Discursul parlamentar românesc (1866-1938): o perspectivă pragma-retorică
Gespeichert in:
| Weitere beteiligte Personen: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Rumänisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Bucureşti
Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti
2018
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Colecţia Lingvistică. Lingua
|
| Schlagwörter: | |
| Links: | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030911211&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030911211&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| Umfang: | 509 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9786061610242 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV045527028 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20190401 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 190325s2018 xx |||| 00||| rum d | ||
| 020 | |a 9786061610242 |9 978-606-16-1024-2 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1090775456 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV045527028 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a rum | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Discursul parlamentar românesc (1866-1938) |b o perspectivă pragma-retorică |c coordonator Liliana Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu în colaborare cu Mihaela-Viorica Constantinescu |
| 264 | 1 | |a Bucureşti |b Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti |c 2018 | |
| 300 | |a 509 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Colecţia Lingvistică. Lingua | |
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rhetorik |0 (DE-588)4076704-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Pragmatismus |0 (DE-588)4047046-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Diskurs |0 (DE-588)4012475-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Parlament |0 (DE-588)4044685-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Rumänien |0 (DE-588)4050939-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4143413-4 |a Aufsatzsammlung |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Rumänien |0 (DE-588)4050939-4 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Parlament |0 (DE-588)4044685-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Diskurs |0 (DE-588)4012475-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Rhetorik |0 (DE-588)4076704-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Pragmatismus |0 (DE-588)4047046-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |a Geschichte |A z |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu, Liliana |d 1941- |0 (DE-588)1028081162 |4 edt | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Constantinescu, Mihaela N. |d 1980- |0 (DE-588)1046827219 |4 edt | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030911211&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030911211&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 09034 |g 498 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 907.2 |e 22/bsb |f 0904 |g 498 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 907.2 |e 22/bsb |f 09034 |g 498 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 0904 |g 498 |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030911211 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1819248801700904960 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | CUPRINS
Introducere................................................................ 9
Liliana lonescu-Ruxándoiu
I. Aspecte generale....................................................... 17
Parlament, discurs parlamentar, reprezentare si vot ín cea de-a doua
jumátate a secolului al XlX-lea ................................... 19
Silvia Marton
Instituya parlamentará románeascá (1866-1938). Repere juridico-politice. 39
Irina Ionescu
Discursul parlamentar ca forma specificá de interactiune institutionalá. 55
Liliana lonescu-Ruxándoiu
II. Concepte recurente.................................................... 71
Istoricitatea democratiei................................................. 73
Liliana lonescu-Ruxándoiu
Statul: constructe ideologice, definitii institutionale §i conceptualizári
metaforice ........................................................ 87
Liliana Hoinárescu
De la concept la metáfora conceptúala: traditie §i modernitate............ 115
Melania Roibu
Metafore identitare
Andra Vasilescu
141
Scenarii metaforice în desemnarea partidelor politice (liberal, conservator;
junimist, socialist, comunist) .................................... 155
Mihaela-Viorica Constantinescu
III. Aspecte retorice ................................................... 189
Caracteristici ale argumcntarii.......................................... 191
Mihaela-Viorica Constantinescu
Arguméntele cvasilogice.................................................. 247
Liliana Hoinârescu
Identitati: identitatea parlamentara .................................... 271
Andra Vasilescu
Constructia discursiva a identitàtii parlamentare........................ 281
Andra Vasilescu
Metapozitionarea: trei studii de caz................................... 305
Andra Vasilescu
Evaluarea de dicto (cu ilustràri din discursurile lui Armand Cálinescu) .... 321
Melania Roibu si Oana Uta Barbulescu
Strategii de atenuare si de evaluare ín secventa exordiala (cazul discursurilor
lui Armand Cálinescu) ........................................... 329
Oana Uta Barbulescu si Melania Roibu
IV. Aspecte discursive $i pragmatice.................................. 339
Plurivocalitate si perspectivare....................................... 341
Liliana lonescu-Ruxándoiu
Strategii ale impolitetii.............................................. 351
Liliana lonescu-Ruxándoiu
Forme sí strategii ale umoruíui ..
Mihaela-Viorica Constantinescu
361
Ipostaze §i funcpi ale ironiei
Liliana Hoinárescu
385
V. Monolog si dialog ................................................. 403
Forme de interactiune comunicativa. Cadre si practici de comunicare.
Imaginea oratorului politic ..................................... 405
Ariadna Stcfiincscu
Forme nominale de adresare ............................................ 445
Liliana lonescu-Ruxándoiu
íntrebarea retorica.................................................... 455
Liliana lonescu-Ruxándoiu
VI. Concluzii ........................................................ 465
Bibliografie
a. Surse............................................................... 477
b. Referinte.......................................................... 479
Prezentarea autorilor.................................................. 507
b. REFERINTE
A bouda, Lotfi, 2004, „Deux types d’imparfait atténuatif’, Langue française, 142, 1, p. 58-74.
Adam, Jean-Michel, André Petitjean, 1989, Le texte descriptif Paris, Nathan.
Aijmer, Karin, 2005, „Evaluation and pragmatic markers”, în Tognini-Bonelli/Del Lungo
Camiciotti (eds.) 2005: 82-96.
Alexandrescu, Ion, Ion Bulei, Ion Mamina, loan Scurtu, 2000, Enciclopedia de istorie a
României, Bucureçti, Meronia. [EIR]
Alexandrescu, Raluca, 2015, Difficiles modernités: rythmes et régimes conceptuels de la
démocratie dans la pensée politique roumaine au XIXe siècle, Bucuresti, Editura
Universitatii din Bucuresti.
Amossy, Ruth, 2006, L’argumentation dans le discours, ed. a Il-a, Paris, Armand Colin.
Amossy, Ruth, 2010, La présentation de sol Ethos et identité verbale, Paris, Presses
Universitaires de France.
Angouri. Jo, Miriam A. Locher, 2012, „Theorising disagreement”, Journal of Pragmatics,
44, 12, p. 1549-1553.
Anolli, Luigi, Rita Ciceri, Giuseppe Riva (eds.), 2001, Say Not to Say: New Perspectives on
Miscommunication, Amsterdam, IOS Press.
Antaki, Charles, Susan Widdicombe (eds.), 1998, Identities in Talk, London, Sage.
Antohi, Sorin, 1999, Civitas imaginalis. Istorie si utopie în cultura românâ, Bucuresti,
Polirom.
Araszkiewicz, Michal, Krysztof Pleszka, 2015, Logic in the Theory and Practice of
Lawmaking, Cham/Heidelberg, Springer.
Arendholz, Jenny, Wolfram Bublitz, Monika Kimer-Ludwig (eds.), 2015, The Pragmatics of
Quoting Now and Then, Berlin/New York, Mouton de Gruyter.
Ariès, Philippe, George Duby (coord.), 1995a, Istoria viefù private, vol. V, Bucuresti,
Meridiane.
Ariès, Philippe, George Duby (coord.), 1995b, Istoria viefii private, vol. VI, Bucuresti,
Meridiane.
Ariès, Philippe, George Duby (coord.), 1997, Istoria viefii private, vol. VII, Bucuresti,
Meridiane.
Aristotel, (1988], Et ica nicomahicâ, tradueere, studiu introductiv, comentarii §i index de
Stella Petecel, Bucuresti, Editura $tiinfificâ §i Enciclopedicà.
Aristotel, [2004], Retorica, Edifia bilingvà. Tradueere, studiu introductiv si index de Maria
Cristina Andries. Note si comentarii de Stefan Sebastian Maftei, Bucuresti, Editura JRI.
Attardo, Salvatore, 1994, Linguistic Theories of Humor; Berlin/New York, Mouton de
Gruyter.
Attardo, Salvatore, 2000, „Irony as relevant inappropriateness”, Journal of Pragmatics, 32,
p. 793-826.
Attardo, Salvatore, 2001, „Humor and irony in interaction: from mode adoption to failure of
detection”, in Anolli/Ciceri/Riva (eds.) 2001: 165-185.
480
REFER1NTE
Augé, Marc, 1994, Pour une anthropologie des mondes contemporains, Paris, Flammarion.
Austin, John Langshaw, 1962, How to Do Things with Words, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Avineri, Shlomo, 1972, HegeVs Theory of the Modem State, Cambridge, Cambridge
University Press.
Bahtin, Mihail, 1970 [1963], Problemele poeticii lui Dostoievsky Bucuresti, Univers.
Bahtin, Mihail, 1982, Problème de literature) si esteticâ, Bucuresti, Univers.
Bakhtine, Mikhail, 1984 [1952], ,,Les genres du discours”, în Esthétique de la création
verbale, Paris, Gallimard, p. 265-308.
Bally, Charles, 1930,,Antiphrase et style indirect libre”, în Bogholm/Brusendorrt/Bodelsen
(eds.) 1930: 331-340.
Bamford, Julia, 2005, „Subjective or objective evaluation? Prediction in academie lectures”,
în Tognini-Bonelli/Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.) 2005: 17-29.
Banciu, Angela, 2001, Istoria constitutionalâ a RomânieL Deziderate nafionale f realitâti
sociale, Bucuresti, Lumina Lex.
Barbu, Daniel, 2001a, „La modernisation politique: une affaire des intellectuels?”, Studia
Politico. Romanian Political Science Review; I, 1, p. 57-67.
Barbu, Daniel, 2001b, Bizani contra Bizanf: explorâri în cultura politicâ româneascâ,
Bucureçti, Nemira.
Barbu, Daniel, 2005a, „The nation against democracy. State formation, liberalism, and
political participation in Romania”, Studia Politica. Romanian Political Science
Review; V, 3, p. 549-560.
Barbu, Daniel, 2005b, Politica pentru barbari, Bucureçti, Nemira.
Barr, Monika, 2010, Historians and Nationalism: East-Central Europe in the Nineteenth
Century, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Basu, Sammy, 1999, „Dialogic ethics and the virtue of humor”, Journal of Political
Philosophy, 7, 4, p. 378-403.
Baycroft, Timothy, Mark Hewitson (eds.), 2006, What is a Nation ? Europe in 1789-1914,
Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Bayley, Paul, 2004, ,Jntroduction. The whys and wherefores of analysing parliamentary
discourse”, în Bayley (ed.) 2004: 1-44.
Bayley, Paul (ed.), 2004, Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse,
Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins.
Bàrbulescu, Constantin, 2015, România medicilor. Medici, târani si igiend rurala in
Romania de la I860 la 1910, Bucuresti, Humanitas.
Bàrbulescu, Mihai, Denis Deletant, Keith Hitchins, Serban Papacostea, Pompiliu Teodor,
1999, Istoria Romaniei, Bucuresti, Editura Enciclopedica.
Bendix, Reinhard, 1967, „Tradition and modernity reconsidered”, Comparative Studies in
Society and History, 9, 3, p. 192-346.
Bennert, Kristina, 1998, „Negotiating training: shifting participant framework in the
workplace”, în Hunston (ed.) 1998: 14-30.
Benveniste, Emile, 1966, „De la subjectivité dans le langage”, în Problèmes de linguistique
générale, 1, Paris, Gallimard, p. 258-266.
Benwell, Bethan, Elisabeth Stokoe, 2006, Discourse and Identity, Edinburgh, Edinburgh
University Press.
Berger, Stefan, 2004, „Representations of the past: the writing of national histories in Europe”,
Debatte: Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, 12, 1, p. 73-%.
DISCURSUL PARLAMENTÄR ROM ÂNE SC (1866-1938). O PERSPECTIVÄ PRAGMA-RETORICÄ
481
Berlin, Lawrence N. (ed.), 2007, Theoretical Approaches to Dialogue Analysis, Selected
Papers from IADA Chicago 2004 Conference, Tübingen, Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Berlin, Lawrence N., Anita Fetzer (eds.), 2012, Dialogue in Politics,
Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins.
Berman, Ruth A., 2005, „Developing discourse stance across adolescence”, Journal of
Pragmatics, 37(2), p. 103-274.
Berman, Ruth A., Hrafiihildur Ragnarsdöttir, Sven Strömqvist, 2002, „Discourse stance”,
Written Language and Literacy, 5(2), p. 255-290.
Berthonneau, Anne-Marie, Georges Kleiber, 1994, „Imparfait et politesse: rupture ou
cohésion?”, Travaux de linguistique, 29, p. 59-92.
Biber, Douglas, 2007, „Corpus-based analyses of discourse: Dimensions of variation in
conversation”, în Advances in Discourse Studies, Routledge Taylor Francis Group,
p. 100-114.
Biber, Douglas, Edward Finegan, 1989, „Styles of stance in English: Lexical and
grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect”, Text, 9(1), p. 93-124.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, Edward Finegan, 1999, The
Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English, London, Longman.
Bieber, Florian, Harald Heppner (eds.), 2015, Universities and Elite Formation in Central,
Eastern and South Eastern Europe, Zürich, LIT Verlag.
Bitzer, Lloyd F., 1999, „The rhetorical situation”, în Lucaites/Condit/Caudill (eds.) 1999:
217-225.
Boari, Vasile, Sergiu Gherghina, Radu Murea (eds.), 2010, Regäsirea identitätii nationale,
Iasi, Polirom, p. 92-99.
Bochmann, Klaus, 2010, „Conceptul de patriotism in cultura romänä”, in Neumann/Heinen
(eds.) 2010: 103-128.
Bogholm, Niels, Aage Brusendorff, Carl Adolf Bodelsen (eds.), 1930, A Grammatical
Miscellany offered to Otto Jespersen on his seventieth Birthday, Copenhagen, Levin
Munksgaard, London, G. Allen Unwin.
Boia, Lucian, 2009, „Germanofilii“. Elita intelectualä româneascâ în anii Primului Räzboi
Mondiah Bucuresti, Humanitas.
Boia, Lucian, 2016, Un joc farä regull Despre imprevizibilitatea istoriei, Bucuresti,
Humanitas.
Borella, Jean, 1995, Criza simbolismului religiös, Ia^i, Institutul European.
Boroumand, Ladan, 1999, La guerre des principes. Les assemblées révolutionnaires face
aux droits de T homme et à la souveraineté de la nation (mai 1789-juillet 1794),
Paris, Editions de l’EHESS.
Bouchet, Thomas, Matthew Legget, Jean Vigreux, Geneviève Verdo (eds.), 2005, L Insulte
(en) politique. Europe et Amérique latine du XIXe siècle à nos jours, Dijon, Éditions
universitaires de Dijon, coll. Sociétés.
Bousfield, Derek, 2007, beginnings, middles and ends: a biopsy of the dynamics of
impolite exchanges”, Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 12, p. 2185—2216.
Bousfield, Derek, 2008a, Impoliteness in Interaction, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John
Benjamins.
Bousfield, Derek, 2008b, „Impoliteness in the struggle for power”, m Bousfield/Locher
(eds.) 2008: 127-153.
482
REFERINTE
Bousiîeld, Derek, Miriam Locher (eds.), 2008, Impoliteness in Language. Studies on its
Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, Berlin/New York, Mouton de Gruyter.
Brâtescu, Liviu, 2015, Liberali versus conservatori: monumente publiée si memorii
concurenîe In România modemâ (1866-1914), Iasi, Editura Universitatii „Al.1. Cuza”.
Breton, Philippe, 2003, L argumentation dans la communication, Paris, La Découverte, coll.
« Repères ».
Brewer, Marylinn B., Wendi Gardner, 1996, „Who is this ‘we’? Levels of collective identity and
self representations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71 ( 1), p. 83-93.
Briquet, Jean-Louis, Frédéric Sawicki (dir.), 1998, Le clientélisme politique dans les sociétés
contemporaines, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.
Briu, Jean-Jacques, 2011, „« démocratie/Demokratie »: variation du sémantisme des deux
termes du 18e au 20e siècle”, în Briu (ed.) 2011: 117-130.
Briu, Jean-Jacques (ed.), 2011, Terminologie (I): analyser des termes et des concepts,
Berna/Berlin/Bruxelles etc., Peter Lang.
Brown, Keith (ed.), 2006, Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. a H-a, vol. 9,
Oxford, Elsevier.
Brown, Penelope, Stephen C. Levinson, 1978, „Universal in language usage”, m Goody
(ed.) 1978: 56-289.
Brown, Penelope, Stephen C. Levinson, 1987, Politeness: Some Universals in Language
Usage, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Bucholtz, Mary, Kira Hall, 2005, „Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic
approach”, Discourse Studies, 7(4-5), p. 585-614.
Bulei, Ion, 1984, Lumea românescâ la 1900, Bucuresti, Editura Eminescu.
Bulei, Ion, 2000, Conservatori §i conservatorism în România, Bucuresti, Editura
Enciclopedicâ.
Bulei, Ion, 2011, Roma ni i în secolele XIX-XX. Europenizarea, Bucureçti, Litera.
Cabasino, Francesca, 2010, „Des formules rituelles de l’adresse au conflit verbal personnalisé
dans l’espace parlementaire”, în Kerbrat-Orecchioni (ed.) 2010: 169-200.
Cameron, Lynne, 1999, „Operationalising ‘metaphor’ for applied linguistic research”, în
Cameron/Law (eds.) 1999: 3-28.
Cameron, Lynne, Graham Law (eds.), 1999, Researching and Applying Metaphor,
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press,
Capone, Alessandro, Jacob L. Mey (eds.), 2016, Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics,
Culture and Society, New-York, Springer.
Carbaugh, Donal, 1996, Situating Selves: The Communication of Social Identities in
American Scenes, Albany, State University of New York Press.
Carbo, Teresa, 2004, „Parliamentary Discourse When Things Go Wrong. Mapping
Histories, Contexts, Conflicts”, în Bayley (ed.) 2004: 301-338.
Carp, Radu, loan Stanomir, Laurentiu Vlad, 2002, De la, ,pravila ” la „ constitute o istorie
a începuturilor constitutionale românesti, Bucuresti, Nemira.
Cattani, Adelino, 2003, „Co-operational and Conflictual Models of Discussion”, în van
Eemeren etal. (eds.) 2003: 171-175.
Cazimir, Stefan, 1986, Alfabetul de tranzitie, Bucuresti, Cartea Româneasca.
Càlinescu, Matei, 1995, Cinci fete ale modemitâtii, traducere de Tatiana Pàtrulescu si de
Radu Turcanu, Bucuresti, Univers.
DISCURSUL PARLAMENTAR ROMÂNESC (1866-1938). O PERSPECTIVE PRAGMA-RETORICÂ
483
Câncea, Paraschiva, Mircea Iosa, Apostol Stan (coord.), 1983, Istoria parlamentului si a
viefii parlamentare din Romania pana la 1918, Bucuresti, Editura Academiei
Republicii Socialiste Romania.
Ceobanu, Adrian-Bogdan, 2016, Diploma fi in Vechiul Regat. Familie, cariera si viafâ
socialâ în timpul lui Carol I (1878-1914), Iasi, Editura Universitatii ,,A1.1. Cuza”.
Cepraga, Dan Octavian, Coman Lupu, Lorenzo Renzi (sous la direction de), Oana Bala§,
Aurora Fir (a, Anamaria Gebâilâ, Melania Stancu (co-eds.), 2013, Hommages offerts
à Florica Dimitrescu et Alexandru Niculescu, vol. II, Bucuresti, Editura Universitatii
din Bucuresti.
Chafe, Wallace, Joanna Nichols (eds.), 1986, Evidentially, Norwood, Ablex.
Charaudeau, Patrick, 1984, „Une théorie des sujets du langage”, Langage et Société, 28, 1,
p. 37-51.
Charaudeau, Patrick, 1992, Grammaire du sens et de Vexpression, Paris, Hachette.
Charaudeau, Patrick, 2005, Le discours politique. Les masques du pouvoir, Paris, Vuibert.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan, 2004, Corpus approaches to Critical Methaphor Analysis,
Basingstoke/New York, Palgrave MacMillan.
Chelaru-Muràruç, Oana, Maria Cvasnîi Câtânescu, Cladia Ene, Camélia Uçurelu, Rodica
Zafiu (eds.), 2011, Text §i diseurs. Omagiu Mihaela Manca§, Bucuresti, Editura
Universitatii din Bucuresti.
Chelcea, Septimiu, 2010, ,,Cu referire la români: caracter national, nationalism, patriotism”,
în Boari/Gherghina/Murea (eds.) 2010: 92-99.
Chilton, Paul, 1996, Security Metaphors: Cold War Discourse from Containment to
Common House, New York, Peter Lang.
Chilton, Paul, 2004, Analysing Polilical Discourse. Theory and Practice, Londra/New York,
Routledge.
Chilton, Paul, Christina Schâffiier, 2002, „Themes and principles in the analysis of political
discourse”, în Chilton/Schâffiier (eds.) 2002: 1-44.
Chilton, Paul, Christina Schâffiier (eds.), 2002, Politics as Text and Talk. Analytic
Approaches to Political Discourse, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins.
Chiper, Mihai, 2015, 1848: Memorie si uitare în România celei de-a doua jumâtâti a
secolului XIX, Iasi, Editura Universitatii „Al. I. Cuza”.
Chiricu, Iuliana, 2007, „Subgenuri ale discursului parlamentar. Mopunea, întrebarea,
interpelarea”, în Pana Dindelegan (coord.): 273-280.
Cicero, De Oratore [orice edipe în latinà] http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/cicero/
oratore2. shtml#259
Cioran, Emil, 1990, Schimbarea la fafâ a României, Bucuresti, Humanitas.
Ciupalâ, Alin, 2017, Bâtâlia lor. Femeile din România în Primul Râzboi Mondial, Iasi,
Polirom.
Clark, Herbert H., 1996, Using Language, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Clark, Herbert H, Richard J. Gerrig, 1984, „On the pretense theory of irony”, Journal of
Experimental Psychology: General, 113, l,p. 121—126.
dayman, Steven E., 1992, „Footing in the achievement of neutrality: the case of news
interview discourse”, in Drew/Heritage (eds.) 1992: 163-198.
Coates, Jennifer (ed.), 1998, Language and Gender: A Reader, Oxford, Blackwell.
Cojocariu, Mihai, Cristian Ploscaru (coord.), 2014, Retorica politico modemâ in spatiul
românesc. Origini si forme de manifestare (secolele XVII-XIX), Iasi, Editura
Universitatii ,,A1.1- Cuza”.
484
REFER1NTE
Coîe, Peter (ed.), 1978, Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, New York, Academic Press.
Cole, Peter, Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), 1975, Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, New York,
Academic Press.
Connolly, William E., 1993, The Terms of Political Discourse, 3rd ed., Princeton, Princeton
University Press.
Conrad, Susan, Douglas Biber, 2000,, Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. A
corpus-based account of evaluative adverbials in three registers of English”, in
Hunston/Thompson (eds.) 2000: 56-73.
Constantinescu, Mihaela N., 2010, „Comunicarea bona-fide vs. non bona-fide în discursul
parlamentar românesc din secolul al XIX-lea”, Analele Universitâfii din Bucureçti
Séria Limbâ çi literaturâ, 2010, p. 69-79.
Constantinescu, Mihaela-Viorica, 2011a, „Retoricà §i idéologie politicâ în dezbaterile
parlamentare româneçti din secolul al XIX-lea - al XX-lea. Socialist, socialism,
comunist”, în Chelaru-Muràruç/Cvasnîi Câtanescu/Ene/Uçurelu/Zafiu (eds.) 2011:
149-159.
Constantinescu, Mihaela-Viorica, 2011b, „Umorul ca strategie a (im)politefii”, în
Zafiu/Uçurelu/Bogdan Oprea (eds.) 2011: 261-269.
Constantinescu, Mihaela-Viorica, 2012a, „Humour as a relation management strategy in the
Romanian parliamentary debates”, Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, LVII, 4,
p. 385-394.
Constantinescu, Mihaela-Viorica, 2012b, „The use of quotations in the Romanian
parliamentary discourse”, în Ionescu-Ruxàndoiu/Roibu/Constantinescu (eds.) 2012:
263-282.
Constantinescu, Mihaela-Viorica, 2014, „Evidential and epistemic strategies in Romanian
parliamentary debates”, Language and Dialogue, Special issue: Certainty and
Uncertainty in Dialogue, Andrzej Zuczkowski (ed.), 4, 1, p. 132-148.
Constantinescu, Mihaela N., Melania Roibu, 2010, ,, Be{ia de cuvinte ... grele in
Parlamentul românesc”, în Ionescu-Ruxândoiu/Hoinârescu (eds.) 2010: 101-113.
Constantinescu, Mihaela-Viorica, Adina Dragomirescu, Alexandru Nicolae, Gabriela Stoica,
Rodica Zafiu (eds.), 2016, Perspective comparative §i diacronice asupra limbii
romane. Acte le Celui de-al 15-lea Colocviu International al Departamentului de
Lingvisticâ (Bucureçti, 27-28 noiembrie 2015), Bucuresti, Editura Univers!tapi din
Bucuresti.
Constantinescu, Mihaela-Viorica, Gabriela Stoica, Oana U{à Bàrbulescu (eds.), 2012,
Modernitate §i interdisciplinaritate în cercetarea lingvisticâ. Omagiu doamnei
profesor Liliana lonescu-Ruxândoiu, Bucuresti, Editura Universitàpi din
Bucureçti.
Cornea, Andrei, 1986, Interpretare la Republica, în Platon, Opéré V. Republica, Bucureçti,
Editura Stiinpficà §i Enciclopedicà, p. 27-79.
Cotteret, Jean-Marie, 1973, Gouvernants et gouvernés. La communication politique, Paris,
Presses Universitaries de France.
Cox, J. Robert, 2006, „Irreparable”, m Sloane (ed.) (e-reference edition, 16.02.2007,
http://www.oxford-rhetoric.com/entry7entry =t223.el40).
Cràciun, Alexandra, Ana Maria Teodorescu (ed.), 2017, Câlâtori si câlâtoril Palimpsest pe
harta reprezentârii, Bucuresti, Editura Universitatii din Bucuresti.
DISCURSUL PARLAMENTAR ROMÂNESC (1866-1938). O PERSPECTIVÂ PRAGMA-RETORICÂ
485
Culpeper, Jonathan, 1996, „Towards an anatomy of impoliteness”, Journal of Pragmatics,
25, 3, p. 349-367.
Culpeper, Jonathan, 2016, „Impoliteness strategies”, in Capone/Mey (eds.) 2016: 421^445.
Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, Anne Wichmann, 2003, „Impoliteness revisited: with
special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects”, Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 10-11,
p. 1545-1579.
Cvasnh Câtànescu, Maria, 2012, „Analogia - stereotip argumentativ in Anonimul
Cantacuzinesc”, in Constantinescu/Stoica/U{a Bârbulescu (eds.) 2012: 203-208.
Daniélou, Jean, 1961, Les symboles chrétiens primitifs, Paris, Seuil.
David, Daniel, 2015, Psihologia poporului roman. Profilai psihologic al românilor într-o
monografie cognitiv-experimentalâ, Iasi, Polirom.
De Cillia, Rudolf, Martin Reisigl, Ruth Wodak, 1999, „The Discursive Construction of
National Identities”, Discourse and Society, vol. 10 (2), p. 149-173.
De Fina, Anna, 2003, Identity in Narrative, a Study of Immigrant Discourse, Amsterdam,
John Benjamins.
De Fina, Anna, Deborah Schiffrin, Michael Bamberg (eds.), 2006, Discourse and Identity,
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
De Michelis, Lidia, 2008, ,JBritain™ and „corporate” national identity”, în Wodak/Koller
(eds.) 2008: 203-222.
Déloye, Yves, 1999, „Se présenter pour représenter. Enquête sur les professions de foi
électorales de 1848”, în Offerlé (dir.) 1999: 231-254.
Déloye, Yves, Bernard Voûtât, 2002, „Entre histoire et sociologie: l’hybridation de la
science politique”, în Déloye/Voutat (dir.) 2002: 7-24.
Déloye, Yves, Bernard Voûtât (dir.), 2002, Faire de la science politique. Pour une analyse
socio-historique du politique, Paris, Belin.
Dendale, Patrick, Liliane Tasmowski (éds.), 2001, Le Conditionnel en français, Coll.
« Recherches Linguistiques » JN° 25, Metz, Université de Metz.
Détrie, Catherine, 2006, De la non-personne à la personne: l ’apostrophe nominale, Paris,
CNRS Éditions.
Détrie, Catherine, 2010, „Les formes nominales d’adresse dans «Questions orales au
Gouvernement»: de la syntaxe aux effets de sens”, în Kerbrat-Orecchioni (ed.) 2010:
143-168.
Dibattista, Denise, 2004, „Legitimising and informative discourse in the Kosovo debates in
the British House of Commons and the Italian Chamber of Deputies”, în Bayley (ed.)
2004: 151-184.
Dictionarul explicativ al limbii române, 1998, Academia Românà, Institutul de Lingvisticà
„Iorgu Iordan-Al. Rosetti”, ed. a Il-a, Bucuresti, Univers Enciclopedic [DEX 1998]
(ed. a Il-a, revâzuta si adaugita, 2009; 2012).
Dictionarul limbii române, 1994, Sérié noua. Tomul X. Partea 5. Litera S SPONGIAR-
SWING, Bucuresti, Editura Academiei Române. [DLR]
Dimitrescu, Florica, 1997, Dictionar de cuvinte recente, ed. a II-a, Bucuresti, LOGOS
[DCR2].
Dirven, René, Roslyn Frank, Cornelia Ilie (eds.), 2001, Language and Ideology, vol. II,
Descriptive Cognitive Approaches, Amsterdam/Philade 1 phia, John Benjamins.
Dolon, Rosana, Julia Todoli (eds.), 2008, Analysing Identities in Discourse,
Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins.
486
REFERINTE
Donald, James, Ali Rattansi (eds.), 1992, ‘Race*, Culture and Difference, London, Sage.
Drâganu, Tudor, 1991, Inceputurile si dezvoltarea regimului parlamentar în România pânâ
in 1916, Cluj, Dacia.
Drew, Paul, John Heritage, 1992, ,Analyzing talk at work: an introduction”, m
Drew/Heritage (eds.) 1992: 3-65.
Drew, Paul, John Heritage (eds.), 1992, Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings,
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Driscoll, James P., 1983, The Shakespearean Drama. Identity in Shakespearean Drama,
Lewisburg, Bucknell University Press, London and Toronto, Associated University
Presses.
Du Bois, John W., 2007, „The stance triangle”, in Englebretson (ed.) 2007: 139-182.
Du Gay, Paul, Jessica Evans, Peter Redman (eds.), 2000, Identity: A Reader, Sage, London.
Ducrot, Oswald, 1980, ,Analyse de textes et linguistique de l’énonciation”, în
Ducrot/Bourcier (éds.) 1980: 7-56.
Ducrot, Oswald, 1984, Le Dire et le Dit, Paris, Les Editions de Minuit.
Ducrot, Oswald, Danièle Bourcier (éds), 1980, Les mots du discours, Paris, Les Editions de
Minuit.
Durandin, Catherine, 1999, Istoria românilor; traducere de Liliana Buruianâ-Popovici, Iasi,
Institutul European.
Duranti, Alessandro, Charles Goodwin (eds.), 1992, Rethinking Context: Language as an
Interactive Phenomenon, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Duranti, Alessandro, Elinor Ochs, Bambi B. Schieffelin (eds.), 2012, The Handbook of
Language Socialisation, Wiley-Blackwell.
Duverger, Maurice, 1976, Les partis politiques, 9e éd., Paris, Armand Colin.
Dyer, Judy, Deborah Keller-Cohen, 2000, „The discursive construction of professional self
through narratives of personal experience”, Discourse Studies, 2 (3), p. 283-304.
Eckert, Penelope, Sally McConnel-Ginnet, 1992, „Think practically and look locally:
language and gender as community-based practice”, Annual Review of Anthropology,
21,461-490.
Eckert, Penelope, Sally McConnel-Ginnet, 1998, „Communities of practice: where
language, gender and power all live”, m Coates (ed.) 1998: 484A94.
Eckert, Penelope, Sally McConnell-Ginet, 2007, „Putting communities of practice in then-
place”, Gender and Language, 1, 1, p. 27-38.
Edwards Derek, Jonathan Potter, 2003, „Sociolinguistics, cognitivism and discursive
psychology”, Journal of English Studies, 3, p. 93-109.
Eliade, Mircea, 1980, Images et symboles. Essais sur le symbolisme magico-religieux, Paris,
Gallimard.
Englebretson, Robert, 2007, „Stancetaking in discourse: an introduction”, în Englebretson
(ed.) 2007: 1-26.
Englebretson, Robert (ed.), 2007, Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation,
Interaction, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins.
Escudier, Alexandre, 2010, „Semantica istoricà, modemitatea politicà §i istoria României
(1780-1939). Câteva considerapi”, în Neumann/Heinen (eds.) 2010: 53-80.
Fairclough, Norman, 1994, „Conventionalization of public discourse and the authority of
the consumer”, în Keat/Whiteley/ Abercrombie (eds.) 1994: 256-268.
Fairclough, Norman, 2003, Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research,
London, Routledge.
DISCURSUL PARLAMENTAR ROMÂNESC (1866-1938). O PERSPECTTVÂ PRAGMA-RETORICÂ
487
Fairclough, Norman, Phil Graham, Jay Lemke, Ruth Wodak, 2004, introduction”, Critical
Discourse Studies, 1(1), p. 1-7.
Fairclough, Norman, Ruth Wodak, 1997, „Critical discourse analysis”, in van Dijk (ed.)
1997: 258-284.
Fauconnier, Gilles, 1997, Mappings in Thought and Language, Cambridge, Cambridge
University Press.
Fetzer, Anita, Gerda Eva Lauerbach (eds.), 2007, Political Discourse in the Media,
Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins.
Fine, Gary Alan, Michaela de Soucey, 2005, , Joking cultures: Humor themes as social
regulation in group life”, Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 18, 1,
p. 1-22.
Finnegan, Ruth, 2011, Why Do We Quote? The Culture and History of Quotation,
Cambridge, Open Book Publishers.
Fitch, Kristine L., Robert E. Sanders (eds.), 2005, Handbook of Language and Social
Interaction, Mahwak/New Jersey/London, Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fitzgerald, Thomas, K, 1993, Metaphors of Identity. A Culture-Communication Dialogue,
Albany, State University of New York Press.
Foucault, Michel, 1972, The Archaeology of Knowledge and Discourse on Language, New
York, Pantheon Books.
Foullioux, Caroline, Didier Tejedor de Felipe, 2004, „À propos du mode et de l’atténuation”,
Langue française, 142, p. 112-126.
Fowler, Roger, 1985, „Power”, în van Dijk (ed.) 1985: 61-82.
Fraser, Bruce, 1996, „Pragmatic markers”, Pragmatics, 6, 2, p. 167-191.
Freddi, Maria, 2005, „From corpus to register. The construction of evaluation and
argumentation in linguistics textbooks”, m Tognini-Bonelli/Del Lungo Camiciotti
(eds.) 2005: 133-151.
Freud, Sigmund, 1988 [1905], Le mot d esprit et sa relation à l inconscient, traducere din
limba germanà de Denis Messier, préfaça de J-C. Lavie, Paris, Gallimard.
Garrigou, Alain, 1993, „La construction sociale du vote. Fétichisme et raison instrumentale”,
Politix, 6, 22, p. 5-42.
Garrigou, Alain, 1998, „Clientélisme et vote sous la Me République”, în Briquet/Sawicki
(dir.) 1998: 39-74.
Gauchet, Marcel, 1989, La révolution des droits de l homme, Paris, Gallimard.
Gavris, Simion-Alexandru, 2014, Ipostazele unei biografii politice: Manolache Costache
Epureanu, Iasi, Editura Universitâtii „Al. I. Cuza”.
Gavris, Simion-Alexandru, 2015, Viata si opiniile printului Grigore Mihail Sturdza
(1821-1901), Iasi, Editura Universitâtii „Ah I. Cuza”.
Gâ^a, Anca, 2007, „Dissociation as a way of strategie manoeuvring”, în van Eemeren
/Blair/Willard/Garssen (eds.) 2007: 441-448.
Georgescu, Vlad, 1992, Istoria românilor: De la origini pânâ în zilele noastre, Bucuresti,
Humanitas.
Ghi^a, Andreea, 1999, Analiza pragmaticâ a ironiei, Tezà de doctorat, Universitatea
Bucureçti.
Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr., 2000, „Metarepresentation in staged communicative acts”, în
Sperber (ed.) 2000: 389-410.
Giora, Rachel, 1995, „On irony and negation”, Discourse Processes, 19, p. 239—264.
488
REFERINTE
Giora, Rachel, 1999, „On the priority of salient meanings: Studies of literal and figurative
language”, Journal of Pragmatics, 31, p. 919-929.
Goatly, Andrew, 2007, Washing the Brain. Metaphor and Hidden Ideology (Discourse
Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture), Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Goffman, Erving, 1959, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Garden City/New York,
Doubleday.
Goffman, Erving, 1974, Frame Analysis. An Essay on the Organisation of Experience, New
York/Hagerstown/San Francisco/London, Harper and Row.
Goffman, Erving, 1981, Forms of Talk, Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goodwin, Jean, 1998, „Forms of authority and the real ad verecundiam”, Argumentation,
12, p. 267-280.
Goodwin, Jean, 2011, „Accounting for the appeal to the authority of experts”,
Argumentation, 25, p. 285-296 (DOI 10.1007/s 10503-011-9219-6, Published online:
26 July 2011).
Goody, Esther N. (ed.), 1978, Questions and Politeness, Cambridge, Cambridge University
Press.
Grad, Héctor, Luisa Martín Rojo, 2008, „Identities in discourse: An integrative view”, in
Dolón/Todolí (eds.) 2008: 3-28.
Graumann, Carl F., 2002, „Explicit and implicit perspectivity”, in Graumann/Kallmeyer
(eds.) 2002: 25-40.
Graumann, Carl F., Werner Kallmeyer, 2002, „Perspective and perspectivation in discourse:
an introduction”, in Graumann/Kallmeyer (eds.) 2002: 1-11.
Graumann, Carl F., Werner Kallmeyer (eds.) 2002, Perspective and Perspectivation in
Discourse, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins.
Grice, Herbert Paul, 1975, „Logic and conversation“, in Cole/Morgan (eds.) 1975: 41-58.
Grice, Herbert Paul, 1978, „Further notes on logic and conversation”, in Cole (ed.) 1978:
113-127.
Grlin-Oesterreich, Andrea, 2006, „Aposiôpësis”, în Sloane (ed.) 2006 (http://www.oxford-
rhetoric.com/ entry?entry=t223.el9).
Guénon, René, 1993, Criza lumii moderne, Bucuresti, Humanitas.
Gumperz, John J., 1982, Language and Social Identity, Cambridge, Cambridge University
Press.
Gumperz, John J., Steven Levinson (eds.), 1996, Rethinking Linguistic Relativity,
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Giintner, Susanne, 2002, „Perspectivity in reported dialogues. The contextualization of
evaluative stances in reconstructing speech”, m Graumann/Kallmeyer (eds.) 2002:
347-374.
Haillet, Pierre Patrick, 2002, Le conditionnel en français. Une approche polyphonique,
Paris, Ophrys.
Haiman, John (ed.), 1985, Iconicity in Syntax, Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Halichias, Ana-Cristina, Theodor Georgescu (eds.), 2014, Sapientia et scientia In honorem
Luciae Wald, Bucuresti, Editura Universitàtii din Bucuresti.
Hall, Edward, 1959, The Silent Language, New York, Doubleday.
Hall, Samuel, 1996, introduction: Who needs “identity”?”, în Halí/Du Gay (eds) 1996: 1-17.
Hall, Samuel, Peter Du Gay (eds), 1996, Questions of Cultural Identity, London, Sage.
Hall, Stuart, 1992, „New Ethnicities”, in Donald/Rattansi (eds.) 1992: 252-260.
DISCURSUL PARLIAMENT AR ROM ÂNES C (1866-1938). O PERSPECTLVÂ PRAGMA-RETORICÂ
489
Hamon, Philippe, 1996, L* ironie littéraire. Essai sur les formes de Vécriture oblique, Paris,
Hachette Supérieur.
Hampe, Beate, Joe Grady (eds.), 2005, From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in
Cognitive Linguistics, Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter.
Hampsher-Monk, lain, 1998, „Speech acts, languages or conceptual history?”, in Hampsher-
Monk/Tilmans/van Vree (eds.) 1998: 37-50.
Hampsher-Monk, Iain, Karin Tilmans, Frank van Vree, 1998, History of Concepts:
Comparative Perspectives, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press.
Harder, Peter, 2014, „National identity: Conceptual models, discourses and political change:
„Britishness” in a social cognitive linguistics”, Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 1(1),
p. 22-54.
Harris, Sandra, 2001, „Being politically impolite: extending politeness theory to adversarial
political discourse”, Discourse Society, 12,4, p. 451-472.
Haugh, Michael, 2010,, Jocular mockery, (dis)affiliation, and face”, Journal of Pragmatics,
42, 8, p. 2106-2119.
Hay, Jennifer, 1995, Gender and Humour. Beyond a Joke, tezà MA la Victoria University of
Wellington.
Hay, Jennifer, 2001, „The pragmatics of humor support”, Humor-International Journal of
Humor Research 14, 1, p. 55-82.
Heinen, Armin, 2010, „Elaborarea istoriei României”, in Neumann/Heinen (eds.) 2010: 35-52.
Heritage, John, 2005, „Conversational Analysis and Institutional Talk”, in Fitch/Sanders
(eds.) 2005: 103-148.
Herman, Thierry, Steve Oswald (eds.), 2014, Rhetoric and Cognition. Theoretical
Perspectives and Persuasive Strategies, Bern, Peter Lang.
Hickey, Leo, Miranda Stewart (eds.), 2005, Politeness in Europe, Clevedon, Multilingual
Matters.
Hitchins, Keith, 1996, Romania. 1866-1947, traducere de George G. Potra si Delia
Razdolescu, Bucuresti, Humanitas.
Hodge, Rachel, Gunther Kress, 1988, Social Semiotics, Cambridge, Polity.
Hofstede, Geert, Gert Jan Hofstede, Michael Minkov, 2010, Cultures and Organizations:
Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and its Importance for Survival, 3rd
ed., McGraw-Hill (trad.rom. Culturi fi organizafii. Softul mental, Bucureçti,
Humanitas, 2012). https://www.geert-hofstede.com; http://geert-hofstede.com/rom
ania.html
Hoinàrescu, Liliana, 2006, Structuri §i strategii ale ironiei în proza postmodemà româneascâ,
Bucuresti, Academia Românà, Fundapa Nation ala pentru §tiin(a $i Artâ.
Hoinàrescu, Liliana, 2013, „Definipa in argumentare”, in Zafiu/§tefanescu/Mârzea
Vasile/Bràescu (ed.) 2013: 75-83.
Hoinàrescu, Liliana, 2015, „Statul în discursul parlamentar românesc: conceptualizàri
metaforice”, in Zafiu/Ene (eds.) 2015: 83-93.
Hoinàrescu, Liliana, 2016, ,Jpostaze §i fiinclii ale ironiei in discursul parlamentar românesc
(1866-1900)”, in Constantinescu/Dragomirescu/Nicolae/Stoica/Zafiu (eds.) 2016:
133-144.
Hoinàrescu, Liliana, 2018, „Definition as an argumentative strategy in parliamentary
discourse. A cross-cultural and comparative approach”, Language and Dialogue, 8,
2, p. 209-234.
490
REFERINTE
Hunston, Susan, 2007, „Using a corpus to investigate stance quantitatively”, in Englebretson
(ed.) 2007: 27-48.
Hunston, Susan (ed.), 1998, Language at Work, Clevendon etc., British Association for
Applied Linguistics Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Hunston, Susan, Geoff Thompson (eds.), 2000, Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the
Construction of Discourse, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Hyland, Ken, 1996, „Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles”,
Applied Linguistics, 17, p. 445-454.
Iacob, Dan Dumitru, 2015, Elitele din Principatele Romane in prima jumátate a secolului al
XlX-lea. Sociabilitate si divertisment, Iasi, Editura Universitátii „Al. I. Cuza”.
Iancu, Alexandra, 2014, „Mecanismele reprezentárii in perioada precomunistá: Elitele
politice si legitimarea prin cunoastere”, in Nastasá-Matei/Vlad (eds.) 2014: 265-284.
Iancu, Alexandra, 2015, „Knowledge and Power in the Romanian Case. University
Education and its Legitimising Force. 1866-2010”, in Bieber/Heppner (eds.) 2015:
111-129.
Hie, Cornelia, 1994, What Else Can I Tell You? A Pragmatic Study of English Rhetorical
Questions as Discursive and Argumentative Acts, Stockholm, Almqvist /Wiksell Int.
Ilie, Cornelia, 2001, „Unparliamentary language: Insults as cognitive forms of ideological
confrontation”, in Dirven/Frank/Ilie (eds.) 2001: 235-263.
Ilie, Cornelia, 2003a, „Discourse and metadiscourse in parliamentary debates”, Journal of
Language and Politics, 2, 1, p. 71-92.
Ilie, Cornelia, 2003b, „Histrionic and agonistic features of parliamentary discourse”, Studies
in Communication Sciences 3(1), p. 25-53.
Ilie, Cornelia, 2004, „Insulting as (un)parliamentary practice in the British and Swedish
parliaments: A rhetorical approach”, in Bayley (ed.) 2004: 45-86.
Ilie, Cornelia, 2005, „Politeness in Sweden: Parliamentary forms of address”, in
Hickey/Stewart (eds.) 2005: 174-188.
Ilie, Cornelia, 2006, „Parliamentary discourses”, in Brown (ed.) 2006: 188-197.
Ilie, Cornelia, 2007, ,Argument refutation through definitions and redefinitions”, in van
Eemeren/BlairAVillard/Garssen (eds.) 2007: 667-674.
Ilie, Cornelia, 2010, „Identity co-construction in parliamentary discourse practices”, in Ilie
(ed.) 2010: 57-78.
Ilie, Cornelia (ed.), 2010, European Parliaments under Scmtinity. Discourse Strategies and
Interaction Practices, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins.
Ilonszky, Gabriella, 2009, Képviselók és képviselet Magyarországon a 19. és 20. Században,
Budapesta, Akadémiai Konyvkiadó.
Ionescu, Irina, 2008, ,Analiza discursului parlamentar din perspectiva stiintei politice.
Studiu de caz: discursul parlamentar románese 1886-1938”, in Pana
Dindelegan/Dragomirescu (eds.) 2008: 533-539.
Ionescu-Ruxándoiu, Liliana, 2008, „Prezentare generala a proiectului”, masa rotunda
„Istoria discursului parlamentar (1866-1938)”, in Pana Dindelegan/Dragomirescu
2008:319-325.
Ionescu-Ruxándoiu, Liliana, 2009, „Sintaxá §i functionare discursiva: preterida in discursul
politic”, in Zafiu/Croitor/Mihail (eds.) 2009: 105-108.
Ionescu-Ruxándoiu, Liliana, 2010a, „Straightforward vs. mitigated impoliteness in the
Romanian parliamentary discourse. The case of in absentia impoliteness”, Revue
Roumaine de Linguistique, nr. LV, 4, p. 343-351.
DISCURSUL PARLAMENTAR ROMÂNESC (1866-1938). O PERSPECTIVA PRAGMA-RETORICÂ
491
Ionescu-Ruxàndoiu, Liliana, 2010b, „Plurivocalitate $i perspectivare în discursul
parlamentar románese din sec. al XIX-lea”, în Zafiu/Dragomirescu/Nicolae (eds.)
2010: 95-100.
Ionescu-Ruxàndoiu, Liliana, 2011a, „Forme nominale de adresare în discursul parlamentar
románese (sec. al XIX-iea - începutul sec. al XX-lea)”, în Zafiu/Uçurelu/Bogdan
Oprea (eds.) 2011: 271-281.
Ionescu-Ruxàndoiu, Liliana, 2011b, „Strategii ale impolitepi în discursul parlamentar
románese (1866-1938)”, în Chelaru-Murâruç/Cvasnîi CàtânescuÆne/U§urelu/Zafiu
(eds.) 2011:283-292.
Ionescu-Ruxàndoiu, Liliana, 2012a, ,Jntroduction”, ih Ionescu-Ruxàndoiu/Roibu/Constantinescu
(eds.) 2012: 1-20.
Ionescu-Ruxàndoiu, Liliana, 2012b, „Perspectivation in the Romanian parliamentary
discourse”, în Berlin/Fetzer (eds.), 2012: 151-165.
Ionescu-Ruxàndoiu, Liliana, 2012c, „The historicity of democracy’, în Ionescu-Ruxàndoiu
/Roibu/Constantinescu (eds.) 2012: 197-207.
Ionescu-Ruxàndoiu, Liliana, 2013, „Íntrebarea retorica: aspecte teoretice si aplicative”, în
Cepraga et al (eds.) 2013: 476-484.
Ionescu-Ruxàndoiu, Liliana, 2014, „Discursul parlamentar ca forma de interactiune
institutionalâ”, m Halichias/Georgescu (eds.) 2014: 277-285.
Ionescu-Ruxàndoiu, Liliana, Liliana Hoinárescu (eds.), 2010, Dialog, diseurs, enunf. In
memoriam Sorin Stati, Bucuresti, Editura Universitàtii din Bucuresti.
Ionescu-Ruxàndoiu, Liliana (ed.), in collaboration with Melania Roibu and Mihaela-Viorica
Constantinescu, 2012, Parliamentary Discourses across Cultures: Interdisciplinary
Approaches, Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Iordache, Anastasie, 1999, Originile constituirea Partidului Conservator din România,
Bucuresti, Paideia.
Isar, Nicolae, 2006, Istoria moderna a românilor: 1774/1784-1918, Bucuresti, Editura
Universitarà.
Janos, Andrew C., 1978, „Modernization and decay in historical perspective: the case of
Romania”, în Jowitt (ed.) 1978: 72-116.
Jasinski, James, 2006, „Rhetorical situation”, m Sloane (ed.) 2006 (16.02.2007,
http://www.oxford-rhetoric.com/entry?entry= t223.e219).
Jaume, Lucien, 1997, L’individu effacé ou le paradoxe du libéralisme français, Paris,
Fayard.
Jaume, Lucien, 2003, „Citizen and State under the French Revolution”, în Skinner/Strâth
(eds.) 2003: 131-143.
Johnson, Mark, 1987, The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and
Reason, Chicago/London, University of Chicago Press.
Johnstone, Barbara, 2007, „Linking identity and dialect through stancetaking”, m
Englebretson (ed.) 2007: 49-68.
Jowitt, Kenneth (ed.), 1978, Social Change in Romania, 1860-1940. A Debate on
Development in a European Nation, Berkeley, University of California.
Karkkàinen, Elise, 2007, „The role of / guess in conversational stancetaking”, în
Englebretson (ed.) 2007: 183-220.
Keat, Russell, Nigel Whiteley, Nicholas Abercrombie (eds.), 1994, The Authority of the
Consumer, Londra, Routledge.
492
REFERJNTE
Kerbr at-Orecchioni, Catherine, 1980, L’énonciation. De la subjectivité dans le language,
Paris, Armand Colin.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine, 2001, Les actes de langage dans le discours. Théorie et
fonctionement, Paris, Nathan.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine, 2005, Le discours en interaction, Paris, Armand Colin.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine, 2010, „Introduction”, în Kerbrat-Orecchioni (ed.) 2010: 7-30.
Kerbrat-Orechioni, Catherine (ed.), 2010, S’adresser à autrui Les formes nominales
d’adresse en français, Chambéry, Université de Savoie.
Kienpointner, Manfred, 1997, „Varieties of rudeness: types and functions of impolite
utterances”, Functions of Language, 4, 2, p. 251-287.
Kienpointner, Manfred, 2009, „Plausible and fallacious strategies to silence one’s opponent”
în van Eemeren (ed.) 2009: 61-76.
Klumpp, James (ed.), 1998, Argument in a Time of Change: Definitions, Frameworks, and
Critiques, Annandale, VA, National.
Koller, Veronika, 2004, “Businesswomen and war metaphors: possessive, jealous and
pugnacious?’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8, 1, p. 3-22.
Korzen, Hanne, Henning Nolke, 2001, „Le conditionnel: niveau de modalisation”, in
Dendale/Tasmowski (éds.)2001: 125-146.
Koselleck, Reinhart, 1996, „A Response to Comments on the Geschichtliche
Grundbegriffe”, în Lehmann/Richter (eds.) 1996: 65-66.
Koselleck, Reinhart, 2002, The Practice of Conceptual History. Timing History, Spacing
Concepts, Stanford, Stanford University Press.
Kosellek, Reinhart, 2004, Futures Past. On the Semantics of Historical Time, traducere de
Keith Tribe, New York, Columbia University Press.
Koselleck, Reinhart, 2006, Begriffsgeschichten. Studien zur Semantik und Pragmatik der
politischen und sozialen Sprache, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp.
Koselleck, Reinhart, 2009 [2006], Conceptele §i istoriile lor. Semantica $i pragmatica
limbajului social-politic, eu doua contribuai ale lui U. Spree si W. Steinmetz,
traducere din limba germana de G. H. Decuble si M. Oruz, Bucureçti, Art.
Koszowy, Marcin, Douglas Walton, 2017, „Profiles of dialogue for repairing faults in
arguments from expert opinion”, Logic and Logical Philosophy, 26, p. 79-113. DOI:
10.12775/LLP.2016.014.
Kotthoff, Helga, 1993, „Disagreement and concession in disputes: on the context sensitivity
of preference structures”, Language in Society, 22, p. 193-216.
Kotthoff, Helga, 1996, ,impoliteness and conversational joking: on relational politics”,
Folia Linguistica, 30, 3-A, p. 299-326.
Kotthoff, Helga, 2002, „Irony, quotation, and other forms of staged intertextuality. Double
or contrastive perspectivations in conversation”, in Grauman/Kallmeyer (eds.) 2002:
201-229.
Kotthoff, Helga, 2003, „Responding to irony in different contexts, on cognition in
conversation”, Journal of Pragmatics, 32, p. 1387-1411.
Kou, Danyang, Orsolya Farkas, 2014, „Source domains in conceptualizations of the state in
Chinese and Hungarian political discourse”, Cognitive Linguistics Studies, 1, 1,
p. 101-130.
Kövecses, Zoltán, 2005, Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation, Cambridge,
Cambridge University Press.
DISCURSUL PARLAMENTAR ROMÂNESC (1866-1938). O PERSPECTIVA PRAGMA-RETORICA
493
Kövecses, Zoltán, 2006, Language, Mind and Culture. A Practical Introduction, Oxford,
Oxford University Press.
Kreuz, Roger J., Sam Glucksberg, 1989, „How to be sarcarstic: The echoic reminder theory
of verbal irony”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118, 4, p. 374—386.
Kronenfeld, David, 2008, Culture, Society, and Cognition. Collective Goals, Values, Action,
and Knowledge, Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter.
Kublikowski, Robert, 2009, „Definition within the Structure of Argumentation”, Studies in
Gramfnar, Logic and Rhetoric, 16, 29, p. 229—244.
Kumon-Nakamura, Sachi, Sam Glucksberg, Mary Brown, 1995, „How about another piece
of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony”, Journal of Experimental
Psychology: General, 124, 1, p. 3—21.
Lacroix, Bernard, 2001, „Retour sur 1848. Le suffrage universel entre l’illusion du «jamais
vu » et l’illusion du « toujours ainsi »”, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales,
140, p. 41-50.
Lakoff, George, 1987, Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about
the Mind, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George, 1993, „The contemporary theory of metaphor”, in Ortony (ed.) 1993: 202-215.
Lakoff, George, 1996, Moral Politics. How Liberals and Conservatives Think, Chicago, The
University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George, Mark Johnson, 1980, Metaphors We Live By, Chicago, University of
Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George, Mark Johnson, 2003, Metaphors we live by (with a new afterword),
Chicago/London, University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, Ronald W., 1985, „Observations and speculations on subjectivity”, in Haiman
(ed.) 1985: 109-150.
Langacker, Ronald W, 1987, Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Theoretical Prerequisites,
Stanford, California, Stanford University Press.
Lapaire, Jean-Rémy, 2002, „The conceptual structure of events: the go-, make- and get-
/give-/have-scenarios”, Anglophonia, 12, p. 7-28.
Lassen, Inger, Jeanne Strunck, Torben Vestergaard (eds.), 2006, Mediating Ideology in Text
and Image: Ten Critical Studies, Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Lave, Jean, Etienne Wenger, 1991, Situated Learning: Legititnate Peripheral Participation,
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Le Goff, Jacques, 1992, « Jésus a-t-il ri? », L’Histoire, 158, p. 72-74.
Leary, Mark R„ June Price Tangney (eds.), 2003, Handbook of Self and Identity, New York,
Guilford Press
Leech, Geoffrey N., 1983, Principles of Pragmatics, London/New York, Longman.
Leech, Geoffrey N., 2014, The Pragmatics of Politeness, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
LeFevre, Karen Burke, 1987, Invention as a Social Act, Carbondale, IL, Southern Illinois
University Press.
Lehmann, Hartmut, Melvin Richter (eds.), 1996, The Meaning of Historical Terms and
Concepts. New Studies on Be griffs geschickte, Washington, D. C., German Historical
Institute.
Leonard, Mark, 1997, Britain™: Renewing our Identity, London, Demos.
Leonhard, Jörn, 2006, Nation-States and War, in Baycroft/Hewitson (eds.) 2006: 231-254.
Levinson, Stephen C„ 1983, Pragmatics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
494
REFERINJE
Light, Andrew, Eric Katz (eds.), 1996, Environmental Pragmatics, New York, Routledge.
Livadâ-Cadeschi, Ligia, 2013, Discursul medico-social al igieniçtilor români. Abordarea
specificitâtilor locale din perspectiva experientelor occidental europene, secolele
XIX-XX, Bucuresti, Editura Muzeului National al Literaturii Române
Livadâ-Cadeschi, Ligia, Laurentiu Vlad, 2002, Departamentul de cremenalion. Din
activitatea unei instante penale muntene (1794-1795), Bucureçti, Nemira.
Locher, Miriam, Derek Bousfield, 2008, introduction: impoliteness and power in language”
in Bousfield/Locher (eds.) 2008: 1-14.
Lovinescu, Eugen, 1972, Istoria civilizatiei române moderne, Bucuresti, Editura Stiintificà.
Lucaites, John Louis, Celeste Michelle Condit, Sally Caudill, 1999, Contemporary
Rhetorical Theory: A Reader, New York/London, The Guilford Press.
Lyons, John, 1994, „Subjecthood and subjectivity”, in Yaguello (ed.) 1994: 9-17.
Macagno, Fabrizio, 2008, „The dialectical-dialogical definitions”, VAnalisi Linguistica e
Letteraria XVI Special issue [Word Meaning in Argumentative Dialogue], 1,
p. 443-461.
Macagno, Fabrizio, 2010, „Definitions in law”, Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée,
Centre de linguistique Appliquée, Numéro spécial 2, p. 199-217.
Macagno, Fabrizio, 2014, „Presupposing redefinitions”, în Herman/Oswald (eds.) 2014:
249-278.
Macagno, Fabrizio, Douglas Walton, 2008, „Persuasive definitions: values, meanings and
implicit disagreements”, Informal logic, 28, 3, p. 203-228.
Macagno, Fabrizio, Douglas Walton, 2017, ,interpreting straw man argumentation: the
pragmatics of quotation and reporting”, Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy
Psychology, Cham, Springer.
Macagno, Fabrizio, Giovanni Damele, 2015, „The hidden acts of definition in law: statutory
definitions and burden of persuasion”, in Araszkiewicz/Krysztof Pleszka (eds.) 2015:
225-251.
Macrea, Dimitrie, Emil Petrovici, Ai. Rosetti (coord.), 1955-1957, Dictionarul lirnbii
române literare contemporane, Bucuresti, Editura Academiei RPR. [DLRLC]
Maingueneau, Dominique, 2008, Lingvisticapentru textul literar, Iasi, Institutul European.
Maiorescu, Titu, 1967, Critice, I, Bucuresti, Editura pentru Literature.
Mamina, Ion, 1997, Consilii de Coroanâ, Bucuresti, Editura Enciclopedica.
Mamina, Ion, 2000, Monarhia constitutionalâ în România. Enciclopediepoliticâ 1866-1938,
Bucuresti, Editura Enciclopedica.
Mamina, Ion, Ion Bulei, 1994, Guveme §i guvemanfi (1866-1916), Bucuresti, Silex.
Manin, Bernard, 1997, Le principe de souveraineté. Histoires et fondements du pouvoir
moderne, Paris, Gallimard.
Martin, James Robert, 2003, ,introduction”, în Text, 23, 2, Special Issue on Evaluation,
p. 171-181.
Marton, Silvia, 2009, La construction politique de la nation. La nation dans les débats du
Parlament de la Roumanie (1866-1871), Iaçi, Institutul European.
Marton, Silvia, 2011, „‘Faction’? ‘Coterie’? ‘Parti’? L’émergence des partis politiques
roumains au XIXe siècle”, în Marton/Oroveanu/Turcanu (eds.) 2011: 85-138.
Marton, Silvia, 2013, „Le bipartisme à l’épreuve. Rivalités, déviances électorales et
démocratisation en Roumanie”, în Marton/Vintilâ-Ghitulescu (dir.) 2013: 293-315.
DISCURSUL PARLAMENTAR ROMÂNESC ( 1866-1938). O PERSPECTIVA PRAGMA-RETOR1CÀ
495
Marton, Silvia, 2014a, ,3ecoming political professionals. Members of parliament in
Romania (1866-1914)”, in Pál/Popovici (eds.) 2014: 267-280.
Marton, Silvia, 2014b, „Patronage, représentation et élections en Roumanie de 1875 à
1914”, în Monier/Dard/Engels (eds.) 2014: 141-166.
Marton, Silvia, 2016, „República de la Ploiesti” si începuturile parlamentarismului în
Romania, Bucuresti, Humanitas.
Marton, Silvia, 2017, ,3’élitisme des réseaux : Les difficultés de la professionnalisation de
la politique en Roumanie (1866-1914)”, în Marton/Monier/Dard (dir.) 2017: 97-110.
Marton, Silvia, Anca Oroveanu, Florin Turcanu (eds.), 2011, L’Etat en France et en
Roumanie aux XIXe et XXe s., Actes du colloque organisé au New Europe College —
Institut d’études avancées les 26-27février 2010, Bucuresti, New Europe College.
Marton, Silvia, Constanta Vintilâ-Ghitulescu (dir.), 2013, Penser le XIXe siècle. Nouveaux
chantiers de recherche, lasi, Editura Universitâtii „ALI. Cuza”.
Marton, Silvia, Frédéric Monier, Olivier Dard (dir.), 2017, Moralité du pouvoir et corruption
en France et en Roumanie, XVlile-XXe siècle, Paris, Presses Universitaires de Paris-
Sorbonne.
Mâgureanu, Anca, 2010, „Argument pour la transifastique: les actes metal inguistiques”, în
lonescu-Ruxàndoiu/Hoinârescu (eds.) 2010: 27-46.
Mey, Jacob L. (ed.), 1998, Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics, Amsterdam etc., Elsevier.
Mey, Jacob L., 2000, When Voices Clash: A Study in Literary Pragmatics, Berlin, Mouton
De Gruyter.
Miecznikowski, Johanna, 2007, „Modality and conversational structure in French”, în Berlin
(ed.) 2007: 49-60.
Mihalache, Catalina, 2016, Copilârie, familie, çcoalâ: politici educationale si receptâri
sociale, lasi, Editura Universitâtii „AL L Cuza”.
Mihalache, Catalina, Leonidas Rados (coord.), 2015, Educafia publica çi conditionârile sale
(secolele XIX-XX), Iasi, Editura Universitâtii „Al. I. Cuza”.
Miller, Yvonne, 2006, Irony and Politeness: Softening or Enhancing Face-Threats.
www.grin.com
Mills, Sara, 2009, „Impoliteness in a cultural context”, Journal of Pragmatics, 41,
p. 1047-1060.
Mio, Jeffery Scott, 1996, „Metaphor, politics and persuasion”, în Mio/Katz (eds.) 1996:
127-146.
Mio, Jeffery Scott, 1997, ,JMetaphor and politics”, Metaphor and Symbol, 12, 2, p. 113-133.
Mio, Jeffrey Scott, A.N. Katz (eds.), 1996, Metaphor: Implications and Applications,
Mahwah, N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Monier, Frédéric, Olivier Dard, Jens Ivo Engels (eds.), 2014, Patronage et corruption
politiques dans VEurope contemporaine, Paris, Armand Colin.
Morreal, John, 2004, „Verbal humor without switching scripts and without non-bona
fide communication”, Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 17, 4,
p. 393 ^-00.
Mortelmans, Jesse, Tanya Mortelmans, Walter de Mulder (eds.), 2011, From Now to
Eternity, Coll. Cahiers Chronos 22, Amsterdam/New York, Editions Rodopi.
Mulkay, Michael, 1988, On Humour: Its Nature and its Place in Society, Cambridge, Polity
Press.
Muraru, loan, Mihai Constantinescu, 2005, Drept parlamentar románese, Bucuresti, Editura
All Beck.
496
REFERINJE
Muraru, loan, Simina Tànàsescu, 2002, Drepi constitutional $i instituai politice; editia a X-a,
Bucuresti, Lumina Lex.
Musolff, Andreas, 2004, Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in
Debates about Europe, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
Musolff, Andreas, 2014, „The metaphor of the “body politic” across languages and
cultures”, în Polzenhagen/Kôvecses/ Vogelbacher/Kleinke (eds.) 2014: 85-99.
Myers, Greg, 1998, ,institutions, writing and talk in environmental discourse”, in Hunston
(ed.) 1998: 1-13.
Nastasà-Matei, Irina, Laurentiu Vlad (eds.), 2014, Universitate si Política Bucuresti, Editura
Universitàtii din Bucuresti.
Neagoe, Liviu (ed.), 2012, Elite, natiune si societate în Románia moderna, Cluj, Presa
Universitarâ Clujeanâ.
Negulescu, P. P., 1984, Geneza formel or culturii, Bucuresti, Eminescu.
Neumann, Victor, 2010a, „Este utilâ rescrierea istoriei României? Evolupa conceptelor
social-politice çi altemativele interpretative” în Neumann/Heinen (eds.) 2010: 11-34.
Neumann, Victor, 2010b, „Neam si popor: notiunile etnocentrismului románese”, în
Neumann/Heinen (eds.) 2010: 379-400.
Neumann, Victor, Armin Heinen (eds.), 2010, Istoria României prin concepte. Perspective
alternative asupra limbajelor social-politice, Iasi, Polirom.
Nicolet, Claude, 1982, L idée républicaine en France. Essai d histoire critique, Paris,
Gallimard.
Niculescu, Alexandru, 1980, între filologiefi poética, Bucuresti, Eminescu.
Norrick, Neal R., 1993, Conversational joking. Humor in everyday talk, Bloomington,
Indiana University Press.
Norrick, Neal R., 1994, „Involvement and joking in conversation”, Journal of Pragmatics,
22, 3-4, p. 409-430.
Norrick, Neal R., 2003, „Issues in conversational joking”, Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 9,
p. 1333-1359.
Norrick, Neal R., 2004, „Non-verbal humor and joke performance”, Humor:International
journal of humor research, 17, 4, p. 401-409.
Norrick, Neal R., Delia Chiaro (eds.), 2009, Humor in Interaction, Amsterdam/Philadelphia,
John Benjamins.
Ochs, Elinor, 1992, „Indexing gender”, în Duranti/Goodwin (eds.) 1992: 335-358.
Ochs, Elinor, 1996, „Linguistic resources for socializing humanity”, în Gumperz/Levinson
(eds.) 1996: 407-438.
Offerlé, Michel, 2007, „Capacités politiques et politisations : faire voter et voter, XIXe-XXe
siècles” (1), Genèses, 2, 67, p. 131-149.
Offerlé, Michel (dir.), 1999, La profession politique, XIXe-XXe siècles, Paris, Belin.
Ornea, Zigu, 1978,Junimeasi junimismul, ed. a Lt-a, Bucuresti, Eminescu.
Orton y, Andrew (ed.), 1993, Metaphor and Thought, ed. a fl-a, Cambridge, Cambridge
University Press.
Ostrogorski, Moisei, 1993 [1903], La démocratie et les partis politiques, Paris, Fayard.
Pâl, Judit, Vlad Popovici (eds.), 2014, Elites and Politics in Central and Eastern Europe
(1848-1918), Frankfurt am Main, Berlin etc., Peter Lang.
Pana Dindelegan, Gabriela (coord.), 2007, Limba românâ. Stadiul actual al cercetârii,
Bucuresti, Editura Universitàtii din Bucuresti.
DISCURSUL PARLIAMENTAR ROMÂNESC (1866-1938). O PERSPECT1VÂ PRAGMA-RETOR1CÀ
497
Pana Dindelegan, Gabriela, Adina Dragomirescu (eds.), 2008, Limba românâ. Dinamica
limbii, Dinamica interprétant Actele celui de al 7-lea Colocviu al Catedrei de
Limba Românâ (7-8 decembrie 2007), Bucureçti, Editura Universitâpi din Bucure§ti.
Partington, Alan, 2006, The Linguistics of Laughter A Corpus-Assisted Study of Laughter-Talk,
London/New York, Routledge, Taylor Francis Group.
Patard, Adeline, Arnaud Richard, 2011, „Attenuation in French simple tenses”, m
Mortelmans/Mortelmans/de Mulder (eds.) 2011: 157-178.
Perelman, Chaim, 2002, L empire rhétorique. Rhétorique et argumentation, ed. a Il-a, Paris,
Vrin.
Perelman, Chaim, Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca, 1958, La nouvelle rhétorique. Traité d’
argumentation, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.
Perelman, Chaim, Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca, 2008 [1958], Traité de Targumentation, 6e
édition, préface par Michel Meyer, Bruxelles, Editions de FUniversité de Bruxelles.
Petrescu-Dîmbovita, Mircea, Alexandru Vulpe (coord.), 2001-2013, Istoria românilor, Vol.
1-10, Bucuresti, Academia Românà/Editura Enciclopedicâ.
Phélippeau, Eric, 2002, L invention de l homme politique moderne. Mackau, l Orne et la
République, Paris, Belin.
Plantin, Christian, 1999, „La construction rhétorique des émotions”, în Rigotti/Cigada (eds.)
1999:203-219.
Platon, [1986] Opéré V. Republica, traducere de Andrei Cornea, editie îngrijitâ de
Constantin Noica §i Petru Cretia, Bucuresti, Editura Çtiinpficà §i Enciclopedicâ.
Ploscaru, Cristian, 2013, Originile ,,partidei nationale din Principatele Romane, /, Sub
semnul„politicii boieresti (1774-1828), Iasi, Editura Universitàtii „AL I. Cuza”.
Ploscaru, Cristian, Mihai-Bogdan Atanasiu (ed.), 2017, Elitele puterii - puterea elitelor în
spatiul românesc (secolele XV-XX), Iasi, Editura Universitàtii „Al. I. Cuza”.
Polzenhagen, Frank, Zoltán Kôvecses, Stefanie Vogelbacher, Sonja Kleinke (eds.), 2014,
Cognitive Explorations into Metaphor and Metonymy. Frankfurt am Main, Peter
Lang.
Precht, Kristen, 2003, „Stance moods in spoken English: evidentiality and affect in British
and American conversation”, Text 23(2), p. 239-257.
Preda, Cristian, 2011, Rumânii fericitl Votsiputere de la 1831 pânâ înprezent, Iasi, Polirom.
Priego-Val verde, Beatrice, 2003, L humour dans la conversation familière,
Paris/Budapest/Torino, l Harmattan.
Priego-Valverde, Béatrice, 2009, „Failed humor in conversation. A double voicing analysis”,
în Norrick/Chiaro (eds.) 2009: 165-188.
Psathas, George, 1998, „Ethnomethodology”, in Mey (ed.) 1998: 290-294.
Quintilian, Institutio oratoria [orice edipe latinà] http://www.thelatinlibrary.com
/quintilian.html
Rachels, James (ed.), 1998, Ethical Theory 1. The Question of Objectivity, Oxford, Oxford
University Press.
Radman, Zdravko (ed.), 1995, From a Metaphorical Point of View. A Multidisciplinry
Approach to the Cognitive Content of Metaphor, Berlin, New York, De Gruyter.
Radu, Sorin, 2005, Modemizarea sistemului electoral din Romania (1866-1937), Iasi,
Institutul European.
Raskin, Viktor, 1985, Semantic Mechanisms of Humour, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster, D.
Reidel.
498
REFERÏNTE
Rädulescu, Mihai Sorin, 1998, Elita liberalä româneascâ (1866-1900), Bucuresti, ALL.
Rémond, René (dir.), 1998, Pour une histoire politique, Paris, Seuil.
Richards, Ivor Armstrong, 1936, The Philosophy of Rhetoric, Oxford, Oxford University
Press.
Richter, Melvin, 1990, „Reconstructing the history of political languages: Pocock, Skinner,
and the Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe”, History and Theory, 29, 1, p. 38-70.
Ricoeur, Paul, 1990, Soi comme un autre, Paris, Seuil.
Rigotti, Eddo, Sara Cigada (eds.), 1999, Rhetoric and Argumentation. Proceedings of the
1997 lAD A International conference, Lugano, 22 April 1997 (Beiträge zur
Dialogforschung), Tübingen, Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Rigotti, Francesca, 1995, The House as Metaphor, în Radman (ed.) 1995: 419-446.
Rohrer, Tim, 2005, „Image schemata in the brain”, in Hampe/Grady (eds.) 2005: 165-196.
Roibu, Melania, 2008, Mijloace lingvistice de reaiizare a funcfiei metacomunicative in limha
romänä, tezä de doctorat, Facultatea de Litere, Universitatea din Bucure§ti.
Roibu, Melania, 2010,,forme de metacomunicare in discursurile lui Armand Cälinescu”, in
Zafiu/Dragomirescu/Nicolae (eds.) 2010: 307-314.
Roibu, Melania, MihaelaN. Constantinescu, 2010, „Verbal Aggressiveness in the Romanian
Parliamentary Debate. Past and Present”, Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, 4,
p. 353-364.
Roibu, Melania, Oana U(ä-Bärbulescu, 2011, „Evaluarea de dicto în discursul parlamentar
din perioada interbelica. Studiu de caz: Armand Cälinescu”, în Zafiu/U§urelu/Bogdan
Oprea (eds.) 2011:281-288.
Roman, Nicoleta, 2016, „Deznädäjduitä mniere n-au fast ca mine“. Femei, onoare sipacat
în Valahia secolului al XIX-le a, Bucuresti, Humanitas.
Rosanvallon, Pierre, 1992, Le sacre du citoyen. Histoire du suffrage universel en France,
Paris, Gallimard.
Rosan vallon, Pierre, 1998, Le peuple introuvable. Histoire de la représentation
démocratique en France, Paris, Gallimard.
Rosanvallon, Pierre, 2003, Pour une histoire conceptuelle du politique, Leçon inaugurale au
Collège de France, Paris, Seuil.
Rosenblum, Nancy L„ 2008, On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and
Partisanship, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Roulet, Eddy, Antoine Auchlin, Jacques Moeschler, Christian Rubattel, Marianne Schelling,
1985, L’articulation du discours en français contemporain, Bema/Frankfurt pe
Main, Peter Lang.
Sacks, Harvey, 1972/1974, „On the Analysability of Stories by Children”, in Turner (ed.)
1974:216-232.
Sacks, Harvey, 1992, Lectures on Conversation (ed. G. Jefferson), Oxford, Blackwell
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel Schegloff, Gail Jefferson, 1974, „A simplest systematics for the
organization of turn-taking in conversation”, Language, 50, p. 696-735.
Sartori, Giovanni, 1976, Parties and Party Systems. A Framework for Analysis, vol. I,
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Säftoiu, Räzvan, 2013, Politics through the Lens of Linguistic Analysis, Braçov, Editura
Universitätii Transilvania din Bra§ov.
Säftoiu, Räzvan, Carmen Popescu, 2014, „Humor as a branding strategy in political
discourse. A case study from Romania”, Revista Signos, 47, 85, p. 293-320.
DISCURSUL PARLAMENTAR ROMANESC (1866-1938). O PERSPECT1VA PRAGMA-RETORICA
499
Saftoiu, Razvan, Ionela Neagu, Stanca Mada (eds.), 2015, Persuasive Games in Political
and Professional Dialogues, Amsterdam/Philadephia, John Benjamins.
Salavastru, Andrei, 2012, „Disease of the body, disease of the state: A methaphor of political
discourse in XVIth century England (Thomas Starkey)“, in Argumentum, 10, 1, p.
18-47. http://www.fssp.uaic.ro/argumentum/Numarul%2011/Articol%20Andrei%20
Salavastru.pdf
Sbisa, Marina, 1999, „Ideology and the persuasive use of presuppositions”, in Verschueren
(ed.) 1999: 492-509.
Schegloff, Emanuel A„ 2007, Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in
Conversation Analysis I, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Scheibman, Joanne, 2007, „Subjective and intersubjective uses of generalizations in English
conversations”, in Englebretson (ed.) 2007: 111-138.
Schiappa, Edward, 1993,, Arguing about definitions”, Argumentation 7, 4, p. 403^-17.
Schiappa, Edward, 1996, „Toward a pragmatic approach to definition: ‘wetlands’ and the
politics of meaning” in Light/Katz (eds.) 1996: 209—230.
Schiappa, Edward, 2003, Defining Reality: Definitions arid the Politics of Meaning,
Carbondale and Edwardsville, Southern Illinois University Press.
Schiffiin, Deborah, 1980, „Meta-Talk: organizational and evaluative brackets in discourse”,
Sociological Inquiry, 50, p. 199-236.
Schulze, Hagen, 2003, St at nafiune in istoria europeana, traducere. de Hans Neumann,
Iasi, Polirom.
Sdrobis, Dragos, 2015, Limitele meritocratiei intr-o societate agrard. Somaj intelectual si
radicalizare politicd a tineretului in Romania interbelicd, Iasi, Polirom.
Searle, John R., 1969, Speech Acts, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Searle, John R„ 1979, Expression and Meanings, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Seche, Mircea, Luiza Seche, 2002, Dicfionar de Sinonime, Bucuresti, Litera International.
[DS]
Semino, Elena, 2008, Metaphor in Discourse, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Sharon E., Jarvis, John Durham Peters, Joseph B. Walther, 2006, „Audience”, in Sloane
(ed.) 2006 (16.02.2007, http://www.oxfordrhetoric.com/entry?entry=t223.e30-sl).
Shenhav, Shaul, 2008, „Showing and telling in the parliamentary discourse”, Discourse and
Society, 19(2), p. 223-255.
Simon, Bemd, 2004, Identity in Modem Society. A Social Psychological Perspective,
Oxford, Blackwell.
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie, Peter R. R. White, Karin Aijmer, 2007, „Presupposition
and „taking-for-granted” in mass communicated political argument”, in
Fetzer/Lauerbach (eds.) 2007: 31-74.
Siupiur, Elena, 2004, Intelectuali, elite, clase politice modeme in sud-estul european.
Secolul XIX, Bucuresti, Editura Dominor.
Skinner, Quentin, 1988, „Reply to my critics”, inTully(ed.) 1988: 231-288.
Skinner, Quentin, Bo Strath (eds.), 2003, States and Citizens. History, Theory, Prospectsf
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Sloane, Thomas O. (ed.), 2001, Encyclopedia of Rhetoric, Oxford University Presss. [ER]
Sloane, Thomas O. (ed.), 2006, Encyclopedia of Rhetoric, Oxford, Oxford University Press
(e-reference edition, www.oxford-rhetoric.com).
500
REFERINTE
Sora, Andrei-Florin, 2011, Servir l’Etat roumain. Le corps préfectoral, 1866-1940,
Bucuresti, Editura Universitàtii din Bucuresti.
Spencer-Oatey, Helen, 2007, „Theories of identity and the analysis of face”, Journal of
Pragmatics, 39, 4, p. 639-656.
Spengler, Oswald, 1976, Le déclin de l’Occident Esquisse d’une morphologie universelle.
IL Perspectives de l’histoire universelle, trad, din germana de M. Tazerout, Paris,
Gallimard.
Sperber, Dan (ed.), 2000, Metarepresentation, New York, Oxford University Press.
Sperber, Dan, Deirdre Wilson, 1978, „Les ironies comme mentions”, Poétique, 36, p. 399-412.
Sperber, Dan, Deirdre Wilson, 1986, Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Cambridge,
MA, Harvard University Press.
Stan, Apostol, 1979, Grupâri si cúrente politice în România între Uniré fi Independentâ
(1859-1877), Bucuresti, Editura Stiintifieâ si Enciclopédica.
Stan, Apostol, Mircea losa, 1996, Liberalismul politic în România: de la origini pânâ la
1918, Bucuresti, Editura Enciclopédica.
Stanomir, loan, 2008, Spintul conservator: de la Barbu Catargiu la Nicolae ïorga,
Bucure^ti, Curtea Veche.
Stanomir, loan, Laurentiu Vlad, 2002, A fi conservator; antologie, comentarii fi bibliografie
de loan Stanomir fi Laurentiu Vlad, Bucuresti, Universitatea din Bucuresti, Institutul
de Cercetâri Politice Meridiane.
Steiner, Jürg, André Bachtiger, Markus Spômdli, Marco R. Steenbergen, 2004, Deliberative
Politics in Action, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Stevenson, Charles Leslie, 1937, „The emotive meaning of ethical terms”, Mind, 46, 181,
p. 14-31.
Stevenson, Charles Leslie, 1938, „Persuasive definitions”, Mind, 47, 187, p. 331-350.
Stevenson, Charles Leslie, 1963, Facts and Values: Studies in Ethical Analysis, New Haven
and London, Yale University Press.
Stevenson, Charles Leslie, 1998, „The nature of ethical disagreement” (reproduction on
Facts and Values), în Rachels (ed.) 1998: 43-50.
Stryker, Sheldon, 1987, Jdentity theory: developments and extensions”, in Yardley/Honess
(eds.) 1987: 89-103.
Sugar, Peter F., Ivo J. Lederer (eds.), 1994, Nationalism in Eastern Europe, Seattle,
University of Washington Press.
Svacinová, Iva, 2017, „The role of quasi-logical arguments in critical dialogue: a pragma-
dialectical redefinition”, Informal Logic 37, 1, p. 42-69.
Serbànescu, Andra, 2007, Cum gândesc si cum vorbesc ceilaltl Prin labirintul culturilor,
Iasi, Polirom.
Çtefanescu, Ariadna, 2008, „Argumentarea m discursul politic. Câteva observafii referitoare
la natura conflictualâ $i la aspectele emociónale ale discursului parlamentar”, in Pana
Dindelegan/Dragomirescu (eds.) 2008: 549-559.
Çtefanescu, Ariadna, 2010, „Remarks on the conceptual tropes of the political act of union in
Mihail Kogàlniceanu’s speech in parliament”, Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, LV,
4, p. 381-396.
Çtefanescu, Ariadna, 201 la, „Conceptual metaphors and flexibility in political notions in use
in 19th century Romanian parliamentary discourse”, în van Eemeren/Garssen/
Godden/Mitchell (eds.) 2011: 1828-1840.
DISCURSUL PARLAMENTAR ROMÂNESC (1866-1938). O PERSPECTIVA PRAGMA-RETORICÂ
501
Çtelanescu, Ariadna, 2011b, „Dezbaterea parlamentará din perspectiva unei abordári
etnometodologice: aspecte teoretice §i practici de comunicare”, ín
Zafiu/Uçurelu/Bogdan Oprea (eds.) 2011: 289-304.
$tetanescu, Ariadna, 2012, „Imaginea oratorului ín discursul parlamentar románese din
secolul al XIX-lea: metoda de analiza §i studiu de caz”, ín Constan tin escu/Stoi ca/Uja
Barbulescu (eds.) 2012: 511-525.
§tefanescu, Ariadna, 2015,, Analysing the rhetoric use of the epistemic marker Eu credcâ (7
think) in Romanian parliamentary discourse”, in Sàftoiu/Neagu/Màda (eds.), 2015:
101-143.
Tajfel, Henri (ed.), 1982, Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, Cambridge, Cambridge
University Press.
Tajfel, Henri, John C. Turner, 1986, „The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour”, in
Worehel/Austin (eds.) 1986: 7-24.
Tannen, Deborah, 2005 [1984], Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk Among Friends, edi(ie
revàzutâ, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Tannen, Deborah, 2010, ,Abduction and identity in family interaction: Ventriloquizing as
indirectness”, Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2, p. 307—316.
Taylor, James R., François Cooren, 1997, „What makes communication organizational”,
Journal of Pragmatics, 27, p. 409-438.
Tànâsescu, Florian, 2000, Parlamentul si viata parlamentará din România: 1930 — 1940,
Bucuresti, Lumina Lex.
Theillier, Damien, 2012, „Hegel et la divinisation de l État”, Le Québécois libre, nr. 299.
http://www.quebecoislibre.org/12/ 120415-4.html
Thompson, Geoffrey, Susan Hunston, 2000, „Evaluation: an introduction”, în
Hunston/Thompson (eds.) 2000: 1-27.
Tindale, Christopher W., 2011, „Character and knowledge: learning from the speech of
experts”, Argumentation, 25, p. 341-353 (DOI 10.1007/s10503-011-9224-9,
Published online: 2 August 2011).
Tognini-Bonelli, Elena, Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.), 2005, Strategies in Academie
Discourses, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins.
Topor, Claudiu-Lucian, Alexandru Istrate, Daniel Cain (ed.), 2015, Diplomad, societate si
mondenitâtL Sfârçit de ,,Belle Epoque” în lumea româneascâ, Iasi, Editura
Universita^ii „Ah I. Cuza”.
Tsakona, Villy, 2013, „Parliamentary punning: is the opposition more humorous than the
ruling party?”, The European Journal of Humour Research, 1,2, p. 101-111.
Tsakona, Villy, Diana Elena Popa (eds.), 2011, Studies in Political Humour: In between
Political Critique and Public Entertainment, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John
Benjamins.
Tselika, Aikaterini, 2015, „Irony as an impoliteness tool: an exploration of irony’s
intentionality, cancellability and strength”, Athens: ATINER S Conference Paper
Series, No: LNG2014-1372. http://www.atiner.gr/papers/LNG2014-1372.pdf
Tully, James H. (ed.), 1988, Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics,
Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Turner, John C., Michael Hogg, Penelope Oakes, Stephen Reicher, Margaret Wetherell,
1987, Rediscovering the Social Group. A Self-Categorization Theory, Blackwell,
Oxford.
502
REFER1NJE
Turner, Mark, 1996, The Literary Mind, New York, Oxford University Press.
Turner, Roy (ed.), 1974, Ethnomethodology. Selected Readings, Harmondsworth, Penguin
Education.
Ullah, Phillip, 1990, „Rhetoric and ideology in social identification: The case of second
generation Irish Youths”, Discourse and Society, 1(2), p. 167-188.
U(à Bârbulescu, Oana, Melania Roibu, 2011, „Strategii de atenuare çi de evaluare in
secvenja exordialà din discursul parlamentar (Studiu de caz: discursurile lui Armand
Càlinescu)”, în Chelaru-Murâruç/Cvasnîi Càtânescu/Ene/Uçurelu/Zafiu (eds.) 2011:
503-510.
van de Mieroop, Dorien, 2005, „An integrated approach of quantitative and qualitative
analysis in the study of identity in speeches”, Discourse and Society, 16, (1), p. 107-
130.
van Dijk, Teun A. 1998, Ideology, London, Sage.
van Dijk, Teun A., 2003, „Knowledge in parliamentary debates”, Journal of Language and
Politics, 2(1), p. 93-129.
van Dijk, Teun A., 2004, „Text and context of parliamentary debates”, în Bayley (ed.): 339-372.
van Dijk, Teun A., 2006, „Discourse and manipulation”, Discourse and Society, 17(3), p.
359-383.
van Dijk, Teun A., 2008, Context, Discourse and Context. A Sociocognitive Approach,
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
van Dijk, Teun A., 2010, „Political identities in parliamentary debates”, in Ilie (ed.) 2010:
29-56.
van Dijk, Teun A. (ed.), 1985, Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vol. 4, London, Academic
Press.
van Dijk, Teun A. (ed.), 1997, Discourse as Social Interaction, vol. II, Londra, Sage.
van Eemeren, Frans H., 2010, Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse.
Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation, Amsterdam/Philadelphia,
John Benjamins.
van Eemeren, Frans H. (ed.), 2009, Examining Argumentation in Context Fifteen Studies on
Strategic Maneuvering, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Rob Grootendorst, 1987, „Fallacies in pragma-dialectical
perspective”, Argumentation, I, 3, p. 283-301.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Rob Grootendorst, 2004, A Systematic Theory of Argumentation.
The Pragma-Dialectical Approach, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
van Eemeren, Frans H„ Rob Grootendorst, 2010, Argumentare, comunicare $i sofisme. O
perspectivâ pragma-dialecticâ, Traducere din limba englezâ de Corina Andone si
Anca Gâta, Galati, Galati University Press.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Rob Grootendors, Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, 2002,
Argumentation. Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation, Mahwah, New Jersey, Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Peter Houtlosser, 2009, „Strategic maneuvering: examining
argumentation in context” in van Eemeren (ed.) 2009: 1-25.
van Eemeren, Frans H. J., Anthony Blair, Charles A. Willard, Bart Garssen (eds.), 2007,
Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of
Argumentation, Amsterdam, SicSat.
DISCURSUL PARLAMENTAR ROMÁNESC (1866-1938). O PERSPECTIVA PRAGMA-RETORICÁ
503
van Eemeren, Frans FL, Bart Garssen, David Godden, Gordon Mitchell (eds.), 2011,
Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of
Argumentation, Amsterdam, Rozenberg/Sic Sat.
van Eemeren, Frans FL, Bart Garssen, Erik C.W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans,
Bart Verheij, Jean H.M. Wagemans, 2014, Handbook of Argumentation Theory,
Dordrecht, Springer.
van Eemeren, Frans FL, Charles A. Willard, Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), 2003,
Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the International Society for the Study of
Argumentation, Amsterdam, Sic Sat.
van Laar, Jan Albert, 2010, „Argumentative bluff in eristic discussion: an analysis and
evaluation”, Argumentation, 24, p. 383-398 (DOI 10.1007/s10503-010-9184-5,
Published online: 18 April 2010).
van Leeuwen, Theo, 2007, „Legitimation”, Discourse and Communication, 1(1), p. 91-112.
Vasilescu, Andra, 2010, „Metastance in the Romanian parliamentary discourse: Case
studies”, Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, LV( 4), p. 365-380.
Vasilescu, Andra, 2011, „Constructia identitátii parlamentare. Cadrul teoretic”, in
Zafiu/Usurelu/Bogdan Oprea (eds.) 2011: 305-315.
Vasilescu, Andra, 2012, „Constructing the parliamentary identity: The Romanian case
(1866-1923)”, in Ionescu-Ruxándoiu/Roibu/Constantinescu (eds.) 2012: 209-225.
Vasilescu, Andra, 2017, „Drumul ca metafora identitará in discursul parlamentar románese
(1866-1932)”, in Cráciun/Teodorescu (eds.) 2017: 17-36.
Verschueren, Jef (ed.), 1999, Language and Ideology. Selected Papers from the 6th
International Pragmatic Conference, I, Antwerp, IPRA.
Vet, Co, Brigitte Kampers-Manhe, 2001, „Futur simple et futur du passé: leurs emplois
temporels et modaux”, in Dendale/Tasmowski (eds.) 2001: 89-104.
Vintilá-Ghitulescu, Constanta, 2013, Evgheniti, ciocoi, mojici. Despre obrazele primei
modemitáti románe§ti (1750-1860% Bucuresti, Humanitas.
Vlastos, Gregory, 2002, Socrate. Ironist §i filosof moral, Bucuresti, Humanitas.
Wagemans, Jean H. M., 2011, „The assessment of argumentation from expert opinion”,
Argumentation, 25, p. 329-339 (DOI 10.1007/s 10503-011-9225-8, Published online:
26 July 2011).
Walton, Douglas, 1996, Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning, Mahwah, N.J.,
Erlbaum.
Walton, Douglas, 1997, Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments from Authority, University
Park, PA, Penn State University Press.
Walton, Douglas, 2001a, „Persuasive definitions and public policy arguments”,
Argumentation and Advocacy 37, p. 117—132.
Walton, Douglas, 2001b, „Enthymemes, common knowledge and plausible inferences”,
Philosophy and Rhetoric, 34, p. 117-132.
Walton, Douglas, 2004, Relevance in Argumentation, Mahwah/New Jersey/London,
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Walton, Douglas, 2006, Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation, Cambridge, Cambridge
University Press.
Walton, Douglas, Fabrizio Macagno, 2006, „Common knowledge in argumentation”,
Studies in Communication Sciences, 6,1, p. 3—26.
504
REFERINJE
Walton, Douglas, Fabrizio Macagno, 2010, „Wrenching from context: the manipulation of
commitments”, Argumentation, 24, p. 283-317 (DOI 10.1007/s10503-009-9157-8).
Walton, Douglas, Fabrizio Macagno, 2011, „Quotations and presumptions: dialogical effects
of misquotations”, Informal Logic, 31, 1, p. 27-55.
Walton, Douglas, Marcin Koszowy, 2018, „Whately on authority, deference, presumption
and burden of proof’, Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric, 36, 2,
p. 179-204. DOI: 10.1525/rh.20l8.36.2.I79
Walton, Douglas, Christopher Reed, Fabrizio Macagno, 2008, Argumentation Schemes,
Cambridge/New York/Melboume, Cambridge University Press.
Watts, Richard J., 1991, Power in Family Discourse, Berlin/New York, Mouton de Gruyter.
Weigand, Edda, 2009, Language as Dialogue. From Rules to Principles of Probability, ed.
by Sebastian Feller. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Weigand, Edda, 2010, Dialogue: The Mixed Games, Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Weil, Eric, 1950, Hegel et TEtat, Paris, Vrin.
White, Peter R.R., 2006, „Evaluative semantics and ideological positioning in journalistic
discourse - a new framework for analysis”, in Lassen/Strunck/Vestergaard (eds.)
2006: 37-69.
Wilson, John, 1981, „Come on now answer the question: an analysis of constraints on
answers”, Belfasst Working Papers in Language and Linguistics, 5, p. 93-121.
Wodak, Ruth, Michael Meyer (eds.), 2001, Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, London,
Sage.
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf De Cillia, Rudolf, Martin Reisigl, Martin, Karin Liebhart, 2009, The
Discursive Construction of National Identity, Second Edition, Edinburgh, Edinburgh
University Press.
Wodak, Ruth, Veronika Roller, 2008, Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere,
Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter.
Woodward, Kath, 2002, Understanding Identity, London, Arnold.
Worchel, Stephen, William G. Austin (eds.), 1986, Psychology of Intergroup Relations,
Chicago, Nelson.
Xenopol, A.D. (1910), Istoria partidelor politice in Romania, vol. I, Dela origini pana la
1866, Bucuresti, Albert Baer.
Yaguello, Marina (ed.), 1994, Subjecthood and Subjectivity: Proceedings of the Colloquium
The Status of the Subject in Linguistic Theory, Paris, Ophrys.
Yardley, Krisia, Terry Honess (eds.), 1987, Self and Identity: Psychosocial Perspectives,
Wiley, New York.
Yule, George, 1996, Pragmatics, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Zafiu, Rodica, 2012, „Argumentarea prin analogic: criterii de evaluare fi strategii de
respingere” in Constantinescu/Stoica/Uja Barbulescu (eds.) 2012: 604-610.
Zafiu, Rodica, Blanca Croitor, Ana-Maria Mihail (ed.), 2009, Studii de gramatica. Omagiu
doamnei profesoare Valeria Gutu Romalo, Bucuresti, Editura Universitatii din
Bucuresti.
Zafiu, Rodica, Adina Dragomirescu, Alexandria Nicolae (eds.), 2010, Limba romana:
controverse, delimitari, noi ipoteze. Actele celui de al 9-lea colocviu al catedrei de
limba romana, vol. II, Bucuresti, Editura Universitatii din Bucuresti.
DISCURSUL PARLAMENTAR ROMÂNESC (1866-1938). O PERSPECTIVA PRAGMA-RETOR1CÀ
505
Zafiu, Rodica, Claudia Ene (ed.), 2015, Variaba lingvisticâ: Problème actúale. Actele Celui
de-al 14-lea Colocviu International al Departamentului de Lingvisticâ, vol. H,
Bucureçti, Editura Universita^ii din Bucureçti.
Zafiu, Rodica, Ariadna § tetan escu, Carmen Mârzea Vasile, Raluca Bràescu (ed.), 2013,
Actele celui de-al 12-lea Colocviu International al Departamentului de Lingvisticâ.
Limba românâ — Variare sincronicâ, variafie diacronicâ, Bucureçti, Editura
Universitâtii din Bucureçti.
Zafiu, Rodica, Camelia Uçurelu, Helga Bogdan Oprea (eds.), 2011, Limba românâ: ipostaze
ale variafiei lingvistice. Actele celui de-al 10-lea Colocviu al Catedrei de limba
românâ (Bucureçti, 3-4 decembtie 2010), vol. II. Pragmaticâ §i stilisticâ, Bucure$ti,
Editura Universitâtii din Bucureçti.
Zamfira, Andreea, 2007, flections et électeurs aux XIXe et XXe siècles. Une généalogie de
Tétude électorale en Roumanie”, Studia Política. Romanian Political Science Review,
VII, 2, p. 339-372.
Zarefsky, David, 1998, „Definitions”, în Klumpp (ed.) 1998: 1—11. Reprinted in Zarefsky
2014: 115-128.
Zarefsky, David, 2004, „Presidential rhetoric and the power of definitions46, Presidential
Studies Quarterly, 34, 3, p. 607-619. Reprinted in Zarefsky 2014: 225—238.
Zarefsky, David, 2006, „Strategic maneuvering through persuasive definitions: implications
for dialectic and rhetoric”, Argumentation, 20, 4, p. 399-416. Reprinted in Zarefsky
2014: 129-144.
Zarefsky, David, 2009, „Strategic maneuvering in political argumentation” In van Eemeren
(ed.) 2009: 115-130.
Zarefsky, David, 2014, Rhetorical Perspectives on Argumentation: Selected Essays, New
York, Springer.
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author2 | Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu, Liliana 1941- Constantinescu, Mihaela N. 1980- |
| author2_role | edt edt |
| author2_variant | l i r lir m n c mn mnc |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1028081162 (DE-588)1046827219 |
| author_facet | Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu, Liliana 1941- Constantinescu, Mihaela N. 1980- |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV045527028 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1090775456 (DE-599)BVBBV045527028 |
| era | Geschichte gnd |
| era_facet | Geschichte |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02473nam a2200541 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV045527028</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20190401 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">190325s2018 xx |||| 00||| rum d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9786061610242</subfield><subfield code="9">978-606-16-1024-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1090775456</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV045527028</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">rum</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Discursul parlamentar românesc (1866-1938)</subfield><subfield code="b">o perspectivă pragma-retorică</subfield><subfield code="c">coordonator Liliana Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu în colaborare cu Mihaela-Viorica Constantinescu</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Bucureşti</subfield><subfield code="b">Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">509 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Colecţia Lingvistică. Lingua</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rhetorik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4076704-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Pragmatismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4047046-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Diskurs</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4012475-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Parlament</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4044685-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rumänien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4050939-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4143413-4</subfield><subfield code="a">Aufsatzsammlung</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rumänien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4050939-4</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Parlament</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4044685-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Diskurs</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4012475-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Rhetorik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4076704-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pragmatismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4047046-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu, Liliana</subfield><subfield code="d">1941-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1028081162</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Constantinescu, Mihaela N.</subfield><subfield code="d">1980-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1046827219</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030911211&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030911211&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09034</subfield><subfield code="g">498</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">907.2</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0904</subfield><subfield code="g">498</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">907.2</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09034</subfield><subfield code="g">498</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0904</subfield><subfield code="g">498</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030911211</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Aufsatzsammlung |
| geographic | Rumänien (DE-588)4050939-4 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Rumänien |
| id | DE-604.BV045527028 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-20T18:29:25Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9786061610242 |
| language | Romanian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030911211 |
| oclc_num | 1090775456 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 509 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Colecţia Lingvistică. Lingua |
| spellingShingle | Discursul parlamentar românesc (1866-1938) o perspectivă pragma-retorică Rhetorik (DE-588)4076704-8 gnd Pragmatismus (DE-588)4047046-5 gnd Diskurs (DE-588)4012475-7 gnd Parlament (DE-588)4044685-2 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4076704-8 (DE-588)4047046-5 (DE-588)4012475-7 (DE-588)4044685-2 (DE-588)4050939-4 (DE-588)4143413-4 |
| title | Discursul parlamentar românesc (1866-1938) o perspectivă pragma-retorică |
| title_auth | Discursul parlamentar românesc (1866-1938) o perspectivă pragma-retorică |
| title_exact_search | Discursul parlamentar românesc (1866-1938) o perspectivă pragma-retorică |
| title_full | Discursul parlamentar românesc (1866-1938) o perspectivă pragma-retorică coordonator Liliana Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu în colaborare cu Mihaela-Viorica Constantinescu |
| title_fullStr | Discursul parlamentar românesc (1866-1938) o perspectivă pragma-retorică coordonator Liliana Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu în colaborare cu Mihaela-Viorica Constantinescu |
| title_full_unstemmed | Discursul parlamentar românesc (1866-1938) o perspectivă pragma-retorică coordonator Liliana Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu în colaborare cu Mihaela-Viorica Constantinescu |
| title_short | Discursul parlamentar românesc (1866-1938) |
| title_sort | discursul parlamentar romanesc 1866 1938 o perspectiva pragma retorica |
| title_sub | o perspectivă pragma-retorică |
| topic | Rhetorik (DE-588)4076704-8 gnd Pragmatismus (DE-588)4047046-5 gnd Diskurs (DE-588)4012475-7 gnd Parlament (DE-588)4044685-2 gnd |
| topic_facet | Rhetorik Pragmatismus Diskurs Parlament Rumänien Aufsatzsammlung |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030911211&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030911211&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ionescuruxandoiuliliana discursulparlamentarromanesc18661938operspectivapragmaretorica AT constantinescumihaelan discursulparlamentarromanesc18661938operspectivapragmaretorica |