busch<br />5. Resolved, the 22nd Amendment should be repealed<br /> Pro: -- David Karol<br /> Con: -- Thomas E. Cronin<br />6. Resolved, the new media has brought the president closer to the people<br /> Pro: -- Matthew R. Kerbel<br /> Con: -- | |
| 505 | 8 | |a Bruce Miroff<br />7. Resolved, presidential success and failure are better explained by political time and the strength of governing coalitions than a president's character and leadership qualities<br /> Pro: -- Stephen Skowronek<br /> Con: -- Paul Quirk<br />8. Resolved, presidential power is (still) the power to persuade<br /> Pro: -- Matt Dickinson<br /> Con: -- George C. Edwards III<br />9. Resolved Congress should be required to vote up or down on legislation proposed by the president<br /> Pro: -- William G. Howell and Terry Moe<br /> Con: -- B. Dan Wood<br />10. Resolved, presidents have usurped the war power that rightfully belongs to Congress<br /> Pro: -- Nancy Kassop<br /> Con: -- Robert Bauer<br />11. Resolved, Congress should have the power to override a presidential pardon by a two-thirds majority vote of both houses<br /> Pro: -- Sharece Thrower<br /> Con: -- | |
| 505 | 8 | |a Jeffrey Crouch<br />12. Resolved, executive orders and other unilateral presidential directives undermine democracy<br /> Pro: -- Gene Healy<br /> Con: -- Andrew Rudalevige<br />13. Resolved, the president has too much power in the selection of judges<br /> Pro: -- David A. Yalof<br /> Con: -- John Anthony Maltese<br />14. Resolved, the vice presidency should be abolished<br /> Pro: -- Douglas L. Kriner<br /> Con: -- Joel K. Goldstein<br /> | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Vollziehende Gewalt |0 (DE-588)4131719-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Präsidentielles Regierungssystem |0 (DE-588)4175552-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 653 | 0 | |a nited States | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Presidents / United States | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Executive power | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Presidents | |
| 653 | 2 | |a United States | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4143413-4 |a Aufsatzsammlung |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Präsidentielles Regierungssystem |0 (DE-588)4175552-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Vollziehende Gewalt |0 (DE-588)4131719-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ellis, Richard J. |d 1960- |0 (DE-588)121587045 |4 edt | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nelson, Michael |d 1949- |0 (DE-588)13650194X |4 edt | |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032514063 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1818987639537139712 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author2 | Ellis, Richard J. 1960- Nelson, Michael 1949- |
| author2_role | edt edt |
| author2_variant | r j e rj rje m n mn |
| author_GND | (DE-588)121587045 (DE-588)13650194X |
| author_facet | Ellis, Richard J. 1960- Nelson, Michael 1949- |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047107543 |
| contents | Preface<br />Contributors<br />1. Resolved, the framers of the Constitution would approve of the modern Presidency<br /> Pro: -- David Nichols<br /> Con: -- Terri Bimes<br />2. Resolved, the unitary executive is a myth<br /> Pro: -- Richard J. Ellis<br /> Con: -- Saikrishna Prakash<br />3. Resolved, political parties should nominate candidates for the presidency through a national primary<br /> Pro: -- Michael Nelson<br /> Con: -- Andrew E. Busch<br />4. Resolved, the president should be elected directly by the people<br /> Pro: -- Burdett Loomis<br /> Con: -- Byron E. Shafer and Monica Busch<br />5. Resolved, the 22nd Amendment should be repealed<br /> Pro: -- David Karol<br /> Con: -- Thomas E. Cronin<br />6. Resolved, the new media has brought the president closer to the people<br /> Pro: -- Matthew R. Kerbel<br /> Con: -- Bruce Miroff<br />7. Resolved, presidential success and failure are better explained by political time and the strength of governing coalitions than a president's character and leadership qualities<br /> Pro: -- Stephen Skowronek<br /> Con: -- Paul Quirk<br />8. Resolved, presidential power is (still) the power to persuade<br /> Pro: -- Matt Dickinson<br /> Con: -- George C. Edwards III<br />9. Resolved Congress should be required to vote up or down on legislation proposed by the president<br /> Pro: -- William G. Howell and Terry Moe<br /> Con: -- B. Dan Wood<br />10. Resolved, presidents have usurped the war power that rightfully belongs to Congress<br /> Pro: -- Nancy Kassop<br /> Con: -- Robert Bauer<br />11. Resolved, Congress should have the power to override a presidential pardon by a two-thirds majority vote of both houses<br /> Pro: -- Sharece Thrower<br /> Con: -- Jeffrey Crouch<br />12. Resolved, executive orders and other unilateral presidential directives undermine democracy<br /> Pro: -- Gene Healy<br /> Con: -- Andrew Rudalevige<br />13. Resolved, the president has too much power in the selection of judges<br /> Pro: -- David A. Yalof<br /> Con: -- John Anthony Maltese<br />14. Resolved, the vice presidency should be abolished<br /> Pro: -- Douglas L. Kriner<br /> Con: -- Joel K. Goldstein<br /> |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1256423498 (DE-599)BVBBV047107543 |
| edition | Fifth edition |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03772nam a22004691c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047107543</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210609 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210127s2020 xx |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781544390192</subfield><subfield code="c">paperback</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-5443-9019-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1256423498</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047107543</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Debating the presidency</subfield><subfield code="b">conflicting perspectives on the American executive</subfield><subfield code="c">Richard J. Ellis (Willamette University), Michael Nelson (Rhodes College), editors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fifth edition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Washington DC</subfield><subfield code="b">CQ Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ix, 302 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Preface<br />Contributors<br />1. Resolved, the framers of the Constitution would approve of the modern Presidency<br /> Pro: -- David Nichols<br /> Con: -- Terri Bimes<br />2. Resolved, the unitary executive is a myth<br /> Pro: -- Richard J. Ellis<br /> Con: -- Saikrishna Prakash<br />3. Resolved, political parties should nominate candidates for the presidency through a national primary<br /> Pro: -- Michael Nelson<br /> Con: -- Andrew E. Busch<br />4. Resolved, the president should be elected directly by the people<br /> Pro: -- Burdett Loomis<br /> Con: -- Byron E. Shafer and Monica Busch<br />5. Resolved, the 22nd Amendment should be repealed<br /> Pro: -- David Karol<br /> Con: -- Thomas E. Cronin<br />6. Resolved, the new media has brought the president closer to the people<br /> Pro: -- Matthew R. Kerbel<br /> Con: -- </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bruce Miroff<br />7. Resolved, presidential success and failure are better explained by political time and the strength of governing coalitions than a president's character and leadership qualities<br /> Pro: -- Stephen Skowronek<br /> Con: -- Paul Quirk<br />8. Resolved, presidential power is (still) the power to persuade<br /> Pro: -- Matt Dickinson<br /> Con: -- George C. Edwards III<br />9. Resolved Congress should be required to vote up or down on legislation proposed by the president<br /> Pro: -- William G. Howell and Terry Moe<br /> Con: -- B. Dan Wood<br />10. Resolved, presidents have usurped the war power that rightfully belongs to Congress<br /> Pro: -- Nancy Kassop<br /> Con: -- Robert Bauer<br />11. Resolved, Congress should have the power to override a presidential pardon by a two-thirds majority vote of both houses<br /> Pro: -- Sharece Thrower<br /> Con: -- </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jeffrey Crouch<br />12. Resolved, executive orders and other unilateral presidential directives undermine democracy<br /> Pro: -- Gene Healy<br /> Con: -- Andrew Rudalevige<br />13. Resolved, the president has too much power in the selection of judges<br /> Pro: -- David A. Yalof<br /> Con: -- John Anthony Maltese<br />14. Resolved, the vice presidency should be abolished<br /> Pro: -- Douglas L. Kriner<br /> Con: -- Joel K. Goldstein<br /></subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Vollziehende Gewalt</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4131719-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Präsidentielles Regierungssystem</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4175552-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">nited States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Presidents / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Executive power</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Presidents</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4143413-4</subfield><subfield code="a">Aufsatzsammlung</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Präsidentielles Regierungssystem</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4175552-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Vollziehende Gewalt</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4131719-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ellis, Richard J.</subfield><subfield code="d">1960-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)121587045</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nelson, Michael</subfield><subfield code="d">1949-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)13650194X</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032514063</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Aufsatzsammlung |
| geographic | USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV047107543 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-20T19:09:53Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781544390192 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032514063 |
| oclc_num | 1256423498 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | ix, 302 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSearch | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | CQ Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Debating the presidency conflicting perspectives on the American executive Richard J. Ellis (Willamette University), Michael Nelson (Rhodes College), editors Fifth edition Washington DC CQ Press 2020 ix, 302 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Preface<br />Contributors<br />1. Resolved, the framers of the Constitution would approve of the modern Presidency<br /> Pro: -- David Nichols<br /> Con: -- Terri Bimes<br />2. Resolved, the unitary executive is a myth<br /> Pro: -- Richard J. Ellis<br /> Con: -- Saikrishna Prakash<br />3. Resolved, political parties should nominate candidates for the presidency through a national primary<br /> Pro: -- Michael Nelson<br /> Con: -- Andrew E. Busch<br />4. Resolved, the president should be elected directly by the people<br /> Pro: -- Burdett Loomis<br /> Con: -- Byron E. Shafer and Monica Busch<br />5. Resolved, the 22nd Amendment should be repealed<br /> Pro: -- David Karol<br /> Con: -- Thomas E. Cronin<br />6. Resolved, the new media has brought the president closer to the people<br /> Pro: -- Matthew R. Kerbel<br /> Con: -- Bruce Miroff<br />7. Resolved, presidential success and failure are better explained by political time and the strength of governing coalitions than a president's character and leadership qualities<br /> Pro: -- Stephen Skowronek<br /> Con: -- Paul Quirk<br />8. Resolved, presidential power is (still) the power to persuade<br /> Pro: -- Matt Dickinson<br /> Con: -- George C. Edwards III<br />9. Resolved Congress should be required to vote up or down on legislation proposed by the president<br /> Pro: -- William G. Howell and Terry Moe<br /> Con: -- B. Dan Wood<br />10. Resolved, presidents have usurped the war power that rightfully belongs to Congress<br /> Pro: -- Nancy Kassop<br /> Con: -- Robert Bauer<br />11. Resolved, Congress should have the power to override a presidential pardon by a two-thirds majority vote of both houses<br /> Pro: -- Sharece Thrower<br /> Con: -- Jeffrey Crouch<br />12. Resolved, executive orders and other unilateral presidential directives undermine democracy<br /> Pro: -- Gene Healy<br /> Con: -- Andrew Rudalevige<br />13. Resolved, the president has too much power in the selection of judges<br /> Pro: -- David A. Yalof<br /> Con: -- John Anthony Maltese<br />14. Resolved, the vice presidency should be abolished<br /> Pro: -- Douglas L. Kriner<br /> Con: -- Joel K. Goldstein<br /> Vollziehende Gewalt (DE-588)4131719-1 gnd rswk-swf Präsidentielles Regierungssystem (DE-588)4175552-2 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf nited States Presidents / United States Executive power Presidents United States (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Präsidentielles Regierungssystem (DE-588)4175552-2 s Vollziehende Gewalt (DE-588)4131719-1 s DE-604 Ellis, Richard J. 1960- (DE-588)121587045 edt Nelson, Michael 1949- (DE-588)13650194X edt |
| spellingShingle | Debating the presidency conflicting perspectives on the American executive Preface<br />Contributors<br />1. Resolved, the framers of the Constitution would approve of the modern Presidency<br /> Pro: -- David Nichols<br /> Con: -- Terri Bimes<br />2. Resolved, the unitary executive is a myth<br /> Pro: -- Richard J. Ellis<br /> Con: -- Saikrishna Prakash<br />3. Resolved, political parties should nominate candidates for the presidency through a national primary<br /> Pro: -- Michael Nelson<br /> Con: -- Andrew E. Busch<br />4. Resolved, the president should be elected directly by the people<br /> Pro: -- Burdett Loomis<br /> Con: -- Byron E. Shafer and Monica Busch<br />5. Resolved, the 22nd Amendment should be repealed<br /> Pro: -- David Karol<br /> Con: -- Thomas E. Cronin<br />6. Resolved, the new media has brought the president closer to the people<br /> Pro: -- Matthew R. Kerbel<br /> Con: -- Bruce Miroff<br />7. Resolved, presidential success and failure are better explained by political time and the strength of governing coalitions than a president's character and leadership qualities<br /> Pro: -- Stephen Skowronek<br /> Con: -- Paul Quirk<br />8. Resolved, presidential power is (still) the power to persuade<br /> Pro: -- Matt Dickinson<br /> Con: -- George C. Edwards III<br />9. Resolved Congress should be required to vote up or down on legislation proposed by the president<br /> Pro: -- William G. Howell and Terry Moe<br /> Con: -- B. Dan Wood<br />10. Resolved, presidents have usurped the war power that rightfully belongs to Congress<br /> Pro: -- Nancy Kassop<br /> Con: -- Robert Bauer<br />11. Resolved, Congress should have the power to override a presidential pardon by a two-thirds majority vote of both houses<br /> Pro: -- Sharece Thrower<br /> Con: -- Jeffrey Crouch<br />12. Resolved, executive orders and other unilateral presidential directives undermine democracy<br /> Pro: -- Gene Healy<br /> Con: -- Andrew Rudalevige<br />13. Resolved, the president has too much power in the selection of judges<br /> Pro: -- David A. Yalof<br /> Con: -- John Anthony Maltese<br />14. Resolved, the vice presidency should be abolished<br /> Pro: -- Douglas L. Kriner<br /> Con: -- Joel K. Goldstein<br /> Vollziehende Gewalt (DE-588)4131719-1 gnd Präsidentielles Regierungssystem (DE-588)4175552-2 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4131719-1 (DE-588)4175552-2 (DE-588)4078704-7 (DE-588)4143413-4 |
| title | Debating the presidency conflicting perspectives on the American executive |
| title_auth | Debating the presidency conflicting perspectives on the American executive |
| title_exact_search | Debating the presidency conflicting perspectives on the American executive |
| title_full | Debating the presidency conflicting perspectives on the American executive Richard J. Ellis (Willamette University), Michael Nelson (Rhodes College), editors |
| title_fullStr | Debating the presidency conflicting perspectives on the American executive Richard J. Ellis (Willamette University), Michael Nelson (Rhodes College), editors |
| title_full_unstemmed | Debating the presidency conflicting perspectives on the American executive Richard J. Ellis (Willamette University), Michael Nelson (Rhodes College), editors |
| title_short | Debating the presidency |
| title_sort | debating the presidency conflicting perspectives on the american executive |
| title_sub | conflicting perspectives on the American executive |
| topic | Vollziehende Gewalt (DE-588)4131719-1 gnd Präsidentielles Regierungssystem (DE-588)4175552-2 gnd |
| topic_facet | Vollziehende Gewalt Präsidentielles Regierungssystem USA Aufsatzsammlung |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ellisrichardj debatingthepresidencyconflictingperspectivesontheamericanexecutive AT nelsonmichael debatingthepresidencyconflictingperspectivesontheamericanexecutive |