Arbitration law of Czech Republic: practice and procedure
Gespeichert in:
| Beteilige Person: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Huntington, New York
Juris
[2013]
|
| Schlagwörter: | |
| Links: | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025939636&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| Umfang: | cxxxiii, 2137 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9781937518189 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV040961271 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20190508 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 130423s2013 xx |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781937518189 |9 978-1-937518-18-9 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)844076789 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV040961271 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-355 |a DE-19 |a DE-703 |a DE-188 |a DE-739 |a DE-M382 | ||
| 084 | |a PU 4410 |0 (DE-625)140585: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Bělohlávek, Alexander J. |d 1968- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)113462891 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Arbitration law of Czech Republic |b practice and procedure |c Alexander J. Bělohlávek |
| 264 | 1 | |a Huntington, New York |b Juris |c [2013] | |
| 300 | |a cxxxiii, 2137 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit |0 (DE-588)4052348-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Schiedsrichterliches Verfahren |0 (DE-588)4121615-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Tschechien |0 (DE-588)4303381-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Tschechien |0 (DE-588)4303381-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit |0 (DE-588)4052348-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Schiedsrichterliches Verfahren |0 (DE-588)4121615-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |C b |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025939636&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-025939636 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1819282609037901824 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | IMAGE 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABOUT THE AUTHOR XLIII
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS XLV
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS XLVII
TEXT AND COMPARISON OF THE ACT LIX
INTRODUCTION CXXVII
PART ONE: GENERAL PROVISIONS
CHAPTER 1, SCOPE OF THE ACT; INDEPENDENCE AND IMPARTIALITY- SECTION 1 3
1.1. ARBITRATION AND LEX ARBITRI 4
1 .II. ARBITRATION AND THE RIGHT TO LEGAL AND JUDICIAL PROTECTION
(EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS-ECHR) 8 1 .III. PURPOSE OF
ARBITRATION: THE NATURE OF ARBITRATION ACCORDING TO THE DOCTRINES
APPLIED BY CERTAIN SELECTED COUNTRIES 10 1 .IV. RIGHT TO LEGAL
PROTECTION VERSUS RIGHT TO JUDICIAL PROTECTION
AND THE IMPORTANCE OF AUTONOMY 13
L.V. SCOPE OF THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL AND ARBITRATION 18
L.VI. NATURE OF ARBITRATION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF CZECH LAW 23 L.VI.L.
CONTRACTUAL THEORY 23
1.VI.2. JURISDICTIONAL THEORY 28
1.VI.3. MIXED (HYBRID) THEORY 37
1.VI.4. AUTONOMOUS THEORY 39
L.VH. DEVELOPMENT AND BASIS OF THE OPINIONS ON THE NATURE OF ARBITRATION
39
L.VIII. CONCEPT OF ARBITRATION IN THE DOCTRINE ADJUDICATED BY THE
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC 49
1 .VIII. 1. DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL OPINION ON ARBITRATION
UNTIL 2011 49
1 .VIII.2. IMPORTANT DECISIONS OF THE CONCOURT FROM 2002 TO 2011 52
1 .VIII.2.1. RESOLUTION OF THE CONCOURT, CASE NO. IV. US 174/02 OF 15
JULY 2002 ...52
ML
IMAGE 2
ARBITRATION LAW OF CZECH REPUBLIC
]. VLLL.2.2. JUDGMENT OF THE CONCOURT, CASE NO. IV. US 2157/08 OF 24
SEPTEMBER 2008: INTERPRETATION OF AN ARBITRATION AGREEMENT; RIGHT TO A
LAWFUL JUDGE; FREE WILL; ALTERNATIVE ARBITRATION CLAUSE- CLAUSE OF
CHOICE 56
1. VLLL.2.3. RESOLUTION OF THE CONCOURT, CASE NO. II. US 3059/08 OF 15
JANUARY 2009 57
1. V1II.2.4. RESOLUTION OF THE CONCOURT, CASE NO. I. US 339/02 OF 26
JANUARY 2004..58 1. VMI.2.5. RESOLUTION OF THE CONCOURT, CASE NO. IV. US
511/03 OF
4 DECEMBER 2003 59
1. VLLL.2.6. RESOLUTION OF THE CONCOURT, CASE NO. III. US 166/05 OF 29
APRIL 2005..59 L.VIII.2.7. RESOLUTION OF THE CONCOURT, CASE NO. III. US
145/03 OF
12 SEPTEMBER 2003 60
1. VIII.2.8. RESOLUTION OF THE CONCOURT, CASE NO. II. US 2169/07 OF 3
SEPTEMBER 2007 62
1. VII1.3. IMPORTANCE OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE CONCOURT, CASE NO. I. US
3227/07 OF 8 MARCH 2011 62 1 .IX. ARBITRABILITY (BASIC CONCEPT AND
CONNECTION TO SECTION 2 AND SOURCES OF INTERNATIONAL ORIGIN) 64
1.1X. 1. OBJ ECTIVE VERSUS SUBJECTIVE ARBITRABILITY AND IMPORTANCE OF
ARBITRABILITY 64
1 .IX.2. PUBLIC NON-PROFIT HEALTH CARE FACILITIES AND CAPACITY OF PUBLIC
ENTITIES TO ENTER INTO ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS 65
1. IX.2.1. ARBITRABILITY OF DISPUTES INVOLVING PUBLIC NON-PROFIT HEALTH
CARE FACILITIES (EX SECTION 2(1) OF THE ARBACT) 65 L.IX.2.2.
ARBITRABILITY OF DISPUTES INVOLVING
PUBLIC ENTITIES 65
1 .IX.3. CONFLICT WITH PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE FINANCIAL ARBITER 66
L.X. CASE LAW 72
1 .XI. CASE LAW OF THE ECTHR (INCLUDING THE COMMISSION S DECISIONS) 109
I .XII. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 115
IV
IMAGE 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 .XIII. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 120
L.XIV. BIBLIOGRAPHY 121
CHAPTER 2, ARBITRABILITY; ARBITRATION AGREEMENT-SECTION 2 135
ARTICLE II PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE ARBACT (ACT NO. 19/2012
COLL.) [TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS] 136
2.1. ARBITRABILITY AND THE LEGAL BASIS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF
ARBITRABILITY 137
2.1.1. ARBITRABILITY AND THE SCOPE OF ARBITRABILITY 137 2.1.2. LEGAL
BASIS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF ARBITRABILITY: IMPORTANCE OF THE PLACE OF
ARBITRATION (CONNECTION TO SECTION 17 OF THE ARBACT AND SECTION 36(1) OF
THE ARBACT) 138
2.II. SECTION 2(1) OF THE ARBACT 141
2.II. 1. DISPUTE: ADVERSARY AND NON-ADVERSARY PROCEEDINGS 141
2.II. 1.1. FACTUAL DISPUTE AND DISPUTE WITHIN THE MEANING OF PROCEDURAL
LAW 141 2.H. 1.2. ADVERSARY AND NON-ADVERSARY PROCEEDINGS 141
2.11.1.3. ADVERSARY PROCEEDINGS 143
2.11.1.4. NON-ADVERSARY PROCEEDINGS 144 2.11.1.5. THE IMPORTANCE OF
DISTINGUISHING ADVERSARY PROCEEDINGS FROM NON- ADVERSARY PROCEEDINGS FOR
OBJECTIVE
ARBITRABILITY (CONNECTION BETWEEN SECTION 1 AND SECTION 2(1) OF THE
ARBACT AND SECTION 2(2) OF THE ARBACT) 147
2.II.2. NATURE OF DISPUTE AS A PROPERTY DISPUTE 148
2.III. SECTION 2(2) OF THE ARBACT 155
2JII.1. GENERAL JURISDICTION OF COURTS 155
2.IIL2 THE POWERS OF SPECIAL PUBLIC AUTHORITIES INFLUENCING
ARBITRABILITY 155
2.111.2.1. ARBITRABILITY OF DISPUTES IN THE ENERGY INDUSTRY 155
2.111.2.2. ARBITRABILITY OF DISPUTES IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS (ELECTRONIC
COMMUNICATIONS) 158
2.111.3. SETTLEMENT AND PERMISSIBILITY OF SETTLEMENT REGARDING THE
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE DISPUTE 162
IMAGE 4
ARBITRATION LAW OF CZECH REPUBLIC
2.111.3.1. DEFINITION OF SETTLEMENT : DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE SUBJECT
MATTER OF THE DISPUTE AND THE CONTENTS OF OBLIGATIONS 162
2.HI.3.2. POSSIBILITY TO SETTLE 167
2.111.4. DISPUTES RELATING TO REAL PROPERTY 169
11III.5. ARBITRABILITY OF INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYMENT DISPUTES.. 171 2.ML.6.
ARBITRABILITY OF DISPUTES CONCERNING BILLS OF EXCHANGE /PROMISSORY NOTES
172
2.111.7. DISPUTES OVER RIGHTS TO INVESTMENTS IN CORPORATIONS AND
DISPUTES OVER THE INVALIDITY OF RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED BY GENERAL MEETINGS
173
11III.8. CAPACITY TO ENTER INTO AN ARBITRATION AGREEMENT.... 175 2.1V.
SECTION 2(3) OF THE ARBACT 175
2.1V.1. ARBITRATION AGREEMENT: CONNECTION TO SUBJECT MATTER REGULATED
UNDER SECTION 3 OF THE ARBACT 175 2.IV.2. THE IMPORTANCE OF TIME IN
CONNECTION WITH AN ARBITRATION AGREEMENT 178
2.IV.2.1. TEMPORAL LIMITATION OF THE RIGHT TO ENTER INTO AN ARBITRATION
AGREEMENT 178 2.1 V.2.2. ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FOR A DEFINITE PERIOD OF
TIME AND OTHER TEMPORAL
LIMITATIONS TO THE DURATION OF AN ARBITRATION AGREEMENT 182
2.1V.3. ALTERNATIVE AGREEMENT ON JURISDICTION- JURISDICTION OF CHOICE
182
2. V. SECTION 2(4) OF THE ARBACT: VALIDITY AND SUBJECT MATTER OF AN
ARBITRATION AGREEMENT AND INDEPENDENCE OF THE MAIN CONTRACT.. 183 2. VI.
SECTION 2(5) OF THE ARBACT: ARBITRATION AGREEMENT AS AN AGREEMENT
BINDING ON LEGAL SUCCESSORS 187
2. VI. 1. ASSIGNMENT (UNIVERSAL AND SINGULAR SUCCESSION).. 187 2.VL2.
ASSUMPTION OF OBLIGATIONS 195
2. VI .3. SELECTED EXAMPLES OF OTHER SITUATIONS WHERE A NON- PARTY TO
THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT IS BOUND BY THE AGREED JURISDICTION OF THE
ARBITRATORS 196
2. VI.3.1. THE GROUP (HOLDING) THEORY (GROUPS OF ENTREPRENEURS BOUND BY
ONE AND THE SAME ARBITRATION AGREEMENT) 197 2.V1.3.2. THE THEORY OF
EXTENSIVE AND PARALLEL
EFFECTS OF AN ARBITRATION AGREEMENT... 199
2. VI.4. GUARANTEE OBLIGATIONS 199
2.VII. CASE LAW 202
VI
IMAGE 5
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2. VIII. CASE LAW OF THE ECTHR (INCLUDING THE COMMISSION S DECISIONS)
249
2.IX. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 250
2.X. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 271
2.XI. BIBLIOGRAPHY 273
CHAPTER 3, FORM, TERMS, AND CONCLUSION OF AN ARBITRATION
AGREEMENT-SECTION 3 293
ARTICLE II PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE ARBACT (ACT NO. 19/2012
COLL.) [TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS] 294
3.1. ESSENCE OF THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT AND LAWS APPLICABLE TO THE
ARBITRATION AGREEMENT 295
3.1.1. THE IMPORTANCE OF DETERMINING THE NATURE OF THE ARBITRATION
AGREEMENT AND PROCEDURAL CONTRACTS....295 3.1.2. ARBITRATION AGREEMENT
AS A PROCEDURAL CONTRACT IN THE BROADER SENSE 298
3.1.2.1. THE CONCEPT AND EFFECTS OF A PROCEDURAL CONTRACT IN THE BROADER
SENSE 298 3.1.2.2. CAPACITY TO ENTER INTO A PROCEDURAL CONTRACT AND
REPRESENTATION IN
CONCLUDING AN ARBITRATION AGREEMENT 299
3.1.2.3. ARBITRATION AGREEMENT AS A CONDITION FOR THE MAIN CONTRACT AND
THE CONTINGENT CONTRACT 301
3.1.3. PROCEDURAL CONTRACT IN THE NARROWER SENSE 302 3.1.4. LAW
APPLICABLE TO THE PROCEDURAL CONTRACT: SUBSTANTIVE LAW VERSUS PROCEDURAL
LAW 308 3.II. GENERAL RULES APPLICABLE TO ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS IN ALL
LEGAL
RELATIONSHIPS (SECTION 3(1) AND (2) OF THE ARBACT) 315 3 .II. 1. SOURCES
OF INTERNATIONAL ORIGIN AND THE CONCEPT OF DOMESTIC LEXARBITRI 315
3.11.2. SECTION 3(1) OF THE ARBACT 316
3.11.2.1. SPECIFIC EXPRESSION OF WILL AND IDENTIFICATION 316
3.11.2.2. REQUIREMENT OF WRITTEN FORM AND MEANS OF ELECTRONIC
COMMUNICATION 316 3.11.2.3. REQUIREMENT OF WRITTEN FORM UNDER THE NEW
CIVIL CODE (NCC) 324
3.11.3. SECTION 3(2) OF THE ARBACT 326
VN
IMAGE 6
ARBITRATION LAW OF CZECH REPUBLIC
3.11.4. THE IMPORTANCE OF THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT BEING INDEPENDENT OF
THE MAIN CONTRACT 330
3.11.5. RELATED RULES OF INTERNATIONAL ORIGIN 330
3.11.5.1. THE NEW YORK CONVENTION [NYCONV] AND THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION
[ECONV] 330
3.11.5.2. TRENDS IN THE APPLICATION OF THE NEW YORK CONVENTION REGARDING
THE FORM OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENT 332
3.111. SPECIAL RULES FOR CONSUMER DISPUTES (SECTION 3(3) THROUGH (6) OF
THE ARBACT) 336
3.111.1. CONCEPT OF SPECIAL CONSUMER PROTECTION WITH RESPECT TO THE
CONCLUSION AND TERMS OF AN ARBITRATION AGREEMENT 336
3.111.2. SECTION 3(3) OF THE ARBACT 338
3.IU.3. SECTION 3(4) OF THE ARBACT 339
3.111.4. SECTION 3(5) OF THE ARBACT 345
3.111.5. SECTION 3(6) OF THE ARBACT 347
3.IV. CASE LAW 347
3.V. CASE LAW OF SLOVAK COURTS 379
3.VI. CASE LAW OF THE ECTHR (INCLUDING THE COMMISSION S DECISIONS) 380
3. VII. CASE LAW OF THE ECJ (CJEU) 381
3.VIII. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 382
3.IX. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 397
3.X. BIBLIOGRAPHY 397
PART TWO: ARBITRATORS
CHAPTER 4, ELIGIBILITY TO ACT AS AN ARBITRATOR-SECTION 4 415
SECTION 118 OF THE PIL [CAPACITY OF A FOREIGNER TO ACT AS AN ARBITRATOR]
(EFFECTIVE FROM 1 JANUARY 2014) 416
4.1. SCOPE AND REVIEW OF THE ELIGIBILITY OF ARBITRATOR 417
4.1.1. TEMPORAL SCOPE OF THE ELIGIBILITY OF AN ARBITRATOR ..417 4.1.2.
TERRITORIAL SCOPE OF THE ELIGIBILITY OF AN ARBITRATOR PURSUANT TO
SECTION 4 OF THE ARBACT 417
4.1.3. PROVING THE ELIGIBILITY OF AN ARBITRATOR 418
4.1.4. ARBITRAL AWARD RENDERED BY AN INELIGIBLE ARBITRATOR 419
4.1.5. NATURE OF THE DUTIES PERFORMED BY AN ARBITRATOR....419
VIII
IMAGE 7
TABLE OF CONTENTS
4.II. SECTION 4(1) OF THE ARBACT: GENERAL ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE
OFFICE OF ARBITRATOR 421
4.II. 1. GENERAL ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE OFFICE OF ARBITRATOR:
MAJORITY AND LEGAL CAPACITY 421 4.11.2. REGISTRATION IN THE LIST OF
ARBITRATORS 422
4.11.3. INCOMPATIBILITY WITH OTHER OFFICES 423
4.11.4. QUALIFICATION CRITERIA 426
4.11.5. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR EXPERTS STIPULATED BY AN ARBITRATION
AGREEMENT 427
4.III. SECTION 4(2) OF THE ARBACT: ELIGIBILITY OF FOREIGNERS TO ACT AS
ARBITRATORS 428
4.III. 1. PERSONAL LAW OF A FOREIGNER APPLICABLE TO THE DETERMINATION OF
THE ELIGIBILITY TO ACT AS AN ARBITRATOR 428
4.III.2. NEW RULES REGULATING THE ELIGIBILITY OF A FOREIGNER TO ACT AS
AN ARBITRATOR EFFECTIVE FROM 1 JANUARY 2014 (PIL) 430
4.IV. SECTION 3(3) OF THE ARBACT: CLEAN CRIMINAL RECORD 433 4.V. SECTION
4(4) OF THE ARBACT: ELIGIBILITY OF AN ARBITRATOR TO HEAR AND RESOLVE
CONSUMER DISPUTES 436
4.VI. CASE LAW 438
4. VII. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 444
4. VIII. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 444
4.IX. BIBLIOGRAPHY 445
CHAPTER 5, ACCEPTANCE OF APPOINTMENT; RESIGNATION - SECTION 5 449
5.1. SECTION 5(1) AND (2) OF THE ARBACT 450
5.II. SECTION 5(3) OF THE ARBACT 451
5.III. CASE LAW 462
5.IV. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 464
5.V. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 465
5. VI. BIBLIOGRAPHY 465
CHAPTER 6, OBLIGATION OF CONFIDENTIALITY-SECTION 6 469
6.1. SECTION 6(1) OF THE ARBACT 470
6.II. SECTION 6(2) OF THE ARBACT 472
6.II. 1. RELEASE FROM CONFIDENTIALITY 472
6.II.2. POWER TO RELEASE FROM CONFIDENTIALITY AS A RIGHT SUI GENERIS
OUTSIDE THE EXERCISE OF JUDICIAL POWER ....473
IMAGE 8
ARBITRATION LAW OF CZECH REPUBLIC
6.11.3. REASONS FOR A RELEASE FROM CONFIDENTIALITY 476 6.11.4. PARTIES
AUTHORIZED TO REQUEST A RELEASE FROM CONFIDENTIALITY 477
6.111. CONFIDENTIALITY OF ARBITRATORS AND ACT NO. 186/2011 COLL 479
6.III. 1. PREMISES AND PURPOSE OF ACT NO. 186/2011 COLL.. 479 6.111.2.
DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE PREMISES OF ACT NO. 186/2011 COLL. AND THE CASE
LAW OF THE ECTHR
REGARDING ARBITRATION 481
6.111.3. ABSENCE OF ANY HARMONIZED RULES AT THE INTERNATIONAL LEVEL.
MINISTRIES ACTING ULTRA VIRES } 485
6.111.4. NATURE OF ASSISTANCE UNDER SECTION 3 OF ACT NO. 186/2011 COLL
486
6.111.4.1. REQUEST TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE 486 6.111.4.2. THE OBLIGATION
OF CONFIDENTIALITY AND OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE INFORMATION UNDER THE ACT
490
6.111.5. PERSONS MAKING BINDING DECISIONS ON THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS
OF OTHERS AS A CATEGORY OF OBLIGORS UNDER ACT NO. 186/2011 COLL.
(ARBITRATORS, THE FINANCIAL ARBITER, ETC.) 494
6.HI.5.1. SPECIFICATION OF PERSONS MAKING DECISIONS ON RIGHTS AND
OBLIGATIONS ..494 6.111.5.2. SPECIAL REGIME FOR RELEASING THE ARBITRATOR
FROM CONFIDENTIALITY FROM
THE PERSPECTIVE OF ACT NO. 186/2011 COLL 495
6.111.5.3. FINANCIAL ARBITER (EXCURSUS) .....496 6.111.6. VAGUENESS AND
CONSTITUTIONAL NONCONFORMITY OF SECTION 3(2) OF ACT NO. 186/2011 COLL
497 6.1V. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 500
6.V. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 500
6. VI. BIBLIOGRAPHY 501
CHAPTER 7, SELECTION OF ARBITRATORS-SECTION 7 503
7.1. SECTION 7(1) OF THE ARBACT 504
7.1.1. SELECTION OF INDIVIDUAL ARBITRATORS.... 504
7.1.2. GENERAL AND SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBILITY TO ACT AS AN
ARBITRATOR 507
7.1.3. REAL AND EFFECTIVE POSSIBILITY TO APPOINT ARBITRATORS (INFLUENCE
THE CHOICE OF (AN) INDIVIDUAL ARBITRATORS)); EQUALITY OF THE PARTIES 509
IMAGE 9
TABLE OF CONTENTS
7.1.4. SELECTION OF ARBITRATORS BY A THIRD PARTY (APPOINTING AUTHORITY)
AND EQUALITY OF THE PARTIES 510 7.1.5. SELECTION OF ARBITRATORS BY
REFERENCE TO RULES ON ARBITRATION 514
7.1.6. NUMBER OF ARBITRATORS 517
7.II. SECTION 7(2) OF THE ARBACT 520
7.II. 1. SUBSTITUTE RULE IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY AGREEMENT 521BETWEEN THE
PARTIES 520
7.II.2. ARBITRATION WITH MORE THAN TWO PARTIES 521 7.III. CASE LAW 523
7.IV. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 533
7.V. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 540
7. VI. BIBLIOGRAPHY 540
CHAPTER 8, LACK OF BIAS-SECTION 8 545
8.1. SECTION 8(1) OF THE ARBACT 546
8.1.1. BASIC SUBSTANTIVE RULES FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LACK OF BIAS ON THE
PART OF THE ARBITRATOR AND CORRELATION WITH THE MECHANISMS OF PROTECTION
OF THE PARTIES UNDER THE ARBACT 546
8.1.2. OBJECTIVE NATURE OF THE GROUNDS FOR BIAS AND CHALLENGE TO
ARBITRATOR 547
8.1.3. CORRELATION BETWEEN IMPARTIALITY (OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE
IMPARTIALITY) AND BIAS 556
8.1.4. ACTING AS ARBITRATOR AND MEDIATOR IN THE SAME CASE 559
8.11. SECTION 8(2) OF THE ARBACT 560
8.III. SECTION 8(3) OF THE ARBACT 565
8.IV. CASE LAW 569
8.V. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 572
8.VI. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 573
8. VII. BIBLIOGRAPHY 574
CHAPTER 9, APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATOR BY THE COURT-SECTION 577
9.1. SECTION 9(1) OF THE ARBACT 577
9.1.1. SELECTION OF ARBITRATOR BY THE COURT IN THE DISCHARGE OF THE
COURT S SUPPORTING FUNCTION VIS-A-VIS ARBITRATION 577
XI
IMAGE 10
ARBITRATION LAW OF CZECH REPUBLIC
9.1.2. POWER TO SUBMIT A MOTION FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF AN ARBITRATOR BY
THE COURT 578
9.1.3. TIME LIMITS 579
9.1.3.1. TIME LIMIT FOR THE SELECTION OF AN ARBITRATOR BY THE PARTIES
579
9.1.3.2. TIME LIMIT FOR THE COURT S DECISION UNDER SECTION 9(1) OF THE
ARBACT 579
9.1.4. JURISDICTION OF THE COURT 580
9.11. SECTION 9(2) OF THE ARBACT 581
9.1II. PROCEDURE UNDER INTERNATIONAL TREATIES 581
9.1V. CASE LAW 582
9. V. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 583
9. VI. BIBLIOGRAPHY 584
CHAPTER 10, REQUIREMENTS FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATOR BY THE
COURT-SECTION 10 585
10.1. SECTION 10(1) OF THE ARBACT 585
10.11. SECTION 10(2) OF THE ARBACT 587
10.HI. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 587
10.IV. BIBLIOGRAPHY 588
CHAPTER 11, CHALLENGE TO ARBITRATOR-SECTION 11 589
11.1. COMMENTARY ON SECTION 11 OF THE ARBACT 589
1 L.II. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 595
11.1II. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 595
11.IV. BIBLIOGRAPHY 596
CHAPTER 12, ADDITIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES, CHALLENGE PROCEDURE - SECTION 12
597
12.1. SECTION 12(1) OF THE ARBACT 598
12.1.1. EFFECTS OF THE RESIGNATION OF AN ARBITRATOR 598 12.1.2.
CHALLENGING AN ARBITRATOR AFTER THE FIRST PROCEDURAL ACT ON THE MERITS
598
12.1.3. EXTINGUISHMENT OF THE PARTY S RIGHT TO CHALLENGE AN ARBITRATOR:
IMPORTANCE OF THE MOMENT WHEN THE ARBITRAL AWARD IS MADE 600
12.11. SECTION 12(2) OF THE ARBACT 602
XII
IMAGE 11
TABLE OF CONTENTS
12.II. 1. REQUIREMENTS FOR A MOTION TO CHALLENGE AN ARBITRATOR 602
12.11.2. NATURE OF COURT PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION 12(2) OFTHEARBACT 603
12.II.3. AUTONOMY OF THE PARTIES WITH RESPECT TO DECISIONS ON THE
CHALLENGE 603
12.111. CASE LAW 604
12.IV. CASE LAW OF THE ECTHR (INCLUDING THE COMMISSION S DECISIONS) 606
12.V. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 608
12. VI. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 608
12.VII. BIBLIOGRAPHY 610
CHAPTER 13, PERMANENT ARBITRAL INSTITUTIONS - SECTION 13 613
13.1. SECTION 13(1) OF THE ARBACT 615
13.1.1. LEGAL BASIS FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PERMANENT ARBITRAL
INSTITUTION 615
13.1.2. PERMANENT ARBITRAL INSTITUTIONS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC 617
13.1.2.1. ARBITRATION COURT AT THE ECONOMIC CHAMBER OF THE CZECH
REPUBLIC AND AGRICULTURAL CHAMBER OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC 617
13.1.2.2. EXCHANGE COURT OF ARBITRATION AT THE PRAGUE STOCK EXCHANGE
[BURZA CENNYCH PAPIRU PRAHA A.S.] 619
13.1.2.3. ARBITRATION COURT OF THE CZECH MORAVIAN COMMODITY EXCHANGE
KLADNO 620
13.1.3. ADVANTAGES OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE A PERMANENT ARBITRAL
INSTITUTION (SPECIFICS) 620
13.11. SECTION 13(2) OF THE ARBACT 621
13.111. SECTION 13(3) OF THE ARBACT 622
13.IV. SECTION 13(4) OF THE ARBACT 624
13.IV. 1. THE SO-CALLED ARBITRAL CENTERS AS ENTITIES PROVIDING
ORGANIZATIONAL SERVICES 624
13.1 V.2. RULES OF PROCEDURE VERSUS ARBITRATION AGREEMENT: PERMANENT
ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS VERSUS AD HOC ARBITRATION 626
XIII
IMAGE 12
ARBITRATION LAW OF CZECH REPUBLIC
13.1 V.3. COMMENCING PROCEEDINGS IN A PERMANENT ARBITRAL INSTITUTION AND
IN AD HOC ARBITRATION (CONNECTION TO SECTION 14(1) OF THE ARBACT) 627
13.1 V.4. SEAT OF ARBITRATION BEFORE A PERMANENT ARBITRAL INSTITUTION
AND IN AD HOC ARBITRATION (CONNECTION TO SECTION 17 OF THE ARBACT, ETC.)
629
13.1V.5. APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS IN PROCEEDINGS IN A PERMANENT
ARBITRAL INSTITUTION AND IN AD HOC ARBITRATION (CONNECTION TO SECTIONS
7, 8, 11, AND 12 OF THE ARBACT) 631
13.IV.6. EXCLUSION OF THE POSSIBILITY TO CONFUSE A PERMANENT ARBITRAL
INSTITUTION WITH ANOTHER ENTITY PROVIDING SERVICES FOR ARBITRATORS (WITH
RESPECT TO ARBITRATION) 637
13.V. CASE LAW 639
13.VI. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 661
13.VII. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 665
13V11I. BIBLIOGRAPHY 667
PART THREE: ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS
CHAPTER 14, COMMENCEMENT OF THE PROCEEDINGS-SECTION 14 677
14.1. MOTION TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS (REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION/STATEMENT
OF CLAIM) 679
14.1.1. CONTENTS OF THE REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION (STATEMENT OF CLAIM) 679
14.1.2. LANGUAGE OF THE REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION (STATEMENT OF CLAIM) 683
14.1.3. FORM OF THE REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION (STATEMENT OF CLAIM) 685
14.1.4. STAMPING THE REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION (STATEMENT OF CLAIM) WITH
THE DATE OF SERVICE AND EVIDENCE OF COMMENCING THE PROCEEDINGS 686
14.1.5. SERVICE OF THE REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION (STATEMENT OF CLAIM) 688
14.1.5.1. SUBMITTING THE REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION (STATEMENT OF CLAIM)
WITH AN INCORRECT ARBITRATOR 688
14.1.5.2. REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION (STATEMENT OF CLAIM) SUBMITTED TO A
FOREIGN ARBITRATOR 689
XIV
IMAGE 13
TABLE OF CONTENTS
14.1.5.3. SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS TO A PLACE DIFFERENT FROM THE
ARBITRATOR S RESIDENCE 690
14.1.6. SERVICE OF THE REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION (STATEMENT OF CLAIM) ON
THE OPPONENT 691
14.1.7. SIGNING THE REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION (STATEMENT OF CLAIM) 693
14.11. CONSEQUENCES OF COMMENCING THE ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS UNDER
SUBSTANTIVE LAW 695
14.11.1. APPLICATION OF THE SUBSTANTIVE STANDARDS AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS
OF THE ARBACT 695
14.11.2. LIMITATION OF ACTIONS WITH RESPECT TO CIVIL LAW LIABILITIES
SUBMITTED TO ARBITRATION (CC/NCC AND ARBACT) 696
14.H.2.1. CONNECTION TO SECTION 110 OF THE CC 696
14.11.2.2. CONNECTION TO SECTION 112 OF THE CC 698
14.11.2.3. CONNECTION TO THE NEW CIVIL CODE (NCC) 700
14.11.3. LIMITATION OF ACTIONS WITH RESPECT TO COMMERCIAL LAW
LIABILITIES SUBMITTED TO ARBITRATION (CC/NCC AND ARBACT) 702
14.II.3.1. EXERCISE OF RIGHT AND DETERMINATION OF THE PERIOD OF
LIMITATION 702
14.11.3.2. COUNTERCLAIM 705
14.II.3.3. PERIOD OF LIMITATION DEPENDING ON THE PROGRESS AND
TERMINATION OF THE PROCEEDINGS 707
(A) ABSENCE OF A DECISION ON THE MERITS 708 (B) MAKING A DECISION ON THE
MERITS 709 14.111. CASE LAW 712
14.IV. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 717
14. V. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 729
14. VI. BIBLIOGRAPHY 732
CHAPTER 15, DECISIONS ON JURISDICTION, PLEA OF LACK OF
JURISDICTION-SECTION 15 737
SECTION 106 OF THE CCP 738
15.1. SECTION 15(1) OF THE ARBACT 739
15.11. SECTION 15(2) OF THE ARBACT 747
XV
IMAGE 14
ARBITRATION LAW OF CZECH REPUBLIC
15.111. ASSESSMENT OF JURISDICTION IN CONSUMER DISPUTES 754 111III.1.
OBLIGATION TO ASSESS JURISDICTION 754
15.111.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA 755
15.111.3. OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE INSTRUCTIONS 757
I5.IV. SECTION 106 OF THE CCP 759
15. V. CASE LAW (WITH RESPECT TO SECTION 15 OF THE ARBACT AND SECTION
106 OF THE CCP) 761
15. VI. CASE LAW OF THE ECJ (CJEU) 774
15. VII. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 776
15.VIII. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 815
15.IX. BIBLIOGRAPHY 816
CHAPTER 16, EFFECTS OF A REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION (STATEMENT OF CLAIM) IN
CASE OF A LACK OF JURISDICTION-SECTION 16 823
16.1. SECTION 16 OF THE ARBACT 823
16.11. BIBLIOGRAPHY 825
CHAPTER 17, SEAT OF ARBITRATION-SECTION 17 827
17.1. DEFINITION OF THE SEAT OF ARBITRATION 827
17.11. MEANING OF THE SEAT OF ARBITRATION 829
17.11.1 IMPORTANCE OF THE SEAT OF ARBITRATION 829
17.11.2. LOCALIZATION THEORY (THE SEAT THEORY) 832 17.H.3.
DEIOCALIZATION THEORY 834
17.111. SEAT OF ARBITRATION; PLACE OF HEARINGS, PLACE WHERE THE ARBITRAL
AWARD IS MADE AND SIGNED; CLASSIFICATION OF AN ARBITRAL AWARD 836
17.III.1. DISTINGUISHING THE SEAT OF ARBITRATION FROM THE PLACE OF
HEARINGS UNDER THE ARBACT 836
17.111.2. PLACE WHERE THE ARBITRAL AWARD IS MADE 837 17.1H.3. PLACE
WHERE THE ARBITRAL AWARD IS SIGNED 838 17.1V. DETERMINATION (CHOICE) OF
THE SEAT OF ARBITRATION IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION 839
17.1 V. 1. AUTONOMY OF THE PARTIES IN DETERMINING THE SEAT OF
ARBITRATION 839
17.IV.2. DETERMINATION OF THE SEAT OF ARBITRATION UNDER THE REGIME
REGULATED BY SECTION 17 OF THE ARBACT.... 843 17.IV.2.1. CHOICE OF THE
SEAT OF ARBITRATION AND ARBITRABILITY OF THE DISPUTE 844
17.IV.2.2. LEGITIMATE INTEREST OF THE PARTIES IN DETERMINING THE SEAT OF
ARBITRATION ...846
XVI
IMAGE 15
TABLE OF CONTENTS
17.IV.2.3. SEAT OF ARBITRATION IN A CASE WHERE JURISDICTION IS VESTED IN
A PERMANENT ARBITRAL INSTITUTION 847
17.IV.2.4. ONLINE PROCEEDINGS; ADMINISTRATIVE SITE 847
17.IV.3. CHANGING THE SEAT OF ARBITRATION 848
17.IV.3.1. CHANGING THE SEAT OF ARBITRATION UNDER THEARBACT 848
17.1 V.3.2. CHANGING THE SEAT OF ARBITRATION IN INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE
848
17. V. SEAT OF ARBITRATION AND ANNULMENT OF ARBITRAL AWARD BY THE COURT
849
17. V.I. FUNDAMENTAL RULE -JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS IN THE SEAT OF
ARBITRATION 849
17.V.2. EXCEPTION -JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS OF THE STATE UNDER THE LAW
OF WHICH THE ARBITRAL AWARD WAS MADE 850
17.V.3. APPROACH UNDER THE ARBACT (CONNECTION TO SECTIONS 5, 31, 38, AND
43 OF THE ARBACT) 852 17. VI. SEAT OF ARBITRATION AND INTERVENTION OF
THE STATE (COURT) IN ARBITRATION UNDER CZECH LAW 855
17. VI. 1. TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS FOR EXERCISING
SUPPORTING AND SUPERVISORY FUNCTIONS 855 17.VI.2. TERRITORIAL
JURISDICTION OF THE COURT FOR DEPOSITING THE ARBITRAL AWARD (SECTION
29(2) OF THE
ARBACT)... 857
17. VI.3. SEAT OF ARBITRATION AND THE LAW APPLICABLE TO THE ARBITRATION
AGREEMENT UNDER THE ARBACT; LAW APPLICABLE TO THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE
DISPUTE ....858 17. VII. SUBJECTIVE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF A DOMESTIC
DISPUTE UNDER
CZECH LAW AND IN COMPARISON WITH INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE 859 17. VII.1.
PERMISSIBILITY OF INTERNATIONALIZATION OF A DISPUTE BY THE PARTIES
CHOICE 859
17. VII.2. THE SEAT OF ARBITRATION IS ABROAD VERSUS THE PLACE WHERE THE
ARBITRAL AWARD IS MADE IS SITUATED IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC 861
17. VII.3. THE SEAT OF ARBITRATION AND THE PLACE WHERE THE ARBITRAL
AWARD IS MADE ARE BOTH SITUATED ABROAD....862 17. VII.4.
INTERNATIONALIZATION OF A DOMESTIC DISPUTE AND ENFORCEMENT OF AN
ARBITRAL AWARD 864
17.VIII. CASE LAW 866
17.IX. CASE LAW OF THE ECJ (CJEU): CONSUMER DISPUTES 867
XVII
IMAGE 16
ARBITRATION LAW OF CZECH REPUBLIC
17.X. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 868
17.XI. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 872
I7.X11. BIBLIOGRAPHY 873
CHAPTER 18, EQUALITY OF THE PARTIES-SECTION 18 879
18.1. SECTION 18 OFTHE ARBACT 879
18.11. CASE LAW 883
18.111. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 895
18.1 V. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OFTHE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 902
18.V. BIBLIOGRAPHY 902
CHAPTER 19, PROCEDURE-SECTION 19 905
19.1. AUTONOMY IN THE DETERMINATION OF PROCEDURAL RULES 906 19.11.
SECTION 19(1) OF THE ARBACT 908
19.111. SECTION 19(2) OFTHE ARBACT 911
19.111.1. TIME LIMITS 911
19.111.2. SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS 914
19.111.2.1. SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS DURING THE COURSE OFTHE ARBITRAL
PROCEEDINGS ....914 19.III.2.2. SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS IN AD HOC
PROCEEDINGS AT THE INTERNATIONAL LEVEL
(ESPECIALLY IN AD HOC PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE UNCITRAL RULES) 922 (A)
LEGAL SOURCES 922
(B) PRINCIPAL PRIORITY OFTHE AUTONOMY OFTHE PARTIES - IMPORTANCE OFTHE
PARTIES AGREEMENT ON SERVICE 923
(C) CONSTRUCTIVE SERVICE UNDER THE UNCITRAL RULES 926
(D) LAST KNOWN RESIDENCE 928
(E) HIERARCHY OFTHE RULES APPLICABLE TO THE PROCEEDINGS IN TERMS OFTHE
SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS 929
(F) SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS IN THE CONTEXT OF EUROPEAN CIVIL PROCEDURE AND
IN CONNECTION WITH THE ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS 931
(G) SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS AND SO-CALLED DENATIONALIZED ARBITRATION 932
XVIII
IMAGE 17
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(H) PROCEDURAL SERVICE WITH AN INTERNATIONAL DIMENSION WITHIN THE
BACKGROUND OF SUBSTANTIVE LAW 934
19.111.2.3. SERVICE OF DECISIONS UNDER SECTION 23 OF THE ARBACT AS A
PROCESS INTEGRATED IN THE PROCEEDINGS AFTER THE AMENDMENT TO THE ARBACT
934
19.1II.2.4. SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS TO ARBITRATORS . 935 19.111.2.5.
SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS BY E-MAIL 935 19.111.2.6. GUARDIAN 936
(A) GUARDIAN FOR RECEIVING CORRESPONDENCE ...936 (B) PROCEDURAL GUARDIAN
937
19.III.3. RESERVATION OF ARBITRATOR WITH RESPECT TO PROCEDURE 937
19.111.4. APPLICATION OF THE RULES ADOPTED BY PERMANENT ARBITRAL
INSTITUTIONS BASED ON AN AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES IN AD HOC PROCEEDINGS
938
19.111.5. FORM OF PROCEDURAL DECISIONS 939
19.111.6. SEVERANCE OF VARIOUS PARTS OF THE REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION
(STATEMENT OF CLAIM) TO BE HEARD AND RESOLVED IN SEPARATE PROCEEDINGS
AND CONSOLIDATION OF SEPARATE CLAIMS 939
19.HI.6.1. EXCLUSION FOR A SEPARATE HEARING (SEVERANCE OF ACTIONS) 939
19.III.6.2. CONSOLIDATION OF ACTIONS FOR A JOINT HEARING 940
19.IH.7. PROCEDURE REGARDING THE TAKING OF EVIDENCE 940 19.IIL8. HEARING
941
19.HI.9. LANGUAGE OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND LANGUAGE OF EVIDENCE 942
19.III. 10. EXCLUSION OF ANALOGY WITH PROCEEDINGS TERMINATED BY A
CONFESSED OR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 945
19.IV. SECTION 19(3) OF THE ARBACT 948
19.IV.1. ORAL HEARING 948
19.IV.2. EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC AND CONFIDENTIALITY OF THE ARBITRAL
PROCEEDINGS 949
19.IV.2.1 EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC VERSUS CONFIDENTIALITY OF THE ARBITRAL
PROCEEDINGS 949
XIX
IMAGE 18
ARBITRATION LAW OF CZECH REPUBLIC
19.1 V.2.2. ABSENCE OF UNIVERSAL CONFIDENTIALITY AS AN OBLIGATION OF THE
PARTIES TO REFRAIN FROM DISCLOSING INFORMATION ABOUT THE HEARING 952
(A) DIVERSITY OF APPROACH TO THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF THE ARBITRAL
PROCEEDINGS AND THE GLOBAL PRACTICE OF EXCLUDING THE PUBLIC FROM THE
HEARING 952
(B) CONFIDENTIALITY, PUBLIC ACCESS TO INFORMATION (DEFINITION OF THE
PUBLIC ) AND PERMISSION GRANTED TO SPECIFIC (THIRD) PARTIES TO ATTEND
THE HEARING OF THE DISPUTE 956
19.IV.2.3. EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC FROM THE ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS AND THE
POSSIBILITY TO ALLOW OTHER SPECIFIC PARTIES TO ATTEND THE HEARING OF
THE DISPUTE 958
19.IV.2.4. EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC FROM THE PROCEEDINGS AND INTERVENORS
960
19. V. SECTION 19(4) OF THE ARBACT 961
19.V1. CHOICE OF PROCEDURAL LAW IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION 966 19.VII.
CONSEQUENCES OF INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS FOR PENDING ARBITRATION 967
19. VII. 1. EFFECTS OF INSOLVENCY AND INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS ON
ARBITRATION 967
19. VH.2. EFFECTS OF INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS ON ARBITRATION IN DOMESTIC
DISPUTES 968
19. VI1.2.1. EFFECTS OF A DECLARATION OF BANKRUPTCY 968
(A) DECLARATION OF BANKRUPTCY IN THE COURSE OF THE ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS
968
(B) DECLARATION OF BANKRUPTCY AFTER THE ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS ARE
TERMINATED 969
(C) DECLARATION OF BANKRUPTCY AFTER THE ARBITRAL AWARD IS MADE OR
BECOMES FINAL AND CONCLUSIVE 970
19.V1I.2.2. PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE ARBITRATORS 970
19.VI1.2.3. ARBITRATION AGREEMENT BINDING UPON THE INSOLVENCY TRUSTEE
973
19.V1I.3. EFFECTS OF INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS ON ARBITRATION IN
INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES 974
IMAGE 19
TABLE OF CONTENTS
19.VII.4. EU LAW: APPLICABILITY AND SCOPE OF APPLICATION OF REGULATION
1346/2000 TO ARBITRATION 977 19.VII.4.1. SCOPE OF THE ISSUE OF
APPLICABILITY OF REGULATION 1346/2000 TO
ARBITRATION 977
19.VII.4.2. APPLICATION OF INSOLVENCY LAW IN ARBITRATION 980
(A) APPLICATION OF INSOLVENCY LAW 980
(B) SUSPENSION OF ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS 982 (C) APPLICATION OF REGULATION
1346/2000 985 (D) APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF REGULATION 1346/2000 987
19.VII.4.3. RISK OF DIFFERENT APPROACHES ADOPTED BY CERTAIN EU MEMBER
STATES 989 19. VII.5. PRIORITY OF COLLECTIVE (INSOLVENCY) PROCEEDINGS
OVER INDIVIDUAL (ARBITRAL) PROCEEDINGS AS A
COMPONENT OF PUBLIC POLICY 991
19. VIII. CASE LAW 992
19.IX. CASE LAW OF THE ECTHR (INCLUDING THE COMMISSION S DECISIONS) 1017
19.X. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 1020
19.XI. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 1049
19.XII. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1052
CHAPTER 20, TAKING OF EVIDENCE; PROCEDURAL ACTS-SECTION 20 1063
20.1. SECTION 20(1) OF THE ARBACT 1063
20.11. SECTION 20(2) OF THE ARBACT 1070
20.H.1. SUPPORT FOR ARBITRATION IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC .. 1070 20.II.2.
LEGAL ASSISTANCE WITH RESPECT TO FOREIGN COUNTRIES, OR ASSISTANCE TO
PROCEEDINGS CONDUCTED ABROAD 1075
20.111. SECTION 20(3) OF THE ARBACT 1078
20.IV. CASE LAW 1079
20. V. CASE LAW OF THE ECJ/CJEU 1082
20. VI. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 1083
20.VII. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) *
1095
20. VIII. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1097
XXI
IMAGE 20
ARBITRATION LAW OF CZECH REPUBLIC
CHAPTER 21, ADDITIONAL ACTS OF THE PARTIES - SECTION 21 1107
21.1. SECTION 21 OF THE ARBACT 1107
21 .II. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 1113
21.111. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 1114
21 .IV. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1114
CHAPTER 22, INTERIM MEASURES - SECTION 22 1117
22.1. SECTION 22 OF THE ARBACT 1117
22.11. CASE LAW 1123
22.III. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 1132
22.1V. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1132
CHAPTER 23, TERMINATION OF THE PROCEEDINGS, ARBITRAL AWARD,
RESOLUTION-SECTION 23 1137
ARTICLE II OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE ARBACT (ACT NO 19/2012 COLL.)
[TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS] 1137
23.1. CONDITIONS FOR TERMINATING THE PROCEEDINGS 1138
23.1.1. RENDERING AN ARBITRAL AWARD 1138
23.1.2. RENDERING A RESOLUTION TERMINATING THE PROCEEDINGS 1139
23.11. DETERMINATION OF THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES IN AN
ARBITRAL AWARD 1140
23.111. INTERIM AND PARTIAL ARBITRAL AWARDS 1141
23.1V. COMPLETENESS OF AN ARBITRAL AWARD AND A SUPPLEMENTAL ARBITRAL
AWARD 1142
23.V. CLOSING THE HEARING OF THE CASE 1143
23. VI. DECISION MAKING EX OFFICIO 1144
23.VII. TIME LIMIT FOR PERFORMANCE UNDER AN AWARD 1145 23.VIH. FORM OF
THE DECISION TERMINATING THE PROCEEDINGS 1146 23.IX. THE MOMENT OF
TERMINATING THE ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS AND A CONCEPTUAL CHANGE UNDER THE
AMENDMENT TO THE ARBACT 1147
23.X. ACCELERATED PROCEEDINGS 1149
23.XI. COSTS OF PROCEEDINGS 1150
23.X1.1. OBLIGATION TO REIMBURSE THE COSTS 1150
23.XI.2. LEGAL FEES 1152
23.XI.3. FEES AND COSTS OF THE ARBITRATORS 1155
23.XH. CASE LAW 1167
23.XIH. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 1187
XXII
IMAGE 21
TABLE OF CONTENTS
23 .XIV. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT)
1223
23.XV. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1225
CHAPTER 24, SETTLEMENT OF THE DISPUTE-SECTION 24 1235
24.1. SECTION 24(1) OF THE ARBACT 1235
24.11. SECTION 24(2) OF THE ARBACT 1238
24.111. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 1245
24.IV. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 1249
24.V. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1249
CHAPTER 25, MAKING THE ARBITRAL AWARD AND REASONS-SECTION 25.... 1259
25.1. SECTION 25( 1) OF THE ARBACT: MAKING THE ARBITRAL AWARD AND A
WRITTEN EXECUTION THEREOF. 1260
25.11. SECTION 25(2) OF THE ARBACT: REASONS FOR THE ARBITRAL AWARD AND
INSTRUCTIONS IN CONSUMER DISPUTES 1269
25.III. SECTION 25(3) OF THE ARBACT: LEGAL BASIS FOR A DECISION AND
DECISION MAKING FOLLOWING THE PRINCIPLES OF EQUITY 1274 25.111.1.
DECISION MAKING ACCORDING TO VALID LAW 1274 25.111.2. DECISION MAKING
FOLLOWING THE PRINCIPLES OF
EQUITY 1275
25.111.2.1. EXCEPTION TO THE APPLICATION OF SUBSTANTIVE RULES IN
ARBITRATION 1275 25.111.2.2. DISTINGUISHING DECISION MAKING FOLLOWING
THE PRINCIPLES OF EQUITY FROM
THE AMIABLE COMPOSITEUR PROCEDURE 1276
25.111.2.3. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DECISION MAKING FOLLOWING THE PRINCIPLES
OF EQUITY (EX AEQUO ET BONO) AND THE AMIABLE COMPOSITEUR PROCEDURE 1279
25.111.2.4. DECISION MAKING AS AMIABLE COMPOSITEUR.., 1281
25.111.2.5. PERMISSIBILITY OF DEPECAGE (SPLITTING) IN CONSEQUENCE OF A
PARTIAL AUTHORIZATION TO DECIDE FOLLOWING THE PRINCIPLES OF EQUITY OR AS
AMIABLE
COMPOSITEUR 1284
25.111.2.6. POWER OF THE ARBITRATOR TO MODIFY THE AGREEMENT OF THE
PARTIES 1286
XXNI
IMAGE 22
ARBITRATION LAW OF CZECH REPUBLIC
25.111.2.7. DECISION MAKING FOLLOWING THE PRINCIPLES OF EQUITY (EX AEQUO
ET BONO) AND CONNECTION WITH VALID LAW 1287 25.111.2.8. UNAMBIGUITY OF
THE AUTHORIZATION
GRANTED TO THE ARBITRATORS TO MAKE DECISIONS FOLLOWING THE PRINCIPLES OF
EQUITY 1288
25.III.2.9 DECISION MAKING OUTSIDE THE LAW VERSUS DECISION MAKING WITHIN
A PARTICULAR LEGAL SYSTEM 1291
25.111.2.10. CONTENTS OF DECISION MAKING FOLLOWING THE PRINCIPLES OF
EQUITY DEPENDING ON THE SCOPE AND MANNER OF EXERCISING THE AUTHORIZATION
1293
25.111.2.11. PROHIBITION OF ARBITRARY CONDUCT 1294 25.IH.2.12.
PRINCIPLES OF DECISION MAKING FOLLOWING THE PRINCIPLES OF EQUITY.. 1295
25.111.2.13. PREDICTABILITY OF DECISIONS 1295 25.111.2.14. PUBLIC POLICY
AS A FACTOR LIMITING
DECISION MAKING FOLLOWING THE PRINCIPLES OF EQUITY 1297
25.111.2.15. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DECISION MAKING FOLLOWING THE
PRINCIPLES OF EQUITY AND HEX MERCATORIA 1297
25.111.2.16. DECISION MAKING FOLLOWING THE PRINCIPLES OF EQUITY AND THE
PROCEDURE PURSUANT TO SECTION 136 OF THE CCP 1298
25.111.3. MANDATORY CONSIDERATION OF CONSUMER PROTECTION LAWS 1299
25.111.4. PREDICTABILITY OF DECISIONS AND CONNECTION TO SECTION 13 OF
THE NCC 1300
25.IV. CASE LAW 1302
25.V. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 1307
25.VI. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 1329
25.VH. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1331
CHAPTER 26, CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN AN ARBITRAL AWARD - SECTION 26 1339
26.1. MANIFEST ERRORS AND MISTAKES 1339
26.11. CONTINUING OBLIGATION OF THE ARBITRATORS 1340
XXIV
IMAGE 23
TABLE OF CONTENTS
26.111. METHOD OF MAKING, FORM AND ESSENTIALS OF A DECISION TO CORRECT
1341
26.IV. THE DIFFERENCE COMPARED TO AN ADDITIONAL (SUPPLEMENTAL) ARBITRAL
AWARD AND INTERPRETATION OF AN ARBITRAL AWARD 1343 26.IV.1. ADDITIONAL
(SUPPLEMENTAL) ARBITRAL AWARD 1343 26.1 V.2. INTERPRETATION OF AN
ARBITRAL AWARD ACCORDING TO
DIFFERENT LEGAL SYSTEMS 1343
26. V. DEPOSITING THE CORRECTION OF AN ARBITRAL AWARD (CONNECTION TO
SECTION 29 OF THE ARB ACT) 1344
26. VI. CONSEQUENCES FOR RUNNING OF THE TIME LIMITS FOR SUBMITTING A
MOTION TO ANNUL AN ARBITRAL AWARD (CONNECTION TO SECTION 32(1) OF THE
ARBACT) 1344
26. VII. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 1345
26.VIII. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT)
1346
26.IX. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1346
CHAPTER 27, REVIEW OF AN ARBITRAL AWARD - SECTION 27 1349
27.1. EXCLUSION OF APPEAL AS A PRINCIPLE OF ARBITRATION 1349 27.11.
SCOPE AND PURPOSE OF REVIEW (ARBITRAL AWARD / RESOLUTION ON TERMINATING
THE PROCEEDINGS) 1352
27.111. NUMBER OF TRIBUNALS EXERCISING THE REVIEW 1356 27.1 V.
COMMENCEMENT OF THE REVIEW AND APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS FOR THE REVIEW
1357
27. V. TIME LIMIT FOR SUBMITTING A MOTION TO REVIEW / SCOPE OF THE
PARTIES AUTONOMY 1359
27.VI. CASE LAW 1359
27. VII. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 1361
27.VIII. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT)
1363
27.IX. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1363
CHAPTER 28, LEGAL FORCE AND EFFECT, ENFORCEABILITY-SECTION 28 1365
28.1. SECTION 28(1) OF THE ARBACT 1365
28.1.1. REASONABLE APPLICATION OF THE CCP AND CHANGE IN THE CONCEPT OF
TERMINATING THE ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS RESULTING FROM THE AMENDMENT TO
SECTION 23 OF THE ARBACT (AMENDMENT TO THE ARBACT) 1365
28.1.2. ADDRESSEE (RECIPIENT) OF AN ARBITRAL AWARD 1367 28.1.3. ONLINE
ARBITRATION AND AN ELECTRONIC ARBITRAL AWARD 1368
XXV
IMAGE 24
ARBITRATION LAW OF CZECH REPUBLIC
28.1.4. CONFIRMATION OF LEGAL FORCE AND EFFECT 1369 28.11. SECTION 28(2)
OF THE ARBACT 1372
28.11.1. LEGAL FORCE AND EFFECT OF AN ARBITRAL AWARD AND EFFECTS OF A
FINAL AND CONCLUSIVE ARBITRAL AWARD 1372
28.11.2. ENFORCEABILITY OF AN ARBITRAL AWARD 1374 28.11.2.1.
ENFORCEABILITY AS A CONSEQUENCE OF LEGAL FORCE AND EFFECT / ENFORCEABLE
DECISION UNDER THE CCP AND UNDER THE
EXECPROCC 1374
28.11.2.2. ABSENCE OF THE CONFIRMATION OF ENFORCEABILITY IN ARBITRATION
(WITH RESPECT TO ARBITRAL AWARDS) 1374
28.11.2.3. THE MOMENT ENFORCEABILITY TAKES EFFECT 1375
28.11.3. CONFIRMATION OF SERVICE OF THE ARBITRAL AWARD ON THE PARTIES
FOR THE PURPOSE OF USING IT ABROAD.... 1376 28.11.4. LEGAL FORCE AND
EFFECT, ENFORCEABILITY, AND MOTION TO ANNUL AN ARBITRAL AWARD 1376
28.111. CONNECTION BETWEEN SECTION 28(1) OF THE ARBACT AND SECTION 28(2)
OF THE ARBACT 1378
28.IV. CASE LAW 1379
28. V. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE , 1405
28. VI. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 1414
28.VH. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1415
CHAPTER 29, DEPOSITION OF THE AWARD AND OTHER DOCUMENTS - SECTION 29
1421
29.1. SECTION 29(1) OF THE ARBACT 1421
29.11. SECTION 29(2) OF THE ARBACT 1422
29.111. SECTION 29(3) OF THE ARBACT 1423
29.1V. OBLIGATION TO ARCHIVE DOCUMENTS AFTER THE PROCEEDINGS ARE
TERMINATED BY A RESOLUTION PURSUANT TO SECTION 23(B) OF THE ARBACT 1424
29.V. PARTIAL AND INTERIM ARBITRAL AWARDS 1424
29.VI. CASE LAW 1426
CHAPTER 30, APPLICATION OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE - SECTION 30 1427
30.1. THE CONCEPT OF SECTION 30 OF THE ARBACT 1427
XXVI
IMAGE 25
TABLE OF CONTENTS
30.11. PROCEDURAL RULES APPLICABLE IN ARBITRATION AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES 1434 30.111. CASE LAW 1439
30.IV. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 1446
30. V. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 1448
30.VI. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1448
PART FOUR: ANNULMENT OF ARBITRAL AWARD BY COURT AND TERMINATION OF
PENDING ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS
CHAPTER 31, ANNULMENT OF ARBITRAL AWARD BY THE COURT- SECTION 31 1457
ARTICLE II OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE ARBACT (ACT NO. 19/2012 COLL.)
[TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS], POINT 2 1458
31.1. ANNULMENT OF AN ARBITRAL AWARD AND PROCEEDINGS BASED ON A MOTION
TO ANNUL (NATURE, PARTIES, MOTION, CONDITIONS, AND EFFECTS) 1459
31.1.1. PURPOSE OF AND CONDITIONS FOR THE APPLICATION OF ANNULMENT OF AN
ARBITRAL AWARD 1459
31.1.2. SCOPE OF ANNULMENT OF AN ARBITRAL AWARD: EXCLUSION OF THE
POSSIBILITY TO ANNUL A FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD 1464
31.1.3. OBLIGATION TO SUPPLY THE RELEVANT STATEMENTS OF FACT AND BURDEN
OF PROOF. 1464
31.1.4. CONSUMER DISPUTES AND EXAMINATION OF SELECTED REASONS FOR
ANNULMENT EX OFFICIO 1465
31.1.5. PARTIES AUTHORIZED TO MAKE A MOTION TO ANNUL AN ARBITRAL AWARD,
PARTIES TO ANNULMENT PROCEEDINGS 1466
31.1.5.1. PARTIES AUTHORIZED TO MAKE A MOTION TO ANNUL 1466
31.1.5.2. ARBITRATORS AND PERMANENT ARBITRAL INSTITUTIONS IN PROCEEDINGS
FOR ANNULMENT OF AN ARBITRAL AWARD (WITNESS, INTERVENOR) 1469
31.1.6. BINDING NATURE OF SECTION 31 ET SEQ. OF THE ARBACT , 1474
XXVII
IMAGE 26
ARBITRATION LAW OF CZECH REPUBLIC
31.1.7. REVIEW PROCEEDINGS (SECTION 27 OF THE ARBACT) AND ANNULMENT
PROCEEDINGS (SECTION 31 OF THE ARBACT) I 4 75
31.1.8. FINAL, INTERIM, AND PARTIAL ARBITRAL AWARDS 1476
31.1.9. CONTENTS AND EFFECTS OF THE MOTION TO ANNUL AN ARBITRAL AWARD
1477
31.1.10. ABSENCE OF ANY EXTERRITORIAL EFFECTS OF THE ANNULMENT OF AN
ARBITRAL AWARD / CONNECTION BETWEEN COURT JURISDICTION AND THE PLACE
WHERE THE ARBITRAL AWARD IS MADE (SEAT OF ARBITRATION) 1479
31.1.11. SPECIAL ARBITRATION (THE STATE AS A PARTY TO ARBITRATION) 1480
31.1.12 FEE FOR A MOTION TO ANNUL AN ARBITRAL AWARD 1481 31.1.13.
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS REGARDING THE ANNULMENT OF AN ARBITRAL AWARD:
NYCONV, UNCITRAL MODEL LAW (UML), AND INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE 1481 31.11.
SECTION 31 (A) OF THE ARBACT 1490
3I.U.I. OBJECTIVE ARBITRABILITY 1490
31.11.2. CHANGES IN THE CONDITIONS OF ARBITRABILITY AFTER THE CONCLUSION
OF AN ARBITRATION AGREEMENT - RELAXING THE CONDITIONS OF ARBITRABILITY
1490
31.11.3. CHANGES IN THE CONDITIONS OF ARBITRABILITY AFTER THE CONCLUSION
OF AN ARBITRATION AGREEMENT - TIGHTENING THE CONDITIONS OF ARBITRABILITY
1493 31.III. SECTION 3 L(B) OF THE ARBACT 1495
31.111.1. VALIDITY AND SCOPE OF AN ARBITRATION AGREEMENT 1495
31.111.2. NULLITY OF AN ARBITRATION AGREEMENT 1496 31.111.3. IMPORTANCE
OF THE CLASSIFICATION OF AN ARBITRATION AGREEMENT AS A TYPE OF CONTRACT
1497
31.111.4. RESJUDICATA AND GROUNDS FOR ANNULMENT OF AN ARBITRAL AWARD
1498
31.111.5. LISPENDENS AND GROUNDS FOR ANNULMENT OF AN ARBITRAL AWARD 1499
31.1V. SECTION 3 L(C) OF THE ARBACT 1502
31 .V. SECTION 3 L(D) OF THE ARBACT 1504
31 .VI. SECTION 31(E) OF THE ARBACT 1504
31 .VII. SECTION 3 L(F) OF THE ARBACT 1512
31 .VIII. SPECIAL GROUNDS FOR ANNULMENT OF AN ARBITRAL AWARD IN
RELATIONS BETWEEN CONSUMER AND PROFESSIONAL (B2C RELATIONS) 1515
XXV11I
IMAGE 27
TABLE OF CONTENTS
31 .VIII. 1. GENERALLY REGARDING SPECIAL GROUNDS FOR ANNULMENT OF AN
ARBITRAL AWARD IN CONSUMER DISPUTES 1515
31.VIH.2. SECTION 3 L(G) OF THE ARBACT 1516
31.VIII.3. SECTION 3 L(H) OF THE ARBACT 1519
31 .IX. SUBSECTION (I) OF THE ARBACT 1521
31.X. CASE LAW 1524
31 .XI. CASE LAW OF THE ECTHR (INCLUDING THE COMMISSION S DECISIONS)
1574
31 .XII. CASE LAW OF THE ECJ (CJEU) 1577
3L.XIII. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 1579
31.XIV. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 1584
31.XV. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1585
CHAPTER 32, TIME LIMIT FOR SUBMITTING A MOTION TO ANNUL AN ARBITRAL
AWARD - SECTION 32 1595
32.1. SECTION 32(1) OF THE ARBACT 1596
32.1.1. OBJECTIVE TIME LIMIT FOR SUBMITTING A MOTION TO ANNUL AN
ARBITRAL AWARD 1596
32.1.2. STATUTORY TIME LIMIT - EXCLUSION OF THE POSSIBILITY TO PARDON OR
POSTPONE THE TIME LIMIT 1597 32.1.3. COMMENCEMENT OF THE TIME LIMIT -
CONNECTION TO SERVICE OF THE AWARD, NOT THE LEGAL FORCE AND EFFECT
OF THE ARBITRAL AWARD 1598
32.1.4. CONSUMER DISPUTES 1598
32.1.5. CORRECTION OF MANIFEST ERRORS IN THE ARBITRAL AWARD: INTERIM,
PARTIAL, AND SUPPLEMENTAL (ADDITIONAL) ARBITRAL AWARDS 1600
32.1.5.1. TIME LIMIT FOR SUBMITTING A MOTION TO ANNUL IN CASE OF A
CORRECTION OF MANIFEST ERRORS IN THE AA (SECTION 26 OF THE ARBACT) 1600
32.1.5.2. INTERIM AND PARTIAL ARBITRAL AWARDS.. 1601 32.1.5.3. TIME
LIMIT FOR SUBMITTING A MOTION TO ANNUL IN CASE OF A SUPPLEMENTAL
(ADDITIONAL) ARBITRAL AWARD 1604 32.11. SECTION 32(2) OF THE ARBACT 1604
32.11.1. SUSPENSION OF ENFORCEABILITY AS AN INSTITUTION EXCLUSIVELY
REGULATED UNDER THE ARBACT 1604 32.11.2. THREAT OF SERIOUS HARM 1605
32.11.3. GROUNDS JUSTIFYING A MOTION TO ANNUL 1606
XXIX
IMAGE 28
ARBITRATION LAW OF CZECH REPUBLIC
32.111. SECTION 32(3) OF THE ARBACT 1607
32.1 V. CASE LAW 1 6 07
32.V. CASE LAW OF THE ECJ (CJEU) 1610
32.VI. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SIOVARBACT) 1612
32.VI1. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1612
CHAPTER 33, DISMISSAL OF A MOTION TO ANNUL AN ARBITRAL AWARD - SECTION
33 1613
33.1. CONCEPT AND CONSTITUTIONAL COMPLIANCE OF SECTION 33 OF THE ARBACT
1614
33.11. EXTINGUISHMENT OF THE GROUNDS FOR ANNULMENT OF AN ARBITRAL AWARD
AS A RESULT OF THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT BEING NON- EXISTENT OR INVALID
1615
33.111. EXTINGUISHMENT OF THE GROUNDS FOR ANNULMENT OF AN ARBITRAL AWARD
AS A RESULT OF AN ARBITRATOR CHALLENGE 1619
33.1V. SPECIAL CONSUMER PROTECTION 1622
33.V. CASE LAW 1622
33. VI. CASE LAW OF THE ECJ (CJEU) 1625
33.VII. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 1627
33.V1II. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1628
CHAPTER 34, CONSEQUENCES OF ANNULMENT OF AN ARBITRAL AWARD- SECTION 34
1629
34.1. PURPOSE OF SECTION 34( 1) COMPARED TO SECTION 34(2) AND A NEW
HEARING ON THE MERITS 1630
34.11. SECTION 34(1) OF THE ARBACT 1633
34.111. SECTION 34(2) OF THE ARBACT 1637
34.IV. SECTION 34(3) OF THE ARBACT 1648
34. V. CASE LAW 1648
34.VI. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SIOVARBACT) 1650
34.V1I. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1651
CHAPTER 35, TERMINATION OF THE ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS - SECTION 35 1653
35.1. SECTION 35(1) OF THE ARBACT * 1654
35.1.1. GENERAL AND SPECIAL GROUNDS 1654
35.1.2. SECTION 35(LXA) OF THE ARBACT 1658
35.1.3. SECTION 35(L)(B) OF THE ARBACT 1659
35.1.4. SUBSECTION (LXC) AND (D) OF THE ARBACT 1660
XXX
IMAGE 29
TABLE OF CONTENTS
35.11. SECTION 35(2) OF THE ARBACT 1660
35.111. SECTION 35(3) OF THE ARBACT 1661
35.IV. CASE LAW 1662
35.V. CASE LAW OF SLOVAK COURTS [SVK] 1672
35.VI. CASE LAW OF THE ECJ (CJEU) 1672
35. VII. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT)
1673
35.VIII. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1674
PART FIVE: LIST OF ARBITRATORS ADMINISTERED BY THE MINISTRY
CHAPTER 35A, LIST OF ARBITRATORS - SECTION 3SA 1679
35A.I. LIMITATION OF THE SCOPE OF THE RULES REGULATING THE LIST OF
ARBITRATORS EXCLUSIVELY TO CONSUMER DISPUTES 1679 35A.II. NATURE OF
ARBITRATION AND STATUS OF ARBITRATOR IN CONSUMER DISPUTES IN CONSEQUENCE
OF STRONGER PUBLIC SUPERVISION 1680
35A.III. PROSPECTS OF THE INSTITUTION OF THE LIST OF ARBITRATORS IN
CONSUMER DISPUTES IN CONNECTION WITH THE PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW ACT
(PIL) AFTER 1 JANUARY 2014 1684 35A.IV. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1687
CHAPTER 35B, REGISTRATION IN THE LIST OF ARBITRATORS- SECTION 35B 1689
ARTICLE II PARAGRAPHS 4 AND 5 OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE ARBACT (ACT NO.
19/2012 COLL.) [TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS] 1690
35B.I. SECTION 35B(L) OF THE ARBACT 1691
35B.IL SECTION 35B(2) OF THE ARBACT 1693
35B.III. SECTION 35B(3) AND (4) OF THE ARBACT 1693
35.IV. SECTION 35B(5) OF THE ARBACT 1695
CHAPTER 35C, STRIKING OFF THE LIST OF ARBITRATORS-SECTION 35C 1697
35C.I. STRIKING OFF THE LIST AS AN ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION 1698 35C.II.
SECTION 35C(L) OF THE ARBACT: OBLIGATION OF THE MINISTRY TO STRIKE THE
ARBITRATOR OFF THE LIST 1699
35C.III. SECTION 35C(2): POSSIBILITY TO STRIKE OFF THE LIST 1701
35C.III.1. INTERPRETATION OF THE TERMS SERIOUS OR REPEATED BREACH OF
DUTIES 1701
35C.III.2. CONNECTION BETWEEN THE CRITERIA FOR ANNULMENT OF AN ARBITRAL
AWARD AND THE INTERPRETATION ADOPTED BY THE MINISTRY 1702
XXXI
IMAGE 30
ARBITRATION LAW OF CZECH REPUBLIC
35C.IU.3. SERVICE OF THE COUNTERPARTS OF THE DECISION ON ANNULMENT OF AN
ARBITRAL AWARD (SECTION 34(3) OF THE ARBACT) AND CONNECTION TO STRIKING
THE ARBITRATOR OFF THE LIST (SECTION 35C(2)) 1703 35C.HI.4. DUTIES
RELATING TO CONSUMER RULES 1706 35C.II1.5. ADMINISTRATIVE DISCRETION OF
THE MINISTRY IN
CHOOSING THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF BREACHING THE DUTIES OF ARBITRATOR
1708
35C.1V. SECTION 35C(3) OF THE ARBACT: POSSIBILITY OF A TEMPORARY
STRIKING OFF THE LIST 1711
35C.V. PROCEDURAL ASPECTS OF THE PROCEEDINGS ON STRIKING THE ARBITRATOR
OFF THE LIST 1711
35C.V.1. APPLICABLE LAWS 1711
35C.V.2. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS AT THE MINISTRY OF JUSTICE OF THE
CZECH REPUBLIC 1713
35C.V.3. REVIEW OF THE MINISTRY S DECISION - APPEAL 1718 35C.V.4.
PROCEEDINGS IN COURT - LAWSUIT IN ADMINISTRATIVE COURT PROCEEDINGS 1719
35C.V1. SECTION 35C(4) OF THE ARBACT 1721
CHAPTER 35D, OBLIGATIONS TO PROVIDE INFORMATION-SECTION 35D 1723
CHAPTER 36, LAW APPLICABLE TO THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT -
SECTION 36 1725
SECTION 117OFTHEPLL [ARBITRATION AGREEMENT] 1725
SECTION 123 OF THE PIL[TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS] 1726
36.1. INTERNATIONAL DIMENSION IN AN ARBITRATION AGREEMENT AND
DIFFERENTIATION OF APPLICABLE LAWS IN ARBITRATION 1726 36.1.1.
MANIFESTATIONS OF THE INTERNATIONAL DIMENSION IN ARBITRATION 1726
36.1.2. THE LAW APPLICABLE TO THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT AS AN AUTONOMOUS
CATEGORY BETWEEN LEX ARBITRI AND LEX CAUSAE 1731
36.11. CORRELATION BETWEEN THE LAW APPLICABLE TO THE PROCEEDINGS AND THE
LAW APPLICABLE TO THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT 1732 36.11.1. DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN APPLICABLE PROCEDURAL LAW AND THE LAW APPLICABLE TO THE
ARBITRATION
AGREEMENT 1732
36.11.2. INTERRELATION BETWEEN APPLICABLE PROCEDURAL LAW AND THE LAW
APPLICABLE TO THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT 1733
XXXII
IMAGE 31
TABLE OF CONTENTS
36.111. ARBITRABILITY AND FORM OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENT UNDER CZECH LAW
1734
36.IV. ARBITRABILITY FROM THE CONFLICT-OF-LAWS PERSPECTIVE 1739 36.1 V.
1. APPROACHES TO THE INTERPRETATION OF ARBITRABILITY IN ARBITRATION
AGREEMENTS WITH AN INTERNATIONAL DIMENSION 1739
36.1 V.2. APPROACHES TO THE ASSESSMENT OF ARBITRABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL
ARBITRATION 1746
36.IV.2.1. THE CONFLICT-OF-LAWS METHOD(S) 1746 36. IV.2.2. PROCEDURAL
APPROACH 1748
36.IV.2.3. INTERNATIONALLY MANDATORY APPROACH 1749
36.1 V.3. LAW APPLICABLE TO ARBITRABILITY UNDER INTERNATIONAL TREATIES
1752
36.IV.3.1. CONCEPT OF INTERNATIONAL TREATIES AND APPROACH TO THE
INTERPRETATION THEREOF (NYCONV AND ECONV) 1752 36.IV.3.2. ABSENCE OF
ARBITRABILITY UNDER
ARTICLE V(2)(A) OF THE NYCONV 1755
36. V. EXCLUSION OF THE LAW APPLICABLE TO AN ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FROM
THE SCOPE OF THE ROME I REGULATION AND THE ROME CONVENTION 1764
36. VI. CONSUMER PROTECTION IN CONNECTION WITH THE LAW APPLICABLE TO AN
ARBITRATION AGREEMENT 1765
36. VII. CHANGES IN CONNECTION WITH THE NEW PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW
ACT 1766
36.VIII. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 1766
36.IX. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 1768
36.X. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1769
CHAPTER 37, APPLICABLE SUBSTANTIVE LAW-SECTION 37 1781
37.1. LAW APPLICABLE TO THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE DISPUTE AND APPROACHES
TO THE DETERMINATION OF THE CONFLICT-OF-LAWS STATUS OF THE LEX CAUSAE IN
ARBITRATION 1783
37.1.1. INTERNATIONAL DIMENSION IN ARBITRATION AND ITS INFLUENCE ON THE
SUBSTANTIVE LAW APPLICABLE TO THE MERITS OF THE DISPUTE 1783
37.1.2. CHOICE OF LAW AND ATTEMPTS AT TRANSNATIONALIZATION OF THE LAW
APPLICABLE TO THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE DISPUTE 1785
XXXIII
IMAGE 32
ARBITRATION LAW OF CZECH REPUBLIC
37.1.3. APPLICATION OF THE CONFLICT-OF-LAWS RULES AND THE
CONFLICT-OF-LAWS METHOD BY ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS 1787 37.1.4. CONNECTING
FACTORS USED BY ARBITRATORS IN INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE 1789
37.1.5. SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION FACTORS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF
APPLICABLE SUBSTANTIVE LAW 1792 37.1.6. CONSIDERATION AND APPLICATION OF
NON-STATE STANDARDS IN ARBITRATION 1794
37.11. SECTION 37( 1) OF THE ARBACT 1795
37.11.1. CHOICE OF LAW IN ARBITRATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 37 OF THE
ARBACT (FIRST SENTENCE OF SECTION 37(1) OF THE ARBACT) 1795
37.11.2. CONSUMER PROTECTION (SECOND SENTENCE OF SECTION 37(1) OF THE
ARBACT) ...1799
37.111. SECTION 37(2) OF THE ARBACT 1802
37.IV. APPLICATION OF EU LAW IN ARBITRATION 1804
37.1V. 1. CONNECTION BETWEEN EU LAW AND ARBITRATION 1804 37.IV.2.
ARBITRATION AND THE ROME I REGULATION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF COMMUNITY
LAW 1810 37.V. CHANGES IN CONNECTION WITH THE NEW PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL
LAW ACT 1813
37.VI. CASE LAW 1814
37.VII. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 1816
37. VIII. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT)
1823
37.IX. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1824
CHAPTER 38, RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL
AWARDS-SECTION 38 1851
SECTION 120 OF THE PIL 1851
SECTION 121 OF THE PIL 1851
SECTION 122 OF THE PIL 1852
SECTION 123 OF THE PIL [TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS] 1852
38.1. THE TERM FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD UNDER THE LAW OF NATIONAL ORIGIN
(ARBACT) AND UNDER THE NEW YORK CONVENTION (NYCONV) 1853
38.1.1. IMPORTANCE OF THE NYCONV (NYCONV) AND THE CONCEPT OF ARBITRATION
/ ARBITRAL AWARD IN THE STATE OF RECOGNITION/ENFORCEMENT 1853
38.1.1.1. IMPORTANCE OF THE NYCONV (NYCONV) 1854
XXXIV
IMAGE 33
TABLE OF CONTENTS
38.1.1.2. CONTRACTUAL CONCEPT OF THE ARBITRAL AWARD 1854
38.1.1.3. JURISDICTIONAL CONCEPT OF THE ARBITRAL AWARD (ARBITRAL AWARD
AS A JUDGMENT) 1855
38.1.1.4. INTERNATIONAL TREATIES 1856
38.1.1.5. CONNECTION BETWEEN THE NYCONV AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL TREATIES
AND NATIONAL RULES 1857
38.1.2. SCOPE OF THE NEW YORK CONVENTION IN CONNECTION WITH SECTIONS 38
AND 39 OF THE ARBACT 1858 38.1.2.1. SCOPE OF THE NEW YORK CONVENTION
(NYCONV) 1858
38.1.2.2. CONCEPT OF ARBITRAL AWARD UNDER THE NEW YORK CONVENTION 1860
38.1.2.3. FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD 1867
(A) TERRITORIAL CRITERION 1867
(B) FUNCTIONAL CRITERION 1870
38.1.2.4. FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTIONS 38 AND
39 OF THE ARBACT 1874
38.11. RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT 1875
3 8.III. CORRELATION BETWEEN RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN
ARBITRAL AWARDS AND STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROCEEDINGS... 1879
38.IV. CASE LAW 1881
38.V. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 1888
38.VI. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1891
CHAPTER 39, REFUSAL TO ENFORCE A FOREIGN AWARD-SECTION 39 1901
SECTION 121 OF THE PIL [RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL
AWARDS] 1901
39.1. PRIORITY APPLICATION OF THE RULES OF INTERNATIONAL ORIGIN 1902
39.11. RULES OF NATIONAL ORIGIN APPLICABLE WHERE RULES OF INTERNATIONAL
ORIGIN CANNOT BE APPLIED (SECTION 39 OF THE ARBACT/ 121 OF THE PIL) 1904
39.111. SECTION 39(A) OF THE ARBACT / SECTION 121(A) AND (B) OF THE PIL
1905
39.IV. SECTION 39(B) OF THE ARBACT / SECTION 121(C) OF THE PIL 1907 39.
V. SECTION 39(C) OF THE ARBACT / SECTION 12 L(D) OF THE PIL 1909 39. VI.
ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS RENDERED IN CONSUMER DISPUTES
1910
XXXV
IMAGE 34
ARBITRATION LAW OF CZECH REPUBLIC
39. VI. 1. GROUNDS FOR REFUSAL OF RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT 1910
39. VI.2. ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRAL AWARDS RENDERED IN STATES WITH A LOWER
DEGREE OF CONSUMER PROTECTION 1916
39.V1.3. DECISIONS OF COURTS IN EU MEMBER STATES IN CASES OF ENFORCEMENT
OF A FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD RENDERED IN A CONSUMER DISPUTE 1918
39.VI.3.1. DECISION OF THE AUSTRIAN SUPREME COURT (OGH), CASE NO. 3 OB
144/09M OF 22 JULY 2009: BREACH OF CONSUMER PROTECTION LAWS DOES NOT
FORM PART
OF INTERNATIONAL OR EU PUBLIC POLICY 1918
39.V1.3.2. DECISION OF THE POLISH SUPREME COURT, CASE NO. NO IV CSK
200/06 OF 22 FEBRUARY 2007 1920
39.V1I. CASE LAW 1922
39. VIII. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT)
1926
39IX. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1926
CHAPTER 40, RECOGNITION OF A FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD - SECTION 40 1939
RULES EFFECTIVE FROM 1 JANUARY 2014 (PIL) [RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT
OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS] 1939
SECTION 120 OF THE PIL 1939
SECTION 122 OF THE PIL 1939
SECTION 123 OF THE PIL [TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS] 1940
40.1. SECTION 40 OF THE ARBACT 1940
40.11. SECTION 122 OF THE PIL 1941
40.111. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 1941
40.1V. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1941
XXXVI
IMAGE 35
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART SIX: SUBJECT-MATTER AND TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF COURTS
CHAPTER 41, SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION OF A COURT-SECTION 41 1947
41.1. GENERAL RULES REGULATING SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION FOR
EXERCISING THE SUPPORTING AND SUPERVISORY FUNCTIONS OF THE STATE 1947
41.11. PROCEEDINGS ON INVALIDITY OF AN ARBITRATION AGREEMENT 1948 41
.III. EXCLUSION OF THE APPLICATION OF SECTION 41 OF THE ARBACT AND THE
RULES REGULATING COURT PROCEEDINGS TO THE PROCEDURE UNDER SECTION 6(2)
OF THE ARBACT 1950
41.IV. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 1950
41.V. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1951
CHAPTER 42, JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS TO ACT INSTEAD OF ARBITRATORS,
JUGE D APPUI - SECTION 42 1953
42.1. SECTION 42(1) OF THE ARBACT 1953
42.11. SECTION 42(2) OF THE ARBACT 1954
42.111. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1955
CHAPTER 43, TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF A COURT-SECTION 43 1957
43.1. SECTION 43 OF THE ARBACT 1957
43.11. CASE LAW 1958
CHAPTER 44, REASONABLE APPLICATION OF THE CCP-SECTION 44 1961
44.1. SCOPE OF SECTION 44 OF THE ARBACT 1961
44.11. METHOD OF APPLYING THE CCP IN EXERCISING THE SUPPORTING AND
SUPERVISORY FUNCTIONS OF COURTS 1961
44.111. EXCLUSION OF THE APPLICATION OF THE CCP TO RELEASE THE
ARBITRATOR FROM CONFIDENTIALITY UNDER SECTION 6(2) OF THE ARBACT 1962
44.IV. COMPARISON OF THE SCOPE AND PURPOSE OF SECTION 30 OF THE ARBACT
AND SECTION 44 OF THE ARBACT 1963
44.V. CASE LAW 1963
44.VI. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 1964
44. VII. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT)
1965
44. VIII. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1965
XXXVII
IMAGE 36
ARBITRATION LAW OF CZECH REPUBLIC
PART SEVEN: AMENDMENT AND SUPPLEMENT TO THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
CHAPTER 45, AMENDMENT OF THE CCP-SECTION 45 1969
45.1. AMENDMENTS TO OTHER LAWS IMPLEMENTED IN THE ORIGINAL TEXT OF ACT
NO. 216/1994 COLL. OF 1 NOVEMBER 1994 1969 45.11. AMENDMENTS TO OTHER
LAWS IMPLEMENTED BY ACT NO. 19/2012 COLL. (AMENDMENT TO THE ARBACT)
OF 20 DECEMBER 2012 1969
PART EIGHT: TRANSITIONAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS
CHAPTER 46, PROCEEDINGS COMMENCED BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE
ACT-SECTION 46 1975
46.1. PROCEEDINGS ON INVALIDITY OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS AND ON
ANNULMENT OF ARBITRAL AWARDS IN THE TRANSITIONAL REGIME FROM THE 1963
ARBACT TO THE ARBACT (SECTION 46 OF THE ARBACT) 1975
46.11. PROCEEDINGS ON ANNULMENT OF ARBITRAL AWARDS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE
AMENDMENT TO THE ARBACT 1976
46.111. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 1977
CHAPTER 47, PRIORITY OF INTERNATIONAL TREATIES-SECTION 47 1979
47.1. SCOPE OF THE SOURCES OF INTERNATIONAL ORIGIN APPLICABLE UNDER
SECTION 47 OF THE ARBACT 1980
47.11. ARBITRATION / RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL
AWARDS UNDER BILATERAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE TREATIES 1982
47.11.1. PROVISION OF LEGAL ASSISTANCE OTHER THAN IN THE FORM OF THE
RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF DECISIONS (ARBITRAL AWARDS) 1982
47.11.2. RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRAL AWARDS 1984
47.11.2.1. SCOPE OF LEGAL ASSISTANCE TREATIES WITH RESPECT TO
ARBITRATION (ARBITRAL AWARDS) 1984
47.11.2.2. CONDITIONS FOR RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRAL
AWARDS..... 1986 47.11.2.3. CONNECTION TO DOMESTIC ARBITRATION LAWS 1987
XXXVIII
IMAGE 37
TABLE OF CONTENTS
47.111. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE REGIME UNDER THE LEGAL ASSISTANCE
TREATIES AND THE NEW YORK CONVENTION 1988
47.111.1. CONFLICT OF SOURCES UNDER THE NEW YORK CONVENTION (NYCONV) AND
THE LEGAL ASSISTANCE TREATIES 1988
47.111.2. CONFLICT OF SOURCES UNDER THE GENERAL RULES OF INTERNATIONAL
LAW 1990
47.111.2.1. THE PRINCIPLE OF LEX POSTERIOR DEROGAT LEGI PRIORI 1990
47.111.2.2. THE PRINCIPLE OF LEX SPECIALIS DEROGAT LEGI GENERALI 1990
47.111.2.3. THE PRINCIPLE OF MAXIMUM EFFICIENCY 1991
47.IV. THE REGIME OF LEGAL ASSISTANCE TREATIES WITH INDIVIDUAL COUNTRIES
1991
47.IV.1. ALBANIA 1991
47.IV.2. AFGHANISTAN 1992
47.IV.3. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 1994
47.IV.4. MONTENEGRO 1996
47.IV.5. CROATIA 1998
47.IV.6. YEMEN 1999
47.IV.7. CYPRUS 2001
47.IV.8. HUNGARY 2003
47.IV.9. MACEDONIA (FYROM) 2004
47.IV.10. MONGOLIA 2006
47.IV.11. PORTUGAL 2008
47.IV.12. ROMANIA 2009
47.IV.13. SLOVAKIA. 2011
47.IV.14. SLOVENIA 2012
47.IV.15. SERBIA 2014
47.IV.16. SYRIA 2016
47.IV.17. SPAIN 2018
47.IV.18. SWITZERLAND 2021
47.IV. 19. TUNISIA 2022
47.IV.20. UKRAINE 2024
47.IV.21. UZBEKISTAN 2025
47.IV.22. VIETNAM 2026
47.V. CASE LAW 2028
47.VI. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 2032
47. VII. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT)
2033
47.VIH. BIBLIOGRAPHY 2033
XXHX
IMAGE 38
ARBITRATION LAW OF CZECH REPUBLIC
CHAPTER 48, TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS - SECTION 48 2037
ARTICLE II OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE ARBACT (ACT NO. 19/2012 COLL.)
[TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS] 2037
48.1. TRANSITION FROM THE PROVISIONS OF THE 1963 ARBACT (THE 1963 ACT)
TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ARBACT (THE 1994 ACT) 2038 48.11. INTERTEMPORAL
RULES IN CONNECTION WITH THE AMENDMENT TO THE ARBACT (THE 2011 ACT
EFFECTIVE FROM 1 APRIL 2012) 2039
48.111. AMENDMENT EFFECTIVE FROM 1 JANUARY 2014 2041 48.1 V. CASE LAW
2042
48.V. FROM ARBITRATION PRACTICE 2043
48.VI. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 2044
48.VI.1. SLOVARBACT 2044
48.VI.2. ACT NO. 218/1996 COLL 2044
CHAPTER 49, REPEALS-SECTION 49 2047
49.1. COMMENTARY ON SECTION 49 OF THE ARBACT 2048
49.11. COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 2049
49.H.1. SLOVARBACT 2049
49.11.2. ACT NO. 218/1996 COLL 2049
CHAPTER 50, EFFECTIVE DATE-SECTION 50 2051
ARTICLE IV OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE ARBACT (ACT NO. 19/2012 COLL.)
[EFFECTIVE DATE] 2051
SECTION 124 OF THE PIL [REPEALS] 2051
SECTION 125 OF THE PIL 2051
50.1. COMMENTARY ON SECTION 50 OF THE ARBACT 2052
50.11. CASE LAW 2052
50.111 COMPARISON WITH THE LAW OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC (SLOVARBACT) 2053
50.111.1. SLOVARBACT 2053
50.111.2. ACT NO. 218/1996 COLL 2053
50.1 V. BIBLIOGRAPHY 2053
XL
IMAGE 39
TABLE OF CONTENTS
BIBLIOGRAPHY 2055
I. MONOGRAPHS ISSUED IN THE CZECH OR SLOVAK REPUBLICS 2055 II.
MONOGRAPHS ISSUED OUTSIDE THE CZECH OR SLOVAK REPUBLICS 2065
III. MASTER S, DOCTORAL, AND DISSERTATION THESES AND OTHER QUALIFICATION
AND SCIENTIFIC PAPERS 2083
INDEX 2087
XLI
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Bělohlávek, Alexander J. 1968- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)113462891 |
| author_facet | Bělohlávek, Alexander J. 1968- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Bělohlávek, Alexander J. 1968- |
| author_variant | a j b aj ajb |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV040961271 |
| classification_rvk | PU 4410 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)844076789 (DE-599)BVBBV040961271 |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01533nam a2200361 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV040961271</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20190508 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">130423s2013 xx |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781937518189</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-937518-18-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)844076789</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV040961271</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PU 4410</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)140585:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bělohlávek, Alexander J.</subfield><subfield code="d">1968-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)113462891</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Arbitration law of Czech Republic</subfield><subfield code="b">practice and procedure</subfield><subfield code="c">Alexander J. Bělohlávek</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Huntington, New York</subfield><subfield code="b">Juris</subfield><subfield code="c">[2013]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">cxxxiii, 2137 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4052348-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Schiedsrichterliches Verfahren</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4121615-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Tschechien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4303381-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Tschechien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4303381-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4052348-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Schiedsrichterliches Verfahren</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4121615-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="C">b</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025939636&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-025939636</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Tschechien (DE-588)4303381-7 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Tschechien |
| id | DE-604.BV040961271 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-20T16:28:08Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781937518189 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-025939636 |
| oclc_num | 844076789 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-703 DE-188 DE-739 DE-M382 |
| owner_facet | DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-703 DE-188 DE-739 DE-M382 |
| physical | cxxxiii, 2137 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publishDateSearch | 2013 |
| publishDateSort | 2013 |
| publisher | Juris |
| record_format | marc |
| spellingShingle | Bělohlávek, Alexander J. 1968- Arbitration law of Czech Republic practice and procedure Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4052348-2 gnd Schiedsrichterliches Verfahren (DE-588)4121615-5 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4052348-2 (DE-588)4121615-5 (DE-588)4303381-7 |
| title | Arbitration law of Czech Republic practice and procedure |
| title_auth | Arbitration law of Czech Republic practice and procedure |
| title_exact_search | Arbitration law of Czech Republic practice and procedure |
| title_full | Arbitration law of Czech Republic practice and procedure Alexander J. Bělohlávek |
| title_fullStr | Arbitration law of Czech Republic practice and procedure Alexander J. Bělohlávek |
| title_full_unstemmed | Arbitration law of Czech Republic practice and procedure Alexander J. Bělohlávek |
| title_short | Arbitration law of Czech Republic |
| title_sort | arbitration law of czech republic practice and procedure |
| title_sub | practice and procedure |
| topic | Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4052348-2 gnd Schiedsrichterliches Verfahren (DE-588)4121615-5 gnd |
| topic_facet | Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit Schiedsrichterliches Verfahren Tschechien |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025939636&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT belohlavekalexanderj arbitrationlawofczechrepublicpracticeandprocedure |