Asking to Die: Inside the Dutch Debate about Euthanasia:
claim was that he had faced a conflict of duties pitting his legal duty not to kill against his duty as a physician to relieve his patient’s unbearable suffering. He was acquitted on the important grounds of conflict of duty. These grounds are based on a concept in Dutch law called "force majeu...
Gespeichert in:
| Weitere beteiligte Personen: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Dordrecht
Springer Netherlands
1998
|
| Schlagwörter: | |
| Links: | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-46863-6 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-46863-6 |
| Zusammenfassung: | claim was that he had faced a conflict of duties pitting his legal duty not to kill against his duty as a physician to relieve his patient’s unbearable suffering. He was acquitted on the important grounds of conflict of duty. These grounds are based on a concept in Dutch law called "force majeure" 4 which recognizes extenuating circumstances such as conflicts of duty. The acquittal was upheld by the Lower Court of Alkmaar, but revoked by an Amsterdam court of appeal. The case went on to the Supreme Court, but before the Supreme Court's decision was issued, the Royal Dutch Medical Association (RDMA) attempted to clarify the criteria for euthanasia that many within the profession already accepted. The RDMA proposed that physicians be permitted to perform euthanasia provided that a set of procedures had been met. Variously stated, the guidelines contain the following central provisions: Voluntary, competent, explicit, and persistent requests on the part of the • patient; Requests based on full information; • The patient is in a situation of intolerable and hopeless suffering (either • physical or mental); No further acceptable alternatives to euthanasia. All alternatives • acceptable to the patient for relief of suffering having been tried; Consultation with at least one other physician whose judgment can be • 5 expected to be independent. Indirectly, these guidelines became the criteria prosecutors used to decide whether or not to bring charges |
| Umfang: | 1 Online-Ressource (XX, 588 p) |
| ISBN: | 9780306468636 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/978-0-306-46863-6 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV046143809 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 190905s1998 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780306468636 |9 978-0-306-46863-6 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/978-0-306-46863-6 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-2-SME)978-0-306-46863-6 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1119031645 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV046143809 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-355 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 610.1 |2 23 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 174.2 |2 23 | |
| 084 | |a CC 7200 |0 (DE-625)17672: |2 rvk | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Asking to Die: Inside the Dutch Debate about Euthanasia |c edited by David C. Thomasma, Thomasine Kimbrough-Kushner, Gerrit K. Kimsma, Chris Ciesielski-Carlucci |
| 264 | 1 | |a Dordrecht |b Springer Netherlands |c 1998 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (XX, 588 p) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a claim was that he had faced a conflict of duties pitting his legal duty not to kill against his duty as a physician to relieve his patient’s unbearable suffering. He was acquitted on the important grounds of conflict of duty. These grounds are based on a concept in Dutch law called "force majeure" 4 which recognizes extenuating circumstances such as conflicts of duty. The acquittal was upheld by the Lower Court of Alkmaar, but revoked by an Amsterdam court of appeal. The case went on to the Supreme Court, but before the Supreme Court's decision was issued, the Royal Dutch Medical Association (RDMA) attempted to clarify the criteria for euthanasia that many within the profession already accepted. The RDMA proposed that physicians be permitted to perform euthanasia provided that a set of procedures had been met. Variously stated, the guidelines contain the following central provisions: Voluntary, competent, explicit, and persistent requests on the part of the • patient; Requests based on full information; • The patient is in a situation of intolerable and hopeless suffering (either • physical or mental); No further acceptable alternatives to euthanasia. All alternatives • acceptable to the patient for relief of suffering having been tried; Consultation with at least one other physician whose judgment can be • 5 expected to be independent. Indirectly, these guidelines became the criteria prosecutors used to decide whether or not to bring charges | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Theory of Medicine/Bioethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public Health | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Political Science | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Medical ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Political science | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Sterbehilfe |0 (DE-588)4077877-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Tötung auf Verlangen |0 (DE-588)4117232-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Unheilbarkeit |0 (DE-588)4201691-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Ethik |0 (DE-588)4015602-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Niederlande |0 (DE-588)4042203-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4143413-4 |a Aufsatzsammlung |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Niederlande |0 (DE-588)4042203-3 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Unheilbarkeit |0 (DE-588)4201691-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Sterbehilfe |0 (DE-588)4077877-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Tötung auf Verlangen |0 (DE-588)4117232-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Ethik |0 (DE-588)4015602-3 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Thomasma, David C. |4 edt | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kimbrough-Kushner, Thomasine |4 edt | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kimsma, Gerrit K. |4 edt | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ciesielski-Carlucci, Chris |4 edt | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |z 9789401738057 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |z 9780792351863 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |z 9780792351856 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-46863-6 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-2-SME | ||
| 940 | 1 | |q ZDB-2-SME_1990/2004 | |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031523992 | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-46863-6 |l DE-355 |p ZDB-2-SME |q ZDB-2-SME_1990/2004 |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1818986026443472896 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author2 | Thomasma, David C. Kimbrough-Kushner, Thomasine Kimsma, Gerrit K. Ciesielski-Carlucci, Chris |
| author2_role | edt edt edt edt |
| author2_variant | d c t dc dct t k k tkk g k k gk gkk c c c ccc |
| author_facet | Thomasma, David C. Kimbrough-Kushner, Thomasine Kimsma, Gerrit K. Ciesielski-Carlucci, Chris |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV046143809 |
| classification_rvk | CC 7200 |
| collection | ZDB-2-SME |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-2-SME)978-0-306-46863-6 (OCoLC)1119031645 (DE-599)BVBBV046143809 |
| dewey-full | 610.1 174.2 |
| dewey-hundreds | 600 - Technology (Applied sciences) 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
| dewey-ones | 610 - Medicine and health 174 - Occupational ethics |
| dewey-raw | 610.1 174.2 |
| dewey-search | 610.1 174.2 |
| dewey-sort | 3610.1 |
| dewey-tens | 610 - Medicine and health 170 - Ethics (Moral philosophy) |
| discipline | Philosophie Medizin |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/978-0-306-46863-6 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04017nam a2200673zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV046143809</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">190905s1998 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780306468636</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-306-46863-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/978-0-306-46863-6</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-2-SME)978-0-306-46863-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1119031645</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV046143809</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">610.1</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">174.2</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CC 7200</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)17672:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Asking to Die: Inside the Dutch Debate about Euthanasia</subfield><subfield code="c">edited by David C. Thomasma, Thomasine Kimbrough-Kushner, Gerrit K. Kimsma, Chris Ciesielski-Carlucci</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Dordrecht</subfield><subfield code="b">Springer Netherlands</subfield><subfield code="c">1998</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (XX, 588 p)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">claim was that he had faced a conflict of duties pitting his legal duty not to kill against his duty as a physician to relieve his patient’s unbearable suffering. He was acquitted on the important grounds of conflict of duty. These grounds are based on a concept in Dutch law called "force majeure" 4 which recognizes extenuating circumstances such as conflicts of duty. The acquittal was upheld by the Lower Court of Alkmaar, but revoked by an Amsterdam court of appeal. The case went on to the Supreme Court, but before the Supreme Court's decision was issued, the Royal Dutch Medical Association (RDMA) attempted to clarify the criteria for euthanasia that many within the profession already accepted. The RDMA proposed that physicians be permitted to perform euthanasia provided that a set of procedures had been met. Variously stated, the guidelines contain the following central provisions: Voluntary, competent, explicit, and persistent requests on the part of the • patient; Requests based on full information; • The patient is in a situation of intolerable and hopeless suffering (either • physical or mental); No further acceptable alternatives to euthanasia. All alternatives • acceptable to the patient for relief of suffering having been tried; Consultation with at least one other physician whose judgment can be • 5 expected to be independent. Indirectly, these guidelines became the criteria prosecutors used to decide whether or not to bring charges</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Theory of Medicine/Bioethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Health</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Political Science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Medical ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Political science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sterbehilfe</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4077877-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Tötung auf Verlangen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4117232-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Unheilbarkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4201691-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015602-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Niederlande</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4042203-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4143413-4</subfield><subfield code="a">Aufsatzsammlung</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Niederlande</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4042203-3</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Unheilbarkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4201691-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Sterbehilfe</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4077877-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Tötung auf Verlangen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4117232-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015602-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Thomasma, David C.</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kimbrough-Kushner, Thomasine</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kimsma, Gerrit K.</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ciesielski-Carlucci, Chris</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">9789401738057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">9780792351863</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">9780792351856</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-46863-6</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-2-SME</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">ZDB-2-SME_1990/2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031523992</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-46863-6</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-2-SME</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB-2-SME_1990/2004</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Aufsatzsammlung |
| geographic | Niederlande (DE-588)4042203-3 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Niederlande |
| id | DE-604.BV046143809 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-20T18:44:15Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780306468636 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031523992 |
| oclc_num | 1119031645 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-355 DE-BY-UBR |
| owner_facet | DE-355 DE-BY-UBR |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (XX, 588 p) |
| psigel | ZDB-2-SME ZDB-2-SME_1990/2004 ZDB-2-SME ZDB-2-SME_1990/2004 |
| publishDate | 1998 |
| publishDateSearch | 1998 |
| publishDateSort | 1998 |
| publisher | Springer Netherlands |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Asking to Die: Inside the Dutch Debate about Euthanasia edited by David C. Thomasma, Thomasine Kimbrough-Kushner, Gerrit K. Kimsma, Chris Ciesielski-Carlucci Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 1998 1 Online-Ressource (XX, 588 p) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier claim was that he had faced a conflict of duties pitting his legal duty not to kill against his duty as a physician to relieve his patient’s unbearable suffering. He was acquitted on the important grounds of conflict of duty. These grounds are based on a concept in Dutch law called "force majeure" 4 which recognizes extenuating circumstances such as conflicts of duty. The acquittal was upheld by the Lower Court of Alkmaar, but revoked by an Amsterdam court of appeal. The case went on to the Supreme Court, but before the Supreme Court's decision was issued, the Royal Dutch Medical Association (RDMA) attempted to clarify the criteria for euthanasia that many within the profession already accepted. The RDMA proposed that physicians be permitted to perform euthanasia provided that a set of procedures had been met. Variously stated, the guidelines contain the following central provisions: Voluntary, competent, explicit, and persistent requests on the part of the • patient; Requests based on full information; • The patient is in a situation of intolerable and hopeless suffering (either • physical or mental); No further acceptable alternatives to euthanasia. All alternatives • acceptable to the patient for relief of suffering having been tried; Consultation with at least one other physician whose judgment can be • 5 expected to be independent. Indirectly, these guidelines became the criteria prosecutors used to decide whether or not to bring charges Theory of Medicine/Bioethics Public Health Ethics Political Science Medical ethics Political science Sterbehilfe (DE-588)4077877-0 gnd rswk-swf Tötung auf Verlangen (DE-588)4117232-2 gnd rswk-swf Unheilbarkeit (DE-588)4201691-5 gnd rswk-swf Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 gnd rswk-swf Niederlande (DE-588)4042203-3 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content Niederlande (DE-588)4042203-3 g Unheilbarkeit (DE-588)4201691-5 s Sterbehilfe (DE-588)4077877-0 s Tötung auf Verlangen (DE-588)4117232-2 s Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 s DE-604 Thomasma, David C. edt Kimbrough-Kushner, Thomasine edt Kimsma, Gerrit K. edt Ciesielski-Carlucci, Chris edt Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 9789401738057 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 9780792351863 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 9780792351856 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-46863-6 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Asking to Die: Inside the Dutch Debate about Euthanasia Theory of Medicine/Bioethics Public Health Ethics Political Science Medical ethics Political science Sterbehilfe (DE-588)4077877-0 gnd Tötung auf Verlangen (DE-588)4117232-2 gnd Unheilbarkeit (DE-588)4201691-5 gnd Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4077877-0 (DE-588)4117232-2 (DE-588)4201691-5 (DE-588)4015602-3 (DE-588)4042203-3 (DE-588)4143413-4 |
| title | Asking to Die: Inside the Dutch Debate about Euthanasia |
| title_auth | Asking to Die: Inside the Dutch Debate about Euthanasia |
| title_exact_search | Asking to Die: Inside the Dutch Debate about Euthanasia |
| title_full | Asking to Die: Inside the Dutch Debate about Euthanasia edited by David C. Thomasma, Thomasine Kimbrough-Kushner, Gerrit K. Kimsma, Chris Ciesielski-Carlucci |
| title_fullStr | Asking to Die: Inside the Dutch Debate about Euthanasia edited by David C. Thomasma, Thomasine Kimbrough-Kushner, Gerrit K. Kimsma, Chris Ciesielski-Carlucci |
| title_full_unstemmed | Asking to Die: Inside the Dutch Debate about Euthanasia edited by David C. Thomasma, Thomasine Kimbrough-Kushner, Gerrit K. Kimsma, Chris Ciesielski-Carlucci |
| title_short | Asking to Die: Inside the Dutch Debate about Euthanasia |
| title_sort | asking to die inside the dutch debate about euthanasia |
| topic | Theory of Medicine/Bioethics Public Health Ethics Political Science Medical ethics Political science Sterbehilfe (DE-588)4077877-0 gnd Tötung auf Verlangen (DE-588)4117232-2 gnd Unheilbarkeit (DE-588)4201691-5 gnd Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 gnd |
| topic_facet | Theory of Medicine/Bioethics Public Health Ethics Political Science Medical ethics Political science Sterbehilfe Tötung auf Verlangen Unheilbarkeit Ethik Niederlande Aufsatzsammlung |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-46863-6 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT thomasmadavidc askingtodieinsidethedutchdebateabouteuthanasia AT kimbroughkushnerthomasine askingtodieinsidethedutchdebateabouteuthanasia AT kimsmagerritk askingtodieinsidethedutchdebateabouteuthanasia AT ciesielskicarluccichris askingtodieinsidethedutchdebateabouteuthanasia |