Quantum Mechanics Versus Local Realism: The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox
Gespeichert in:
Beteilige Person: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Veröffentlicht: |
Boston, MA
Springer US
1988
|
Schriftenreihe: | Physics of Atoms and Molecules
|
Schlagwörter: | |
Links: | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8774-9 |
Beschreibung: | If you have two small objects, one here on Earth and the other on the planet Pluto, what would you say of the following statement: No modification of the properties of the object on the earth can take place as a consequence of an interaction of the distant object with a third body also located on Pluto? The opinion that the previous statement is correct is very natural, but modern quantum theory implies that it must be wrong in certain cases. Consider in fact two arbitrary objects separated by such a large distance that they are unable to exert any important mutual influence. It is possible to show rigorously that a measurable physical quantity exists, with a value more than 40% different from the value theoretically predicted by quantum mechanics. Necessarily then, either space is largely an illusion of our senses and it does not exist objectively, or information can be sent from the future to the past, or ... something important has to be changed in modern physics. This is the essence of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox. A paradox is an argument that derives absurd conclusions by valid deduction from acceptable premises. In the case of the EPR paradox the absurd conclusion is that Bell's observable d should have two different values d = 2.Ji and The "acceptable premises" are the following: 1. All the empirical predictions of the existing quantum theory are correct |
Umfang: | 1 Online-Ressource (XVIII, 461 p) |
ISBN: | 9781468487749 9781468487763 |
DOI: | 10.1007/978-1-4684-8774-9 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV042412197 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20220420 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 150316s1988 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9781468487749 |c Online |9 978-1-4684-8774-9 | ||
020 | |a 9781468487763 |c Print |9 978-1-4684-8776-3 | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/978-1-4684-8774-9 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (OCoLC)860225042 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV042412197 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-91 |a DE-83 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 530.1 |2 23 | |
084 | |a PHY 000 |2 stub | ||
084 | |a PHY 028f |2 stub | ||
100 | 1 | |a Selleri, Franco |d 1936-2013 |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1255711078 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Quantum Mechanics Versus Local Realism |b The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox |c edited by Franco Selleri |
264 | 1 | |a Boston, MA |b Springer US |c 1988 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (XVIII, 461 p) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Physics of Atoms and Molecules | |
500 | |a If you have two small objects, one here on Earth and the other on the planet Pluto, what would you say of the following statement: No modification of the properties of the object on the earth can take place as a consequence of an interaction of the distant object with a third body also located on Pluto? The opinion that the previous statement is correct is very natural, but modern quantum theory implies that it must be wrong in certain cases. Consider in fact two arbitrary objects separated by such a large distance that they are unable to exert any important mutual influence. It is possible to show rigorously that a measurable physical quantity exists, with a value more than 40% different from the value theoretically predicted by quantum mechanics. Necessarily then, either space is largely an illusion of our senses and it does not exist objectively, or information can be sent from the future to the past, or ... something important has to be changed in modern physics. This is the essence of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox. A paradox is an argument that derives absurd conclusions by valid deduction from acceptable premises. In the case of the EPR paradox the absurd conclusion is that Bell's observable d should have two different values d = 2.Ji and The "acceptable premises" are the following: 1. All the empirical predictions of the existing quantum theory are correct | ||
650 | 4 | |a Physics | |
650 | 4 | |a Theoretical, Mathematical and Computational Physics | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Paradox |0 (DE-588)4220769-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
655 | 7 | |8 1\p |0 (DE-588)4143413-4 |a Aufsatzsammlung |2 gnd-content | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Paradox |0 (DE-588)4220769-1 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8774-9 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-2-PHA | ||
912 | |a ZDB-2-BAE | ||
940 | 1 | |q ZDB-2-PHA_Archive | |
883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027847690 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
DE-BY-TUM_katkey | 2061517 |
---|---|
_version_ | 1821931274600710144 |
any_adam_object | |
author | Selleri, Franco 1936-2013 |
author_GND | (DE-588)1255711078 |
author_facet | Selleri, Franco 1936-2013 |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Selleri, Franco 1936-2013 |
author_variant | f s fs |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV042412197 |
classification_tum | PHY 000 PHY 028f |
collection | ZDB-2-PHA ZDB-2-BAE |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)860225042 (DE-599)BVBBV042412197 |
dewey-full | 530.1 |
dewey-hundreds | 500 - Natural sciences and mathematics |
dewey-ones | 530 - Physics |
dewey-raw | 530.1 |
dewey-search | 530.1 |
dewey-sort | 3530.1 |
dewey-tens | 530 - Physics |
discipline | Physik |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/978-1-4684-8774-9 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03062nam a2200469zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV042412197</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220420 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">150316s1988 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781468487749</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-4684-8774-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781468487763</subfield><subfield code="c">Print</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-4684-8776-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/978-1-4684-8774-9</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)860225042</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV042412197</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-83</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">530.1</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHY 000</subfield><subfield code="2">stub</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PHY 028f</subfield><subfield code="2">stub</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Selleri, Franco</subfield><subfield code="d">1936-2013</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1255711078</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Quantum Mechanics Versus Local Realism</subfield><subfield code="b">The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox</subfield><subfield code="c">edited by Franco Selleri</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Boston, MA</subfield><subfield code="b">Springer US</subfield><subfield code="c">1988</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (XVIII, 461 p)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Physics of Atoms and Molecules</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">If you have two small objects, one here on Earth and the other on the planet Pluto, what would you say of the following statement: No modification of the properties of the object on the earth can take place as a consequence of an interaction of the distant object with a third body also located on Pluto? The opinion that the previous statement is correct is very natural, but modern quantum theory implies that it must be wrong in certain cases. Consider in fact two arbitrary objects separated by such a large distance that they are unable to exert any important mutual influence. It is possible to show rigorously that a measurable physical quantity exists, with a value more than 40% different from the value theoretically predicted by quantum mechanics. Necessarily then, either space is largely an illusion of our senses and it does not exist objectively, or information can be sent from the future to the past, or ... something important has to be changed in modern physics. This is the essence of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox. A paradox is an argument that derives absurd conclusions by valid deduction from acceptable premises. In the case of the EPR paradox the absurd conclusion is that Bell's observable d should have two different values d = 2.Ji and The "acceptable premises" are the following: 1. All the empirical predictions of the existing quantum theory are correct</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Physics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Theoretical, Mathematical and Computational Physics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Paradox</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4220769-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4143413-4</subfield><subfield code="a">Aufsatzsammlung</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Paradox</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4220769-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8774-9</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-2-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-2-BAE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">ZDB-2-PHA_Archive</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027847690</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
genre | 1\p (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content |
genre_facet | Aufsatzsammlung |
id | DE-604.BV042412197 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-12-20T17:10:26Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9781468487749 9781468487763 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027847690 |
oclc_num | 860225042 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-83 |
owner_facet | DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-83 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (XVIII, 461 p) |
psigel | ZDB-2-PHA ZDB-2-BAE ZDB-2-PHA_Archive |
publishDate | 1988 |
publishDateSearch | 1988 |
publishDateSort | 1988 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Physics of Atoms and Molecules |
spellingShingle | Selleri, Franco 1936-2013 Quantum Mechanics Versus Local Realism The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox Physics Theoretical, Mathematical and Computational Physics Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Paradox (DE-588)4220769-1 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4220769-1 (DE-588)4143413-4 |
title | Quantum Mechanics Versus Local Realism The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox |
title_auth | Quantum Mechanics Versus Local Realism The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox |
title_exact_search | Quantum Mechanics Versus Local Realism The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox |
title_full | Quantum Mechanics Versus Local Realism The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox edited by Franco Selleri |
title_fullStr | Quantum Mechanics Versus Local Realism The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox edited by Franco Selleri |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantum Mechanics Versus Local Realism The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox edited by Franco Selleri |
title_short | Quantum Mechanics Versus Local Realism |
title_sort | quantum mechanics versus local realism the einstein podolsky rosen paradox |
title_sub | The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox |
topic | Physics Theoretical, Mathematical and Computational Physics Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Paradox (DE-588)4220769-1 gnd |
topic_facet | Physics Theoretical, Mathematical and Computational Physics Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Paradox Aufsatzsammlung |
url | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8774-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sellerifranco quantummechanicsversuslocalrealismtheeinsteinpodolskyrosenparadox |