The costs of low birth weight:
Gespeichert in:
| Beteiligte Personen: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge, Mass.
National Bureau of Economic Research
2004
|
| Schriftenreihe: | National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series
10552 |
| Schlagwörter: | |
| Links: | http://papers.nber.org/papers/w10552.pdf |
| Abstract: | "Birth weight has emerged as the leading indicator of infant health and welfare and the central focus of infant health policy. This is because low birth weight (LBW) infants experience severe health and developmental difficulties that can impose enormous costs on society. But would the prevention of LBW generate equally sizable cost savings and health improvements? Estimates of the return to LBW-prevention from cross-sectional associations may be biased by omitted variables that cannot be influenced by policy, such as genetic factors. To address this, we compare the hospital costs, health at birth, and infant mortality rates between heavier and lighter infants from all twin pairs born in the United States. We also examine the effect of maternal smoking during pregnancy the leading risk factor for LBW in the United States on health among singleton births after controlling for detailed background characteristics. Both analyses imply substantially smaller effects of LBW than previously thought, suggesting two possibilities: 1) existing estimates overstate the true costs and consequences of LBW by at least a factor of four and by as much as a factor of 20; or 2) different LBW-preventing interventions have different health and cost consequences, implying that policy efforts that presume a single return to reducing LBW will necessarily be suboptimal"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site. |
| Umfang: | 46, [28] S. graph. Darst. |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zcb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV023590830 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20091221 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 040617s2004 xxud||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)55879263 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV023590830 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a xxu |c XD-US | ||
| 049 | |a DE-521 |a DE-19 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a HB1 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 330.072 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Almond, Douglas |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)129337706 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The costs of low birth weight |c Douglas Almond ; Kenneth Y. Chay ; David S. Lee |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge, Mass. |b National Bureau of Economic Research |c 2004 | |
| 300 | |a 46, [28] S. |b graph. Darst. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |v 10552 | |
| 520 | 3 | |a "Birth weight has emerged as the leading indicator of infant health and welfare and the central focus of infant health policy. This is because low birth weight (LBW) infants experience severe health and developmental difficulties that can impose enormous costs on society. But would the prevention of LBW generate equally sizable cost savings and health improvements? Estimates of the return to LBW-prevention from cross-sectional associations may be biased by omitted variables that cannot be influenced by policy, such as genetic factors. To address this, we compare the hospital costs, health at birth, and infant mortality rates between heavier and lighter infants from all twin pairs born in the United States. We also examine the effect of maternal smoking during pregnancy the leading risk factor for LBW in the United States on health among singleton births after controlling for detailed background characteristics. Both analyses imply substantially smaller effects of LBW than previously thought, suggesting two possibilities: 1) existing estimates overstate the true costs and consequences of LBW by at least a factor of four and by as much as a factor of 20; or 2) different LBW-preventing interventions have different health and cost consequences, implying that policy efforts that presume a single return to reducing LBW will necessarily be suboptimal"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site. | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Statistik | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Birth weight, Low | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Health Care Costs |z United States |v Statistics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Health Care Costs |z United States |v Twin Study | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Infant Mortality |z United States |v Statistics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Infant Mortality |z United States |v Twin Study | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Infant, Low Birth Weight |z United States |v Statistics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Infant, Low Birth Weight |z United States |v Twin Study | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects |z United States |v Statistics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects |z United States |v Twin Study | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Smoking |x adverse effects |z United States |v Statistics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Smoking |x adverse effects |z United States |v Twin Study | |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 655 | 2 | |a Statistics | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chay, Kenneth Y. |d 1969- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)12886687X |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lee, David S. |d 1972- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)12933765X |4 aut | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |
| 830 | 0 | |a National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |v 10552 |w (DE-604)BV002801238 |9 10552 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://papers.nber.org/papers/w10552.pdf |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016906160 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1818965830656851968 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Almond, Douglas Chay, Kenneth Y. 1969- Lee, David S. 1972- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)129337706 (DE-588)12886687X (DE-588)12933765X |
| author_facet | Almond, Douglas Chay, Kenneth Y. 1969- Lee, David S. 1972- |
| author_role | aut aut aut |
| author_sort | Almond, Douglas |
| author_variant | d a da k y c ky kyc d s l ds dsl |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV023590830 |
| callnumber-first | H - Social Science |
| callnumber-label | HB1 |
| callnumber-raw | HB1 |
| callnumber-search | HB1 |
| callnumber-sort | HB 11 |
| callnumber-subject | HB - Economic Theory and Demography |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)55879263 (DE-599)BVBBV023590830 |
| dewey-full | 330.072 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 330 - Economics |
| dewey-raw | 330.072 |
| dewey-search | 330.072 |
| dewey-sort | 3330.072 |
| dewey-tens | 330 - Economics |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03539nam a2200529zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV023590830</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20091221 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">040617s2004 xxud||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)55879263</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV023590830</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">XD-US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HB1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">330.072</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Almond, Douglas</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)129337706</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The costs of low birth weight</subfield><subfield code="c">Douglas Almond ; Kenneth Y. Chay ; David S. Lee</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, Mass.</subfield><subfield code="b">National Bureau of Economic Research</subfield><subfield code="c">2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">46, [28] S.</subfield><subfield code="b">graph. Darst.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series</subfield><subfield code="v">10552</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Birth weight has emerged as the leading indicator of infant health and welfare and the central focus of infant health policy. This is because low birth weight (LBW) infants experience severe health and developmental difficulties that can impose enormous costs on society. But would the prevention of LBW generate equally sizable cost savings and health improvements? Estimates of the return to LBW-prevention from cross-sectional associations may be biased by omitted variables that cannot be influenced by policy, such as genetic factors. To address this, we compare the hospital costs, health at birth, and infant mortality rates between heavier and lighter infants from all twin pairs born in the United States. We also examine the effect of maternal smoking during pregnancy the leading risk factor for LBW in the United States on health among singleton births after controlling for detailed background characteristics. Both analyses imply substantially smaller effects of LBW than previously thought, suggesting two possibilities: 1) existing estimates overstate the true costs and consequences of LBW by at least a factor of four and by as much as a factor of 20; or 2) different LBW-preventing interventions have different health and cost consequences, implying that policy efforts that presume a single return to reducing LBW will necessarily be suboptimal"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Statistik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Birth weight, Low</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Health Care Costs</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="v">Statistics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Health Care Costs</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="v">Twin Study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Infant Mortality</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="v">Statistics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Infant Mortality</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="v">Twin Study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Infant, Low Birth Weight</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="v">Statistics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Infant, Low Birth Weight</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="v">Twin Study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="v">Statistics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="v">Twin Study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Smoking</subfield><subfield code="x">adverse effects</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="v">Statistics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Smoking</subfield><subfield code="x">adverse effects</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="v">Twin Study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Statistics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chay, Kenneth Y.</subfield><subfield code="d">1969-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)12886687X</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lee, David S.</subfield><subfield code="d">1972-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)12933765X</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series</subfield><subfield code="v">10552</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV002801238</subfield><subfield code="9">10552</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://papers.nber.org/papers/w10552.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016906160</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | Statistics |
| genre_facet | Statistics |
| geographic | USA |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV023590830 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-20T13:23:15Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016906160 |
| oclc_num | 55879263 |
| open_access_boolean | 1 |
| owner | DE-521 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| owner_facet | DE-521 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| physical | 46, [28] S. graph. Darst. |
| publishDate | 2004 |
| publishDateSearch | 2004 |
| publishDateSort | 2004 |
| publisher | National Bureau of Economic Research |
| record_format | marc |
| series | National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |
| series2 | National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |
| spelling | Almond, Douglas Verfasser (DE-588)129337706 aut The costs of low birth weight Douglas Almond ; Kenneth Y. Chay ; David S. Lee Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2004 46, [28] S. graph. Darst. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series 10552 "Birth weight has emerged as the leading indicator of infant health and welfare and the central focus of infant health policy. This is because low birth weight (LBW) infants experience severe health and developmental difficulties that can impose enormous costs on society. But would the prevention of LBW generate equally sizable cost savings and health improvements? Estimates of the return to LBW-prevention from cross-sectional associations may be biased by omitted variables that cannot be influenced by policy, such as genetic factors. To address this, we compare the hospital costs, health at birth, and infant mortality rates between heavier and lighter infants from all twin pairs born in the United States. We also examine the effect of maternal smoking during pregnancy the leading risk factor for LBW in the United States on health among singleton births after controlling for detailed background characteristics. Both analyses imply substantially smaller effects of LBW than previously thought, suggesting two possibilities: 1) existing estimates overstate the true costs and consequences of LBW by at least a factor of four and by as much as a factor of 20; or 2) different LBW-preventing interventions have different health and cost consequences, implying that policy efforts that presume a single return to reducing LBW will necessarily be suboptimal"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site. Statistik Birth weight, Low Health Care Costs United States Statistics Health Care Costs United States Twin Study Infant Mortality United States Statistics Infant Mortality United States Twin Study Infant, Low Birth Weight United States Statistics Infant, Low Birth Weight United States Twin Study Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects United States Statistics Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects United States Twin Study Smoking adverse effects United States Statistics Smoking adverse effects United States Twin Study USA Statistics Chay, Kenneth Y. 1969- Verfasser (DE-588)12886687X aut Lee, David S. 1972- Verfasser (DE-588)12933765X aut Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series 10552 (DE-604)BV002801238 10552 http://papers.nber.org/papers/w10552.pdf kostenfrei Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Almond, Douglas Chay, Kenneth Y. 1969- Lee, David S. 1972- The costs of low birth weight National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series Statistik Birth weight, Low Health Care Costs United States Statistics Health Care Costs United States Twin Study Infant Mortality United States Statistics Infant Mortality United States Twin Study Infant, Low Birth Weight United States Statistics Infant, Low Birth Weight United States Twin Study Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects United States Statistics Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects United States Twin Study Smoking adverse effects United States Statistics Smoking adverse effects United States Twin Study |
| title | The costs of low birth weight |
| title_auth | The costs of low birth weight |
| title_exact_search | The costs of low birth weight |
| title_full | The costs of low birth weight Douglas Almond ; Kenneth Y. Chay ; David S. Lee |
| title_fullStr | The costs of low birth weight Douglas Almond ; Kenneth Y. Chay ; David S. Lee |
| title_full_unstemmed | The costs of low birth weight Douglas Almond ; Kenneth Y. Chay ; David S. Lee |
| title_short | The costs of low birth weight |
| title_sort | the costs of low birth weight |
| topic | Statistik Birth weight, Low Health Care Costs United States Statistics Health Care Costs United States Twin Study Infant Mortality United States Statistics Infant Mortality United States Twin Study Infant, Low Birth Weight United States Statistics Infant, Low Birth Weight United States Twin Study Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects United States Statistics Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects United States Twin Study Smoking adverse effects United States Statistics Smoking adverse effects United States Twin Study |
| topic_facet | Statistik Birth weight, Low Health Care Costs United States Statistics Health Care Costs United States Twin Study Infant Mortality United States Statistics Infant Mortality United States Twin Study Infant, Low Birth Weight United States Statistics Infant, Low Birth Weight United States Twin Study Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects United States Statistics Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects United States Twin Study Smoking adverse effects United States Statistics Smoking adverse effects United States Twin Study USA Statistics |
| url | http://papers.nber.org/papers/w10552.pdf |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV002801238 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT almonddouglas thecostsoflowbirthweight AT chaykennethy thecostsoflowbirthweight AT leedavids thecostsoflowbirthweight |