Sustainable food waste evaluation:
Gespeichert in:
| Beteilige Person: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Alexandria, VA
WERF
2012
|
| Schlagwörter: | |
| Links: | http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=605185 http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=605185 http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=605185 |
| Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA, 2011), over 34 million tons of food waste are generated annually in the United States. The agency further reports that almost all of this waste is landfilled. Based on these estimates, food waste is the second greatest category of waste generated in the United States, only behind paper. Given the mass of food waste generated, determining the economic and environmental costs and benefits of different food waste management methods should be a significant priority. The purpose of this research is to estimate economic and environmental costs and benefits of different food waste management alternatives. This study examined food waste management, taking into special consideration the processing of food waste introduced into the wastewater system through residential food disposers, at a commonly configured treatment plant and food waste that is hauled directly to anaerobic digesters at the same treatment facility. The researchers also examined common practices for food waste management, such as landfilling, composting and mixed waste recovery. The study assessed economic, environmental, social, and operational considerations of food waste management. To maintain consistency throughout the analysis, assumptions that impacted multiple alternatives (e.g., equipment demands, fuel characteristics, and general costs) were made common to all the alternatives. In order of preference, assumptions were based on vendor data, literature values, and professional experience. All of the food waste management scenarios were based on a representative community of 100,000 residents located in North America. The research examined the impacts to a representative wastewater treatment plant, assuming an increased use of food waste disposers throughout the service population and the co-digestion of post-consumer food waste hauled directly to anaerobic digesters located at wastewater treatment plants. The focus of the research was on residential food waste generation and does not apply to commercial or industrial food waste generation |
| Umfang: | 1 Online-Ressource |
| ISBN: | 1780401280 1780403852 9781780401287 9781780403854 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043066308 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 151126s2012 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 1780401280 |c electronic bk. |9 1-78040-128-0 | ||
| 020 | |a 1780403852 |9 1-78040-385-2 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781780401287 |c electronic bk. |9 978-1-78040-128-7 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781780403854 |9 978-1-78040-385-4 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)854346338 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043066308 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-1046 |a DE-1047 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 363.72/8 |2 23 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Parry, David L. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Sustainable food waste evaluation |c by David L. Parry |
| 264 | 1 | |a Alexandria, VA |b WERF |c 2012 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Includes bibliographical references | ||
| 500 | |a According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA, 2011), over 34 million tons of food waste are generated annually in the United States. The agency further reports that almost all of this waste is landfilled. Based on these estimates, food waste is the second greatest category of waste generated in the United States, only behind paper. Given the mass of food waste generated, determining the economic and environmental costs and benefits of different food waste management methods should be a significant priority. The purpose of this research is to estimate economic and environmental costs and benefits of different food waste management alternatives. This study examined food waste management, taking into special consideration the processing of food waste introduced into the wastewater system through residential food disposers, at a commonly configured treatment plant and food waste that is hauled directly to anaerobic digesters at the same treatment facility. | ||
| 500 | |a The researchers also examined common practices for food waste management, such as landfilling, composting and mixed waste recovery. The study assessed economic, environmental, social, and operational considerations of food waste management. To maintain consistency throughout the analysis, assumptions that impacted multiple alternatives (e.g., equipment demands, fuel characteristics, and general costs) were made common to all the alternatives. In order of preference, assumptions were based on vendor data, literature values, and professional experience. All of the food waste management scenarios were based on a representative community of 100,000 residents located in North America. The research examined the impacts to a representative wastewater treatment plant, assuming an increased use of food waste disposers throughout the service population and the co-digestion of post-consumer food waste hauled directly to anaerobic digesters located at wastewater treatment plants. | ||
| 500 | |a The focus of the research was on residential food waste generation and does not apply to commercial or industrial food waste generation | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Environmental / Waste Management |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a SCIENCE / Applied Sciences |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Refuse and refuse disposal |2 fast | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Refuse and refuse disposal | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=605185 |x Aggregator |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028490500 | |
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=605185 |l DE-1046 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=605185 |l DE-1047 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1818981168808198144 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Parry, David L. |
| author_facet | Parry, David L. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Parry, David L. |
| author_variant | d l p dl dlp |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043066308 |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)854346338 (DE-599)BVBBV043066308 |
| dewey-full | 363.72/8 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 363 - Other social problems and services |
| dewey-raw | 363.72/8 |
| dewey-search | 363.72/8 |
| dewey-sort | 3363.72 18 |
| dewey-tens | 360 - Social problems and services; associations |
| discipline | Soziologie |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03838nam a2200445zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043066308</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">151126s2012 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1780401280</subfield><subfield code="c">electronic bk.</subfield><subfield code="9">1-78040-128-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1780403852</subfield><subfield code="9">1-78040-385-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781780401287</subfield><subfield code="c">electronic bk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-78040-128-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781780403854</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-78040-385-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)854346338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043066308</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1047</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">363.72/8</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Parry, David L.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Sustainable food waste evaluation</subfield><subfield code="c">by David L. Parry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Alexandria, VA</subfield><subfield code="b">WERF</subfield><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA, 2011), over 34 million tons of food waste are generated annually in the United States. The agency further reports that almost all of this waste is landfilled. Based on these estimates, food waste is the second greatest category of waste generated in the United States, only behind paper. Given the mass of food waste generated, determining the economic and environmental costs and benefits of different food waste management methods should be a significant priority. The purpose of this research is to estimate economic and environmental costs and benefits of different food waste management alternatives. This study examined food waste management, taking into special consideration the processing of food waste introduced into the wastewater system through residential food disposers, at a commonly configured treatment plant and food waste that is hauled directly to anaerobic digesters at the same treatment facility. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The researchers also examined common practices for food waste management, such as landfilling, composting and mixed waste recovery. The study assessed economic, environmental, social, and operational considerations of food waste management. To maintain consistency throughout the analysis, assumptions that impacted multiple alternatives (e.g., equipment demands, fuel characteristics, and general costs) were made common to all the alternatives. In order of preference, assumptions were based on vendor data, literature values, and professional experience. All of the food waste management scenarios were based on a representative community of 100,000 residents located in North America. The research examined the impacts to a representative wastewater treatment plant, assuming an increased use of food waste disposers throughout the service population and the co-digestion of post-consumer food waste hauled directly to anaerobic digesters located at wastewater treatment plants. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The focus of the research was on residential food waste generation and does not apply to commercial or industrial food waste generation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Environmental / Waste Management</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">SCIENCE / Applied Sciences</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Refuse and refuse disposal</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Refuse and refuse disposal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=605185</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028490500</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=605185</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=605185</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-1047</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV043066308 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-20T17:27:02Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 1780401280 1780403852 9781780401287 9781780403854 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028490500 |
| oclc_num | 854346338 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| owner_facet | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA ZDB-4-EBA FAW_PDA_EBA |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publishDateSearch | 2012 |
| publishDateSort | 2012 |
| publisher | WERF |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Parry, David L. Verfasser aut Sustainable food waste evaluation by David L. Parry Alexandria, VA WERF 2012 1 Online-Ressource txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Includes bibliographical references According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA, 2011), over 34 million tons of food waste are generated annually in the United States. The agency further reports that almost all of this waste is landfilled. Based on these estimates, food waste is the second greatest category of waste generated in the United States, only behind paper. Given the mass of food waste generated, determining the economic and environmental costs and benefits of different food waste management methods should be a significant priority. The purpose of this research is to estimate economic and environmental costs and benefits of different food waste management alternatives. This study examined food waste management, taking into special consideration the processing of food waste introduced into the wastewater system through residential food disposers, at a commonly configured treatment plant and food waste that is hauled directly to anaerobic digesters at the same treatment facility. The researchers also examined common practices for food waste management, such as landfilling, composting and mixed waste recovery. The study assessed economic, environmental, social, and operational considerations of food waste management. To maintain consistency throughout the analysis, assumptions that impacted multiple alternatives (e.g., equipment demands, fuel characteristics, and general costs) were made common to all the alternatives. In order of preference, assumptions were based on vendor data, literature values, and professional experience. All of the food waste management scenarios were based on a representative community of 100,000 residents located in North America. The research examined the impacts to a representative wastewater treatment plant, assuming an increased use of food waste disposers throughout the service population and the co-digestion of post-consumer food waste hauled directly to anaerobic digesters located at wastewater treatment plants. The focus of the research was on residential food waste generation and does not apply to commercial or industrial food waste generation TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Environmental / Waste Management bisacsh SCIENCE / Applied Sciences bisacsh Refuse and refuse disposal fast Refuse and refuse disposal http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=605185 Aggregator Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Parry, David L. Sustainable food waste evaluation TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Environmental / Waste Management bisacsh SCIENCE / Applied Sciences bisacsh Refuse and refuse disposal fast Refuse and refuse disposal |
| title | Sustainable food waste evaluation |
| title_auth | Sustainable food waste evaluation |
| title_exact_search | Sustainable food waste evaluation |
| title_full | Sustainable food waste evaluation by David L. Parry |
| title_fullStr | Sustainable food waste evaluation by David L. Parry |
| title_full_unstemmed | Sustainable food waste evaluation by David L. Parry |
| title_short | Sustainable food waste evaluation |
| title_sort | sustainable food waste evaluation |
| topic | TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Environmental / Waste Management bisacsh SCIENCE / Applied Sciences bisacsh Refuse and refuse disposal fast Refuse and refuse disposal |
| topic_facet | TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Environmental / Waste Management SCIENCE / Applied Sciences Refuse and refuse disposal |
| url | http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=605185 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT parrydavidl sustainablefoodwasteevaluation |