Damages and human rights:
Gespeichert in:
| Beteilige Person: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Hochschulschrift/Dissertation Buch |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford ; Portland, Oregon
Hart Publishing
2016
|
| Schlagwörter: | |
| Links: | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=028935510&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=028935510&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| Beschreibung: | Based on author's thesis (doctoral - University of Cambridge, 2011) issued under title: Damages for breaches of human rights : a tort-based approach. - Includes bibliographical references and index |
| Umfang: | LII, 499 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9781849463720 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043519539 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20160822 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 160420s2016 xxk m||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 010 | |a 015049495 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781849463720 |9 978-1-84946-372-0 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)952057378 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043519539 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a xxk |c GB | ||
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-19 |a DE-355 |a DE-706 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a K935 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 342.08/5 |2 23 | |
| 084 | |a PR 2213 |0 (DE-625)139532: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a PU 4346 |0 (DE-625)140564: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Varuhas, Jason N. E. |0 (DE-588)1064603394 |4 aut | |
| 240 | 1 | 0 | |a Damages for breaches of human rights : a tort-based approach |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Damages and human rights |c Jason N.E. Varuhas |
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford ; Portland, Oregon |b Hart Publishing |c 2016 | |
| 300 | |a LII, 499 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Based on author's thesis (doctoral - University of Cambridge, 2011) issued under title: Damages for breaches of human rights : a tort-based approach. - Includes bibliographical references and index | ||
| 502 | |b Dissertation |c University of Cambridge |d 2011 | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Liability for human rights violations | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Schadensersatz |0 (DE-588)4051927-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Menschenrechtsverletzung |0 (DE-588)4276272-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Menschenrechtsverletzung |0 (DE-588)4276272-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Schadensersatz |0 (DE-588)4051927-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m LoC Fremddatenuebernahme |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=028935510&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m HBZ Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=028935510&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028935510 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1819320049752604672 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | DAMAGES AND HUMAN RIGHTS
/ VARUHAS, JASONYYEAUTHOR
: 2016
TABLE OF CONTENTS / INHALTSVERZEICHNIS
INTRODUCTION
THE TORT FRAMEWORK
A TORT-BASED APPROACH TO HUMAN RIGHTS DAMAGES
THE PUBLIC LAW-PRIVATE LAW DISTINCTION
HUMAN RIGHTS DAMAGES AND JUST SATISFACTION : THE MIRROR APPROACH
INTEREST-BALANCING APPROACHES
OTHER METHODS OF LIMITING HUMAN RIGHTS DAMAGES
CONCLUSION
DIESES SCHRIFTSTCK WURDE MASCHINELL ERZEUGT.
Titel: Damages and human rights
Autor: Varuhas, Jason N. E
Jahr: 2016
Table of Contents
Foreword..................................................................................................v
Preface....................................................................................................vü
Acknowledgements..................................................................................xi
Table of Cases........................................................................................xxi
Table of Legislation................................................................................xlv
Table of International Treaties and Conventions.......................................li
1. Introduction.......................................................................................1
I. The Structure of the Argument....................................................7
Part 1: A Tort-Based Approach to Damages for
Human Rights Breaches
2. The Tort Framework........................................................................13
I. Setting the Scene: Vindication, Damages and
Torts Theory..............................................................................14
A. The Concept of Vindication in the
Law of Torts.......................................................................14
i. Rights and Interests.....................................................15
ii. Vindication and Other Functions................................17
B. Damages.............................................................................21
C. Torts Theory.......................................................................23
II. Distinguishing Vindicatory and Compensatory Torts.................25
A. Vindicatory Torts: Torts Actionable Per Se..........................25
i. Prerequisites to Actionability.......................................26
ii. Strictness of Liability...................................................27
iii. Onus...........................................................................30
iv. Defences......................................................................31
v. Other Features............................................................32
B. Compensatory Torts: Negligence........................................32
i. The Gist: Actionable Loss...........................................33
ii. Fault...........................................................................35
iii. Causation....................................................................36
iv. Duty of Care...............................................................39
v. Onus and Defences......................................................40
vi. Rights-Based, Vindicatory Theories
of Negligence..............................................................41
C. Torts Which Combine Vindication and
Compensation: Private Nuisance........................................45
xiv Table of Contents
III. Vindication and Damages.........................................................46
A. Range of Damages............................................................47
B. Compensatory Damages and Vindication..........................50
C. Compensatory Damages within Torts
Actionable Per Se..............................................................53
i. Overview..................................................................54
ii. Normative Damage Inherent in
the Interference........................................................58
iii. The Supreme Court Decision in Lumba:
Deviation from Orthodoxy......................................61
iv. Recovery and Assessment of Damages
for Normative Damage............................................67
v. Consequential Losses...............................................70
vi. Other Features of Damages within Torts
Actionable Per Se.....................................................72
IV. Conclusions..............................................................................73
3. A Tort-Based Approach to Human Rights Damages.........................76
I. A Tort-Based Approach as a Matter of Principle......................76
A. Common Aims of Protection and
Vindication: Background...................................................77
B. Common Aims of Protection and
Vindication: Significant Doctrinal Features........................82
i. Standing...................................................................83
ii. Actionable Per Se.....................................................83
iii. Strict Liability..........................................................83
iv. Defences..................................................................85
v. Substantive Questions for the Judiciary...................87
vi. Remedies.................................................................87
vii. Procedure.................................................................88
viii. Miscellaneous..........................................................89
C. Common Functions, the Implications
for Damages, and the Prevailing Approach
to Human Rights Damages...............................................89
D. Are Positive Obligations Distinguishable?.........................97
E. Common Functions, Common Interests
and Coherence................................................................104
F. What Tort Can Offer.......................................................113
II. The Tort-Based Approach: Core Features...............................116
A. Non-Compensatory Damages.........................................116
i. Nominal Damages.................................................117
ii. User and Gain-Based Measures..............................117
iii. Exemplary Damages..............................................122
iv. Vindicatory Damages.............................................125
Table of Contents xv
B. Compensatory Damages..................................................129
i. Non-Pecuniary Damage and Loss............................130
ii. Flexibility in Methodology......................................134
iii. Pecuniary Loss.........................................................135
iv. Recoverable Heads Not Limited to
those Recognised at Common Law..........................136
III. The Relationship Between Human Rights
Damages and Other Judicial Remedies...................................140
A. Monetary Remedies........................................................140
i. General....................................................................140
ii. Disciplining the Current Approach to
Concurrent Liability Under the HRA:
Case Study on Nuisance and Article 8.....................142
B. Specific Relief..................................................................146
i. Situations where Specific Relief shall
be Sufficient Remedy...............................................146
ii. Situations where Specific Relief is
Granted to Prevent a Wrong....................................147
iii. Situations where Specific Relief and
Damages are Both Required....................................148
iv. Situations where Specific Relief is of
No Relevance..........................................................149
v. Situations where Damages may be
Awarded in Lieu of Injunctive Relief........................150
vi. Specific Relief of Primary Importance
in Human Rights Law?............................................152
IV. The Tort-Based Approach and the Provisions
of the HRA.............................................................................153
A. Decision to Award Damages...........................................153
B. Quantum and Range of Damages....................................157
V. Flawed Tort-Based Approaches: The United States
Constitutional Tort Jurisprudence..........................................159
Part 2: Human Rights Damages and the Public
Law-Private Law Distinction
The Public Law-Private Law Distinction........................................167
SECTION 1. THE PUBLIC LAW-PRIVATE
LAW DISTINCTION AS A TOOL FOR LEGAL
DEVELOPMENT.......................................................................171
I. Lack of an Anchor..................................................................171
II. Choppy Seas: The Implications of Publicness .......................179
III. Oceans or Seas of Doctrine? The Pluralistic Nature
of Public Law Doctrine...........................................................184
IV. Pulling Into Port: Conclusion.................................................187
xvi Table of Contents
SECTION 2. THE PUBLIC LAW-PRIVATE LAW
DISTINCTION AND HUMAN RIGHTS DAMAGES................189
I. Protection of the Public and Human Rights
Damages: The Approach in Anufrijeva...................................189
A. The Public Interest Theory of Public Law........................190
B. The Public Interest Theory and Human
Rights Damages..............................................................193
C. Understanding the Public Interest Theory as
a Product of Its Time.......................................................198
II. Individual Rights and the Public Interest Theory
of Public Law.........................................................................199
A. Individual Rights versus Public Duties,
Individual Interests versus Public Interests.......................200
B. Rights versus Public Duties: The Role of the Court.........209
C. Public Law and Private Law:
The Procedural Dimension..............................................212
III. Conclusion: Slaying Chimaera................................................218
IV. Is the Public Interest Approach the Only
Public Law Approach?.........................................................220
Part 3: Alternative Approaches to Damages for
Human Rights Breaches
Introduction..........................................................................................228
I. The Case Law Under the Act..................................................229
II. Context: No Other Remedy...................................................233
5. Human Rights Damages and Just Satisfaction :
The Mirror Approach...................................................................235
SECTION 1. THE TERMS OF THE HRA.....................................238
I. Principles or Practice?.............................................................241
A. Quantum.........................................................................244
II. ASection2(l) Analogy?.........................................................245
III. The Ordinary Approach.......................................................250
SECTION 2. THE SUPRANATIONAL DIMENSION...................252
I. Supranational versus Domestic Context.................................252
A. No Strasbourg Imperative...............................................252
B. The Subsidiary Role of the European
Court of Human Rights..................................................254
C. The Conceptual Nature of Convention Rights:
International Law versus Domestic Law..........................258
D. The Supranational Context.............................................261
E. The English Courts (Lack of) Consideration of
the Distinctiveness of Supranational Context..................263
F. Compliance with Convention Requirements...................266
Table of Contents xvii
II. Problematic Jurisprudences: Supranational
and Municipal........................................................................268
A. The Supranational Jurisprudence....................................269
B. Limited Guidance............................................................275
C. Emergence of a Problematic Domestic
Jurisprudence..................................................................279
i. Problems of Reasoning............................................280
ii. Problems of Broad Discretion:
Subjective Concerns and Inconsistency....................286
iii. Quantum.................................................................288
iv. Incoherence.............................................................290
D. Supplementing Strasbourg...............................................292
SECTION 3. THE METHODOLOGY OF
THE MIRROR APPROACH......................................................297
I. A Problematic Method...........................................................297
II. Quantum................................................................................301
III. Inconsistent Method and the Risk of
Skewed Interpretation............................................................303
IV. [0]ne Damn Thing after Another .........................................307
SECTION 4. THE FUTURE OF THE MIRROR
APPROACH POST-FAULKNER................................................310
I. Delphic Dicta.........................................................................310
II. Beginnings of a Liberalisation of Approach?..........................313
III. A British Bill of Rights?..........................................................319
SECTION 5. OVERVIEW..............................................................321
Interest-Balancing Approaches........................................................324
SECTION 1: DOCTRINAL ANALYSIS OF
THE INTEREST-BALANCING APPROACH.............................326
I. The Interest-Balancing Approach and the
Terms of the HRA..................................................................326
II. The Interest-Balancing Approach and
Convention Requirements......................................................330
A. Requirements of Article 13
(and Articles 34 and 35(1)).............................................331
B. Substantive Rights and Remedies....................................334
C. Absolute Nature of Article 13.........................................335
D. Proportionality................................................................336
III. The Interest-Balancing Approach and
Fundamental Principles of English Law..................................337
A. Ubi lus, Ibi Remedium....................................................337
B. The Principle of Equality.................................................340
xviii Table of Contents
SECTION 2: NORMATIVE ANALYSIS OF
THE INTEREST-BALANCING APPROACH.............................342
I. Concerns that may Justify an
Interest-Balancing Approach..................................................343
II. The Importance of Remedying Rights-Violations...................345
III. Prejudice to the Public Interest: Only in Public Law?..............353
IV. Is the Interest-Balancing Approach Necessary?.......................355
V. Public Interest Factors: A Critical Analysis.............................361
A. Depletion of Resources Available to
Benefit the Wider Community.........................................363
i. The Importance of a Robust,
Evidence-Based Approach........................................367
ii. Constitutional, Institutional and
Practical Concerns...................................................370
iii. Financial Impact in Other Parts of
Public Law...............................................................372
B. Moral Status of the Victim..............................................375
C. Pragmatic Political Concerns...........................................380
D. Chilling Effects................................................................382
i. An Empirical Void...................................................382
ii. Empirical Evidence and Difficulties
ofPrediction............................................................383
iii. Limitations of Courts..............................................389
E. Floodgates and Litigation Culture .................................390
F. Leaving the Political Branches to Respond:
Is it Realistic?..................................................................397
i. Case Studies.............................................................399
VI. Rule-of-Law and Other Concerns Raised
by the Discretionary Nature of the Interest-Balancing
Approach...............................................................................405
VII. Refining the Interest-Balancing Approach...............................409
A. Individual versus Public:
Avoiding a False Dichotomy............................................409
B. Starting-Point, Structure and
Weighting of Factors.......................................................418
SECTION 3. CONCLUSIONS.......................................................423
7. Other Methods of Limiting Human Rights Damages......................426
I. Degree of Loss Under Article 41, ECHR................................427
II. EU Law, Francovich Liability and the
Sufficiently Serious Criterion................................................433
A. The Francovich Criteria..................................................434
Table of Contents xix
B. Should the Francovich Criteria
Govern Human Rights Damages?...................................435
i. Different Interests....................................................435
ii. A Marginal Remedy................................................437
iii. Range of Institutions Potentially Liable...................438
iv. Different Contexts: EU Law versus
Domestic Human Rights Law..................................438
C. Conclusion......................................................................445
III. Immunities from Suit in US Constitutional Tort Law..............446
A. The Importance of Context.............................................447
i. Constitutional Concerns..........................................448
ii. Widespread Governmental and
Official Immunities..................................................451
iii. Relevant Defendant.................................................456
iv. Instrumentalist Conception of Liability...................458
B. The Qualified Immunity Doctrine...................................460
i. The Clearly Established Element............................460
ii. The Objective Reasonableness Element.................463
iii. Avoidance of Substantive
Constitutional Issues................................................466
C. Conclusion......................................................................468
8. Conclusion.....................................................................................470
Index.....................................................................................................477
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Varuhas, Jason N. E. |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1064603394 |
| author_facet | Varuhas, Jason N. E. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Varuhas, Jason N. E. |
| author_variant | j n e v jne jnev |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043519539 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | K935 |
| callnumber-raw | K935 |
| callnumber-search | K935 |
| callnumber-sort | K 3935 |
| callnumber-subject | K - General Law |
| classification_rvk | PR 2213 PU 4346 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)952057378 (DE-599)BVBBV043519539 |
| dewey-full | 342.08/5 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law |
| dewey-raw | 342.08/5 |
| dewey-search | 342.08/5 |
| dewey-sort | 3342.08 15 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Thesis Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02186nam a2200469 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043519539</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20160822 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160420s2016 xxk m||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">015049495</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781849463720</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-84946-372-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)952057378</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043519539</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxk</subfield><subfield code="c">GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-706</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K935</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.08/5</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PR 2213</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139532:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PU 4346</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)140564:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Varuhas, Jason N. E.</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1064603394</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="240" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Damages for breaches of human rights : a tort-based approach</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Damages and human rights</subfield><subfield code="c">Jason N.E. Varuhas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford ; Portland, Oregon</subfield><subfield code="b">Hart Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LII, 499 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Based on author's thesis (doctoral - University of Cambridge, 2011) issued under title: Damages for breaches of human rights : a tort-based approach. - Includes bibliographical references and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Dissertation</subfield><subfield code="c">University of Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="d">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Liability for human rights violations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Schadensersatz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4051927-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Menschenrechtsverletzung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4276272-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Menschenrechtsverletzung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4276272-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Schadensersatz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4051927-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">LoC Fremddatenuebernahme</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=028935510&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">HBZ Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=028935510&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028935510</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
| id | DE-604.BV043519539 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-20T17:38:30Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781849463720 |
| language | English |
| lccn | 015049495 |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028935510 |
| oclc_num | 952057378 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-706 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-706 |
| physical | LII, 499 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publishDateSearch | 2016 |
| publishDateSort | 2016 |
| publisher | Hart Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| spellingShingle | Varuhas, Jason N. E. Damages and human rights Liability for human rights violations Schadensersatz (DE-588)4051927-2 gnd Menschenrechtsverletzung (DE-588)4276272-8 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4051927-2 (DE-588)4276272-8 (DE-588)4113937-9 |
| title | Damages and human rights |
| title_alt | Damages for breaches of human rights : a tort-based approach |
| title_auth | Damages and human rights |
| title_exact_search | Damages and human rights |
| title_full | Damages and human rights Jason N.E. Varuhas |
| title_fullStr | Damages and human rights Jason N.E. Varuhas |
| title_full_unstemmed | Damages and human rights Jason N.E. Varuhas |
| title_short | Damages and human rights |
| title_sort | damages and human rights |
| topic | Liability for human rights violations Schadensersatz (DE-588)4051927-2 gnd Menschenrechtsverletzung (DE-588)4276272-8 gnd |
| topic_facet | Liability for human rights violations Schadensersatz Menschenrechtsverletzung Hochschulschrift |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=028935510&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=028935510&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT varuhasjasonne damagesforbreachesofhumanrightsatortbasedapproach AT varuhasjasonne damagesandhumanrights |