Rethinking the ontological argument: a neoclassical theistic response
In recent years, the ontological argument and theistic metaphysics have been criticised by philosophers working in both the analytic and continental traditions. Responses to these criticisms have primarily come from philosophers who make use of the traditional, and problematic, concept of God. In th...
Gespeichert in:
| Beteilige Person: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
2006
|
| Schlagwörter: | |
| Links: | https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498916 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498916 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498916 |
| Zusammenfassung: | In recent years, the ontological argument and theistic metaphysics have been criticised by philosophers working in both the analytic and continental traditions. Responses to these criticisms have primarily come from philosophers who make use of the traditional, and problematic, concept of God. In this 2006 volume, Daniel A. Dombrowski defends the ontological argument against its contemporary critics, but he does so by using a neoclassical or process concept of God, thereby strengthening the case for a contemporary theistic metaphysics. Relying on the thought of Charles Hartshorne, he builds on Hartshorne's crucial distinction between divine existence and divine actuality, which enables neoclassical defenders of the ontological argument to avoid the familiar criticism that the argument moves illegitimately from an abstract concept to concrete reality. His argument, thus, avoids the problems inherent in the traditional concept of God as static |
| Beschreibung: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) |
| Umfang: | 1 online resource (vii, 172 pages) |
| ISBN: | 9780511498916 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/CBO9780511498916 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043928919 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20220813 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 161202s2006 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780511498916 |c Online |9 978-0-511-49891-6 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/CBO9780511498916 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511498916 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)967420846 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043928919 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 212/.1 |2 22 | |
| 084 | |a CC 6000 |0 (DE-625)17650: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a CC 8500 |0 (DE-625)17709: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Dombrowski, Daniel A. |d 1953- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)102597624X |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Rethinking the ontological argument |b a neoclassical theistic response |c Daniel A. Dombrowski |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 2006 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (vii, 172 pages) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a Historical background -- Poetry versus the ontological argument: Richard Rorty's challenge -- Deconstructionism and the ontological argument: the case of Mark Taylor -- Is the ontological argument worthless? Graham Oppy's rejection -- Oppy, perfect islands, and existence as a predicate -- Rival concepts of God and the ontological argument: Thomas Morris, Katherin Rogers, and Alvin Plantinga | |
| 520 | |a In recent years, the ontological argument and theistic metaphysics have been criticised by philosophers working in both the analytic and continental traditions. Responses to these criticisms have primarily come from philosophers who make use of the traditional, and problematic, concept of God. In this 2006 volume, Daniel A. Dombrowski defends the ontological argument against its contemporary critics, but he does so by using a neoclassical or process concept of God, thereby strengthening the case for a contemporary theistic metaphysics. Relying on the thought of Charles Hartshorne, he builds on Hartshorne's crucial distinction between divine existence and divine actuality, which enables neoclassical defenders of the ontological argument to avoid the familiar criticism that the argument moves illegitimately from an abstract concept to concrete reality. His argument, thus, avoids the problems inherent in the traditional concept of God as static | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Gott | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Process theology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a God / Proof, Ontological | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Ontologischer Gottesbeweis |0 (DE-588)4139857-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Ontologischer Gottesbeweis |0 (DE-588)4139857-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-0-521-32635-3 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-0-521-86369-8 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498916 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029337998 | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498916 |l DE-12 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498916 |l DE-473 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBG_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1818982544537812992 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Dombrowski, Daniel A. 1953- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)102597624X |
| author_facet | Dombrowski, Daniel A. 1953- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Dombrowski, Daniel A. 1953- |
| author_variant | d a d da dad |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043928919 |
| classification_rvk | CC 6000 CC 8500 |
| collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
| contents | Historical background -- Poetry versus the ontological argument: Richard Rorty's challenge -- Deconstructionism and the ontological argument: the case of Mark Taylor -- Is the ontological argument worthless? Graham Oppy's rejection -- Oppy, perfect islands, and existence as a predicate -- Rival concepts of God and the ontological argument: Thomas Morris, Katherin Rogers, and Alvin Plantinga |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511498916 (OCoLC)967420846 (DE-599)BVBBV043928919 |
| dewey-full | 212/.1 |
| dewey-hundreds | 200 - Religion |
| dewey-ones | 212 - Existence, knowability & attributes of God |
| dewey-raw | 212/.1 |
| dewey-search | 212/.1 |
| dewey-sort | 3212 11 |
| dewey-tens | 210 - Philosophy and theory of religion |
| discipline | Philosophie Theologie / Religionswissenschaften |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/CBO9780511498916 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03365nam a2200517zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043928919</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220813 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161202s2006 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780511498916</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-511-49891-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/CBO9780511498916</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511498916</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)967420846</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043928919</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">212/.1</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CC 6000</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)17650:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CC 8500</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)17709:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dombrowski, Daniel A.</subfield><subfield code="d">1953-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)102597624X</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rethinking the ontological argument</subfield><subfield code="b">a neoclassical theistic response</subfield><subfield code="c">Daniel A. Dombrowski</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (vii, 172 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Historical background -- Poetry versus the ontological argument: Richard Rorty's challenge -- Deconstructionism and the ontological argument: the case of Mark Taylor -- Is the ontological argument worthless? Graham Oppy's rejection -- Oppy, perfect islands, and existence as a predicate -- Rival concepts of God and the ontological argument: Thomas Morris, Katherin Rogers, and Alvin Plantinga</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In recent years, the ontological argument and theistic metaphysics have been criticised by philosophers working in both the analytic and continental traditions. Responses to these criticisms have primarily come from philosophers who make use of the traditional, and problematic, concept of God. In this 2006 volume, Daniel A. Dombrowski defends the ontological argument against its contemporary critics, but he does so by using a neoclassical or process concept of God, thereby strengthening the case for a contemporary theistic metaphysics. Relying on the thought of Charles Hartshorne, he builds on Hartshorne's crucial distinction between divine existence and divine actuality, which enables neoclassical defenders of the ontological argument to avoid the familiar criticism that the argument moves illegitimately from an abstract concept to concrete reality. His argument, thus, avoids the problems inherent in the traditional concept of God as static</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gott</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Theism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Process theology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">God / Proof, Ontological</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ontologischer Gottesbeweis</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4139857-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ontologischer Gottesbeweis</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4139857-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-521-32635-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-521-86369-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498916</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029337998</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498916</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498916</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV043928919 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-20T17:48:54Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780511498916 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029337998 |
| oclc_num | 967420846 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| physical | 1 online resource (vii, 172 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO |
| publishDate | 2006 |
| publishDateSearch | 2006 |
| publishDateSort | 2006 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Dombrowski, Daniel A. 1953- Verfasser (DE-588)102597624X aut Rethinking the ontological argument a neoclassical theistic response Daniel A. Dombrowski Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2006 1 online resource (vii, 172 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) Historical background -- Poetry versus the ontological argument: Richard Rorty's challenge -- Deconstructionism and the ontological argument: the case of Mark Taylor -- Is the ontological argument worthless? Graham Oppy's rejection -- Oppy, perfect islands, and existence as a predicate -- Rival concepts of God and the ontological argument: Thomas Morris, Katherin Rogers, and Alvin Plantinga In recent years, the ontological argument and theistic metaphysics have been criticised by philosophers working in both the analytic and continental traditions. Responses to these criticisms have primarily come from philosophers who make use of the traditional, and problematic, concept of God. In this 2006 volume, Daniel A. Dombrowski defends the ontological argument against its contemporary critics, but he does so by using a neoclassical or process concept of God, thereby strengthening the case for a contemporary theistic metaphysics. Relying on the thought of Charles Hartshorne, he builds on Hartshorne's crucial distinction between divine existence and divine actuality, which enables neoclassical defenders of the ontological argument to avoid the familiar criticism that the argument moves illegitimately from an abstract concept to concrete reality. His argument, thus, avoids the problems inherent in the traditional concept of God as static Gott Theism Process theology God / Proof, Ontological Ontologischer Gottesbeweis (DE-588)4139857-9 gnd rswk-swf Ontologischer Gottesbeweis (DE-588)4139857-9 s 1\p DE-604 Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-0-521-32635-3 Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-0-521-86369-8 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498916 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Dombrowski, Daniel A. 1953- Rethinking the ontological argument a neoclassical theistic response Historical background -- Poetry versus the ontological argument: Richard Rorty's challenge -- Deconstructionism and the ontological argument: the case of Mark Taylor -- Is the ontological argument worthless? Graham Oppy's rejection -- Oppy, perfect islands, and existence as a predicate -- Rival concepts of God and the ontological argument: Thomas Morris, Katherin Rogers, and Alvin Plantinga Gott Theism Process theology God / Proof, Ontological Ontologischer Gottesbeweis (DE-588)4139857-9 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4139857-9 |
| title | Rethinking the ontological argument a neoclassical theistic response |
| title_auth | Rethinking the ontological argument a neoclassical theistic response |
| title_exact_search | Rethinking the ontological argument a neoclassical theistic response |
| title_full | Rethinking the ontological argument a neoclassical theistic response Daniel A. Dombrowski |
| title_fullStr | Rethinking the ontological argument a neoclassical theistic response Daniel A. Dombrowski |
| title_full_unstemmed | Rethinking the ontological argument a neoclassical theistic response Daniel A. Dombrowski |
| title_short | Rethinking the ontological argument |
| title_sort | rethinking the ontological argument a neoclassical theistic response |
| title_sub | a neoclassical theistic response |
| topic | Gott Theism Process theology God / Proof, Ontological Ontologischer Gottesbeweis (DE-588)4139857-9 gnd |
| topic_facet | Gott Theism Process theology God / Proof, Ontological Ontologischer Gottesbeweis |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498916 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dombrowskidaniela rethinkingtheontologicalargumentaneoclassicaltheisticresponse |