The licensing of nominal and verbal ellipsis in Romanian:
Gespeichert in:
| Beteilige Person: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Bucureşti
Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti
2019
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Lingvistică. Lingua
|
| Schlagwörter: | |
| Links: | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032430367&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032430367&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| Umfang: | 400 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9786061611447 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047022931 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20210526 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 201123s2019 xx |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9786061611447 |9 978-606-16-1144-7 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1178990836 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047022931 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Nicolae, Alexandru |d 1986- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1024910253 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The licensing of nominal and verbal ellipsis in Romanian |c Alexandru Nicolae |
| 264 | 1 | |a Bucureşti |b Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti |c 2019 | |
| 300 | |a 400 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Lingvistică. Lingua | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Nominalsatz |0 (DE-588)4042460-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rumänisch |0 (DE-588)4115807-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Verbalsatz |0 (DE-588)4187546-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Auslassung |0 (DE-588)4359960-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 653 | |a Romanian language | ||
| 653 | 0 | |a Limba română / Morfologie | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Limba română / Verb | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Rumänisch |0 (DE-588)4115807-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Verbalsatz |0 (DE-588)4187546-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Nominalsatz |0 (DE-588)4042460-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Auslassung |0 (DE-588)4359960-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032430367&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032430367&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20210526 | |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 400 |e 22/bsb |f 0905 |g 498 |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032430367 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1819375366387531776 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Contents Preface.............................................................................. xüi Acknowledgements..................................................................................................... xv Abbreviations and conventions.................................................................................. xvii I. Introduction: goals, outline and framework.......................................................... 1. Motivation, aim and contents....................................................................... 2. Theoretical framework.................................................................................. 3. Some technical remarks on the organization of this book............................ 4. Examples and glossing.................................................................................. 1 1 5 8 10 II. Ellipsis: diagnostics and distinctions.................................................................... 1. The sources for ellipsis in Universal Grammar............................................. 1.1. Setting the picture................................................................................. 1.2. Gapping vs. VP-ellipsis or multidominance vs. PF-deletion................. 1.3. Summary............................................................................................... 2. The PF-deletion approach to ellipsis............................................................. 2.1. Semantics or syntax?.............................................................................. 2.2. Full structure in the ellipsis
site............................................................ 2.2.1. Extraction.................................................................................... 2.2.2. Connectivity effects.................................................................... 2.2.3. Antecedent-contained deletion..................... 2.2.4. Unreliable diagnostics................................................................. 3. The nature of the parallelism relation holding between the antecedent and the ellipsis site................................................... 3.1. Lexical parallelism................................................................................ 3.1.1. The Lexical Identity condition.................................................... 3.1.2. Diathesis alternations.................................................................. 11 12 12 16 22 23 24 25 25 28 29 30 33 33 33 34
viii Contents 3.2. Syntactic parallelism: apparent mismatches......................................... 3.2.1. Syntactic Parallelism (1): can there be any mismatches?............ 3.2.2. Syntactic Parallelism (2): morphemic transparency................... 3.2.3. Summary..................................................................................... 3.3. Syntactic-semantic constraints on deletion: MaxElide......................... 3.4. Summary............................................................................................... 4. Ellipsis is more than meets the eye............................................................... 4.1. EPP-suspension..................................................................................... 4.2. The Infinitīvus Pro Participio Effect...................................................... 4.3. Obligatory deletion............................................................................... 4.4. Some other sluicing disparities............................................................. 4.5. Summary............................................................................................... 5. A common topic approach............................................................................ 5.1. An E-feature?......................................................................................... 5.2. Building a common topic...................................................................... 6. Ellipsis and larger discourse access.............................................................. 7. Summary and
conclusions................................ III. Nominal ellipsis: anaphoricity as definiteness.... ........................................... 1. Setting the picture.......................................................................................... 2. A definiteness parameter ?......................................................................... 2.1. Remarks on parametrization................................................................. 2.1.1. The classical model of parametrization...................................... 2.1.2. Parametrization in Minimalism.................................................. 2.1.3. Summary..................................................................................... 2.2. On the definiteness parameter . Patterns of definiteness valuation in Romanian.............................................................................................. 2.2.1. Danon s (2010) proposal............................................................. 2.2.2. Definiteness as a morphosyntactic feature................................. 2.2.3. The definiteness parameter in Romanian. Deriving definiteness valuation and definiteness agreement in Romanian.................................................................................. 2.2.Յ.1. Patterns of definiteness valuation and definiteness realization...................................................................... 2.2.3.2. A brief detour into definiteness agreement in modem Romanian...................................................................... 36 37 43 45 45 47 47 47 48 49 51 52
53 53 56 59 60 63 65 69 69 69 70 73 73 74 74 77 78 89
The Licensing of Nominal and Verbal Ellipsis in Romanian 2.2.4. More on the definiteness parameter: causes, consequences...... 2.2.5. Definiteness valuation by the freestanding definite article cel.... 2.3. Summary............................................................................................... 3. Licensing nominal ellipsis in Romanian....................................................... 3.1. Constructing a common topic ........................................................... 3.2. From interpretation to syntax............................................................... 3.2.1. The structure question................................................................. 3.2.2. Splitting the D-head......... .......................................................... 3.2.3. A syntax-semantics interface implication................................... 3.2.4. Evidence for definiteness in the ellipsis site............................... 3.2.5. Evidence for focus on the remnant............................................. 3.2.6. Characterizing the chosen P-features...................................... . 3.3. Nominal ellipsis headed by cel.............................................................. 3.3.1. The distribution of cel in the adjectival article construction....... 3.3.2. The interpretation of the ceZ-construction................................... 3.3.3. A brief note on the classification of adjectives........................... 3.3.4. The derivation of the ceZ-construction........................................ 3.3.5. A speculation on the emergence of
the adjectival article cel...... 3.3.6. The analysis of nominal ellipsis headed by cel........................... Յ.Յ.6.1. The range of remnants................................................... 3.3.6.2. CeZ-ellipsis with qualifying adjectives............................ 3.3.6.3. Extending the analysis. Predictions............................... 3.3.6.4. Conclusions.................................................................... 3.3.7. On nominal ellipsis with cardinal remnants.............................. Յ.Յ.7.1. Definiteness of the complement..................................... 3.3.7.2. Analysing nominal ellipsis with cardinal remnants...... 3.3.7.3. Evidence for focus......................................................... 3.3.7.4. Extending the analysis to unul (one.def)....................... 3.4. Conclusions........................................................................................... 4. Substantivization vs. nominal ellipsis. A diachronic perspective on nominal ellipsis.......................................................................................................... 4.1. Stating the problem: ellipsis with participial remnants from old to modem Romanian............................................................................... 4.2. Putting things into a perspective: the suffixal definite article as a licenser of nominal ellipsis in old Romanian...................................... 4.3. On the status of cel in old Romanian..................................................... ix 94 97 103 103 103 109 109 110 112 113 115 118 121 122 126
127 128 133 136 136 140 141 148 150 150 152 156 157 162 165 165 168 170
x Contents 4.4. Summary............................................................................................... 4.5. Substantivization vs. nominal ellipsis....................................... ........... 173 174 4.6. Assessing the relevance of the diachronic facts.................................... 5. Conclusions and further speculations.......................................................... 180 183 IV. Verb syntax and verbal ellipsis in Romanian..................................................... 189 1. Setting the picture.......................................................................................... 190 2. Romanian as a Verb-Stranding VP-ellipsis language? Romanian vs. Portuguese................................................................................................... 195 3. Verb syntax and auxiliary-complement ellipsis in Romanian...................... 201 3.1. Delimiting auxiliary-complement ellipsis............................................. 201 3.1.1. No auxiliary-complement ellipsis in Romanian?........................ 201 3.1.2. Auxiliary-complement deletion after all. Always?..................... 203 Յ.1.2.1. Passive and copular ƒ: ( be )........................................... 203 Յ.1.2.2. Non-agreeing fi ( be )..................................................... 208 3.2. On the syntax of Romanian auxiliary constructions............................. 211 3.2.1. Fi ( be ): agreeing and non-agreeing........................................... 211 3.2.2. Inserting the perfective auxiliary avea ( have ) into the picture.... 215
3.2.3. The morphosyntax of the Romanian verb.................................. 217 Յ.2.Յ.1. Preliminary remarks...................................................... 217 3.2.3.2. Evidence for a Mood projection..................................... 218 3.2.3.3. Evidence for Aspect and Tense projections................... 221 3.2.3.4. Summary....................................................................... 223 3.2.3.5. Verb raising and the split IP-parameter......................... 227 3.2.3.6. The derivation of periphrastic verbal forms................. 239 Յ.2.Յ.6.1. The compound past configuration................ 239 3.2.3.6.2. Non-agreeing be configurations..................... 245 3.2.3.6.3. Agreeing be configurations: the passive and copular constructions.................................... 251 3.2.3.6.4. Deriving periphrastic verbal forms: summary and implications............................................ 256 3.3. Accounting for the auxiliary-complement ellipsis disparities.............. 258 4. Ellipsis licensed by modal verbs................................................................... 260 4.1. Form - modal interpretation correlations............................................. 261 4.2. Raising or control with modal verbs?................................................... 272
The Licensing of Nominal and Verbal Ellipsis in Romanian 4.2.1. Preliminary remarks................................................................... 4.2.2. Truth conditions under voice switch.......................................... 4.2.3. Manimate subjects...................................................................... 4.2.4. Idiom chunks............................................................................... 4.2.5. Scope properties.......................................................................... 4.2.6. Other diagnostics........................................................................ 4.2.7. Summary: the syntactic nature of raising verbs.......................... 4.3. The syntax of modal constructions........................................................ 4.3.1. Preliminary remarks................................................................... 4.3.2. Putea + bare short infinitive......................................................... 4.3.2.1. Monoclausal or biclausal?.............................................. 4.3.2.2. The syntactic status of the bare short infinitive............. 4.3.2.3. Deriving the bare short infinitive modal construction... 4.3.2.4. The passive bare short infinitival construction.............. 4.3.2.5. The bare short infinitive modal construction: results.... 4.3.3. Putea + subjunctive..................................................................... 4.Յ.Յ.1. Monoclausal or biclausal?.............................................. 4.3.3.2. The status of the Romanian subjunctive: CP or TP?...... 4.Յ.Յ.2.1.
Morphology at play: the subjunctive value is encoded by the verb morphology itself........ 4.3.3.2.2. Negation and clitics....................................... 4.3.3.2.3. Să-omission.................................................... 4.3.3.2.4. The ca (...) sã structure.................................... 4.3.3.2.5. Summary and implications........................... 4.3.3.3. Deriving the poate + subjunctive construction................ 4.Յ.Յ.Յ.1. Tackling the data............................................ 4.3.3.3.2. Feature inheritance at play............................ 4.3.4. Summary..................................................................................... 4.3.5. Trebui + subjunctive.................................................................... 4.3.6. Trebui + participle / supine.......................................................... 4.3.7. Summary..................................................................................... 4.4. Modal complement ellipsis.................................................................... 4.4.1. Diagnosing ellipsis...................................................................... 4.4.2. Configurations feeding ellipsis................................................... 4.4.3. The range of readings................................................................. 4.4.4. Accounting for the elliptical puzzles.......................................... xi 272 275 278 280 282 284 285 290 290 292 293 299 301 306 309 311 311 313 315 317 322 326 327 329 329 330 333 334 338 342 343 343 346 349 352
xii Contents 4.4.5. Summary..................................................................................... 5. Verbal ellipsis: conclusions........................................................................... 5.1. Auxiliary complement ellipsis and its relevance.................................. 5.2. Modal complement ellipsis.................................................................... 5.3. The relevance of Tense.......................................................................... 5.4. Semantics is important.......................................................................... 356 357 357 358 359 361 IV. Conclusions and open ends.................................................................................. 363 References 371
References Abbott, В. 2004. “Definites and indefinites”. In: L. R. Horn, G. L. Ward (eds), The Handbook ofPragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 122-149. Abbott, B., 2006, “Definite and indefinite”. In: K. Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia ofLanguage and Linguistics, voi. 14. second edn. Boston: Elsevier, 3-392. Abney, S. P. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT. Aboh, E. O. 2004. “Topic and focus within DP”. Linguistics in the Netherlands 21, 1-12. Adams, P. W., T. Satoshi, T. 2012. “Sluicing in Mandarin Chinese: An instance of pseudosluicing”. In: J. Merchant, A. Simpson (eds), Sluicing. Cross-Linguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 219-247. Adger, D., P. Svenonius. 2011. “Features in minimalist syntax”. In: C. Boeckx (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2751. Aelbrecht, L. 2007. “Dutch modals with a null VP proform complement”, CSSP 2007, Paris. Aelbrecht, L. 2009. You have the right to remain silent. The syntactic licensing ofellipsis. PhD dissertation. Katholieke Universiteit Brussel Hogeschool Universiteit Brussel. Aelbrecht, L. 2010. The Syntactic Licensing ofEllipsis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Aelbrecht, L. 2012. “What ellipsis can do for phases and what it can’t, but not how”, Ellipsis 2012 Workshop, University of Vigo. Aelbrecht, L., L. Haegeman. 2012. “VP ellipsis is not licensed by VP topicalization”. Linguistic Inquiry 43, 4: 591-614. Aelbrecht, L., W. Harwood. 2012. “To be or not to be elided: VP ellipsis revisited”. lingbuzz/001609 Akiyama, M. 2004. “Multiple
Nominative Constructions in Japanese and Economy”. Linguistic Inquiry 34, 4: 671-683. Akmajian, A., S. Steele, T. Wasow. 1979. “The Category AUX in Universal Grammar”, Linguistic Inquiry 10, 1: 1-64. Alboiu, G. 2000. “Contrastive focus in Romanian and sentence-initial operators in Romanian”. In: G. van Herk (ed.), Proceedings from the 1999 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Society. Ottawa: Cahiers Linguistique d’Ottawa, 1-12.
372 References Alboiu, G. 2002. The Features ofMovement in Romanian. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti. Alboiu, G. 2007. “Moving forward with Romanian backward control and raising”. In: W. D. Davies, S. Dubinsky (eds), New horizons in the analysis of control and raising. Dordrecht: Springer, 187-211. Alboiu, G. 2009. “Null expletives and Case: The view from Romance”. In: J. P. Masullo, E. O’Rourke, C.-H. Huang (eds). Romance Linguistics 2007: Selected papers from the 37th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Pittsburg, 15-18 March 2007, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1-18. Alboiu, G., V. Motapanyane. 2000. “The generative approach to Romanian grammar: an overview”. In: V. Motapanyane (ed.), Comparative Studies in Romanian Syntax. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1-48. Authier, M. 2012. “Ellipsis as Movement and Silence: Evidence from French”. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 18, 1, http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1207 context=pwpl Avram, L. 1999. Auxiliaries and the Structure of Language. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti. Avram, L., V. Hill. 2007. “An irrealis BE auxiliary in Romanian”. In: R. Aranovich (ed.), Split Auxiliary Systems: a Cross-linguistic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 47-64. Avram, M. 1960. Evoluţia subordonării circumstanţiale cu elemente conjuncţionale în limba română. Bucharest: Editura Academiei. Avram, M. 1997. Gramatica pentru toţi. second edition. Bucharest: Humanitás Bach, E., J. Bresnan, T. Wasow. 1974. ““Sloppy identity”: An unnecessary and insufficient criterion for
deletion rules”. Linguistic Inquiry 5, 4: 609-614. Baker, M. C. 1985. “The Mirror Principle and morphosyntactic explanation”. Linguistic Inquiry 16, 3: 373-415. Baker, M. C. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory ofGrammatical Function Changing. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press. Baker, M. C. 2003. Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns, and Adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Baker, M., K. Johnson, I. Roberts. 1989. “Passive arguments raised”. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 2:219-251. Baltin, M. 2012. “Deletion versus pro-forms: An overly simple dichotomy?”. Natural Languages and Linguistic Theory 30: 381-423. Barbosa, P. 1995. Null Subjects. PhD Dissertation, MIT. Barbu, N. 1.1951. “Să, semn distinctiv al subjonctivului în limba română”. Buletin ştiinţific, Secţiunea de ştiinţa limbii, literatură şi arte 1-2: 55-62.
The Licensing of Nominal and Verbal Ellipsis in Romanian 373 Barwise, J., R. Cooper. 1981. “Generalized quantifiers and natural language”. Linguistics Philosophy 4: 159-219. Bayer, J., E. Brandner. 2008. “On Wh-Head-Movement and the Doubly-Filled-Comp Filter”. In: C. B. Chang, H. J. Haynie (eds), Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 87-95. Beavers, J., I. Sag. 2004. “Coordinate ellipsis and apparent non-constituent coordination”. In: S. Müller (ed.), Proceedings ofthe HPSG04 Conference. Stanford CA: CSLI, 4869. Belletti, A. 2004. “Aspects of the Low IP Area”. In: L. Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP. The cartography ofsyntactic structures, voi. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 16-51. Benincà, P. 1988. “Costruzioni con ordine marcato degli elementi”. In: L. Renzi (ed.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione. I. Bologn: il Mulino, 129-145. Bernstein, J. 2001. “Focusing the ‘right’ way in Romance determiner phrases”. Probus 13: 1-29. Bhattacharya, T. and Simpson, A. 2012. “Sluicing in Indo-Aryan: An investigation of Bangla and Hindi”. In: J. Merchant, A. Simpson, (eds), Sluicing. Cross-Linguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 183-218. Bianchi, V. 2006. “Wh-infinitives and the licensing of anaphoric tense”, XVI Coloquio de Gramática Generativa, Madrid, April 20-22. Biberauer, T., I. Roberts. 2005. “Changing EPP-parameters in the history of English: Accounting for variation and change”, English Language and Linguistics 9, 1: 5-46. Biberauer, T., I. Roberts. 2010.
“Subjects, Tense, and verb-movement”. In: T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts, M. Sheehan (eds), Parametric Variation. Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 263-303. Bîlbîie, G. 2011. Grammaire des constructions elliptiques. Une étude comparative des phrases sans verbe en roumain et en français. PhD dissertation, Université Paris Diderot-Paris 7. Bîlbîie, G. 2018. Grammaire des constructions elliptiques. Une étude comparative des phrases sans verbe en roumain et en français. Language Science Press. Bîlbîie, G., A. Mardale. 2013. “Autour du subjonctif en roumain”, The 27th International Congress ofRomance Linguistics and Philology, Nancy, July 2013. Bliimel, A. 2013. “When generalized pied-piping meets ellipsis - Island repair under sluicing doesn t exist”, abstract, Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, February 2013. Boeckx, C. 2007. Understanding Minimalist Syntax: Lessons from Locality in Long distance Dependencies. Oxford: Blackwell. Boeckx, C., K. K. Grohmann. 2007. “Putting phases into perspective”. Syntax 10, 2: 204222.
374 References Bonfante, G. 1942. “The Romance desiderative se”. PMLA 4, 57: 930-950. Borer, H. 2005. Structuring Sense, Vol I: In Name Only. Oxford: Oxford: Oxford University Press. Boskovic, Z. 2007. “On the locality and motivation of Move and Agree: An even more minimal theory”. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 589-644. Bosque, I., C. Picallo. 1996. “Postnominal adjectives in Spanish”. Journal of Linguistics 32, 2: 349-385. Bosque, I., V. Demonte (eds). 1999. Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa. Brăescu, R. 2009. “Observaţii asupra substantivizării adjectivului în limba română actuală”. In: G. Pană Dindelegan (ed.), Dinamica limbii române actuale. Aspecte gramaticale şi discursive. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române, 75-94. Brăescu, R. 2013. “Adjectives and adjectival phrases”. In: GR 2013: 410-431. Bresnan, J. 1971. “A note on the notion ‘identity of sense anaphora”’. Linguistic Inquiry 2, 4: 589-597. Brugè, L. 2002. “The position of demonstratives in the extended nominal projection”. In: G. Cinque (ed.), Functional Structure in DP and IP: the Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 15-53. Burt, M. 1971. From Deep to Surface Structure. New York: Harper Row. Busquets, J., 2006. “Stripping vs. VP-ellipsis in Catalan: What is deleted and when?”. Probus 18: 159-187. Butler, J. 2003. “A minimalist treatment of modality”. Lingua 113: 967-996. Butler, J. 2004. Phase structure, Phrase structure, and Quantification. PhD Dissertation, University of York. Calabrese, A. 1997. “Distributed morphology and sentential complementation
in the Salentino dialect of Italian”. In: S. Peter, B. Vaux, S. Kuno (eds), Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics, Voi. 6. Cambridge: Harvard University, 47-85. Campos, H. 1986. “Indefinite Object Drop”. Linguistic Inquiry 17, 2: 354-359. Cardinaletti, A., U. Shlonsky. 2004. “Clitic positions and restructuring in Italian”. Linguistic Inquiry 35, 4: 519-557. Cardinaletti, A., G. Giusti. 2007. “The syntax of quantified phrases and quantitative clitics”. In: M. Everaert, H. van Riemsdijk (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax. Blackwell, 23-93. Chafe, Wallace L. (1976), “Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view”. In: C. N. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press, 27-55. Chao, W. 1988. On Ellipsis. New York - London: Garland Publishing. Cheng. L. 1991 .On the Typology ofwh-Questions. Doctoral dissertation, MIT. Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
The Licensing of Nominal and Verbal Ellipsis in Romanian 375 Chomsky, N. 1970. “Remarks on nominalizations”. In: R. A. Jacobs, P. S. Rosenbaum (eds), Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, Massachusetts: Ginn and Co., 184-221. Chomsky, N. 1977. “On Wh movement”. In: P. W. Culicover, T. Wasow, A. Akmajian (eds), Formal Syntax. New York: Academic Press, 71-132. Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris. Chomsky, N. 1991. “Some notes on economy of derivation and representation”. In: R. Freidin (ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 417-454. Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Chomsky, N. 2000. “Minimalist inquiries: the framework”. In: R. Martin, D. Michaels, J. Uriagereka (eds), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 89-156. Chomsky, N. 2001. “Derivation by phase”. In: M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1-52. Chomsky, N. 2002. “An interview on minimalism”. In: A. Belletti, L. Rizzi (eds), On Nature and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 92-161. Chomsky, N. 2004. “Beyond explanatory adequacy”. In: A. Belletti (ed.). Structures and Beyond. The Cartography ofSyntactic Structure. Voi. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 104-131. Chomsky, N. 2005. “Three factors in language design”. Linguistic Inquiry 36, 1, 1-22. Chomsky, N. 2007. “Approaching UG from below”. In: U. Sauerland, H.-M. Gärtner (eds), Interfaces + Recursion = Language?, Berlin/New
York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1-29. Chomsky, N. 2008. “On phases”. In: R. Freidin, C. P. Otero, M. L: Zubizarreta (eds), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor ofJean-Roger Vergnaud. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 133-166. Chomsky, N. 2013. “Problems of projection”. Lingua 130, 33-49. Chomsky, N., H. Lasnik. 1977. “Filters and control”. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 3: 425-504. Christophersen, P. 1939. The Articles: A Study of their Theory and Use in English. Copenhagen: Einar Munksgaard. Chung, S. 2005. “What fronts? On the VP raising account of verb-initial order”. In: A. Camie, S. D. Collberg, H. Harley (eds), Verb First: Papers on the Syntax of Verb Initial Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 9-29. Chung, S., W. Ladusaw, J. McCloskey. 1995. “Sluicing and Logical Form”. Natural Language Semantics 3: 239-282. Cinque, G. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cinque, G. 2004a. “«Restructuring» and functional structure”. In A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond: the cartography of syntactic structures, volume 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 132-191.
376 References Cinque, G. 2004b. “A phrasal movement analysis of the Romanian DP”. In: A. Minuţ, E. Munteanu (eds), Studia Linguistica et Philologìca in honorem D. Irimia. Iaşi: Editura Editura Universităţii “А. І. Сига”, 129-142. Cinque, G. 2005. “Deriving Greenberg’s Universal 20 and its exceptions”. Linguistic Inquiry 35, 3: 315-332. Cinque, G. 2010. The Syntax ofAdjectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Cipariu, T. 1869-1877. Gramateca limbei romane, I. Analitica (1869), II. Sintetica (1877), Bucharest, Societatea Academică Română. In: Cipariu, T., Opere, I, II, ed. by Carmen-Gabriela Pamfil. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române, 1992. Čitko, В. 2005. “On the nature of Merge: External Merge, Internal Merge, and Parallel Merge”. Linguistic Inquiry 36,4: 475-496. Čitko, B. 2011a. Symmetry in Syntax: Merge, Move and Labels. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Čitko, B. 2011b. “Multidominance”. In: C. Boeckx (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 119-142, Clements, C. J. 1994. “Notes on topicalization and object drop in Spanish”. In: M. L. Mazzola (ed.), Issues and Theory in Romance Linguistics. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 219-237. Coene, M. 1999. Definite Null Nominals in Romanian and Spanish. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universiteit Antwerpen. Collins, C. 2005. “A smuggling approach to the passive in English”. Syntax 8, 2: 81-120. Corbett, G. G. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Corbett, G. G. 2011. “The penumbra of morphosyntactic feature systems”. Morphology 21 : 445-480. Corbett, G. G. 2012.
Features. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Comilescu, A. 1982. English Syntax. Volume 2. Bucharest: Tipografia Universităţii din Bucureşti. Comilescu, A. 1992. “Remarks on the determiner system of Rumanian: the demonstratives al and ceF. Probus 4: 189-260. Comilescu, A. 1995. “Romanian genitive constructions”. In: G. Cinque, G. Giusti (eds), Advances in Romanian Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1-52. Comilescu, A. 2000. “The double subject construction in Romanian”. In: V. Motapanyane (ed.), Comparative Studies in Romanian Syntax, Amsterdam - Lausanne - New York - Oxford - Shannon - Singapore ֊ Tokyo: Elsevier, 83-133. Comilescu, A. 2001. “Romanian nominalizations: case and aspectual structure”. Journal ofLinguistics 37, 3: 467-501. Comilescu, A. 2004. “în legătură cu conceptul de pronume semiindependent. Observaţii asupra articolului adjectival ceF. In: G. Pană Dindelegan (ed.), Tradiţie şi inovaţie în studiul limbii române. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti, 51-62.
The Licensing of Nominal and Verbal Ellipsis in Romanian 377 Comilescu, A. 2005. “Demonstratives and minimality”. Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics VI, 1: 102-116. Comilescu, A. 2007. “Despre trăsăturile periferice şi cum le-am putea folosi”. In: C. Stan, R. Zafiu, A. Nicolae (eds), Studii lingvistice. Omagiu profesoarei Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, la aniversare. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti, 43-56. Comilescu, A. 2009a. “Measure Phrases and the syntax of Romanian nouns and adjectives”. Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics 1: 35-66. Comilescu, A. 2009b. “On the linearization of adjectives in Romanian”. In: D. Torek, W. L. Wetzels (eds), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2006. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 33-52. Comilescu, A., A. Nicolae. 2010. “On nominal ellipsis and the valuation of definiteness in Romanian”. Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics 12, 1: 93-125. Comilescu, A., A. Nicolae. 2011a. “On the syntax of Romanian definite phrases: changes in the patterns of definiteness checking”. In: P. Sleeman, H. Perridon (eds), The Noun Phrase in Romance and Germanic. Structure, Variation, and Change. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 193-221. Comilescu, A., A. Nicolae. 2011b. “Nominal peripheries and phase structure in the Romanian DP”. Revue roumaine de linguistique 56, 1: 35-68. Comilescu, A., A. Nicolae. 2011c. “On the syntax of the Romanian indefinite pronouns unul and altuľ. In: R. Zafiu, C. Uşurelu, H. Bogdan Oprea (eds), Limba română. Ipostaze ale variaţiei lingvistice, vol. I. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti, 67-94.
Comilescu, A., A. Nicolae. 2012a. “Nominai ellipsis as definiteness and anaphoricity”. Lingua 122: 1070-1111. Comilescu, A., A. Nicolae. 2012b. “Nominal ellipsis with argumentai remnants?”. In: R. Zafiu, A. Dragomirescu, A. Nicolae (eds), Limba română: direcţii actuale în cercetarea lingvistică. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti, 71-86. Comilescu, A., A. Nicolae. 2013. “Remarks on verb movement in modem Romanian”, Al Xlll-lea Colocviu Internaţional al Departamentului de Lingvistică, University of Bucharest, 13-14 December. Comilescu, A., A. Nicolae. 2015. “The grammaticalization of a constraint on passive reflexive constructions in Romanian”. In: G. Pană Dindelegan, R. Zafiu, A. Dragomirescu, I. Nicula, A. Nicolae, L. Esher (eds), Diachronic Variation in Romanian. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 309-361. Comilescu, A., A. Nicolae. 2016. “Romanian adjectives at the syntax-semantics interface”. Acta linguistica hungarica 63, 2: 197-240. Comilescu, A., R. Cosma. 2013. “Restructuring strategies as means of providing increased referentiality for the internal argument of the de-supine clause”. Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics 15, 2: 91-121.
378 References Comilescu, A., R. Cosma. 2014. “On the functional structure of the Romanian de-supine”. In: R. Cosma, S. Engelberg, S. Schlotthauer, S. L. Stănescu, G. Zifonun (eds), Komplexe Argumentstrukturen: Kontrastive Untersuchungen zum Deutschen, Rumänischen und Englischen. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 283-336. Coteanu, I., 1994. “Se condiţional în româna veche”. Studii şi cercetări lingvistice XLV, 1-2:31-32. Cotfas, M. A. 2011. On the Syntax of the Romanian Subjunctive. Control and Obviation. PhD Dissertation, University of Bucharest. Creţia, G. 1999. Morfologia istorică a verbului latin. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti. Croitor, В. 2008. “Aspecte privind acordul în determinare în limba română veche”. In: G. Pană Dindelegan (ed.), Limba română. Dinamica limbii, dinamica interpretării. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti, 213-218. Croitor, B. 2013. “Coordination”. In: GR 2013: 514-525. Culicover, P., R. Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cyrino, S. M. L., G. Matos. 2002. “VP Ellipsis in European and Brazilian Portuguese - a comparative analysis”. Journal ofPortuguese Linguistics 1,2: 177-195. Cyrino, S., G. Matos. 2006. “Null complement anaphora in Romance. Deep or surface anaphora?”. In: J. Doetjes, P. Gonzalez, Paz (eds), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2004: selectedpapersfrom “Going Romance ”, Leiden, 9-11 December 2004. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 95-120. D’Alessandro, R. 2004. “Syntactic and pragmatic features: A case study”. Estodos em Sintaxe Comparativa ЪЪ: 185-202. Dagnac, A. 2009. “How does
F-marking actually mark F at PF? A crosslinguistic puzzle”, BCGL4, November 9-10. Dagnac, A. 2010. “Modal ellipsis in French, Spanish and Italian. Evidence for a TPdeletion analysis”. In: K. Arregi, Z. Fagyai, S. A. Montrai, A. Tremblay (eds), Romance Linguistics 2008: Interactions in Romance. Selected papers from the 38th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Urbana-Champaign, April 2008. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 157-170. Danon, G. 2010. “The definiteness feature at the syntax-semantics interface”. In: A. Kibort, G. G. Corbett (eds), Features: Perspectives on a Key Notion in Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 144-165. den Dikken, M. 2006. Relators and Linkers. The Syntax of Predication, Predicate Inversion, and Copulas. Cambridge-Massachusetts: MIT Press. den Dikken, M. 2007. “Phase extension: contours of a theory of the role of Head Movement in phasal extraction”. Theoretical Linguistics 33, 1: 1-41. Densusianu, O. 1961. Istoria limbii române. Vol. II, ed. by J. Вуск. Bucharest: Editura Ştiinţifică.
The Licensing of Nominal and Verbal Ellipsis in Romanian 3 79 Depiante, M. A. 2000. The Syntax of Deep and Surface Anaphora: A Study of Null Complement Anaphora and Stripping/Bare Argument Ellipsis. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut. Diesing, M. 1990. The Syntactic Roots of Semantic Partition. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Diliinger, D. 1974. History oflinguistics: the Renaissance and Ellipsis in the Grammars of Despauterius, Linacre, Scaliger Sanctius. PhD Dissertation, Indiana University. Dimitrescu, F. (coord.). 1978, Istoria limbii române: fonetică, morfosintaxă, lexic. Bucharest: Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică. Dimitrescu, F. 1975. Introducere în morfosintaxa istorică a limbii române. Bucharest: Centrul de multiplicare al Universităţii din Bucureşti. Dimitrova-Vulchanova, M., G. Giusti. 1998. “Fragments of Balkan nominal structure”. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 8, 1: 141-172. Dobrovie-Sorin, C. 1994. The Syntax ofRomanian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Dobrovie-Sorin, C. 2000. “Head-to-head merge in Balkan subjunctives and locality”. In: M. L. Rivero, A. Ralli (eds), Comparative syntax of the Balkan languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 44-73. Dobrovie-Sorin, C., I. Giurgea. 2006. “The suffixation of definite articles in Balkan languages”. Revue roumaine de linguistique LI, 1: 73-103. DOOM2 - I. Vintilă-Rădulescu (ed.). Dicţionarul ortografic, ortoepic şi morfologic al limbii române. Bucharest: Editura Univers Enciclopedic, 2005. Doron, E. 1999. “VP-Movement and VP Ellipsis”. In: S. Lappin, E.
Benmamoun (eds), Fragments: Studies in Ellipsis and Gapping. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 124-140. Dragomirescu, A. 2010. Ergativitatea. Tipologie, sintaxă, semantică. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti. Dragomirescu, A. 2011. “The subject of the supine clause in Romanian and A-chains”. Revue roumaine de linguistique LVI, 4: 371-392. Dragomirescu, A. 2013a. Particularităţi sintactice ale limbii române în context romanic. Supinul. Bucharest: Editura Muzeului Naţional al Literaturii Române. Dragomirescu, A. 2013b. “O schimbare parametrică de la româna veche la româna modernă în sintaxa formelor verbale compuse cu auxiliar”. Limba română LXII, 2: 225-239. Dragomirescu, A. 2013c. “Complexpredicates”. In: GR 2013: 191-201. Dragomirescu, A. 2016. “The past participle and the participial clause”. In: SOR 2016: 259-270. Dragos, E. 1995. Elemente de sintaxă istorică românească. Bucharest: Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică.
380 References Eguren, L. 2010. “Contrastive focus and nominal ellipsis in Spanish”. Lingua 120: 435457. Elboume, P., 2008. “Ellipsis sites as definite descriptions”. Linguistic Inquiry 39, 191-220. Emonds, J. 1978. “The verbal complex V’-V in French”. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 151-175. Emoto, H. 2007. “The theory of ellipsis in a single-cycle system”. English Linguistics (The English Linguistic Society of Japan) 24, 2: 319-340. Enç, M. 1987. “Anchoring conditions for Tense”. Linguistic Inquiry 18,4: 633-657. Enger, H.-O., G. G. Corbett. 2012. “Definiteness, gender, and hybrids: evidence from Norwegian dialects”. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 24, 4: 287-324. Faarlund, J. T. 2009. “On the history of definiteness marking in Scandinavian”, Journal of Linguistics 45, 3: 617-639. Fàbregas, A. 2007. “The internal syntactic structure of relational adjectives”. Probus 19, 1: 135-170. Fauconnier, G. 1975. “Pragmatic scales and logical structure”. Linguistic Inquiry 6,3: 353375. Fiengo, R., R. May. 1994. Indices and Identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Fischer, I. 1985. Latina dunăreană. Introducere în istoria limbii române. Bucharest: Editura Ştiinţifică şi Enciclopedică. Fortin, C. 2007. Indonesian Sluicing and Verb Phrase Ellipsis: Description and Explanation in a Minimalist Framework. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Fox, D. 1995. “Economy, scope and semantic interpretation. Evidence from VP Ellipsis”. North-Eastern Linguistic Society 25: 143-157. Fox, D. 1999. “Focus, parallelism and accommodation”. In: T. Matthews, D. Strolovich (eds), SALT 9, Ithaca, NY :
CLC Publications, 70-90. Fox, D., D. Pesetsky. 2005. “Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure”. Theoretical Linguistics 31: 1-45. Fox, D., H. Lasnik. 2003. “Successive-cyclic movement and island repair: the difference between Sluicing and VP-Ellipsis”. Linguistic Inquiry 34, 1: 143-154. Frampton, J., S. Gutmann. 2006. “How sentences grow in the mind: Agreement and selection in an efficient minimalist syntax”. In: C. Boeckx (ed.), Agreement Systems. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 121-157. Francu, C. 1969. “Cu privire la ‘uniunea lingvistică balcanică’. înlocuirea infinitivului prin construcţii personale în limba româna veche”. Anuar de lingvistică şi istorie literară 20: 69-116. Francu, C. 2009. Gramatica limbii române vechi. Iaşi: Casa Editorială Demiurg. Francu, C. 2010. Conjunctivul românesc şi raportul lui cu alte moduri, second edition. Iaşi: Casa Editorială Demiurg.
The Licensing of Nominal and Verbal Ellipsis in Romanian 381 Frege, G. 1892. “Über Begriff und Gegenstand”. Vierteljahrschrift fur Wissenschaftliche Philosophie 16: 192-205. Gallego, À. (ed.). 2012. Phases: Developing the Framework. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Gallego, Á. J. 2009. “Cyclic domains and ellipsis: the case of prepositions”. BCGL4, November 9-10. Gallego, Á. J. 2010. Phase Theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. GALR 2008 - V. Guţu Romalo (ed.). Gramatica limbii române, vol. I - Cuvântul՛, vol. II - Enunţul. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române, (first edition, 2005) GBLR 2010 - G. Pană Dindelegan (ed.). Gramatica de bază a limbii române. Bucharest: Editura Univers Enciclopedic Gold. Geană, I. 2012. “Un tip special de coordonare copulativă: elementele interogative”. In: N. Saramandu, M. Nevāci, C. I. Radu (eds), Convergenţe lingvistice. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti. Gergel, R. 2009. Modality and Ellipsis. Diachronic and Synchronic Evidence. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Gheorghe, M. 2004. Propoziţia relativă. Piteşti: Paralela 45. Gheorghe, M. 2013. “Relative clauses (relative arguments and relative adjuncts)”. In: GR 2013: 483-497. Gherman, C. 2007. “Schimbarea valorii gramaticale”. In: M. Popescu-Marin (ed.), Formarea cuvintelor în limba română din secolele alXVI-lea — alXVIII-lea. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române, 271-296. Gheţie, 1.1975. Baza dialectală a românei literare. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române. Gillon, C. 2009. “The semantic core of determiners: Evidence from Skwxwú7mesh”. In: J. Ghomeshi, I. Paul, M.
Wiltschko (eds), Determiners: Universals and Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 177-214. Ginzburg, J., I. Sag. 2000. Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning, and Use of English Interrogatives. Stanford CA: CSLI. Giorgi, A. 2010. About the Speaker. Towards a syntax of indexicality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Giurgea, I. 2008. Recherches sur la structure interne des pronoms et des expressions nominales sans nom exprimé, PhD dissertation, University of Paris 7 “Denis Diderot”. Giurgea, I. 2009. “Elipsa nominală în grupuri cu determinanţi definiţi”. In: R. Zafiu, В. Croitor, A.-M. Mihail (eds), Studii de gramatică: omagiu doamnei profesoare Valeria Guţu Romalo. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti, 85-97. Giurgea, I. 2010. Pronoms, déterminants et ellipse nominale: Une approche minimaliste. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti. Giurgea, I. 2011. “The Romanian verbal cluster and the theory of head movement”. In: J. Herschensohn (ed.), Romance linguistics 2010. Selected Papers from the 4(fr
382 References Linguistic Symposium on Romance Linguistics (LSRL), Seattle, Washington, March 2010. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 271-286. Giurgea, I. 2012. “The origin of the Romanian ‘possessive-genitivaľ article and the development of the demonstrative system”, Revue roumaine de linguistique LVII, 1 : 35-65. Giurgea, I. 2015. “On the reanalysis of the article al into a genitive marker and the emergence of the adnominal dative in Romanian”. In: G. Pană Dindelegan, R. Zafiu, A. Dragomirescu, I. Nicula, A. Nicolae, L. Esher (eds), Diachronic Variation in Romanian. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 69-98. Giurgea, I., I. Nedelcu. 2009. “Elipsa nominală şi construcţia partitivă”. In: R. Zafiu, G. Stoica, M. Constantinescu (eds), Limba română. Teme actuale. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti, 109-124. Giusti, G. 1993. La sintassi dei determinanti, Unipress, Padova. Giusti, G. 1996. “Is there a TopP and a FocP in the norm phrase?”. University of Venice Working Papers inLinguitics 6, 1, 105-128. Giusti, G. 1998. “The rise of a functional category. From Latin ILLE to Romance article and personal pronoun”. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 8, 2: 5371. Giusti, G. 2005. “At the left periphery of the Romanian noun phrase”. In: M. Coene, L. Tasmmowski (eds), On space and time in language. Cluj-Napoca: Clusium, 23-49. Giusti, G. 2012. “On Force and Case, Fin and Num”. In: V. Bianchi, C. Creşti (eds), Enjoy Linguistics! Papers offered to Luigi Rizzi on the occasion of his 6tfh anniversary. Centro Interdipantamentale di Studi Cognitivi sul
Linguaggio, Siena, CISCL Press, 205-217. GLR 1966 - Al. Graur, M. Avram, L. Vasiliu (eds). Gramatica limbii române. 2 volumes. Bucharest: Editura Academiei (first print 1963). Goldberg, L. 2005. Verb-stranding VP ellipsis: A cross-linguistic study. PhD dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. Gonzales, J. M. 2010. “Voice mismatches in English and Spanish Sluicing”. Iberia: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2, 2: 23-44. Goodall, G. 1987. Parallel Structures in Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. GR 2013 - G. Pană Dindelegan (ed.). The Grammar of Romanian. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Grecu, V. V. 2004. Istoria limbii române. Cluj-Napoca: Scientia. Gribanova, V. 2013. “A new argument for verb-stranding verb phrase ellipsis”. Linguistic Inquiry 44, 1: 145-157. Grimshaw J. 2005. Words and Structures. Stanford: CSLI Publications. Groat, E. M. 1995. “English expletives: A minimalist approach”. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 354-365.
The Licensing of Nominal and Verbal Ellipsis in Romanian 383 Gueron, J., T. Hoekstra. 1988. “T-chains and the constituent structure of auxiliaries”. In: G. Cinque, G. Giusti (eds), Annali Di Ca ’ Foscari. Rivista della faciolta di Lingue e letterature straniere dell’ Universita di Venezia 4: 35-50. Guţu Romalo, V. 1968. Morfologia structurală a limbii române. Bucharest: Editura Academiei. Guţu Romalo, V. 2005a. “Semiauxiliarele de mod”. In: Aspecte ale evoluţiei limbii române. Bucharest: Humanitás, 156-184. [initially published as: Guţu, V. 1956. “Semiauxiliarele de mod”. In: Al. Graur, J. Вуск (eds). Studii de gramatică I. Bucharest: Editura Academiei, 57-81]. Guţu Romalo, V. 2005b. “Semiauxiliare de aspect?”. In: Aspecte ale evoluţiei limbii române. Bucharest: Humanitás, 184-196. [initially published as: Guţu, V. 1961. “Semiauxiliare de aspect?”. Limba română X, 1: 3-15]. Hacquard, V. 2009. “On the interaction of aspect and modal auxiliaries”. Linguistics and Philosophy 32: 279-315. Haddican, B. 2007. “The structural deficiency of verbal pro-forms”. Linguistic Inquiry 38, 3:539-547. Haegeman, L., M. van Koppen. 2012. “Complementizer agreement and the relation between C° and T°”. Linguistic Inquiry 43, 3: 441-454. Hale, K., S. J. Keyser. 1993 “On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations”, In: K. Hale, J. Keyser (eds), The Viewfrom Building 20: Essays in Honor ofSylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 53-105. Hall Partee, В. 1973. “Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English”. The Journal ofPhilosophy LXX, 18:
601-609. Halpem, A. 1992. “The Balkan definite article and pseudo-second position”. In: L. Buszard-Welcher, L. Wee, W. Weigel (eds), Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Meeting ofthe Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 338-349. Hartkamer, J., I. Sag. 1976. “Deep and surface anaphora”. Linguistic Inquiry 7, 3: 391-426. Hardt, D. 1993. “VP ellipsis and semantic identity”. In: Department of Computer Information Science. Technical Reports, University of Pennsylvania. http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1435 context=cis_reports [accessed 15.03.2013] Hardt, D. 1999. “Dynamic interpretation of verb phrase ellipsis”. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 187-221. Harley, H. 2011. “Affixation and the Mirror Principle”. In: R. Folli, C. Ulbrich (eds), Interfaces in Linguistics: New Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 166-186. Harley, H., E. Ritter. 2002. “Person and number in pronouns: a feature-geometric analysis”. Language 78: 482-526.
384 References Harris, M. 1982. “The ‘past simple’ and ‘present perfect’ in Romance”. In: M. Harris, N. Vincent (eds), Studies in the Romance verb. London: Croom Helm, 42-70. Hartman, J. 2011. “The semantic uniformity of traces: Evidence from ellipsis paralelism”. Linguistic Inquiry 43, 3: 367-388. Harwood, W. 2013. “An existential crisis: understanding the aspectual restrictions on English existential constructions”, lingbuzz/001829 Harwood, W. 2014. “Rise of the auxiliaries: a case for auxiliary raising vs. affix lowering”. The Linguistic Review 31, 2: 295-362. Harwood, W. 2015. “Being progressive is just a phase: celebrating the uniqueness of progressive aspect under a phase-based analysis”. Natural Language Linguistic Theory 33, 2: 523-573. Hasdeu, B. P. 1879 [1984]. “O pagină din sintaxa româno-albaneză. Reduplicarea şi triplicarea articolului hotărât”. In: Cuvente din bătrâni, vol. II, 1879, ed. by Gh. Mihailā. Bucharest: Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică, 432-481. Hazout, I. 2004. “The syntax of existential constructions”. Linguistic Inquiry 35, 3: 393430. Heim, I. 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Doctoral Dissertation: University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Heim, I. 1991. “Articles and definiteness”. [English version] Published in German as “Artikel und Definitheit”. In: A. von Stechow, D. Wunderlich (eds), Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Berlin: de Gruyter, 487-535. Heim, L, A. Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Maiden, MA Oxford: Blackwell. Hendriks, P., J. Spenader. 2005. “Why be silent? Some
functions of ellipsis in natural language”. Proceedings of the ESSLLI ’05 workshop on cross-modular approaches to ellipsis, 29-35. Higginbotham, J. 1985. “On semantics”. Linguistic Inquiry 16, 4: 547-621. Higginbotham, J. 1987. “Indefiniteness and predication”. In: E. Reuland, A. ter Meulen (eds), The representation of (in)definiteness. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 43-70. Hill, V. 2012. “Romanian ‘can’: changes in parametric settings”. In: C. Galvės, S. Cyrino, R. Lopes, F. Sandalo, J. Avelar (eds). Parameter Theory Linguistic Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 265-280. Hill, V. 2013a. “The emergence of the Romanian subjunctive”. The Linguistic Review 30, 4: 547-583. Hill, V. 2013b. Vocatives: How syntax meets with pragmatics. Leiden: Brill. Hiraiwa, K., S. Ishihara, S. 2002. “Missing links: Cleft, sluicing, and “no da” construction in Japanese”. In: T. Ionin, H. Ko, A. Nevins (eds), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 43: Proceedings of the 2nd HUMIT Student Conference in Language Research (HUMIT2001). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 35-54.
The Licensing of Nominal and Verbal Ellipsis in Romanian 385 Hirschbühler, P. 1982. “VP Deletion and across-the-board quantifier scope”. Proceedings ofNELS (North Eastern Linguistic Society) 12: 132-139. Hoji, H. 1998. “Null object and sloppy identity in Japanese”. Linguistic Inquiry 29, 1: 127152. Hom, L., 1972. On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, LA. Houser, M. J. 2010. The Syntax and Semantics of Do So Anaphora. PhD Dissertation. University of California, Berkeley. Hoyt, F., Teodorescu A., 2012. “How many kinds of sluicing, and why? Single and multiple sluicing in Romanian, English, and Japanese”. In: J. Merchant, A. Simpson (eds). Sluicing. Cross-Linguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 83-103. Ihsane, T., G. Puskás. 2001. “Specific is not definite”. GG@G (Generative Grammar in Geneva) 2: 39-54. ILR - Al. Rosetti, В. Cazacu, I. Coteanu. 1965-1969. Istoria limbii române, 2 voi. Bucharest: Editura Academiei. Ionescu, D. C. 1998. Small clauses in English and Romanian. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti. Ionescu, E. 2001. Manual de lingvistică generala, 3rd edn., Bucharest: All. Ionin, T., O. Matushanky. 2006. “The composition of complex cardinals”. Journal of Semantics 23, 4: 315-360. Iordan, I., 1947. Limba română actuală. O gramatică а „greşelilor”. Bucharest: Editura Socec Со. Iordan, L, M. Manoliu. 1965. Introducere în lingvistica romanică. Bucharest: Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică. Isac, D., E. Jakab. 2004. “Mood and Force features in the languages of the Balkans”. In:
O. Mišeska Tomié (ed.), Balkan syntax and semantics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 315-338. Ivănescu, G. 1980. Istoria limbii române. Iaşi: Junimea. Jackendoff, R. 1971. “Gapping and Related Rules”. Linguistic Inquiry 2, 1: 21-35. Jacobson, P. 2000. “Paycheck pronouns, Bach-Peters sentences, and variable-free semantics”. Natural Language Semantics 8: 77-155. Jenkins, L. 1975. The English existential. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. Johnson, K. 2001. “What VP ellipsis can do, and what it can’t, but not why”. In: M. Baltin, C. Collins (eds), The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory. New York: Blackwell, 439-479. Johnson, K. 2004. “How to be Quiet”. In: N. Adams, A. Cooper, F. Panili, T. Wier (eds), Proceedings from the 40th Annual Meeting ofthe Chicago Linguistics Society, 1-20. Johnson, K. 2009. “Gapping is not (VP-) Ellipsis”. Linguistic Inquiry 40, 2: 289-328.
386 References Jordan, M. 2009. Loss of Infinitival Complementation in Romanian Diachronic Syntax. Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida. Julien, M., 2005. Nominal phrases from a Scandinavian perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Karttunen, L. 1971. “Implicative verbs”. Language 47, 2: 340-358. Käyne, R. S. 1975. French Syntax. The Transformational Cycle. MIT Press. Käyne, R. S. 1991. ‘Romance clitics, verb movement, and PRO’. Linguistic Inquiry 22, 4: 647-686. Käyne, R. S. 1994. The Antisymmetry ofSyntax. Cambridge: MA / MIT Press. Käyne, R. S. 2005. “Silent years, silent hours”. In: Movement and Silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 241-260. Käyne, R. S. 2013. “Comparative syntax”. Lingua 130: 132-151. Keenan, E. L., S. M. Dryer. 2007. “Passive in the world’s languages”. In: T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. I: Clause Structure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 325-361. Kehler, A. 2000. “Coherence and the resolution of ellipsis”. Linguistics and Philosophy 23 : 533-575. Kennedy, C. 2003. “Ellipsis and syntactic representation”. In: K. Schwabe, S. Winkler (eds). The Interfaces: Deriving and Interpreting Omitted Structures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 29-53. Kibort, A., 2010. “Towards a typology of grammatical features”. In: A. Kibort, G. G. Corbett (eds), Features. Perspectives on a Key Notion in Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 64-106. Kibort, A., G. G. Corbett. 2010. “Introduction”, In: A. Kibort, G. G. Corbett (eds), Features. Perspectives on a Key Notion in Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 1-13. Kirsten G., A. McNay. 2006. “Recursive information-structural layers in syntax: Evidence from the vP layer”. In: C. Chang, E. Dugarova, I. Theodoropoulus, E. Vilar-Beltrán (eds), Proceedings of the CamLing Conference, Cambridge, 75-82. Kratzer, A. 1996. “Severing the external argument from its verb”. In: J. Rooryck, L. Zaring (eds), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon. Kluwer: Dordrecht, 109-137. LaCara, N. 2012. “Comparative deletion in as-parentheticals”, Ellipsis conference, University of Vigo, November 2012. Ladusaw, W. 1982. “Semantic constraints on the English partitive construction”. In: D. Flickinger, M. Macken, N. Wiegand (eds), Proceedings of WCCFL 1, Stanford: Stanford Linguistics Association, 231-242. Laenzlinger, C. 2005a. “French adjective ordering: perspectives on DP-internal movement types”. Lingua 115: 645-689.
The Licensing of Nominal and Verbal Ellipsis in Romanian 387 Laenzlinger, C. 2005b. “Some Notes on DP-internal Movement”. GG@G {Generative Grammar in Geneva) 4: 227-260. Laenzlinger, C. 2010. “The CP/DP parallelism revisited”. GG@G {Generative Grammar in Geneva) 6: 49-107. Lakoff, G. 1969. “On derivational constraints”. In: R. I. Binnick et al. (eds), Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, Department ofLinguistics, Univ. of Chicago, 117-139. Lakoff, G. 1970. “Global grammar”. Language 46, 3: 627-639. Landau, I. 2013. Control in Generative Grammar: A Research Companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Langacker, R. 1966. “On pronominalization and the cham of command”. In: D. A. Reibel, S. Schane (eds), Modern Studies in English. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 160-186. Larson, R. K., F. Marušič. 2004. “On indefinite pronoun structures with APs: Reply to Kishimoto”. Linguistic Inquiry 35, 2: 268-287. Lasnik, H. 1992. “Case and expletives: Notes toward a parametric account”. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 381-405. Lasnik, H. 1995. “Syntactic Structures meets The Minimalism Program”. In: H. Campos, P. Kempchinsky (eds), Evolution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Carlos Otero. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 251-275. [abridged version printed in Ž. Bošković, H. Lasnik (eds). 2007. Minimalist Syntax. The Essential Readings. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 263-277]. Lasnik, H. 1997. “A gap in an ellipsis paradigm: Some theoretical implications”. Linguistic Analysis 27: 166-185. Lasnik, H. 2001. “When can you save a structure
by destroying it?”. In: M. Kim, U. Strauss (eds), Proceedings o/NELS 31, 2: 301-320. Lasnik, H. 2007. “On ellipsis: the PF approach to missing constituents”. In: A. Conroy, C. Jing, C. Nakao, E. Takahashi (eds), University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 143-153. Lasnik, H. 2009. “Shortest Move and Equidistance”. http://ling.umd.edu/~lasnik/LING611%202009 /Equidistance.pdf Ledgeway, A. 2012a. From Latin to Romance. Morphosyntactic Typology and Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ledgeway, A. 2012b, “Greek and Romance in Southern Italy. Interpreting language convergence and divergence in terms of parameter hierarchies”, SyntaxLab, University of Cambridge, October 23. Ledgeway, A. 2015. “Romance auxiliary selection in light of Romanian evidence”. In: G. Pană Dindelegan, R. Zafiu, A. Dragomirescu, I. Nicula, A. Nicolae, L. Esher (eds), Diachronic Variation in Romanian. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 3-34.
388 References Ledgeway, A. 2017b. ‘The Romanian definite article in a comparative Romance perspective’. In: A. Dragomirescu, A. Nicolae, C. Stan, R. Zafiu (eds), Sintaxa ca mod de a fi: Omagiu Gabrielei Pană Dindelegan, la aniversare. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti, 229-245. Link, G. 1983. “The logical analysis of plural and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach”. In: R. Bauerle, C. Schwarze, A. von Stechow (eds), Meaning, use and interpretation oflanguage. Berlin: de Gruyter, 302-323. Lobeck, A. 1995. Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing, and Identification. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lobeck, A. 1999. “VP Ellipsis and the Minimalist Program: Some speculations and proposals”. In: S. Lappin, E. Benmamoun (eds), Fragments: Studies in Ellipsis and Gapping. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 98-123. Lombard, A. 1974. La langue roumaine. Une présentation. Paris: Klincksieck. Longobardi, G. 1994. “Reference and proper names: a theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form”. Linguistic Inquiry 25, 609-665. Longobardi, G. 2001. “The structure of DPs: some principles, parameters and problems”. In: M. Baltin, C. Collins (eds), The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 562-603. López, L. 1994. “The syntactic licensing of VP-Ellipsis: A comparative study of Spanish and English”. In: M. L. Mazzola (ed.), Issues and Theory in Romance Linguistics, Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 333-354. López, L. 2000. “Ellipsis and discourse linking”. Lingua 110: 183-213. López, L. 2009. A Derivational Syntax for Information
Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lyons, C. 1986. “The syntax of English genitive constructions”. Journal ofLinguistics 22, 1: 123-143. Maling, J. 1972. “On gapping and the order of constituents”. Linguistic Inquiry 3, 1: 101108. Manea, D. 2008a. “Categoria aspectului”. In: GALR 2008,1: 449-467. Manea, D. 2008b. “Modul”. In: GALR 2008,1: 358-393. Manoliu Manea, M. 1968. Sistematica substitutelor din româna contemporană standard. Bucharest: Editara Academiei. Manoliu, M. 2000. “Demonstratives, story-world and talk-interaction”. In: M. Coene, W. De Mulder, P. Dendale, Y. D’Hulst (eds), Troiani Augusti vestigial pressa sequamur. Studia lingvistica in honorem Lilianae Tasmowski. Padua: Unipress, 583600. Manoliu-Manea, M. 1993. Gramatică, pragmasemantică, discurs. Bucharest: Litera.
The Licensing of Nominal and Verbal Ellipsis in Romanian 389 Marchis M., A. Alexiadou A. 2009. “On the distribution of adjectives in Romanian: the cel construction”. In: E. Aboh, E. van der Linden, J. Quer, P. Sleeman (eds). Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Martins, A.-M. 1994. “Enclisis, VP-deletion and the nature of Sigma”. Probus 6: 173-205. Marušič, F., T. Marvin, R. Žaucer. 2008. “Depictive Secondary Predication with no PRO”. In: G. Zybatow et al. (eds), Formal Description of Slavic Languages. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 423-434. Matos, M. G. 1992. Construções de Elipse do predicado em Português - SV Nulo e Despojamento. PhD Dissertation, Universidade de Lisboa. Matthewson, L., 2001. “Quantification and the nature of crosslinguistic variation”. Natural Language Semantics 9: 145-189. McCawley, J. 1968. “Lexical insertion in a transformational grammar without deep structure”. Proceedings ofthe Chicago Linguistic Society 4: 71-80. McNally, L. 1992. An Interpretation for the English Existential Construction. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA. McNally, L., G. Boleda. 2004. “Relational adjectives as properties of kinds”. In O. Bonami, P. C. Hofherr (eds), Empirical issues in formal syntax and semantics 5. Paris: CNRS Université de Paris 7, 179-196. McShane, M. 2005. A Theory ofEllipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Merchant, J. 1998. “Pseudosluicing: Elliptical clefts in English and Japanese”. In: A. Alexiadou, N. Fuhrhop, P. Law, U. Kleinhenz (eds), ZAS Working Papers in Linguistics 10. Berlin: Zentrum fur
Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, 88-112. Merchant, J. 2000. “Economy, the copy theory, and antecedent-contained deletion”. Linguistic Inquiry 31, 3: 566-575. Merchant, J. 2001. The syntax of silence. Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Merchant, J. 2009. “Ellipsis”. In: A. Alexiadou, T. Kiss (eds), Syntax: An international handbook, second edn., Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, [online version: http://home.uchicago.edu/~merchant/pubs/merchant.ellipsis.pdf; consulted: 17.03.2013] Merchant, J. 2010a. “Diagnosing ellipsis”. In: L. Cheng, N. Corver (eds), Diagnosing Syntax, Oxford, Oxford University Press. [online version: http://home.uchicago.edu/~merchant/publications.html; consulted: 18.03.2013] Merchant, J. 2010b. “Three kinds of ellipsis: syntactic, semantic, pragmatic?”. In: F. Recanati, L Stojanovič, N. Villanueva (eds), Context-Dependence, Perspective, and Relativity, Berlin: de Gruyter, Mouton, 141-192. Merchant, J. 2013. “Voice and ellipsis”. Linguistics Inquiry 44, 1: 77-108. Merchant, J. 2014. “Gender mismatches under nominal ellipsis”. Lingua 151, Part A: 9-32.
390 References Merchant, J. 2018. “Ellipsis. A survey of analytical approaches”. In: J. van Craenenbroeck, T. Temmerman (eds), The Oxford Handbook ofEllipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 19-45. Merchant, J., A. Simpson (eds). 2012. Sluicing. Cross-Linguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Meyer-Lübke, W. 1895, 1900. Grammaire des langues romanes. II. Morphologie. III. Syntaxe. Paris: H. Welter. Migdalski, K. 2006. The Syntax ofCompound Tenses in Slavic. Utrecht: LOT Dissertations. Milsark, G. 1974. Existential Sentences in English. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA. Mirzea Vasile, C. 2015. “The position of the light adverbials şi, cam, mai, prea, and tot in the verbal cluster: synchronic variation and diachronic observations”. In: G. Pană Dindelegan, R. Zafiu, A. Dragomirescu, I. Nicula, A. Nicolae, L. Esher (eds), Diachronic Variation in Romanian. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 3 89-421. Mitran, M. 1966. “Articolul”. In: GLR 1966,1: 97-113. Molnar, V., S. Winkler, S. 2010. “Edges and gaps: Contrast at the interfaces”. Lingua 120: 1392-1415. Moltmann, F. 1992. Coordination and Comparatives. Doctoral dissertation, MIT. Motapanyane, V. 1995. “NP-Movement from finite clauses in Romanian”. In: G. Cinque, G. Giusti (eds), Advances in Rumanian Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 161-170. Muadz, H. 1991. Coordinate Structures: A Planar Representation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson. Munn, A. 1993. Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Coordinate Structures. PhD dissertation, University of
Maryland. Nash L., A. Rouveret. 1997. “Proxy categories in Phrase Structure Theory”. Proceedings ofNELS 27: 287-304. Nash L., A. Rouveret. 2002. “Cliticization as unselective attract”. Catalan Journal of Linguistics I: 145-187. Nedelcu, I. 2009. Categoria partitivului în limba română. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti. Nedelcu, I. 2013. “Inflectional classes”. In: GR 2013: 273-277. Nicholson, G. G. 1935. “Origine de la conjonction si . Romania 241, LXI: 3-16. Nicolae, A. 2007. “Utilizarea actuală a formelor de viitor”. In: G. Pană Dindelegan (ed.), Limba română - stadiul actual al cercetării. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti, 167-172.
The Licensing of Nominal and Verbal Ellipsis in Romanian 391 Nicolae, A. 2008. “Altul vs un altul. Noi explicaţii”. In G. Pană Dindelegan (ed.), Limba română. Dinamica limbii, dinamica interpretării. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti, 119-126. Nicolae, A. 2012a. “Gramaticalizarea articolului hotărât românesc. Noi rezultate”. Limbă şi literatură LIV, I—II: 7-19. Nicolae, A. 2012b. “On the diachronic syntax of the Romanian nominal phrase: the rise of the determiner CEĽ , Special Romance Linguistics Seminar on Romanian Linguistics, University of Oxford, May 10. Nicolae, A. 2013 a. “Notă de sintaxă comparată: parametrul [+definit] în sintaxa grupului nominal românesc”. Limba română LXII, 2: 186-209. Nicolae, A. 2013b. “A note on the syntax of Romanian aspectual verbs: aspectuals and voice”. In: D. Răuţu, A. Rezeanu, D.-M. Zamfir (eds), „ Cuvinte potrivite ”. Omagiu doamnei Maria Marin la aniversare. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române, 353371. Nicolae, A. 2013c. “Alternative and identity determiners”. In: GR 2013: 300-309. Nicolae, A. 2013d. “Demonstratives”. In: GR2013: 294-300. Nicolae, A. 2013e. “Nominal ellipsis and the pronominalization of determiners”. In: GR 2013: 370-374. Nicolae, A. 2013f. “The determiner CEL”. In: GR 2013: 309-319. Nicolae, A. 2015a. Ordinea constituenţilor în limba română: O perspectivă diacronică. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti. Nicolae, A. 2015b. ‘The parameter of definiteness: Diachronic and synchronic evidence’. In V. Hill (ed.), Formal Approaches to DPs in Old Romanian. Boston/Leiden: Brill, 17-61. Nicolae, A. 2015c.
‘On the syntactic specialization of Romanian demonstratives and the grammaticalization of the article ceľ. Revue roumaine de linguistique 60, 1: 47-70. Nicolae, A. 2016. “Constraints on aspectual complement ellipsis. The view from Romanian”. The Linguistic Review 33, 4: 611-647. Nicolae, A. 2017. ‘Syntactic effects of the morphological status of the negative marker: negative imperatives vs negative gerunds’. In: V. Barbu Mititelu, M. Ionescu, G. Iordăchioaia (eds), Lingvistică generală, lingvistică formală, lingvistică computaţională: Omagiu profesorului Emil Ionescu la 60 de ani. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti, 73-89. Nicolae, A. 2019. Word Order and Parameter Change in Romanian. A Comparative Romance Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Nicolae, A. 2020. “Grammaticalization as pattern formation: Romanian auxiliaries from a diachronic and a Romance perspective”, Revue roumaine de linguistique, in press. Nicolae, A., A. Dragomirescu. 2009. “Omonimia sintactică a participiilor româneşti”. In: R. Zafiu, B. Croitor, A.-M. Mihail (eds), Studii de gramatică. Omagiu doamnei
392 References profesoare Valeria Guţu Romalo. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti, 193-205. Niculescu, D. 2013. Particularităţi sintactice ale limbii române din perspectivă tipologică: gerunziul. Bucharest: Editura Muzeului Naţional al Literaturii Române. Ordonez, F., and Treviño, E. 2011. “Impersonals with passive morphology”. In: L. A. Ortiz-López (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 13th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Somerville. MA, Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 314-324. Ortmann, A., and Popescu, A. 2000. “Romanian definite articles are not clitics”. In: B. Gerlach, J. Grijzenhout (eds), Clitics in Phonology, Morphology and Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 295-324. Ouali, H. 2008. “On C-to-T ф-feature transfer: the nature of Agreement and AntiAgreement in Berber”. In: R. D’Alessandro, S. Fischer, G. H. Hrafnbjargarson (eds), Agreement Restrictions. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 159-180. Pană Dindelegan, G. 1992. Sintaxă şi semantică. Clase de cuvinte şiforme gramaticale cu dublă natură (adjectivul, adverbul, prepoziţia, formele verbale nepersonale). Bucharest: Tipografia Universităţii din Bucureşti. Pană Dindelegan, G. 2003. Elemente de gramatică: dificultăţi, controverse, noi interpretări. Bucharest: Humanitás. Pană Dindelegan, G. 2006. “Din nou despre diateză. Consideraţii pe marginea soluţiei din noua gramatică academică”. In: M. Sala (ed.), Studii de gramatică şi de formare a cuvintelor. Bucharest, Editura Academiei Române, 332-339. Pană Dindelegan, G. 2007. “Din nou despre participiu şi supin. Câteva precizări”. Studii şi cercetări lingvistice
LVIII, 1: 163-173. Pană Dindelegan, G. 2008. “Supinul”. In: GALR 2008,1: 509-524. Pană Dindelegan, G. 2013 a. “Romanian - a brief presentation”. In: GR 2013: 1-7. Pană Dindelegan, G. 2013b. “The direct object”. In: GR 2013: 125-144. Panagiotidis, P. 2003. “Empty nouns”. Natural Languages and Linguistic Theory 21:381432. Pesetsky, D. 1987. “Wh-in-Situ: Movement and Unselective Binding”. In: E. J. Reuland, A. G. В. ter Meulen (eds), The Representation of(In) definiteness. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 98-129. Pesetsky, D., E. Torrego. 2001. “T-to-C movement: causes and consequences”. In: M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale. A Life in Language. Cambridge, Mass., London: The MIT Press, 355-426. Pesetsky, D., E. Torrego. 2004. “Tense, case, and the nature of syntactic categories”. In: J. Guéron, J. Lecarme (eds). The Syntax of Time. Cambridge Massachusetts, London, England: The MIT Press, 355-426. Pesetsky, D., E. Torrego. 2007. “The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features”. In: S. Karimi, V. Samhan, W.K. Wilkins (eds), Phrasal and Clausal
The Licensing of Nominal and Verbal Ellipsis in Romanian 393 Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 262-294. Pesetsky, D., E. Torrego. 2011. “Case”. In: C. Boeckx (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 55-72. Philippide, Al. 1894. Istoria limbii române. Vol. 1. Principii de istoria limbii. Iaşi: Tipografia Naţională; republished as Phillipide 2011, Iaşi: Polirom. Piattelli-Palmarini, M., J. Uriagereka, P. Saluburu. 2009. OfMinds and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pickering, W. N. 2009. “Gapping and constituent order in Apurinã”. Associação Internacional de Linguística, SIL, Brasil, Anápolis - GO. Pollock, J. Y. 1989. “Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP”. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 3: 365-424. Pomian, I. 2006-2007. “Modalizarea, predicativitatea şi expresivitatea în construcţiile relative infinitival e”. Dacoromania (serie nouă) XI-XII: 193-206. Postal, P. M. 1972. “A global constraint on pronominalization”. Linguistic Inquiry 3,1: 3559. Postdam, E. 1997. “English verbal morphology and VP ellipsis”. In: K. Kusumoto (ed.). The Proceedings ofthe Twenty-Seventh Annual Meeting ofthe North East Linguistic Society. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA, 353-358. Progovac, L., K. Paesani, E. Casielles, E. Barton. 2006. Introduction to the Syntax of Nonsententials. Multidisciplinary perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1-11. Puglielli, A., M. Frascarelli. 2011. Linguistic Analysis. From Data to Theory. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Pullum, G. К. 2000. “Hankamer was!”.
http://babel.ucsc.edu/Jorge/pullum.html Rădulescu Sala, M. 2008. “Gramatică şi ortografie: niciun, nido vs nici un, nici o”. Studii şi cercetări lingvistice LIX, 2: 535-545. Raposo, E. 1986. “On the null object in European Portuguese”. In: O. Jaeggli, C. SilvaCorvalán (eds), Studies in Romance Linguistics. Dordrecht: Foris, 373-390. Raţiu, D. 2010. “Obligatory sluicing isn’t sluicing”, Going Romance, Leiden, December 910. Reich, 1.2011. “Ellipsis”. In: K. von Heusinger, C. Maienbom, P. Portner (eds), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning. HSK 33.2. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1849-1874. Reichenbach, H. 1947. Elements ofSymbolic Logic. MacMillan Co. Richards, M. D. 2007. “On feature inheritance: An argument from the Phase Impenetrability Condition”. Linguistic Inquiry 38, 3: 563-572. Richards, N. 1997. What moves where when in which language?. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
394 References Rivero, M. L. 1993. “Long Head Movement vs. V2, and null subjects in Old Romance”. Lingua 89: 217-245. Rizescu, I. 1966. “Elipsa”. In: GLR 1966, II: 397-406. Rizzi, L. 1978. ‘A restructuring rule in Italian syntax’. In: S. J. Keyser (ed.), Recent Transformational Studies in European Languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 113-158. Rizzi, L. 1982. Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. Rizzi, L. 1986. “Null objects in Italian and the theory ofpro”. Linguistic Inquiry 17,3: 501557. Rizzi, L. 1997. “The fine structure of the Left Periphery”. In: L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 281-337. Roberts, I. 1985. “Agreement parameters and the development of English auxiliaries”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 21-58. Roberts, I. 1991. “Excorporation and minimality”. Linguistic Inquiry 22, 1: 209-218. Roberts, I. 2007. Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Roberts, I. 2010a. “A deletion analysis of null subjects”. In: T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts, M. Sheehan (eds), Parametric variation. Null subjects in Minimalist Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 58-87. Roberts, I. 2010b. Agreement and Head Movement. Clitics, Incorporation, and Defective Goals. Cambridge, Mass., London, England: The MIT Press. Roberts, I. 2011. “Head movement and the minimalist program”. In: C. Boeckx (ed.), Oxford Handbook ofLinguistic Minimalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 195219. Roberts, I. 2012a. “Macroparameters and minimalism. A programme for comparative research”. In: C. Galvės, S. Cyrino, R. Lopes, F.
Sandalo, J. Avelar (eds), Parameter Theory and Linguistic Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 320-335. Roberts, I. 2012b. “Some remarks on parameter hierarchies”, Limba română. Variaţie sincronică, variaţie diacronică, Facultatea de Litere, Universitatea din Bucureşti, December 14—15. Roberts, I. 2012c. “Phases, head-movement and second-position effects”. In: A. Gallego (ed.), Phases: Developing the Framework. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 385-440. Roberts, L 2013. “Some Speculations on the Development of the Romance Periphrastic Perfect”. Revue roumaine de linguistique LVIII, 1: 3-30. Roberts, I. 2017. “The Final-over-Final Condition in DP: Universal 20 and the Nature of Demonstratives”, in: M. Sheehan, T. Biberauer, I. Roberts, A. Holmberg (eds), The Final-over-Final Condition. A Syntactic Universal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 151-185. Roberts, I., A. Roussou. 2003. Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
The Licensing of Nominal and Verbal Ellipsis in Romanian 395 Rodrigues, C., A. I. Nevins, L. Vicente. 2009. “Cleaving the interactions between sluicing and P-stranding”. In: D. Torek, W. L. Wetzels (eds), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2006: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance ’, Amsterdam, 7-9 December 2006. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 175-198. Rosetti, Al. 1986. Istoria limbii române: De la origini până la începutul secolului al XVIIlea. Ediţie definitivă. Bucharest: Editura Ştiinţifică şi Enciclopedică. Ross, J. R. 1967. Constraints on Variables inSyntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT. Ross, J. R. 1969. “Auxiliaries as main verbs”. In: W. Todd (ed.), Studies in Philosophical Linguistics Series I, Evanston: Great Expectations Press, 77-102. Rouveret, A. 1998. “Points de vue sur le verbe être”. In: A. Rouveret (ed.). 1998. « Être » et « avoir ». Syntaxe, sémantique, typologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes, 11-65. Rouveret, A. 2012. “VP ellipsis, phases and the syntax of morphology”. Natural Languages and Linguistic Theory 30, 3: 897-963. Russell, B. 1905. “On denoting”. Mind 14: 479-493. Saab, A. L. 2009. “Distributed identity: silent interactions at the Syntax-PF interface”. BCGL4, November 9-10. Sag, I. 1979. “The Nonunity of Anaphora”. Linguistic Inquiry 10, 1: 152-164. Sag, I. A., J. Hankamer. 1984. “Toward a theory of anaphoric processing”. Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 3: 325-345. Sáinz, К. 2013. “A Relación entre C et T e a Sintaxe Historica dos Infinitivos Flexionados”, The International Congress ofRomance Linguistics and Philology, Nancy, July.
Sala, M. 2006. De la latina la românã, 2nd edn. Bucharest: Univers Enciclopedic. Santos, A. L. 2009. Minimal Answers. Ellipsis, syntax and discourse in the acquisition of European Portuguese. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Sava, C. 2012a. Complementizatorii în limba română veche. Doctoral dissertation, University of Bucharest. Sava, C. 2012b. “Distribuţia conenctorului de în limba română veche”. In: L. IonescuRuxăndoiu, M. Roibu (eds), Limba română din perspectivă sincronică şi diacronică. Bucharest: Institutul European, 241-271. Sava, C. 2013. “Ipoteze privind originile şi istoria particulei modale să”. In: L. IonescuRuxăndoiu, M. Roibu (eds), Orientări actuale în cercetarea limbii române, Bucharest: Institutul European, 131-151. Săvescu Ciucivara, O. 2011. A Syntactic Analysis of Pronominal Clitic Clusters in Romance. The View From Romanian. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti. Schächter, P. 1977. “Does she or doesn’t she?”. Linguistic Inquiry 8,4: 763-767. Schifano, N. 2015. “The paradigmatic instantiation of TAM: A novel approach to Romance verb-movement”. In: E. O. Aboh (ed.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2013. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 83-102.
396 References Schifano, N. 2016. “Le lingue romanze: verso una cartografia del movimento del verbo”. In: A. Ledgeway, M. Cerniamo, G. Mensching (eds), Actes du XXVIIe congrès international de linguistique et de philologie romanes (Nancy, 15-20 juillet 2013): Section 4: Syntaxe. Nancy, ATILF/SLR, 415-426. Schifano, N. 2018. Verb Movement in Romance: A Comparative Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Schlangen, D. 2003. A Coherence-Based Approach to the Interpretation ofNon-Sentential Utterances in Dialogue. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Edinburgh. Schwarz, B. 2000. Topics in ellipsis. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts. Schwarzschild R. 2006. “The Role of Dimensions in the Syntax of Noun Phrases”. Syntax 9, 1:67-110. Schwarzschild, R. 2005. “Measure phrases as modifiers of adjectives”. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes 34: 207-288. Scott, G.-J. 2002. “Stacked adjectival modification and the structure of nominal phrases”. In: G. Cinque (ed.), Functional Structure in DP and IP: the Cartography ofSyntactic Structures, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 91-120. Shimoyama, J. 1995. “On “sluicing” in Japanese”. Manuscript, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Shopen, T. 1972. A Generative Theory ofEllipsis. Doctoral Dissertation, UCLA. Šimík, R. 2011. Modal Existential Wh-Constructions. Utrecht: LOT. Simpson, A., S. Syed. 2016. “Blocking effects of higher numerals in Bangla: A phasebased approach”. Linguistic Inquiry 47, 4: 754-763. Sleeman, P. 1996. Licensing Empty Nouns in French. The Hague: Holland Academic. Sleeman, P. 2012. “The suffixal
nature of the post-nominal article in Swedish and Romanian: evidence from LÍ acquisition”. In: M. Norde (ed.), Languagefor Its Own Sake: Essays on Language and Literature Offered to Harry Perridon. Amsterdam: Scandinavisch Instituut Universiteit van Amsterdam, 189-207. Smith, C. 1991. The Parameter ofAspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. SOR 2016 - G. Pană Dindelegan (ed.), The Syntax of Old Romanian. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sportiche, D. 1988. “A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure”. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 425-449. Stainton, R. 2006. “Neither fragments nor ellipsis”. In: L. Progovac, K. Paesani, E. Casielles, E. Barton (eds), The Syntax of Nonsententials. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 93-116. Stan, C. 2007. “Notă gramaticală: conjuncţia ca (...) să”. Studii şi cercetări lingvistice 58, 2: 451-458.
The Licensing of Nominal and Verbal Ellipsis in Romanian 397 Stan, C. 2008. “Grupul nominal românesc (aspecte diacronice)”. In: G. Pană Dindelegan (ed.), Limba română. Dinamica limbii, dinamica interpretării. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti, 239-243. Stan, C. 2013. “The enclitic definite article. The proclitic indefinite article”. In: GR 2013: 285-294. Stateva, P. 2002. “Possessive clitics and the structure of nominal expressions”. Lingua 112: 647-690. Ştefanescu, I. 1982 [2013]. “The transformational rule of Raising in Romanian”. Revue roumaine de linguistique 27, 3: 365-395 (republished in D. Chiţoran (ed.). 2013. Contrastive studies in English and Romanian. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti, 203-228). Ştefanescu, I. 1997. “The syntax of agreement in Romanian”. ШТ Ocassional Papers in Linguistics 14, Cambridge: MIT Press. Stoicescu, I. 2013. The Acquisition of Tense and Aspect in Romanian. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti. Stroh-Wollin, U. 2009. “On the development of definite markers in Scandinavian”. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 83: 1-25. Stump, G. T. 2001. Inflectional Morphology: A Theory ofParadigm Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Stump, G.. 1977. “Pseudogapping”. Manuscript, Ohio State University. Svenonius, P., 2004, “On the Edge”. In: D. Adger, C. de Cat, G. Toulas (eds), Peripheries. Syntactic Edges and Their Effects. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 259-287. Syed, S., A. Simpson. 2017. “On the DP/NP status of nominal projections in Bangla: Consequences for the theory of phases”. Glossa: A Journal of General
Linguistics 2, 1, 68: 1-24. Takahashi, S., D. Fox. 2005. “MaxElide and the Re-binding problem”. In: E. Georgala, J. Howell (eds), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistics Theory 15 (SALT 15). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications, 223-240. Tanaka, H. 2011. “Voice mismatch and syntactic identity”. Linguistic Inquiry 42, 3: 470490. Tănase-Dogaru, M. 2009. The Category ofNumber. Its Relevance for the Syntax and the Semantic Typology of the Nominal Phrase. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti. Tasmowski, L. 1990. “Les démonstratifs français et roumains dans la phrase et dans le texte”. Langages 97, 82-99. Tasmowski, L. 1990. “Les démonstratifs français et roumains dans la phrase et dans le texte”. In: P. Cadiot, A. Zribi-Hertz (eds), Aux confines de la grammaire: l’anaphore. Langages 96: 82-99.
398 References Tasmowsky-de Ryck, L., 2000. Trăsături neaşteptate ale limbii române. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române. Thráinsson, H. 1996. “On the (non-)universality of functional categories”. In: W. Abraham, S. D. Epstein, H. Thráinsson, C. J.-W. Zwart (eds), Minimal ideas: Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 253-281. Thoms, G. 2010. ‘“Verb floating” and VP-ellipsis: Towards a movement account of ellipsis licensing’. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 10: 252-297. Ticio, M. E. 2003. On the structure ofDPs. Doctoral dissertation, University of Conneticut. Ticio, M. E. 2010. Locality Domains in the Spanish Determiner Phrase. Dordrecht: Springer. Tigău, A.-M. 2011. Syntax Semantics of the Direct Object in Romance and Germanic Languages. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti. TILR ֊ Gh. Chivu, G. Pană Dindelegan et al. (eds), Studii de istorie a limbii române. Morfosintaxa românei literare în secolele alXLX-lea - al XX-lea. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române. Todi, A. 2001. Elemente de sintaxa românească veche. Iaşi: Editura Paralela 45. Tomescu, D. 2008. “Elipsa”. In: GALR 2008, II: 807-811. Tuller, L. 1992. “The syntax of focus constructions in Chadic”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10: 303-334. Uriagereka, J. 1999. “Multiple spell-out”. In: S. Epstein, N. Hornstein (eds), Working Minimalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 251-282. van Craenenbroeck, J., M. den Dikken. 2006. “Ellipsis and EPP Repair”. Linguistic Inquiry 37, 4: 653-664. Vasilescu, A. 2009a. “Strategii pragmatice de reluare, gramaticalizate ca relaţii
apozitive de tip GN1-GN2”. Limba română LWI, 2: 275-284. Vasilescu, A. 2009b. “Ceh categorie semilexicală”. In: R. Zafiu, B. Croitor, A.-M. Mihail (eds), Studii de gramatică: Omagiu doamnei profesoare Valeria Guţu Romalo. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti, 265-287. Vasiliu, E., L. Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu. 1986. Limba română în secolele alXII-lea - alXV-lea. Fonetică. Fonologie. Gramatică. Bucharest: Tipografia Universităţii din Bucureşti. Velea, A. I. 2013. “Imperatives and subjunctives in Romanian”. Journal ofPragmatics 51, 92-104. Vicente, L. 2007. The Syntax of Heads and Phrases: A Study of Verb (Phrase) Fronting. PhD dissertation, Leiden University. Utrecht: LOT Dissertations. Vicente, L. 2007. The Syntax of Heads and Phrases: A Study of Verb (Phrase) Fronting. PhD dissertation, Leiden University. Utrecht: LOT Dissertations. Vincent, N. 2011. “Non-finite forms, periphrases and autonomous morphology in Latin and Romance”. In: M. Maiden, J. C. Smith, M. Goldbach, M. O. Hinzelin (eds),
The Licensing of Nominal and Verbal Ellipsis in Romanian 399 Morphological Autonomy. Perspectives from Romance Inflectional Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 417-435. Warner, A. R. 1986. “Ellipsis conditions and the status of the English copula”. York Papers in Linguistics 12: 153-172. Wasow, T. 1972. Anaphoric Relations in English. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT. Wilder, C. 1997. “Some properties of ellipsis in coordination”. In: A. Alexiadou, T. A. Hall (eds), Studies in Universal Grammar and Typological Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 59-107. Williams, E. 1977. “Discourse and Logical Form”. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 1: 101-139. Williams, E. 1984. “TTzere-insertion”. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 131-153. Winkler, S. 2005. Ellipsis and Focus in Generative Grammar. Berlin: Mouton. Winkler, S. 2006. “Ellipsis”. In: K. Brown (ed.), The Encliclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Oxford: Elsevier, vol. D (Du Change, Charles de Fresne - Generative Grammar), 109-113. Winter, Y. 2002. “Atoms and sets: a characterization of semantic number”. Linguistic Inquiry 33, 3: 493-505. Winter, Y. 2005. “On some problems of (m)definiteness within flexible semantics”. Lingua 115:767-786. Wurmbrand, S. 1999. “Modal verbs must be raising verbs”. In: S. Bird, A. Camie, J. D. Haugen, P. Norquest (eds). The Proceedings of the 18th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 599-612. Wurmbrand, S. 2003. Infinitives. Restructuring and Clause Structure. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Yoshida, M., H. Wang, D. Potter. 2012. “Remarks on “Gapping” in DP”.
Linguistic Inquiry 43,3:475-494. Yu-Ying, J. S. 2012. The Syntax of Functional Projections in the vP Periphery. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto. Zaflu, R. 2006. “Observaţii asupra originii şi a evoluţiei adverbului modal poate”. In: M. Sala (ed.), Studii de gramatică şi de formare a cuvintelor. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române, 478-490. Zaflu, R. 2008. “Modalizarea”. In: GALR 2008, II: 702-726. Zaflu, R. 2011. “Observaţii asupra semanticii conjunctivului românesc”. In: R. Zafîu et al. (eds), Limba română. Ipostaze ale variaţiei lingvistice. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti, 163-171. Zaflu, R. 2013a. “Modality and evidentiality”. In: GR 2013: 575-584. Zaflu, R. 2013b. “Mood, tense and aspect”. In: GR 2013: 24-65. Zaflu, R. 2014. “Auxiliary encliticization in 16th century Romanian: Restrictions and regularities”. Linguistica Atlantica 33,2: 71-86.
400 References Zamfir, D.-M. 2005. Morfologia verbului în dacoromâna veche (secolele al XVI-lea — al XVII-lea). Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române. Zanuttini, R. 1997. “Negation and verb movement”. In: L. Haegeman (ed.), The New Comparative Syntax. London, New York: Longman, 214-245. Zeijlstra, H. 2004. Sentential Negation and Negative Concord. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam. Zubizarreta, M. L. 1982. On the relationship ofthe lexicon to syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT. Zwicky, A. M., and Pullum, G. К. 1983. “Cliticization vs. Inflection: English N’T Language 59, 3: 502-513. Zwicky, A. M., J. M. Sadock. 1975. “Ambiguity tests and how to fail them”. In: J. P. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 4: 1-36.
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Nicolae, Alexandru 1986- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1024910253 |
| author_facet | Nicolae, Alexandru 1986- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Nicolae, Alexandru 1986- |
| author_variant | a n an |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047022931 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1178990836 (DE-599)BVBBV047022931 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02091nam a2200481 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047022931</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210526 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201123s2019 xx |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9786061611447</subfield><subfield code="9">978-606-16-1144-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1178990836</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047022931</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nicolae, Alexandru</subfield><subfield code="d">1986-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1024910253</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The licensing of nominal and verbal ellipsis in Romanian</subfield><subfield code="c">Alexandru Nicolae</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Bucureşti</subfield><subfield code="b">Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">400 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lingvistică. Lingua</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Nominalsatz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4042460-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rumänisch</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115807-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verbalsatz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4187546-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Auslassung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4359960-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Romanian language</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Limba română / Morfologie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Limba română / Verb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rumänisch</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115807-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Verbalsatz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4187546-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Nominalsatz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4042460-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Auslassung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4359960-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032430367&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032430367&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20210526</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">400</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0905</subfield><subfield code="g">498</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032430367</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV047022931 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-20T19:07:35Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9786061611447 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032430367 |
| oclc_num | 1178990836 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 400 Seiten |
| psigel | BSB_NED_20210526 |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publishDateSearch | 2019 |
| publishDateSort | 2019 |
| publisher | Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Lingvistică. Lingua |
| spellingShingle | Nicolae, Alexandru 1986- The licensing of nominal and verbal ellipsis in Romanian Nominalsatz (DE-588)4042460-1 gnd Rumänisch (DE-588)4115807-6 gnd Verbalsatz (DE-588)4187546-1 gnd Auslassung (DE-588)4359960-6 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4042460-1 (DE-588)4115807-6 (DE-588)4187546-1 (DE-588)4359960-6 |
| title | The licensing of nominal and verbal ellipsis in Romanian |
| title_auth | The licensing of nominal and verbal ellipsis in Romanian |
| title_exact_search | The licensing of nominal and verbal ellipsis in Romanian |
| title_full | The licensing of nominal and verbal ellipsis in Romanian Alexandru Nicolae |
| title_fullStr | The licensing of nominal and verbal ellipsis in Romanian Alexandru Nicolae |
| title_full_unstemmed | The licensing of nominal and verbal ellipsis in Romanian Alexandru Nicolae |
| title_short | The licensing of nominal and verbal ellipsis in Romanian |
| title_sort | the licensing of nominal and verbal ellipsis in romanian |
| topic | Nominalsatz (DE-588)4042460-1 gnd Rumänisch (DE-588)4115807-6 gnd Verbalsatz (DE-588)4187546-1 gnd Auslassung (DE-588)4359960-6 gnd |
| topic_facet | Nominalsatz Rumänisch Verbalsatz Auslassung |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032430367&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=032430367&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nicolaealexandru thelicensingofnominalandverbalellipsisinromanian |