The reception of international law in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights: harmonisation or fragmentation of the European legal order?
Gespeichert in:
| Beteilige Person: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Hochschulschrift/Dissertation Buch |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2009
|
| Schlagwörter: | |
| Links: | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024398894&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| Umfang: | IV, 432, 4 S. |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV039546940 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20111107 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 110825s2009 sz m||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)756285182 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV039546940 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a sz |c CH | ||
| 049 | |a DE-188 |a DE-19 |a DE-12 |a DE-384 | ||
| 084 | |a PS 4140 |0 (DE-625)139835: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Forowicz, Magdalena |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The reception of international law in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights |b harmonisation or fragmentation of the European legal order? |c vorgelegt von Magdalena Forowicz |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2009 | |
| 300 | |a IV, 432, 4 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 502 | |a Zürich, Univ., Diss., 2009 | ||
| 610 | 2 | 4 | |a European Court of Human Rights |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte |0 (DE-588)1003803-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 630 | 0 | 7 | |a Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention |f 1950 November 4 |0 (DE-588)4015727-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 4 | |a Menschenrecht | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Human rights |z Europe | |
| 650 | 4 | |a International and municipal law |z Europe | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsprechung |0 (DE-588)4115710-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Völkerrecht |0 (DE-588)4063693-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 4 | |a Europa | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte |0 (DE-588)1003803-6 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Rechtsprechung |0 (DE-588)4115710-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention |f 1950 November 4 |0 (DE-588)4015727-1 |D u |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Völkerrecht |0 (DE-588)4063693-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m HBZ Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024398894&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-024398894 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1819376596657635328 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Titel: The reception of international law in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights
Autor: Forowicz, Magdalena
Jahr: 2009
Table of Contents
Aknowledgments i
Principal Abbreviations ii
A. Introduction 1
1. The Evolving Background of the European Convention 1
2. A Delicate Balance of Reception: The Interpretative Framework 3
2.1. Interpretation Hindering the Reception Process 7
2.1.1. Margin of Appreciation 7
2.1.2. Consensual Interpretation 9
2.1.3. Autonomous Interpretation 10
2.1.4. Judicial Restraint 10
2.2. Interpretation Enhancing the Reception Process 11
2.2.1. Evolutive and Dynamic Interpretation 11
2.2.2. Effectiveness Principle 12
2.2.3. Systematic Integration 13
2.2.4. Judicial Activism 14
3. A Systemic Approach to the European Public Order 15
3.1. An Operational System 15
3.2. A Special Regime 16
3.3. Fragmentation 17
3.4. International Constitutionalism 20
B. Reception in Selected Areas
I. The Law of Treaties 22
1. Preliminary Observations 25
2. The Case Law of the Court Concerning the VCLT 25
2.1. The Ordinary Meaning of Words 25
2.2. The Object and Context 31
2.3. Subsequent Practice 36
2.4. Other Relevant Rules of International Law 43
2.4.1. The Renewed Interest in Article 31 (3) (c) VCLT 43
2.4.2. The Case Law relating to Article 31 (3) (c) VCLT 47
2.5. Travaux Preparatoires 59
3. Rationale of the Reasoning 70
II. International Court of Justice 74
1. Preliminary Observations 74
2. Case Law Concerning the ICJ s Decisions and Statute 76
2.1. The Initial Case Law 77
2.2. Filling in Gaps 81
2.3. The Clarification of Certain Commercial Aspects 85
2.4. The Growing Differences between Both Systems 87
2.5. Certain Points of Interests 91
2.6. Issues of Fundamental International
and Regional Importance 93
2.7. Judicial Review of UN s Actions 97
3. Rationale of the Reasoning 105
HI. Child Rights 110
1. Preliminary Observations 110
2. The Hague Convention on International Child Abduction 111
2.1. Closely Intertwined with the Strasbourg case law 111
2.2. The Case Law of the Commission 113
2.3. The Case Law of the ECtHR 118
2.3.1. An Archetypal Aase 118
2.3.2. Non-Ratification as a Relevant Factor 120
2.3.3. Other Sources external to the ECHR 121
2.3.4. Direct Intervention into Domestic Law 122
2.3.5. Lack of Invocation and Application 123
3. The Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption 124
3.1. An International Treaty with strong European Support 124
3.2. The Pini and Others v. Romania case 125
4. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child 127
4.1. An International Treaty with Unanimous European Support 127
4.2. Corporal Punishment and Abuse 128
4.3. Children in Conflict with the Law and Juvenile Justice Issues 131
4.3.1. The Nortierv. The Netherlands Case 131
4.3.2. The T. v. UnitedKindgom and
V. v. United Kingdom Casts 132
4.4. Ill-treatment of Illegal Immigrant Children 137
4.5. Sexual Abuse and Rape 139
5. ILO Convention on Worst Forms of Child Labour (No. 182) 143
1. An International Treaty Neglected in the ECtHR s Case Law 143
5.2 Early Forced Labour Case Law 145
5.3 Ihe Siliadin v. France Case 146
6. Rationale of the Reasoning 150
IV. Civil and Political Rights 154
1. Pre liininary Observations 154
1.1 The Co-existence of Both Systems 154
1.2. Ihe Differences between Both Systems 157
2. International Civil and Political Rights 159
2.1. Case law on the Co-existence with the HRC 160
2.1.1. The Definition of the Relationship 160
2.1.2. Proceedings Raising Different Issues 161
2.1.3. The ECtHR and the HRC Rule Differently
on Identical Issues 165
2.1.4. An Improvement in the Relationship 166
2.1.5. The ECtHR follows the HRC s case law 169
2.2. Case Law Referring to the ICCPR 170
2.2.1. The Council of Civil Service Unions Case 170
2.2.2. The Groppera Radio Case 172
2.2.3. The T. and S.H. Case 174
2.2.4. The Brannigan andMcBride and
iiieJ.S.,P.B. and Others Cases 176
2.2.5. The Kurt Case 179
2.2.6. The Streletz and K.-H. W. Cases 181
2.2.7. The Gatzinger and Polacek Cases 186
2.2.8. The Mamatkulov Cases 187
2.2.9. The Riener and Bartik Cases 189
3. Rationale of the Reasoning 193
V. Prohibition on Torture and Other Ill-Treatment 197
1. Preliminary Observations 197
2. Case Law Concerning the CAT Framework and Beyond 201
2.1. Case Law Referring to the Convention Against Torture 201
2.1.1. Pre-CAT Case Law 201
2.1.2. Post-CAT Case Law 206
3. Case Law Referring to the Commitee Against Torture 221
3.1. Case Law on the Co-existence with the Committee 222
3.2. Case Law Referring to the Committee s Activities 225
3.2.1. Case Law concerning the Committee s Jurisprudence 225
3.2.2. The Committee s and the Special Rapporteur s Reports 231
4. Rationale of the Reasoning 236
VI. Refugee Rights 240
1. Preliminary Observations 240
2. Case Law referring to the 1951 Refugee Convention 242
2.1. Case Law Relating to Article 3 ECHR 243
2.1.1. A Comparison of the ECHR with
the 1951 Refugee Convention 243
2.1.2. Extraterritorial Effect and
the Limitations of the Examination 247
2.1.3. Distinction between Both Instruments 248
2.1.4. Granting of a Refugee Status 250
2.1.5. International Obligations of the Respondent States 253
2.2. Case law Relating to Article 5 ECHR 256
2.2.1. A Comparison of the ECHR with
the 1951 Refugee Convention 256
2.2.2. Limited Number of References in the Case Law 262
2.3. Case law Relating to Article 8 ECHR 274
2.3.1. A Comparison of the ECHR with
the 1951 Refugee Convention 274
2.3.2. Limitations of the Examination 280
2.3.3. Criticisms of the Court s Approach 281
2.3.4. Duty of Contracting States 284
2.3.5. The Court s Conception of Its Own Role 285
3. Case Law Referring to the Convention Against Torture 286
4. Rationale of the Reasoning 288
VII. State Immunity 292
1. Preliminary Observations 292
1.1. The Concept of Immunity 292
1.2. Conventional Law 294
1.3. International Practice 295
1.4. State Practice 296
2. The Strasbourg Case Law 300
2.1. Preliminary Observations 300
2.2. The Al-Adsani v. United Kingdom Case 301
2.3. The Fogarty v. United Kingdom Case 302
2.4. The McElhinney v. Ireland Case 303
3. Analysis of the Court s References to International Law 303
3.1. A Common Reasoning 303
3.1.1. Analysis of Article 6(1) ECHR 305
3.1.2. The Court s Reasoning 307
3.2. Differences in the Reasoning 308
3.2.1. The Reasoning of the Majority 308
3.2.2. The Limited Contribution of the Majority 311
3.2.3. The Different Reasoning of the Minority 314
3.3. Additional Considerations 317
4. Rationale of the Reasoning 319
VIII. International Humanitarian Law 324
1. Preliminary Observations 324
2. International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law 325
2.1. Differences and Similarities between Both Systems 325
2.2. The Interaction of Both Systems in Treaty Provisions 326
2.3. The Position of International Bodies:
the Status of Lex Specialis 327
2.4. The Challenging of the Lex Specialis Rule by Academics 329
3. References to IHL in the Strasbourg Case Law 333
3.1. The Cyprus v. Turkey Case 334
3.2. The Engel and Others v. the Netherlands Case 336
3.3. The Gulec v. Turkey Case 338
3.4. The Ergi v. Turkey Case 339
3.5. The Ozkan v. Turkey Case 342
3.6. The Isayeva and Others v. Russia Case 343
3.7. The Isayeva v. Russia Case 347
3.8. The Akkum and Others v. Turkey case 349
3.9. The Markovic v. Italy Case 350
3.10 The Korbely v. Hungary Case 354
4. Analysis of the Reasoning Used in the Case Law 358
5. Rationale of the Reasoning 360
C. Synthesis 365
1. Preliminary Observations 365
2. Cross-Cutting Factors: To Receive or Not to Receive? 366
2.1. International Law Was Invoked at Domestic Level 366
2.2. Case Intertwined with International Law 367
2.3. Need to Harmonise a Provision 368
2.4. Used in the Drafting of the ECHR 370
2.5. Uncertainty Regarding International Law 371
2.6. Need to Fill In Gaps 373
2.7. Textual and Substantive Similarities 374
2.8. More Specific Guidelines Available in International Law 375
2.9. Need to Assess Factual Situations 375
2.10. Political Issues and State Interests 376
2.11. More Advantageous to Use the ECHR 378
2.12. Procedural and Substantive Law 379
2.13. Ratification Record 380
2.14. Universal Reach of International Instruments 381
2.15. Background of the Judges 382
3. Basic Characteristics of the Strasbourg Case Law 383
3.1. The Difference between the Court and the Commission 384
3.2. Referring to General Law vs. to a Special Regime 385
3.3. Margin of Appreciation 387
4. Comparative Analysis 388
4.1. Overview of the Factors Influence 388
4.1.1. Pre-Existing and Technical Reasons 390
4.1.2. Need to Improve and to Update the ECHR 391
4.1.3. Common Ground between the ECHR and
International Law 392
4.1.4. Other Factors 392
4.2. Overview of the Cross-Cutting Issues and
Results Analysis 393
4.2.1. General Trends 393
4.2.2. The Reception Scenarios 396
5. The Wider Context of the Strasbourg Reception Process 397
5.1. Interactions between the ECHR and International Law 397
5.2. An Approach Aimed at Self-Reinforcement 400
5.3. Insufficient Integration into the International Legal System 401
5.4. The Nature of the ECHR Special Regime 402
5.4.1. The ECHR s Constitutional and Regional Features 402
5.4.2. The ECHR Conflict Resolution Rules 405
5.5. Interactions between Special Regimes 409
5.6. International Conflict Resolution Rules 411
5.7. The Role of General International Law 412
6. Future Research 413
7. Further Improvement at the ECHR Level 415
Bibliography 420
Curriculum Vitae 433
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Forowicz, Magdalena |
| author_facet | Forowicz, Magdalena |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Forowicz, Magdalena |
| author_variant | m f mf |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV039546940 |
| classification_rvk | PS 4140 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)756285182 (DE-599)BVBBV039546940 |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Thesis Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02037nam a2200469zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV039546940</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20111107 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">110825s2009 sz m||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)756285182</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV039546940</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">sz</subfield><subfield code="c">CH</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PS 4140</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139835:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Forowicz, Magdalena</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The reception of international law in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights</subfield><subfield code="b">harmonisation or fragmentation of the European legal order?</subfield><subfield code="c">vorgelegt von Magdalena Forowicz</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">IV, 432, 4 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zürich, Univ., Diss., 2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">European Court of Human Rights</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1003803-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="630" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention</subfield><subfield code="f">1950 November 4</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015727-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Menschenrecht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Human rights</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International and municipal law</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsprechung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115710-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Völkerrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4063693-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1003803-6</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Rechtsprechung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115710-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention</subfield><subfield code="f">1950 November 4</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015727-1</subfield><subfield code="D">u</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Völkerrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4063693-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">HBZ Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024398894&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-024398894</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
| geographic | Europa |
| geographic_facet | Europa |
| id | DE-604.BV039546940 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-20T15:57:02Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-024398894 |
| oclc_num | 756285182 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-188 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-12 DE-384 |
| owner_facet | DE-188 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-12 DE-384 |
| physical | IV, 432, 4 S. |
| publishDate | 2009 |
| publishDateSearch | 2009 |
| publishDateSort | 2009 |
| record_format | marc |
| spellingShingle | Forowicz, Magdalena The reception of international law in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights harmonisation or fragmentation of the European legal order? European Court of Human Rights Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (DE-588)1003803-6 gnd Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention 1950 November 4 (DE-588)4015727-1 gnd Menschenrecht Human rights Europe International and municipal law Europe Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 gnd Völkerrecht (DE-588)4063693-8 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)1003803-6 (DE-588)4015727-1 (DE-588)4115710-2 (DE-588)4063693-8 (DE-588)4113937-9 |
| title | The reception of international law in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights harmonisation or fragmentation of the European legal order? |
| title_auth | The reception of international law in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights harmonisation or fragmentation of the European legal order? |
| title_exact_search | The reception of international law in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights harmonisation or fragmentation of the European legal order? |
| title_full | The reception of international law in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights harmonisation or fragmentation of the European legal order? vorgelegt von Magdalena Forowicz |
| title_fullStr | The reception of international law in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights harmonisation or fragmentation of the European legal order? vorgelegt von Magdalena Forowicz |
| title_full_unstemmed | The reception of international law in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights harmonisation or fragmentation of the European legal order? vorgelegt von Magdalena Forowicz |
| title_short | The reception of international law in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights |
| title_sort | the reception of international law in the case law of the european court of human rights harmonisation or fragmentation of the european legal order |
| title_sub | harmonisation or fragmentation of the European legal order? |
| topic | European Court of Human Rights Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (DE-588)1003803-6 gnd Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention 1950 November 4 (DE-588)4015727-1 gnd Menschenrecht Human rights Europe International and municipal law Europe Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 gnd Völkerrecht (DE-588)4063693-8 gnd |
| topic_facet | European Court of Human Rights Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention 1950 November 4 Menschenrecht Human rights Europe International and municipal law Europe Rechtsprechung Völkerrecht Europa Hochschulschrift |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024398894&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT forowiczmagdalena thereceptionofinternationallawinthecaselawoftheeuropeancourtofhumanrightsharmonisationorfragmentationoftheeuropeanlegalorder |