Jak se žije Čechům v současné Evropě?:
Gespeichert in:
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV045236784 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20190205 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 181017s2018 xx |||| |||| 00||| cze d | ||
| 020 | |a 9788020028556 |9 978-80-200-2855-6 | ||
| 020 | |a 8020028552 |9 80-200-2855-2 | ||
| 020 | |a 9788073303235 |9 978-80-7330-323-5 | ||
| 020 | |a 807330323X |9 80-7330-323-X | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1057684515 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV045236784 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a cze | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Pospíšilová, Jaroslava |d 1982- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1169247245 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Jak se žije Čechům v současné Evropě? |c Jaroslava Pospíšilová, Eva Krulichová a kol. |
| 250 | |a Vydání I. | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Praha |b Academia |c 2018 | |
| 264 | 1 | |a Praha |b Sociologický ústav AV ČR | |
| 300 | |a 170 Seiten |b Diagramme |c 24 cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Edice Společnost |v sv. 24 | |
| 500 | |a Literaturverzeichnis Seite 154-167 | ||
| 546 | |a Zusammenfassung auf Englisch | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Soziale Situation |0 (DE-588)4077575-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Lebensqualität |0 (DE-588)4034922-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Politik |0 (DE-588)4046514-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Tschechien |0 (DE-588)4303381-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Češi / sociální poměry / 21. století | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Evropané / sociální poměry / 21. století | |
| 653 | 0 | |a názory a postoje / Česko / 21. století | |
| 653 | 0 | |a hodnotová orientace / Česko / 21. století | |
| 653 | 0 | |a kvalita života / Česko / 21. století | |
| 653 | 0 | |a názory a postoje / Evropa / 21. století | |
| 653 | 0 | |a hodnotová orientace / Evropa / 21. století | |
| 653 | 0 | |a kvalita života / Evropa / 21. století | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Czechs / social conditions / 21st century | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Europeans / social conditions / 21st century | |
| 653 | 0 | |a views and attitudes / Czechia / 21st century | |
| 653 | 0 | |a value orientation / Czechia / 21st century | |
| 653 | 0 | |a quality of life / Czechia / 21st century | |
| 653 | 0 | |a views and attitudes / Europe / 21st century | |
| 653 | 0 | |a value orientation / Europe / 21st century | |
| 653 | 0 | |a quality of life / Europe / 21st century | |
| 653 | 4 | |a 2016-2017 | |
| 653 | 4 | |a 21. století | |
| 653 | 6 | |a kolektivní monografie | |
| 653 | 6 | |a srovnávací studie | |
| 653 | 6 | |a collective monographs | |
| 653 | 6 | |a comparative studies | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Tschechien |0 (DE-588)4303381-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Lebensqualität |0 (DE-588)4034922-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Soziale Situation |0 (DE-588)4077575-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Politik |0 (DE-588)4046514-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Krulichová, Eva |d ca. 20./21. Jh. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1169247393 |4 aut | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Edice Společnost |v sv. 24 |w (DE-604)BV041359707 |9 24 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030625056&sequence=000005&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030625056&sequence=000006&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Abstract |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030625056&sequence=000007&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030625056&sequence=000008&line_number=0004&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Register // Gemischte Register |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 306.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 4371 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 4371 |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030625056 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1819354390675324928 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Obsah
Predmluva 9
1— Ceho si Cesi vazf a jake hodnoty dnes preferuji? 13
2— Co Cesi potrebuji ke stesti? 37
3— Citi se Cesi v bezpeci? A jake jsou jejich obavy z kriminality? 53
4— Dopady mezinarodni migrace aneb Strach jako hlavni akter? 71
5— Je ceska demokracie v krizi? 87
6— Rozumeji 6esi demokracii? 107
7— Proc bychom si meli duverovat? 127
8— European Social Survey 141
Zaver 147
Summary 150
Seznam literatury 154
Rejstrik 168
Summary
We are living in a century of the most precipitous change, and it is almost
impossible to predict what the world will look like in 20 years’ time.
According to Bauman (2017, p. 9) our age is a fluid one - no new social
forms have time to establish themselves, society is changeable, orientated
towards individual interests and globalised. The global world, meanwhile,
faces serious social problems, the impact of which can also be seen in
Europe. In the context of the other socio-economic changes that are taking
place (for example, the advent of the fourth industrial revolution), the
already difficult path of démocratisation is for many European countries
becoming even more thorny. The European Union, whose chief mission
is to maintain peace and prosperity in all its member states, has shown
itself to be a highly heterogeneous grouping that has difficulty coming
to agreement on the solutions to complex problems such as the ongoing
migration crisis. The result is an increase in anti-European feeling that is
fertile ground for the new wave of populism and nationalism, not only
in post-communist countries but in traditional democracies as well. The
desire for certainty and security is, moreover, being abused by some
politicians as an excuse to slice away at individual freedoms (as, for
example, in Hungary and Poland, but also in France).
Given the events with which we as a society have had to deal in the
past few years, the question we ask in this book concerns the nature of
people’s lives in present-day Europe. Specifically, we try to capture the
values and attitudes of the inhabitants of the Czech Republic in comparison
with people living in other European countries. Our answers come from
the data in the European Social Survey, in which the Czech Republic
first participated in 2002. The data currently available is from the eighth
wave of the survey, which took place at the end of 2016. This extensive
international research allows us to carry out a truly detailed analysis of the
attitudes of Europeans in many areas of their lives. The book thus contains
a number of analyses of attitudes and value orientations concerning
certain issues, both of Czechs and of the inhabitants of the other European
countries that took part in the ESS project. A certain common denominator
across all the chapters is difference - the difference between the Czech
Republic and other post-communist countries on one hand and the rest of
Europe on the other.
It can be seen that the historical legacy of communism is still found in
the values of these societies. One of the areas significantly influenced by
the communist past is that of social trust. All the post-communist countries
150—Jak se zije Ce chum v soucasné Evropé?
have, compared to traditional democracies, lower values for individual
and collective social capital and a lower level of generalised trust. Yet
social capital is important not just from the societal point of view, but also
from the individual point of view, as we have clearly shown in relation to
its connection with health.
In a similar way, the different nature of the post-communist countries can
also be found when we look at European societies from the perspective of the
values to which people give precedence. Here, Czechs and other countries
of the former Eastern bloc differ from their western neighbours above all
in terms of their orientation towards success and power - an orientation
that has even grown over time, contrary to expectations. On the contrary,
the values of tolerance and orientation towards other people, typical of
economically-advanced countries, are on the wane in the Czech Republic,
in contrast with the economic trends. A further interesting feature of Czech
society is that it shows a different trend regarding the influence of education
on preferred values. While in other European countries, tertiary education
is connected with the values of tolerance and orientation towards others, in
Czech society this orientation is more the domain of less-educated groups
with lower social status. Inhabitants with tertiary education recognise above
all the values of orientation towards success and power.
Success at work and sufficient financial means play a significant role in
the overall feeling of satisfaction with life. As our book also shows, material
sufficiency is even more important to Czechs than health. However, health
follows immediately after financial security in the list of factors that
influence Czechs’ feelings of satisfaction with life. In keeping with the
current academic literature, our data supports the proposition that overall
satisfaction with life is not overly associated with the presence of a child
in the household. A lack of success in all the areas under study (health,
the sharing of a household with a partner or children, work and the
ability to live on one’s income) increases the likelihood that respondents
will evaluate their lives negatively, both in the case of men and women -
indeed, especially so for women.
Women also differ from men in the degree of their declared feeling of
safety and fear of crime. This is not, of course, something peculiar to Czech
women. In general, the proportion of people in the Czech Republic who
feel safe is relatively low. Moreover, this feeling seems to be associated
only in part with overall crime levels. It must be understood as a broader
social phenomenon which may be influenced by a number of more general
societal factors. In countries whose inhabitants are more trusting, happier
and more satisfied with life, the degree of safety felt is higher. It can also
Summary—151
be seen that fear of crime and feelings of safety significantly influence the
evaluation of quality of life. People who do not feel safe in the places where
they live, and who are worried they will become the victims of crime, tend
to seek out the company of other people to a somewhat lesser extent than
do people with a low level of fear and a greater feeling of safety. On the
other hand, the degree of impact that the fear of crime has on quality of
life is to a large extent subjective. In the case of Czechs, we may observe
a higher declared degree of the impact of fear than we might expect, while
in the case of the Nordic countries it is the other way around.
We also found Czechs to have considerably more negative attitudes to
the impacts of international migration than official statistics might lead
us to expect. In this regard, Czechs are considerably more critical than
the inhabitants of other countries. Nevertheless, they are not exceptional
in their attitudes. The ESS data show that even before the peak of the
“migration crisis” there were fears in Europe of the impacts of migration,
above all relating to rising crime. Positive expectations relate mainly to
the enrichment of cultural life. On the contrary, the impact of migration
on the economy and labour market is evaluated by Europeans in a largely
negative way. The greatest fears of migration are declared by people with
lower education levels and lower social status, with sex, age and size of
place of residence having only a small influence, or almost none at all.
Given the above-mentioned weak attachment of Czech society to the
values of tolerance and orientation towards other people, it is not very
surprising that in their understanding of democracy Czechs place far
less weight than inhabitants of any other country on the protection of
minorities, and in general on egalitarian attributes in democracy. However,
this is also intensified by the fact that the level of income inequality and
the degree of threat of poverty is low in the Czech Republic. In their ideas
of the ideal democracy the Czechs come closest to their Slovak neighbours,
as well as to other post-communist countries in the region. We may thus
once again state that the perception of democratic values is closely tied to
the cultural and historical context of the country in question, and reflects
the society’s value alignment. Overall, it may be said that for Europeans
the dominant characteristics of democracy are a just and independent
justice system, and free and fair elections. The more emphasis that people
put on freedom as a value, the more likely they are to be satisfied with the
current state of Czech democracy.
Satisfaction with democracy is something that has long been at the
centre of interest of political scientists and sociologists. The democracy
boom also brought a boom in democracies that are in many regards
152—Jak se zije Cechum v soucasne Evrope?
non-standard. The study of democracy thus gained a new dimension -
researchers started to look at its quality. The issue of the quality of
democracy is connected to the degree to which it corresponds to its citizens’
ideas. Some authors suggest that the more dissatisfied citizens are with
the state of democracy in their countries, the smaller their support will be
for democratic rule in general. Satisfaction with democracy is, however,
not only related to the performance of democratic institutions. While
it used to be true that in the countries of Western Europe citizens were
more satisfied with democracy than were citizens in the post-communist
countries, it now needs to be stated that the degree of satisfaction with
democracy is closely connected to a country’s economic performance. In
the countries of the Eurozone that were affected by the debt crisis we thus
find a fall in the level of satisfaction with the functioning of democracy.
This dissatisfaction is therefore connected to a considerable degree with
the inabilities of national governments to deal with citizens’ problems in
an effective manner.
It might be said that Czechs do not see their life in present-day Europe
in too positive light. In our data the position of the Czech Republic is
similar to that of its geographical location - in many respects the positions
and values of the Czechs are close to the other post-communist countries,
but they are frequently closest to the value alignment of the West. The
overall picture of the values and positions of Europeans is nevertheless
much more complex. As our analyses of the ESS data have shown, it is
important to research social phenomena in a complex way, for only thus
will we be able to understand and capture its current development.
Summary—153
Seznam literatury
Aarts, K., Thomassen, J. (2008). Satisfaction with Democracy: Do Institutions Matter? Electo-
ral Studies, 27(1), 5-18.
Aebi, M. R, Akdeniz, G., Barclay, G., Campistol, C., Caneppele, S., Gruszczyhska, B., ... f 6-
risdöttir, R. (2014). European Sourcebook of Crime and Criminal Justice Statistics. Hel-
sinky: HEUNI.
Aebi, M. F., Lucia, S., Egli, N. M. (2010). Famille et délinquance: la situation en Suisse selon
les sondages de délinquance juvénile autoreportée (1SRD) de 1992 et de 2006. In A. Kuhn,
F. Vogler, S. Steiner, V. Dittmann, C. Bessler (Eds.), Junge Menschen und Kriminalität
(pp. 163-207). Bern: Stämpfli.
Àgh, A. (2014). The Decline of Democracy in East-Central Europe. Hungary as the Worst Sce-
nario. Problems of Post-Communism, 63(5-6), 277-287.
Anderson, C. J., Guillory, C. A. (1997)* Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democra-
cy: A Cross-national Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems. American Political
Science Review, 91(1), 66-82.
Anyzovä, P. (2014). Srovnatelnost Schwartzovy hodnotové skaly v mezinarodnich datech. So-
ciologicky casopis, 50 (4) 547-58°.
Arezzo, M. R, Giudici, C. (2017). Social Capital and Self Perceived Health Among European Ol-
der Adults. Social Indicators Research, 130(2), 665-685.
Armingeon, K., Guthmann, K. (2014). Democracy in Crisis? The Declining Support for Natio-
nal Democracy in European Countries, 2007 - 2011. European Journal of Political Reserch,
53(3), 423-442.
Barber, B. (2003). Strong Democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bauman, Z. (2017). Tekuté easy: Zivot ve vëku nejistoty. Praha: Academia.
Baviskar, S., Malone, M. F. T. (2004). What Democracy Means to Citizens - and Why It Matters.
European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 76, 3-23.
Beetham, D. (2006). Parliament and Democracy in the Twenty-first Century. A Guide to Good
Practice. Geneva: Inter-parliamentary Union. http://www.ipu.org/PDF/publications/de-
mocracy_en.pdf
Beierlein, C., Schmidt, P., Davidov, E., Schwartz, S. H. (2012). Testing the Discriminant Validity
of Schwartz’ Portrait Value Questionnaire Items - A Replication and Extension of Knoppen
and Saris (2009). Survey Research Methods, 6(1), 25-36.
Beutel A. M., Marini, M. M. (1995). Gender and Values. American Sociological Review, 60(3),
436-448.
154—Jak se zije Cechûm v soucasné Evropé?
Bilodeau, A. (2014). Is Democracy the Only Game in Town? Tension between Immigrants’ De-
mocratic Desires and Authoritarian Imprints. Democratization, 21(2), 359-381.
Bjornskov, C. (2003). The Happy Few: Cross-Country Evidence on Social Capital and Life Sa-
tisfaction. Kyklos, 56(1), 3-16.
Blalock, H. M. Jr. (1967). Toward a Theory of Minority-group Relations. New York: John
Wiley Sons.
Blumstein, A., Wallman, J. (2006). The Crime Drop in America. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-
versity Press.
Bobo, L. (1983). Whites’ Opposition to Busing: Symbolic Racism or Realistic Group Conflict?
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(6), 1196-1210.
Boers, K. (2003). Crime, Fear of Crime and the Operation of Crime Control in the Light of Victim
Surveys and Other Empirical Studies. Prispevek prezentovany na 22. Criminological Re-
search Conference (PC-CRC). Strasbourg.
Bonacich, E. (1972). A Theory of Ethnic Antagonism: The Split Labor Market. American Socio-
logical Review, 37(5), 547-559.
Borjas, G. (2015). Immigration and Globalization: A Review Essay. Journal of Economic Litera-
ture, 53(4), 961-974.
Brettell, C. B., Hollifield J. (2014). Migration Theory: Talking across Disciplines. Routledge.
Burianek, J. (2014). From Patience to Problems: the Czech Experience of the Transition. Acta
Universitatis Carolinae Philosophica et Historica 2/2012, (2), 17-35.
Buriankova, J., Hamplova, D. (2013). Zdravi a vyhledavani zdravotni pece. In K. Vlachova (Ed.),
Zdravi avyhledavam zdravotnipece (pp. 45-64). Praha: Sociologicky ustav AV CR.
Canache, D. (2012). Citizens’ Conceptualizations of Democracy: Structural Complexity,
Substantive Content, and Political Significance. Comparative Political Studies, 45(9),
1132-1158.
Canache, D., Mondak, J., Seligson, M. (2001). Meaning and Measurement in Cross National Re-
search on Satisfaction with Democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65(4), 506-528.
Castels, S., Miller, M. J. (2003). The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the
Modern World. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.
Castles, S., de Haas, H., Miller, M. J. (2013). The Age of Migration: International Population Mo-
vements in the Modern World. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cieciuch, J., Schwartz, S. H., Davidov, E. (2015). Social Psychology of Values. In J. D. Wright
(Ed.), International Encycopedia of the Social Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Edition, Vol. 25
(pp. 41-46). Oxford: Elsevier.
Seznam literatury—155
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of
Sociology, 94 (Supplement: Organizations and Institutions: Sociological and Economic
Approaches to the Analysis of Social Structure [1988]), 95-120.
Cordero, G., Simón, P. (2015). Economic Crisis and Support for Democracy in Europe. West Eu-
ropean Politics, 39(2), 305-325.
Cadová, N. (2017). Názory ceské vefejnosti na úroveñ demokracie a respektování lidskych práv
v CR - únor 2017. Praha: CWM.
Cadová, N. (2017). Názory vefejnosti na usazování cizincü v ÉR brezen - 2017. Praha: CWM.
Cervenka, J. (2017). Vefejnost o svych obavách a bezpecnostnich rizicich pro Ceskou republi-
ku - prosinec 2016. Praha: CWM.
CSÚ (2017). Cizinci v CRvletech 2004-2016 (online, cit. 7. 6.2017). Dostupné z: https://www.
czso.cz/csu/cizinci/4-ciz_pocet_cizincu
Dahl, R. A. (2001). O demokracii: prúvodce pro obcany. Praha: Portál.
Dahlberg, S., Linde, J., Holmberg, S. (2015). Democratic Discontent in Old and New Democra-
cies: Assessing the Importance of Democratic Input and Governmental Output. Political
Studies, 63(Si), 18-37.
Davidov, E. (2008). A Cross-Country and Cross-Time Comparison of the Human Values Measu-
rements with the Second Round of the European Social Survey. Survey Research Methods,
2(1), 33-46.
Davidov, E. (2010). Testing for Comparability of Human Values across Countries and Time with
the Third Round of European Social Survey. International Journal of Comparative Socio-
logy, 51(3), 171-191.
Davidov, E., Schmidt, R, Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Bringing Values Back In: Testing the Adequa-
cy of the European Social Survey to Measure Values in 20 Countries. Public Opinion Quar-
terly, 72(3), 420-445.
De Neve, J.-E., Christakis, N. A., Fowler, J. H., Frey, B. s. (2012). Genes, Economics, and Happi-
ness. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 5(4), 193-211.
de Sousa, L., Magalháes, P. C., Amaral, L. (2014). Sovereign Debt and Governance Failures Portu-
guese Democracy and the Financial Crisis. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(12), 1517-1541.
Diener, E. (2009). The Science of Well-Being. The Collected Works of Ed Diener. Dordrecht: Springer.
Dixon, J. C. (2006). The Ties That Bind and Those That Don’t: Toward Reconciling Group
Threat and Contact Theories of Prejudice. Social Forces, 84 (4), 2179-2204.
Donovan, T., Karp, J. (2017). Electoral Rules, Corruption, Inequality and Evaluation of De-
mocracy. European Journal of Political Research, http://dx.doi.org/10.1m/1475-6765.12188
156—Jak se zije Cechúm v soucasné Evropé?
Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.
Drbohlav, D. (2010). Migrace a (i)migranti v Cesku: Kdojsme, odkud prichdzime a kamjdeme?
1. vyd. Praha: SLON.
Drbohlav, D., Jaroszewicz, M., Seidlovâ, M., Cermakovâ, D. (2016). Monitoring of Migration and
Policy Changes Conducted in Ukraine, Poland, Czechia and Slovakia (September 2015 - June
2016). Praha: Karlova Univerzita.
Easton, D. (1975). A Reassessment of the Concept of Political Support. British Journal of Poli-
tical Science, 5(4), 435“457-
Eikemo, T. A., Mastekaasa, A., Ringdal, K. (2008). Health and Happiness. In H. Ervasti, T. Fridberg,
M. Hjerm, K. Ringdal (Eds.), Health and Happiness (pp. 48-64). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Eurobarometer (2015). Europeans’Attitudes towards Security (online, cit. 1. 5. 2017). Dostup-
né z: http://ec.europa.eu/commffontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_432_en.pdf
Eurostat (2017). Migration and Migrant Population Statistics (online, cit. 7.6.2017). Dostupné z:
http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php/Migration_and_migrant_po-
pulation_statistics#Migrant_population
Farrell, G., Tilley, N., Tseloni, A., Mailley, J. (2008). The Crime Drop and the Security Hypothe-
sis. British Society of Criminology Newsletter, (62), 17-21.
Ferraro, K. F. (1995). Fear of Crime: Interpreting Victimization Risk. Albany: State University of
New York Press.
Field, J. (2003). Social Capital London; New York: Routledge.
Freedom House (2017). Freedom in the World 2017 - Populists and Autocrats: The Dual Threat to
Global Democracy. (online, cit. 31. 7. 2017) Dostupné z: https://freedomhouse.org/sites/
default/files/FH_FIW_2oi7_Report_Final.pdf nffeedomhouse.org
Freedom House (2017). Press Freedom’s Dark Horizon. Freedom of the Press 2017.
Frey, B. S., Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness Prospers in Democracy. Journal of Happiness Stu-
dies, 1, 79-102.
Garcia, L. B. (2013). The Quality of Democracy in Spain Took a Great Leap Backwards in 2012.
LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) (online, cit. 23. 6. 2017). Dostupné z: http: //
blogs.lse.ac.uk/eurocrisispress/2013/08/30/the-quality-of-democracy-in-spain-took-a-
-great-leap-backwards-in-2012/
Gerbner, G., Gross, L. (1976). Living with Television: The Violence Profile. Journal of Commu-
nication, 26(2), 172-194.
Golebiowska, E. A. (1995). Individual Value Priorities, Education, and Political Tolerance. Po-
litical Behavior, 17(1), 23-48.
Seznam literatury—157
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6),
1360-1380.
Hagevi, M. (2015). Bloc Identification in Multi-Party Systems: The Case of the Swedish Two-
Bloc System. West European Politics, 38(1), 73-92.
Hall, C. M., Rath, J. (2007). Tourism, Migration and Place Advantage in the Global Cultural Eco-
nomy. In J. Rath (Ed.), Tourism, Ethnic Diversity and the City (pp. 1-24). New York: Routledge.
Hamplová, D. (2015). Proc potrebujeme rodinu, práci a prátele: stéstize sociologicképerspektivy.
Praha: Fortuna Libri.
Hamplová, D., Brezinová, K., Klímová Chaloupková, J., Sivková, O. (2014). Rodina a zdravi-
jejich vzájemnésouvislosti. Praha: SLON.
Heath, A., Richards, L. (2016). Attitudes towards Immigration and Their Antecedents: Topline Re-
sults from Round 7 of the European Social Survey. ESS Topline Results Series (online, cit.
4. 8. 2017). Dostupné z: https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/findings/ESS7_
toplines_issue_7_immigration.pdf
Holmberg, S., Lindberg, S., Svensson, R. (2017). Trust in Parliament. Journal of Public Affairs,
17(1-2), 1-9*
Hummelsheim, D., Hirtenlehner, H., Jackson, J., Oberwittler, D. (2011). Social Insecurities and
Fear of Crime: A Cross-National Study on the Impact of Welfare State Policies on Crime-
-related Anxieties. European Sociological Review, 27(3), 327-345.
Huntington, S. P. (2008). Tretivlna: demokratizace na sklonku dvacateho stoleti. Brno: CDK.
Hvizd’ala, K., 2016. Demokracie je permanentni krize. A referenda na tom nezmeni vubec nic.
Aktualne.cz (online, cit. 23. 6. 2017). Dostupne z: https://nazory.aktualne.cz/komen-
tare/karel-hvizdala-demokracie-je-permanentni-krize-a-referenda-n/r~ 3ob3cc8a-
02dfne687030025900fea04/
Chiricos, T., Eschholz, S., Gertz, M. (1997). Crime, News and Fear of Crime: Toward an Identi-
fication of Audience Effects. Social Problems, 44 (3), 342-357.
Christmann, P., Torcal, M. (2017). The Political and Economic Causes of Satisfaction with De-
mocracy in Spain - A Twofold Panel Study. West European Politics. http://dx.doi.0rg/10.1
080/01402382.2017.1302178.
Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: Princeton Univer-
sity Press.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, R., Baker, W. F. (2000). Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Tra-
ditional Values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19-51.
158—Jak se zije Cechúm v soucasné Evropé?
Inglehart, R., Catterberg, G. (2002). Trends in Political Action: The Developmental Trend and the
Post-Honeymoon Decline. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 43 (3-5), 300-316.
Institute for Economics Peace. (2017). Global Peace Index: Measuring peace in a complex world,
136. (online cit. 31.7.2017) Dostupne z: http://visi0n0fhumanity.0rg/app/upl0ads/2017/06/
GPI-2017-Rep0rt-1.pdf
Jackson, J. (2006). Introducing Fear of Crime to Risk Research. Risk Analysis, 26(1), 253-264.
Jackson, J., Stafford, M. (2009). Public Health and Fear of Crime: A Prospective Cohort Study.
British Journal of Criminology, 49(6), 832-847.
Jahoda, M., Zeisel, H. (1974). Marienthal: The Sociographyofan Unemployed Community. London:
Transaction Publishers.
Jeffrey, K., Abdallah, S., Quick, A. (2015). Europeans’Personal and Social Wellbeing: Topline Re-
sults from Round 6 of the European Social Survey. ESS Topline Results Series (online, cit.
24. 6. 2017). Dostupne z: https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/findings/ESS6_to-
plines_issue _5_pers0nal_and_s0cial_wellbeing.pdf
Karp, J. A., Milazzo, C. (2015). Democratic Scepticism and Political Participation in Europe.
Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 25(1), 97-110.
Katz, R. S., Mair, P. (1995). Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy.
The Emergence of the Cartel Party. Party Politics, 1(1), 5-28.
Kawachi, I., Berkman, L. F. (2001). Social Ties and Mental Health. Journal of Urban Health:
Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 78(3), 458-467.
Keller, J. (2009). Nejistota a duvera aneb K cemuje modernite dobra tradice. Praha: SLON.
Kennedy, B. P., Kawachi, I., Prothrow-Stith, D., Lochner, K., Gupta, V. (1998). Social Capital,
Income Inequality, and Firearm Violent Crime. Social Science Medicine, 47(1), 7-17.
Klicperova-Baker, M. (1998). Post-totalitni syndrom? CeskoslovenskaPsychologie, 42(4), 344-350.
Klicperova-Baker, M., Feierabend, I. (2007). Demokraticka kultura v Ceske republice: obcanska
kultura, etos a vlastenectv{ ze srovnavaciho pohledu. Praha: Academia.
Klima, M. (2013). Koncept klientelisticke strany. Pripadova studie - Ceska republika. Politolo-
gicky casopis, 3, 215-235-
Knoppen, D., Saris, W. (2009). Do We Have to Combine Values in the Schwartz’ Human Va-
lues Scale? A Comment on the Davidov Studies. Survey Research Methods, 3(2), 91-103.
Kohn, M. L., Schooler, C. (1983). Work and Personality. Norwood, NJ (N. J.): Ablex.
Kornai, J. (2006). The Great Transformation of Central Eastern Europe Success and Disap-
pointment. Economics of Transition, 14(2), 207-244.
Seznam literatury—159
Krulichovâ, E. (2016). Kdo se obavâ kriminality a jak tyto obavy ovlivnuji duvëru ve vybrané
spolecenské instituée v Ceské republice? Sociologicky casopis, 52(2), 131-155.
Kuntz, A., Davidov, E., Semyonov, M. (2017). The Dynamic Relations between Economie
Conditions and Anti-immigrant Sentiment: A Natural Experiment in Times of the Eu-
ropean Economic Crisis. International Journal of Comparative Sociology. https://doi.
org/10.1177/0020715217690434
Leontiyeva, Y (2015). Postoje k migrantûm v zemich Visegradské ctyrky: promëny v case a koil-
textuâlni vlivy. In K. Vlachovâ (Ed.), Narodni identity a identifikace: Ceska republika, Vise-
gradska ctyrka, Evropskd unie (pp: 143-157). Praha: SLON.
Levitt, S. D. (2004). Understanding why Crime Fell in the 1990s: Four Factors that Explain the
Decline and Six that do not. Journal of Economic Perspectives, r8( 1), 163-190.
Lewis, D. A., Salem, G. (1986). Fear of Crime: Incivility and the Production of a Social Problem.
New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Li, Q., Wilsnack, R., Wilsnack, S., Kristjanson, A. (2010). Cohabitation, Gender, and Alcohol Con-
sumption in 19 Countries: A Multilevel Analysis. Substance Use Misuse, 45(14), 2481-2502.
Light, I., Gold, S. J. (2000). Ethnic Economies. San Diego: Academic Press.
Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-six
Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lindberg, S. I. (2013). Mapping Accountability: Core Concept and Subtypes. International Re-
view of Administrative Sciences, 79(2), 202-226.
Linde, J., Ekman, J. (2003). Satisfaction with Democracy: A Note on a Frequently Used Indicator
in Comparative Politics. European Journal of Political Research, 42(3), 391-408.
Linek, L. (2010). Zrazenisnu? Struktura a dynamika postojû kpolitickému rezimu ajeho institu-
cim ajejich dûsledky. Praha: SLON.
Linz, J. J., Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore:
Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lipset, S. M. (1981). Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Uni-
versity Press.
Lipset, S. M. (1994). The Social Requisites of Democracy Revisited: 1993 Presidential Address.
American Sociological Review, 59(1), 1-22.
Lühiste, K. (2014). Social Protection and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Multi-level Analysis.
Political Studies, 62(4), 784-803.
Lupia, A., Matsusaka, J. G. (2004). Direct Democracy: New Approaches to Old Questions.
Annual Review of Political Science, 7(1), 463-482.
160—Jak se zije CechCim v soucasné Evropé?
Lupia, A., McCubbins, M. D. (2000). Representation or Abdication? How Citizens Use Institu-
tions to Help Delegation Succeed. European Journal of Political Research, 37(3), 291-307.
Lyons, P. (2013). Adjectives of Democracy: Citizenship and Political Attitudes Under Socialist and
Liberal Democracy in the Czech Republic. Praha: SLON.
Lyons, S., Duxbury, L., Higgins, C. (2005). Are Gender Differences in Basic Human Values a Ge-
nerational Phenomenon? Sex Roles, 53(9-10), 763-778.
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., Diener, E. (2005). The Benefits of Frequent Positive Affect: Does
Happiness Lead to Success? Psychological Bulletin, J3i(6), 803-855.
Magalhäes, P. C. (2014). Government Effectiveness and Support for Democracy. European Jour-
nal of Political Research, 53(1), 77-97•
Magalhäes, P. C. (2016). Economic Evaluations, Procedural Fairness, and Satisfaction with De-
mocracy. Political Research Quaterly, 69(3), 522-534.
Machova, Z. (2013). Volebni prdvo cizincü v komunalnich volbach Ceske republiky ajeho vyuziti.
Praha: Karolinum.
Mannheim, K. (1952 f Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routeledge Kegan Paul.
Mansfeldovä, Z. (2003). Democracy in the Czech Republic: An Assessment of Attitudes towards
Democracy and Democratic Values of the Czech Population 1990-2001. Bremen: Forschungs-
stelle Osteuropa an der Universität Bremen.
Markkola, P., Naumann, L (2014). Lutheranism and the Nordic Welfare States in Comparison.
Journal of Church and State, 56(1), 1-12.
Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., Taylor, J. E. (1993). Theories
of International Migration: A Review and Appraisal. Population and Development Review,
19(3), 431-466.
Matejü, P., Vitäskovä, A. (2006). Interpersonal Trust and Mutually Beneficial Exchanges: Mea-
suring Social Capital for Comparative Analyses. Sociologies casopis, 42(3), 493-516.
Matthes, C.-Y. (2016). Comparative Assessments of the State of Democracy in East-Central Eu-
rope and Its Anchoring in Society. Problems of Post-Communism, 63(5-6), 323-334.
McKee-Ryan, F., Song, Z., Wanberg, C. R., Kinicki, A. J. (2005). Psychological and Physical
Well-being uring Unemployment: A Meta-analytic Study. Journal of Applied Psychology,
90(1), 53-76.
Meertens, R. W., Pettigrew, T. F. (1997)- Is Subtle Prejudice Really Prejudice? Public Opinion
Quarterly, 61(1), 54-71.
Merkel, W. (2014). Is There a Crisis of Democracy? Democratic Theoiy, 1(2), 11-25.
Seznam literatury—161
Meuleman, B., Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., Billiet, J. (2013). Social Location and Value Priorities.
A European-wide Comparison of the Relation between Socio-demographic Variables and
Human Values. In 0. Gabriel, S. I. Keil (Eds.), Society and Democracy in Europe (pp. 45-67).
Routledge: New York.
Mishler, W., Rose, R. (1999). Five Years After the Fall: Trajectories of Support for Democracy in
Post-Communist Europe. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical Citizens. Global Support for Democratic
Government (pp. 78-99). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mlejnek, J. (2015). Kufe v hrnci a kfecek v kole: ceska politika ajeji transformace v kontextu civi-
lizacmkrize. Brno: CDK.
Mohnen, S. M., Völker, B., Flap, H., Subramanian, S. V., Groenewegen, P. P. (2015). The Influen-
ce of Social Capital on Individual Health: Is it the Neighbourhood or the Network? Social
Indicators Research, 121(1), 195-214.
Morlino, L. (1998). Democracy Between Consolidation and Crisis: Parties, Groups, and Citizens in
Southern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Morlino, L. (2012). Changes for Democracy. Actors, Structures, Processes. Oxford: Oxford Uni-
versity Press.
Morlino, L., Piana, D. (2014). Economic Crisis in a Stalemated Democracy. The Italian Case.
American Behavioral Scientist, 58(12), 1657-1682.
Mozny, I. (1999). Proc tak snadno... nektere rodinne düvody sametove revoluce; sociologicky esej.
Praha: SLON
Müller, K. B. (2017). Potrebujeme vie politologü i kunsthistorikü. Respekt (online,
cit. 5. 5. 2017). Dostupne z: https://www.respekt.cz/externi-hlasy/potrebujeme-vic-
politologu-i-kunsthistoriku
Mustafa, A., Richards, L. (2016). European Muslim Attitudes on Immigration. Prispevek prezen-
tovany na 3. International ESS Conference. Lausanne.
Neundorf, A. (2010). Democracy in Transition: A Micro Perspective on System Change in Post-
-Socialist Societies. The Journal of Politics, 72 (4), 1096-1108.
Neundorf, A., Niemi, R. G. (2014). Beyond Political Socialization: New Approaches to Age, Pe-
riod, Cohort Analysis. Electoral Studies, 33,1-6.
Nomaguchi, K. M., Milkie, M. A. (2003). Costs and Rewards of Children: The Effects of Beco-
ming a Parent on Adults’ lives. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(2), 356-374-
Offe, C., Adler, P. (1991). Capitalism by Democratic Design? Democratic Theory Facing the Tri-
pie Transition in East Central Europe. Social Research, 58(4), 865-892.
Okolski, M. (2009). Transition from Emigration to Immigration: Is it a Destiny of Modem Eu-
ropean Countries? In J. Arango, J. Bijak, D. Drobhlav, H. Fassmann, D. Kupiszewska, M. Ku-
piszewski,... A. Wisniowski (Eds.), Europe: The Continent of Immigrants. Trends, Structures
and Policy Implications (pp. 10-27). Working paper no. 13. IDEA Working Papers.
162—Jak se zije Cechum v soucasne Evrope?
Oswald, A. J., Proto, E., Sgroi, D. (2009). Happiness and Productivity. Working paper no. 4645«
IZA discussion papers.
Pechholdovâ, M., Samanovâ, G. (2013). Mortality by Marital Status in a Rapidly Changing So-
ciety: Evidence from the Czech Republic. Demographic Research, 29, 307-322.
Pickel, S., Breustedt, W., Smolka, T. (2016). Measuring the Quality of Democracy: Why In-
clude the Citizens Perspective? International Political Science Review. http://doi.
org/io.1177/0192512116641179
Pilnâcek, M. (2017). Hodnocenibezpecnostnisituace vCRa Evropë- prosinec 2016. Praha: CWM.
Prince-Gibson, E., Schwartz, S. H. (1998). Value Priorities and Gender. Social Psychology Quar-
terly, 61(1), 49-67.
Przeworski, A. (2004). Democracy and Economic Development. In E. D. Mansfield, R. Sisson
(Eds.), The Evolution of Political Knowledge (pp. 300-324). Columbus: Ohio State Univer-
sity Press.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New
York: Simon Schuster.
Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty first Centu-
ry- The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137-174.
Quaranta, M., Martini, S. (2016). Does the Economy Really Matter for Satisfaction with De-
mocracy? Longitudinal and Cross-country Evidence from the European Union. Electoral
Studies, 42,164-174.
Quintelier, E., van Deth, J. W. (2014). Supporting Democracy: Political Participation and Po-
litical Attitudes. Exploring Causality Using Panel Data. Political Studies, 62(Si), 153-171.
Rainie, H., Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The New Social Operating System. Cambridge, Mass:
MIT Press.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.
Rose, R., Mishler, W., Haerpfer, C. (1998). Democracy and its Alternatives. UnderstandingPost-
-communist Societies. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Rose, R., Shin, D. C. (2001). Democratization Backwards: The Problem of Third-Wave Democra-
cies. British Journal of Political Science, 31(2), 331-354.
Rountree, R W., Land, K. C. (1996). Perceived Risk versus Fear of Crime: Empirical Evidence of
Conceptually Distinct Reactions in Survey Data. Social Forces, 74(4), 1353-1376.
Rehakovâ, B. (2006). Mëreni hodnotovych orientaci metodou hodnotovych portrétû
S. H. Schwartze. Sociologicky casopis, 42(1), 107-128.
Sacco, V. F. (1990). Gender, Fear, and Victimization: A Preliminary Application of Power-Con-
trol Theory. Sociological Spectrum, 10(4), 485-506.
Seznam literatury—163
Sartori, G. (1991). Comparing and Miscomparing. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 3(3), 243-257,
Savelkoul, M., Scheepers, P., Tolsma, J., Hagendoorn, L. (2011). Anti-Muslim Attitudes in the
Netherlands: Tests of Contradictory Hypotheses Derived from Ethnic Competition Theory
and Intergroup Contact Theory. European Sociological Review, 27(6), 741-758.
Sedlâckovâ, M. (2012). Dûvëra a demokracie: prehled sociologickych teoriidûvëry od Tocquevilla
po transformaciv postkomunistickych zemich. Praha: SLON.
Semyonov, M., Raijman, R., Tov, A. Y., Schmidt, P. (2004). Population Size, Perceived Threat,
and Exclusion: A Multiple-indicators Analysis of Attitudes toward Foreigners in Germany.
Social Science Research, 33 (4), 681-701.
Senik, C. (2014). The French Unhappiness Puzzle: The Cultural Dimension of Happiness. Jour-
nal of Economic Behavior Organization, 106, 379-401.
Schedler, A. (1999). Conceptualizing Accountability. In A. Schedler, L. Diamond, M. F. Plattner
(Eds.), The Self-Restraining State Power and Accountability in New Democracies (pp. 13-28).
London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Scheepers, P., Gijsberts, M., Coenders, M. (2002). Ethnic Exclusionism in European Countries.
Public Opposition to Civil Rights for Legal Migrants as a Response to Perceived Ethnic
Threat. European Sociological Review, r8(i), 17-34.
Schmitter, P. C, Karl, T. L. (1991). What Democracy Is... And Is Not. Journal of Democracy,
2(3), 75-88-
Schneider, S. L. (2008). Anti-immigrant Attitudes in Europe: Outgroup Size and Perceived
Ethnic Threat. European Sociological Review, 24(1), 53-67.
Schumpeter, J. A. (2004). Kapitalismus, socialismus a demokracie. Brno: CDK.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advan-
ces and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social
Psychology (pp. 1-65). New York: Academic Press.
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human
Values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-45.
Schwartz, S. H. (2003). A Proposal for Measuring Value Orientations across Nations. In Eu-
ropean Social Survey Core Questionnaire Development (pp. 259-319). ESS central co-ordi-
natingteam (online, cit. 27. 3. 2017). Dostupné z: http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/
docs/methodology/core_ess_questionnaire/ESS_core_questionnaire_human_vaIues.pdf
Schwartz, S. H. (2005). Robustness and Fruitfulness of a Theory of Universals in Individual
Human Values. In A. Tamayo, J. B. Porto (Eds.), Valores e comportamento nas organizaçÔes
[Values and Behavior in Organizations] (pp. 56-95). Petropolis: Vozes.
Schwartz, S. H. (2006a). Les valeurs de base de la personne: Théorie, mesures et applications
[Basic Human Values: Theory, Measurement, and Applications]. Revue française de Socio-
164—Jak se zije Cechûm v soucasné Evropé?
logie, 42,249-288 (online v anglicke verzi pod nazvem Basic Human Values: An Overview,
cit. 27.3.2017). Dostupnez: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286951722_Ba-
sic_human_values_Theory_measurement_and_applications
Schwartz, S. H. (2006b). Value Orientations: Measurement, Antecedents and Consequences
across Nations. In R. Jowell, C. Roberts, R. Fitzgerald, G. Eva (Eds.), Measuring Attitudes
Cross-nationally - Lessons from the European Social Survey (pp. 169-203). London, UK:
Sage.
Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Cultural and Individual Value Correlates of Capitalism: A Comparative
Analysis. Psychological Inquiry, j8(i), 52-57.
Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values. Online Readings
in Psychology and Culture, 2(1).
Schwartz, S. H., Bardi, A. (1997). Influences of Adaptation to Communist Rule on Value Prio-
rities in Eastern Europe. Political Psychology, 18(2), 385-410.
Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M. (2001). Extending the Cross-
-cultural Validity of the Theory of Basic Human Values with a Different Method of Measu-
rement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 519-542.
Schwartz, S. H., Rubel, T. (2005). Sex Differences in Value Priorities: Cross-cultural and Multi-
method Studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 1010-1028.
Schwartz, S. H., Rubel-Lifschitz, T. (2009). Cross-National Variation in the Size of Sex Diffe-
rences in Values: Effects of Gender Equality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
97(1), 171-185.
Schwartz, S. H., Sagiv, G. (2000). Value Consensus and Importance: A Cross-national Study.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31 (4), 465-497.
Skogan, W. G., Maxfield, M. G. (1981). Coping with Crime: Individual and Neighborhood Re-
actions. London: Sage.
Stadelmann-Steffen, I., Vatter, A. (2012). Does Satisfaction with Democracy Really Increase
Happiness? Direct Democracy and Individual Satisfaction in Switzerland. Political Beha-
vior, 34(3), 535-559-
Stafford, M., Tarani, C., Marmot, M. (2007). Association Between Fear of Crime and Mental
Health and Physical Functioning. American Journal of Public Health, 97(11), 2076-2081.
Stachova, J., Bernard, J., Cermak, D. (2009). Socialni kapital v Ceske republice a v mezinarod-
nim srovnani. Praha: Sociologicky ustav AV CR.
Statisticke prehledy kriminality (2000). Policie Ceske Republiky (online, cit. 1. 5. 2017). Dostup-
ne z: http://www.policie.cz/statistiky-kriminalita.aspx
STEM (2012). Nejzavaznejsim problemem CRje podle obcanu korupce. Praha: STEM.
Seznam literatury—165
Stenius, H. (1997). The Good Life is a Life of Conformity: The Impact of the Lutheran Tradition
on Nordic Political Culture. In G. Sorensen, B. Strath (Eds.), The Cultural Construction of
Norden (pp. 161-171). Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
Strabac, Z., Toril, A., Valenta, M. (2014). Attitudes towards Muslim Immigrants: Evidence
from Survey Experiments across Four Countries. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies,
40(1), 100-118.
Suh, E., Koo, J. (2008). Comparing Subjective Well-being across Cultures and Nations.
In M. Eid, R. J. Larsen (Eds.), Comparing Subjective Well-being across Cultures and Nations
(pp. 414-427). New York: Guilford Press.
Svolik, M. W. (2013). Learning to Love Democracy: Electoral Accountability and the Success of
Democracy. American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 685-702.
Saradin, P. (2017). Uvahy o soucasne demokracii. Filozofia, 72(4), 306-311.
Thomassen, J. (1998). Support for Democratic Values. In H.-D. Klingemann, D. Fuchs (Eds.),
Citizens and the State (pp. 383-416). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Totterdell, P. (2000). Catching Moods and Hitting Runs: Mood Linkage and Subjective Perfor-
mance in Professional Sport Teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 848-859.
Tucek, M. (2017). Mira nalehavosti ruznych oblasti verejneho zivota - unor 2017. Praha: CWM.
Urbinati, N. (2014). Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth, and the People (e-book). Cambridge,
Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
van Biezen, I., Mair, P., Poguntke, T. (2012). Going, going... gone? The Decline of Party Mem-
bership in Contemporary Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 51(1), 24-56.
van Dijk, J., Tseloni, A., Farrell, G. (2012). The International Crime Drop: New Directions in Re-
search. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Varelius, J. (2013). Objective Explanations of Individual Well-being. In A. Delle Fave (Ed.), Ob-
jective explanations of individual well-being (pp. 15-30). Dordrecht: Springer.
Visser, M., Scholte, M., Scheepers, P. (2013). Fear of Crime and Feelings of Unsafety in Euro-
pean Countries: Macro and Micro Explanations in Cross-National Perspective. The Socio-
logical Quarterly, 54, 278-301.
Warr, M. (1984). Fear of Victimization: Why are Women and the Elderly More Afraid. Social
Science Quarterly, 65(3), 681-702.
Warr, M. (1987). Fear of Victimization and Sensitivity to Risk. Journal of Quantitative Crimi-
nology, 3(1), 29-46.
Weaver, J., Wakshlag, J. (1986). Perceived Vulnerability to Crime, Criminal Victimization Expe-
rience, and Television Viewing. Journal of Broadcasting Electronic Media, 30 (2), 141-158.
166—Jak se zije Cechum v soucasne Evrope?
Weiss, A., Bates, T. C., Luciano, M. (2008). Happiness is a Personal (ity) Thing: The Genetics of
Personality and Well-being in a Representative Sample. Psychological Science, 19(3), 205-210.
Welzel, C. (2007). Are Levels of Democracy Affected by Mass Attitudes? Testing Attainment and
Sustainment Effects on Democracy. International Political Science Review, 28(4), 397-424.
Wike, R., Holzwart, K. (2008, April 15). Where Trust is High, Crime and Corruption are Low. Pew
Research Global Attitudes Project 15 (online, cit. 4. 3.2017). Dostupne z: http://www.pew-
global.org/2008/04/15/where-trust-is-high-crime-and-corruption-are-low/
Xiao, H. (2000). Class, Gender, and Parental Values in the 1990s. Gender and Society, 14(6),
785-803.
Zakaria, F. (2012). Budoucnostsvohody: neliberalnidemokracievUSAivesvete. Praha: Academia.
Zeman, P., Diblikova, S., Travnickova, I., Tomasek, J. (2010). Nazory apostoje obcanu v oblasti
trestnipolitiky. Praha: Institut pro kriminologii a socialni prevenci.
Seznam literatury—167
Rejstrïk
Cisla stran oznacenâ kurzivou odkazuji k tabulkàm a grafum.
B
Belgie 57,59, 66, 67, 68, 73, 85, 9h
92, 98,100,105,115,143,*44
bezpecnost 9,10,16,17,18, 20, 27, 30-34,
35, 55, 58, 69, 62, 64,146,156,163
blaho 17,20, 23, 25, 31,35
Bulharsko 57, 58,59, 66-68,115,143,144
C
CWM 55, 58, 61, 99
D
Dânsko 11, 20, 21, 40,57,58,59, 61,
65, 67, 68, 75, 85, 90-92, 90, 95,
98,105, J15,123,132,133,144
demokracie 89-126
demokratické instituée 89, 93,
109,112,120,149
demokratizace 9, 91, 96,109, hi, 115
demoskepticismus 89, 99
dulezitost demokracie 11, ror, 103
duvera 12 9-139
v lidi 131
v parlament 94,95
v policii 59
sociâlni dûvëra 132,133,*33,147
E
Estonsko 57,59, 66, 67, 67, 73, 85, 91-93,
97, 105,106,115,134,143,144
Evropskà unie 9, 58, 73, 98,101,105,118,123
F
Finsko 20, 21, 57, 58,59, 66-68, 75, 85,
90, 91, 92,105,112,115,143, W
Francie 9, 21,40,57,59, 66-68, 73, 85,
91, 92,100,105,115,123,143, *44
Freedom House 11,117
G
General Social Survey 30
Global democracy ranking 92, 93
H
HDP 20, 96, 97, 97,105,106
hodnoty 15-36
hospodàrstvi 48, 55, 96
CH
Chorvatsko 57, 66, 66-68,144
chudoba 113,114,121,122,148
I
IKSP (Institut pro kriminologii
a socialni prevenci) 62
index demokracie 92
Irsko 57,59, 66-68, 73, 76, 85, 90-92,
98, 105,115,143, *44
Italie 59, 73, 90, 91, 92, 95, 97, 98,
98,105,106,115,123,144
K
kartelovâ strana 94
konzervatismus 10, r6,17,19, 20, 22,
23, 25, 27, 29-31, 33, 34,35
korupce 55, 91,131
168—Jak se zije Cechûm v soucasné Evropë?
kriminalita 55-70
kultura 15,17, *8,22, 26,27, 31, 32,
40, 74-76,79» 81-84, 93, no,
115,125,134,135» 139,148
kvalita
demokracie 91-93» 100, no, in, 114,149
zivota 39,40,45, 48, 52,
67-70, 68,131,148
Kypr 57, 58,59, 66-68, 98,112,143,*44
L
legitimita 105,109, no, 145
Litva 20, 57-59, 59, 66-68, 73, 76,
**5,135,137,143,144
M
Mad’arsko 9, n, 20-23, 25, 58, 70,
73, 75, 76, 84, 90, 92, 93, 95, 98,
98,105,115,117,134,137,144
media 64, 89, 91,113,114,116-118,
138,145,146
migrace 73-85
moc 15-36
muslimove 82, 84, 85
N
nabozenstvi 18,35, 74, 75, 79
Nemecko 10, 20, 27, 57, 58, 61, 62, 66,
73, 75, 85, 92,115,143,144
nezamestnanost 43,48-51, 55, 79-81,
83, 91, 96, 99, 99,101,105
Nizozemsko 20, 27,57,59, 66-68,
76, 85, 92,115,123,143,144
Norsko 57,59, 66, 66-68, 69-70, 73, 75, 76,
85, 90, 92, 98,115, 123,123,143,144
O
obavy z kriminality 55-70
otevrenost 10,16,17, 21, 22, 25,25, 26,
27, 30, 32, 34,36, 74, 81, 94
P
parlament 89, 93, 94, 95,112,113,113,116
pocit bezpeci 55-70
podpora demokracie 89,102,149
- difuzni 89
- specificka 89
pohlavi 26, 27,28,45, 50, 56, 62, 63,
66, 67, 80, 80, 81-83,124,148
policie 56, 59
politicka participace 94,105, in, 117,118,145
politicke strany 89, 93, 94, 95, 114, n6
Polsko 9,11, 20-23, 25, 27,57,58,59, 61, 61,
66, 66-68, 69, 70, 73, 45, 76, 85, 91-93,
98,105,115,117,132-134,137,143,144
Portugalsko 57, 58,59, 66-68, 73,
76, 90, 92, 93, 95, 97, 98, 98,
106,115, ri5,122,143, *44
postkomunismus no, 1x5,119,123,
125,133-135,138,139,147-149
postoje k imigrantum viz migrace
pozitkarstvi 16,17,18, 20, 21,
25, 27, 29, 31-34,36
pratele 35, 68,129-138
prijmova nerovnost 99,105,121,122,146,148
PVQ skala 15,35
R
referenda 95,113,114,117, n8
rodinny stav 30,45,46,136
Romove 82, 84, 85,137
rovnost 17, 20, 93, 99,105,112,
119,122-125,123
R
Recko 57, 58, 98, hi, 145
S
Schwartz, S. H. 15-20, 26, 27, 29-31
Slovensko 22, 23,23-25, 25,57, 58,
59, 61, 62, 66-68, 90, 91-93, 95,
97, 98,105,106,115,145,148
Slovinsko 20,57, 58,59, 66, 66-68, 70,
85, 91-93, 97, 98,1x5,123, 143,145
socialni
duvera 132,133,133,147
- izolace 135
kapital 11, 76,129-131,133,
134,137-139,147
- kontakt 67, 68,130
- normy 40
- postaveni 26, 34
- prava 121,122
- site 56
spokojenost 39-52
STEM 55
svoboda 9, n, 18, 25, 30, 34,36, 45, 93, 96,
109, hi, 112,113,115-117,122-125,148
Rejstrik—169
s
Spanëlsko 20, 27,73,90, 91, 9*, 95, 97, 98,
98y 105,106,115,115, 122,123,143,145
stësti 39-52
Svédsko 20, 2i, 57, 58,59, 66-68,75, 85,
90, 92, 98,115,116,123,135, M3,145
Svycarsko 10, 20, 57, 57,59, 66-68, 73, 75, 76,
85, 92, 93, 97, 98, ri5,118,123,143,145
T
terorismus 55,131
tolerance 17,18, 20, 23, 26, 27, 31, 34,147,148
tradice r6,17,18, 20, 22, 27, 30-32, 34,35
Trojka 98
U
Ukrajina 57, 58, 59,59, 66, 67, 68, 74, 84,
85, 90, 91, 95, 96, 97, 98,100,134,145
univerzalismus 16,17, r8, 20, 29-32,35, 118
ùspëch il, 16,17,18, 20, 21, 21,24, 25-34,
36,147
V
Velká Británie 10,57,59, 66-68,
73, 90,115,118,143,144
viktimizace 58, 59, 62, 64, 65,145
vláda il, 35, 89-93, 958, 96, 99,100,
102-105,10 9-114,113 y 116,
120-122,124,149
volby 89, 91, 94, 95,103, 104,109-116,
113, 118,120,121,125,148
volebni
ücast 94
volatilita 94
volici 79, 81, 83, 84, 94,102-104,
106,112-114,113,120,121
vzdëlâni 26, 30-32,32, 34, 35, 4i
63, 64, 65, 74, 79, 81-84, 93,
102, 124, 132,137,147,148
Z
zdravi 41,43-45,48, 50, 51, 67,
129,138,139,146
zemë Visegrádské ctyrky 25, 27, 61
:
f
}
/
170—Jak se zije Cechûm v soucasné Evropé?
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Pospíšilová, Jaroslava 1982- Krulichová, Eva ca. 20./21. Jh |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1169247245 (DE-588)1169247393 |
| author_facet | Pospíšilová, Jaroslava 1982- Krulichová, Eva ca. 20./21. Jh |
| author_role | aut aut |
| author_sort | Pospíšilová, Jaroslava 1982- |
| author_variant | j p jp e k ek |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV045236784 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1057684515 (DE-599)BVBBV045236784 |
| edition | Vydání I. |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04200nam a2200841 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV045236784</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20190205 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">181017s2018 xx |||| |||| 00||| cze d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9788020028556</subfield><subfield code="9">978-80-200-2855-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">8020028552</subfield><subfield code="9">80-200-2855-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9788073303235</subfield><subfield code="9">978-80-7330-323-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">807330323X</subfield><subfield code="9">80-7330-323-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1057684515</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV045236784</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">cze</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pospíšilová, Jaroslava</subfield><subfield code="d">1982-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1169247245</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Jak se žije Čechům v současné Evropě?</subfield><subfield code="c">Jaroslava Pospíšilová, Eva Krulichová a kol.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vydání I.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Praha</subfield><subfield code="b">Academia</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Praha</subfield><subfield code="b">Sociologický ústav AV ČR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">170 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Diagramme</subfield><subfield code="c">24 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Edice Společnost</subfield><subfield code="v">sv. 24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Literaturverzeichnis Seite 154-167</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zusammenfassung auf Englisch</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Soziale Situation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4077575-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Lebensqualität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4034922-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Politik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046514-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Tschechien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4303381-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Češi / sociální poměry / 21. století</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evropané / sociální poměry / 21. století</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">názory a postoje / Česko / 21. století</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">hodnotová orientace / Česko / 21. století</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">kvalita života / Česko / 21. století</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">názory a postoje / Evropa / 21. století</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">hodnotová orientace / Evropa / 21. století</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">kvalita života / Evropa / 21. století</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Czechs / social conditions / 21st century</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europeans / social conditions / 21st century</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">views and attitudes / Czechia / 21st century</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">value orientation / Czechia / 21st century</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">quality of life / Czechia / 21st century</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">views and attitudes / Europe / 21st century</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">value orientation / Europe / 21st century</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">quality of life / Europe / 21st century</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">2016-2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">21. století</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">kolektivní monografie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">srovnávací studie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">collective monographs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">comparative studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Tschechien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4303381-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Lebensqualität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4034922-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Soziale Situation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4077575-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Politik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046514-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Krulichová, Eva</subfield><subfield code="d">ca. 20./21. Jh.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1169247393</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Edice Společnost</subfield><subfield code="v">sv. 24</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV041359707</subfield><subfield code="9">24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030625056&sequence=000005&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030625056&sequence=000006&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030625056&sequence=000007&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030625056&sequence=000008&line_number=0004&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Register // Gemischte Register</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">306.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">4371</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">4371</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030625056</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Tschechien (DE-588)4303381-7 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Tschechien |
| id | DE-604.BV045236784 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-20T18:21:39Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9788020028556 8020028552 9788073303235 807330323X |
| language | Czech |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030625056 |
| oclc_num | 1057684515 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 170 Seiten Diagramme 24 cm |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Academia Sociologický ústav AV ČR |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Edice Společnost |
| series2 | Edice Společnost |
| spellingShingle | Pospíšilová, Jaroslava 1982- Krulichová, Eva ca. 20./21. Jh Jak se žije Čechům v současné Evropě? Edice Společnost Soziale Situation (DE-588)4077575-6 gnd Lebensqualität (DE-588)4034922-6 gnd Politik (DE-588)4046514-7 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4077575-6 (DE-588)4034922-6 (DE-588)4046514-7 (DE-588)4303381-7 |
| title | Jak se žije Čechům v současné Evropě? |
| title_auth | Jak se žije Čechům v současné Evropě? |
| title_exact_search | Jak se žije Čechům v současné Evropě? |
| title_full | Jak se žije Čechům v současné Evropě? Jaroslava Pospíšilová, Eva Krulichová a kol. |
| title_fullStr | Jak se žije Čechům v současné Evropě? Jaroslava Pospíšilová, Eva Krulichová a kol. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Jak se žije Čechům v současné Evropě? Jaroslava Pospíšilová, Eva Krulichová a kol. |
| title_short | Jak se žije Čechům v současné Evropě? |
| title_sort | jak se zije cechum v soucasne evrope |
| topic | Soziale Situation (DE-588)4077575-6 gnd Lebensqualität (DE-588)4034922-6 gnd Politik (DE-588)4046514-7 gnd |
| topic_facet | Soziale Situation Lebensqualität Politik Tschechien |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030625056&sequence=000005&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030625056&sequence=000006&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030625056&sequence=000007&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030625056&sequence=000008&line_number=0004&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV041359707 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pospisilovajaroslava jaksezijecechumvsoucasneevrope AT krulichovaeva jaksezijecechumvsoucasneevrope |