The Death of Argument: Fallacies in Agent Based Reasoning
Gespeichert in:
| Beteilige Person: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Dordrecht
Springer Netherlands
2004
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Applied Logic Series
32 |
| Schlagwörter: | |
| Links: | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2712-3 |
| Beschreibung: | The present work is a fair record of work I've done on the fallacies and related matters in the fifteen years since 1986. The book may be seen as a sequel to Fallacies: Selected papers 1972-1982, which I wrote with Douglas Walton, and which appeared in 1989 with Foris. This time I am on my own. Douglas Walton has, long since, found his own voice, as the saying has it; and so have I. Both of us greatly value the time we spent performing duets, but we also recognize the attractions of solo work. If I had to characterize the difference that has manifested itself in our later work, I would venture that Walton has strayed more, and I less, from what has come to be called the Woods-Walton Approach to the study of fallacies. Perhaps, on reflection "stray" is not the word for it, inasmuch as Walton's deviation from and my fidelity to the WWA are serious matters of methodological principle. The WWA was always conceived of as a way of handling the analysis of various kinds of fallacious argument or reasoning. It was a response to a particular challenge [Hamblin, 1970]. The challenge was that since logicians had allowed the investigation of fallacious reasoning to fall into disgraceful disarray, it was up to them to put things right. Accordingly, the WWA sought these repairs amidst the rich pluralisms of logic in the 1970s and beyond |
| Umfang: | 1 Online-Ressource (XXVII, 378 p) |
| ISBN: | 9781402027123 9789048167005 |
| ISSN: | 1386-2790 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/978-1-4020-2712-3 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zcb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV042419247 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 150317s2004 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781402027123 |c Online |9 978-1-4020-2712-3 | ||
| 020 | |a 9789048167005 |c Print |9 978-90-481-6700-5 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/978-1-4020-2712-3 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)860335388 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV042419247 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-384 |a DE-703 |a DE-91 |a DE-634 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 160 |2 23 | |
| 084 | |a MAT 000 |2 stub | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Woods, John |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The Death of Argument |b Fallacies in Agent Based Reasoning |c by John Woods |
| 264 | 1 | |a Dordrecht |b Springer Netherlands |c 2004 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (XXVII, 378 p) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Applied Logic Series |v 32 |x 1386-2790 | |
| 500 | |a The present work is a fair record of work I've done on the fallacies and related matters in the fifteen years since 1986. The book may be seen as a sequel to Fallacies: Selected papers 1972-1982, which I wrote with Douglas Walton, and which appeared in 1989 with Foris. This time I am on my own. Douglas Walton has, long since, found his own voice, as the saying has it; and so have I. Both of us greatly value the time we spent performing duets, but we also recognize the attractions of solo work. If I had to characterize the difference that has manifested itself in our later work, I would venture that Walton has strayed more, and I less, from what has come to be called the Woods-Walton Approach to the study of fallacies. Perhaps, on reflection "stray" is not the word for it, inasmuch as Walton's deviation from and my fidelity to the WWA are serious matters of methodological principle. The WWA was always conceived of as a way of handling the analysis of various kinds of fallacious argument or reasoning. It was a response to a particular challenge [Hamblin, 1970]. The challenge was that since logicians had allowed the investigation of fallacious reasoning to fall into disgraceful disarray, it was up to them to put things right. Accordingly, the WWA sought these repairs amidst the rich pluralisms of logic in the 1970s and beyond | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Philosophy (General) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Science (General) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Logic | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Philosophy of law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Philosophy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Science, general | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Philosophy of Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Linguistics (general) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Naturwissenschaft | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Philosophie | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Fehlschluss |0 (DE-588)4132069-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Fehlertheorie |0 (DE-588)4474146-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Logik |0 (DE-588)4036202-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Fehlertheorie |0 (DE-588)4474146-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Logik |0 (DE-588)4036202-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 1 | 0 | |a Logik |0 (DE-588)4036202-4 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | 1 | |a Fehlschluss |0 (DE-588)4132069-4 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | |8 2\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2712-3 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-2-SMA | ||
| 912 | |a ZDB-2-BAE | ||
| 940 | 1 | |q ZDB-2-SMA_Archive | |
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 883 | 1 | |8 2\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027854664 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-TUM_katkey | 2066256 |
|---|---|
| _version_ | 1821931179653201920 |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Woods, John |
| author_facet | Woods, John |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Woods, John |
| author_variant | j w jw |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV042419247 |
| classification_tum | MAT 000 |
| collection | ZDB-2-SMA ZDB-2-BAE |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)860335388 (DE-599)BVBBV042419247 |
| dewey-full | 160 |
| dewey-hundreds | 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
| dewey-ones | 160 - Philosophical logic |
| dewey-raw | 160 |
| dewey-search | 160 |
| dewey-sort | 3160 |
| dewey-tens | 160 - Philosophical logic |
| discipline | Mathematik Philosophie |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/978-1-4020-2712-3 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03445nam a2200625zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV042419247</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">150317s2004 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781402027123</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-4020-2712-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789048167005</subfield><subfield code="c">Print</subfield><subfield code="9">978-90-481-6700-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/978-1-4020-2712-3</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)860335388</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV042419247</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-634</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">160</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAT 000</subfield><subfield code="2">stub</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Woods, John</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The Death of Argument</subfield><subfield code="b">Fallacies in Agent Based Reasoning</subfield><subfield code="c">by John Woods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Dordrecht</subfield><subfield code="b">Springer Netherlands</subfield><subfield code="c">2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (XXVII, 378 p)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Applied Logic Series</subfield><subfield code="v">32</subfield><subfield code="x">1386-2790</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The present work is a fair record of work I've done on the fallacies and related matters in the fifteen years since 1986. The book may be seen as a sequel to Fallacies: Selected papers 1972-1982, which I wrote with Douglas Walton, and which appeared in 1989 with Foris. This time I am on my own. Douglas Walton has, long since, found his own voice, as the saying has it; and so have I. Both of us greatly value the time we spent performing duets, but we also recognize the attractions of solo work. If I had to characterize the difference that has manifested itself in our later work, I would venture that Walton has strayed more, and I less, from what has come to be called the Woods-Walton Approach to the study of fallacies. Perhaps, on reflection "stray" is not the word for it, inasmuch as Walton's deviation from and my fidelity to the WWA are serious matters of methodological principle. The WWA was always conceived of as a way of handling the analysis of various kinds of fallacious argument or reasoning. It was a response to a particular challenge [Hamblin, 1970]. The challenge was that since logicians had allowed the investigation of fallacious reasoning to fall into disgraceful disarray, it was up to them to put things right. Accordingly, the WWA sought these repairs amidst the rich pluralisms of logic in the 1970s and beyond</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophy (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Science (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Logic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophy of law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Science, general</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophy of Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Linguistics (general)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Naturwissenschaft</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Fehlschluss</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4132069-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Fehlertheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4474146-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Logik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4036202-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Fehlertheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4474146-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Logik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4036202-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Logik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4036202-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Fehlschluss</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4132069-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2712-3</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-2-SMA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-2-BAE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">ZDB-2-SMA_Archive</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027854664</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV042419247 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-20T17:10:40Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781402027123 9789048167005 |
| issn | 1386-2790 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027854664 |
| oclc_num | 860335388 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-384 DE-703 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-634 |
| owner_facet | DE-384 DE-703 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-634 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (XXVII, 378 p) |
| psigel | ZDB-2-SMA ZDB-2-BAE ZDB-2-SMA_Archive |
| publishDate | 2004 |
| publishDateSearch | 2004 |
| publishDateSort | 2004 |
| publisher | Springer Netherlands |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Applied Logic Series |
| spellingShingle | Woods, John The Death of Argument Fallacies in Agent Based Reasoning Philosophy (General) Science (General) Logic Philosophy of law Philosophy Science, general Philosophy of Law Linguistics (general) Naturwissenschaft Philosophie Fehlschluss (DE-588)4132069-4 gnd Fehlertheorie (DE-588)4474146-7 gnd Logik (DE-588)4036202-4 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4132069-4 (DE-588)4474146-7 (DE-588)4036202-4 |
| title | The Death of Argument Fallacies in Agent Based Reasoning |
| title_auth | The Death of Argument Fallacies in Agent Based Reasoning |
| title_exact_search | The Death of Argument Fallacies in Agent Based Reasoning |
| title_full | The Death of Argument Fallacies in Agent Based Reasoning by John Woods |
| title_fullStr | The Death of Argument Fallacies in Agent Based Reasoning by John Woods |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Death of Argument Fallacies in Agent Based Reasoning by John Woods |
| title_short | The Death of Argument |
| title_sort | the death of argument fallacies in agent based reasoning |
| title_sub | Fallacies in Agent Based Reasoning |
| topic | Philosophy (General) Science (General) Logic Philosophy of law Philosophy Science, general Philosophy of Law Linguistics (general) Naturwissenschaft Philosophie Fehlschluss (DE-588)4132069-4 gnd Fehlertheorie (DE-588)4474146-7 gnd Logik (DE-588)4036202-4 gnd |
| topic_facet | Philosophy (General) Science (General) Logic Philosophy of law Philosophy Science, general Philosophy of Law Linguistics (general) Naturwissenschaft Philosophie Fehlschluss Fehlertheorie Logik |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2712-3 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT woodsjohn thedeathofargumentfallaciesinagentbasedreasoning |