The allocation of power between arbitral tribunals and state courts:
Gespeichert in:
| Beteilige Person: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
[Leiden]
Brill Nijhoff
2018
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Pocketbooks of The Hague Academy of International Law
|
| Links: | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030674179&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| Abstract: | The ultimate question that runs through all of our law of arbitration is the allocation of responsibility between state courts and arbitral0tribunals : If private tribunals assume the power to bind others in a definitive fashion, we must ask, where does this authority come from ?0Fundamentally different in this respect from a state judge, a private arbitrator may only derive his legitimacy from that exercise of private0ordering and self-government which characterizes any voluntary commercial transaction. This work begins then with the dimensions of that "consent" which alone can justify arbitral jurisdiction. The discussion is then carried forward to explore how party autonomy in the contracting process may be expanded, giving rise to the voluntary reallocation of authority between courts and arbitrators. It concludes with the necessary inquiry into the autonomy with respect to the "chosen law" that will govern the agreement to arbitrate itself |
| Beschreibung: | Literaturangaben |
| Umfang: | 599 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9789004388918 9004388915 9789004388925 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV045286746 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20191018 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 181113s2018 xx |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9789004388918 |9 978-90-04-38891-8 | ||
| 020 | |a 9004388915 |9 90-04-38891-5 | ||
| 020 | |a 9789004388925 |9 978-90-04-38892-5 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1099716292 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV045286746 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-M382 |a DE-739 | ||
| 084 | |a PU 1555 |0 (DE-625)139930: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Rau, Alan Scott |d 1942- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)101164343X |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The allocation of power between arbitral tribunals and state courts |c Alan Scott Rau |
| 264 | 1 | |a [Leiden] |b Brill Nijhoff |c 2018 | |
| 300 | |a 599 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Pocketbooks of The Hague Academy of International Law | |
| 500 | |a Literaturangaben | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a The ultimate question that runs through all of our law of arbitration is the allocation of responsibility between state courts and arbitral0tribunals : If private tribunals assume the power to bind others in a definitive fashion, we must ask, where does this authority come from ?0Fundamentally different in this respect from a state judge, a private arbitrator may only derive his legitimacy from that exercise of private0ordering and self-government which characterizes any voluntary commercial transaction. This work begins then with the dimensions of that "consent" which alone can justify arbitral jurisdiction. The discussion is then carried forward to explore how party autonomy in the contracting process may be expanded, giving rise to the voluntary reallocation of authority between courts and arbitrators. It concludes with the necessary inquiry into the autonomy with respect to the "chosen law" that will govern the agreement to arbitrate itself | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030674179&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030674179 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1819348946120605696 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter I. Dimensions of the problem: “consent” and agreement...................................................... A. The insidious “gateway” metaphor................ B. “I used to teach contracts, did you know that ?” : challenges based on a lack of “agree ment” and challenges to the “arbitration agree ment itself’...................................................... 1. “Incorporation by reference”..................... C. The burden of proof....................................... D. The construction of “true consent” : the Dallah case................................................................... E. “Contracts of adhesion”................................. F. Consent to arbitrate “this dispute”: default rules and the problem of “scope”.................. Chapter II. The unmysterious notion of “separabi lity” ........................................................................... A. “Just one more discretecontroversy”............ B. “To particularize is the alone distinction of merit”................................................................ C. “Lapse”, “expiration”, “rescission”............... D. The “illegality” of a contract........................ E. “The arbitration clause itself’........................ F. “Void, schmoid”............................................. G. Being and nothingness: or does the overall contract even “exist” ?.................................... 1. “Existence”: mutual mistake..................... 2. “Existence”: “agreements to agree” .... 3. “Existence”: negotiation and the stages of
agreement.................................................... 4. “Existence” : lack of authority.................. 5. “Existence” : “conditions precedent” . ... 6. “Existence”: minority................................. 7. “Separability with a vengeance” : the asym metrical arbitration clause........................... 15 20 29 40 58 64 89 105 125 137 142 148 155 171 183 186 192 194 208 215 217 223 236
10 Contents Chapter ПІ. The spectrum of “consent” : third parties, “preconditions”, and remedies.............................. A. The question of “scope”................................. B. Signatories and non-signatories..................... C. “Who, whom?”................................................. 1. Enforcing arbitration against a non-signa tory................................................................ 2. Enforcing arbitration against a signatory. . (a) Assignment: assignee and assignor together move to compel arbitration. . (b) Assignment: assignor alone moves to compel arbitration.............................. (c) Assignment: assignee alone moves to compel arbitration.............................. D. “Preconditions” and “admissibility”............... 1. “Not any more”........................................... 2. “It is possible”, says the gatekeeper, “but not now”....................................................... 3. BG Group v. Republic of Argentina .... E. Excluding remedies........................................... Chapter IV. “Party autonomy” and contractual reallocation of power.............................................. 252 269 291 295 299 300 320 323 325 330 330 342 348 366 380 A. The notion of party autonomy........................ B. Party autonomy and reallocation by contract . 1. Reviewing the bidding.............................. 2. First Options.............................................. (a) The “clear and unmistakable”............ 3. “Delegation” of authority and the “broad
clause”.......................................................... 4. Rent-A-Center and the “arbitration agree ment itself’................................................. 5. The dilemma of institutional rules............ 6. Building bridges........................................... 7. Class-wide proceedings.............................. C. “Expanded review”........................................... 380 391 391 393 399 409 429 449 456 471 Chapter V. “Party autonomy” and the choice of law 481 A. The “separable” governing law..................... B. The problem of Fredonia................................. C. The Restatement and the Rome Regulation . . 481 488 490 400
Contents и D. The Sarhank case................................................ E. The chosen law................................................... F. Substantive law and the Mastrobuono case . . G. English law : the Sulamérica case................... H. The “principle of validity”................................ I. “Federal common law”...................................... J. French law and the règle matérielle”............. K. “Formal validity”................................................ 502 512 531 544 551 559 571 581 About the Author......................................................... Biographical note...................................................... Principal publications............................................ 597 597 597
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Rau, Alan Scott 1942- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)101164343X |
| author_facet | Rau, Alan Scott 1942- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Rau, Alan Scott 1942- |
| author_variant | a s r as asr |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV045286746 |
| classification_rvk | PU 1555 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1099716292 (DE-599)BVBBV045286746 |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02264nam a2200337 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV045286746</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20191018 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">181113s2018 xx |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789004388918</subfield><subfield code="9">978-90-04-38891-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9004388915</subfield><subfield code="9">90-04-38891-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789004388925</subfield><subfield code="9">978-90-04-38892-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1099716292</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV045286746</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PU 1555</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139930:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rau, Alan Scott</subfield><subfield code="d">1942-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)101164343X</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The allocation of power between arbitral tribunals and state courts</subfield><subfield code="c">Alan Scott Rau</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">[Leiden]</subfield><subfield code="b">Brill Nijhoff</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">599 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pocketbooks of The Hague Academy of International Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Literaturangaben</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The ultimate question that runs through all of our law of arbitration is the allocation of responsibility between state courts and arbitral0tribunals : If private tribunals assume the power to bind others in a definitive fashion, we must ask, where does this authority come from ?0Fundamentally different in this respect from a state judge, a private arbitrator may only derive his legitimacy from that exercise of private0ordering and self-government which characterizes any voluntary commercial transaction. This work begins then with the dimensions of that "consent" which alone can justify arbitral jurisdiction. The discussion is then carried forward to explore how party autonomy in the contracting process may be expanded, giving rise to the voluntary reallocation of authority between courts and arbitrators. It concludes with the necessary inquiry into the autonomy with respect to the "chosen law" that will govern the agreement to arbitrate itself</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030674179&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030674179</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV045286746 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-20T18:23:04Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9789004388918 9004388915 9789004388925 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030674179 |
| oclc_num | 1099716292 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-M382 DE-739 |
| owner_facet | DE-M382 DE-739 |
| physical | 599 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Brill Nijhoff |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Pocketbooks of The Hague Academy of International Law |
| spellingShingle | Rau, Alan Scott 1942- The allocation of power between arbitral tribunals and state courts |
| title | The allocation of power between arbitral tribunals and state courts |
| title_auth | The allocation of power between arbitral tribunals and state courts |
| title_exact_search | The allocation of power between arbitral tribunals and state courts |
| title_full | The allocation of power between arbitral tribunals and state courts Alan Scott Rau |
| title_fullStr | The allocation of power between arbitral tribunals and state courts Alan Scott Rau |
| title_full_unstemmed | The allocation of power between arbitral tribunals and state courts Alan Scott Rau |
| title_short | The allocation of power between arbitral tribunals and state courts |
| title_sort | the allocation of power between arbitral tribunals and state courts |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030674179&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT raualanscott theallocationofpowerbetweenarbitraltribunalsandstatecourts |