The paradox of consensualism in international law:
Gespeichert in:
| Beteiligte Personen: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
The Hague [u.a.]
Kluwer Law Internat.
1998
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Developments in international law
31 |
| Schlagwörter: | |
| Links: | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=008004216&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| Umfang: | XIX, 322 S. |
| ISBN: | 9041105166 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV011850901 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20130812 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 980325s1998 ne |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9041105166 |9 90-411-0516-6 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)37806167 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV011850901 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a ne |c XA-NL | ||
| 049 | |a DE-739 |a DE-12 |a DE-521 |a DE-11 |a DE-188 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KZ1262.C65E44 1998 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 341 |2 21 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 341 21 | |
| 084 | |a PR 2180 |0 (DE-625)139518: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a PR 2200 |0 (DE-625)139520: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Elias, Olufemi A. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)129642282 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The paradox of consensualism in international law |c O. A. Elias and C. L. Lim |
| 264 | 1 | |a The Hague [u.a.] |b Kluwer Law Internat. |c 1998 | |
| 300 | |a XIX, 322 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Developments in international law |v 31 | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Consensus |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Consentement (Droit) |2 ram | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Droit international |2 ram | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Internationaal recht |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Rechtsvorming |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Staten |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Internationales Recht | |
| 650 | 4 | |a International law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Consent (Law) | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Völkergewohnheitsrecht |0 (DE-588)4188476-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Konsens |0 (DE-588)4010504-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Völkerrecht |0 (DE-588)4063693-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Völkerrecht |0 (DE-588)4063693-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Konsens |0 (DE-588)4010504-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 1 | 0 | |a Völkergewohnheitsrecht |0 (DE-588)4188476-0 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | 1 | |a Konsens |0 (DE-588)4010504-0 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lim, C. L. |d 1947- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)129642290 |4 aut | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Developments in international law |v 31 |w (DE-604)BV021463578 |9 31 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m GBV Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=008004216&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-008004216 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1819370994610995200 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | O.A. ELIAS AND C.L. LIM THE PARADOX OF CONSENSUALISM IN INTERNATIONAL
LAW KLUWER LAW INTERNATIONAL THE HAGUE / LONDON / BOSTON TABLE OF
CONTENTS PREFACE XI FOREWORD XV PART ONE: CUSTOM CHAPTERI THE SUBJECTIVE
ELEMENT IN CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW 3 1. THE FORMATION OF CUSTOMARY
INTERNATIONAL LAW 4 1.1. THE PROBLEM 4 1.2. THE SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS 5
1.3. THE WORKABLE SOLUTIONS 10 1.3.1. OPINIO JURIS AS (OBJECTIVE)
EXPRESSION RATHER THAN (SUBJECTIVE) BELIEF 11 1.3.2. THE STAGES APPROACH
12 1.4. A COMPARISON OF THESE WORKABLE THEORIES OF OPINIO JURIS AND
CONSENT 13 1.4.1. OPINIO JURIS AS (OBJECTIVE) EXPRESSION RATHER THAN
(SUBJECTIVE) BELIEF AND CONSENT 13 1.4.2. THE STAGES APPROACH AND
CONSENT 13 1.4.3. SOME POSSIBLE OBJECTIONS 14 1.4.3.1. OPINIO JURIS AND
CONSENT ARE DIFFERENT THINGS 14 1.4.3.2. THE TERMINOLOGY PRECLUDES A
NON-DECLARATORY CONCEPTION 16 1.4.3.3. NO SUBJECTIVE ELEMENT IS
NECESSARY IN THE FORMATION OF CUSTOMARY LAW 18 1.5. CONCLUSION 21 2. THE
DISTINCTION BETWEEN LAW AND NON-LAW 21 3. SOME REMAINING ISSUES 24 3.1.
CUSTOM AND TREATY 24 3.2. THE DIVISIBILITY OF OPINIO JURIS 26 4.
CONCLUSIONS 27 A NOTE ON STATE PRACTICE 28 VI TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER II THE ROLE OF INDIVIDUAL CONSENT: THE DIFFERENT THEORIES 29 1.
THE INTELLECTUALIST THEORY 29 2. THE MAJORITARIAN THEORY 30 3. THE
PERSISTENT OBJECTOR THEORY 30 4. THE CONSENSUAL THEORY 31 5. THE VETO
THEORY 31 6. A COMMENT ON THE CLASSIFICATION 31 CHAPTER FFL THE ROLE OF
INDIVIDUAL CONSENT IN THE WORLD COURT 35 1. THE INTELLECTUALIST THEORY
37 2. THE VETO THEORY 37 3. THE MAJORITARIAN, PERSISTENT OBJECTOR AND
CONSENSUAL THEORIES 38 3.1. THE AMBIGUOUS CASES 38 3.2. THE DIRECTLY
RELEVANT CASES 56 3.3. SUMMARY ON THE DIRECT TREATMENT OF THE
MAJORITARIAN, PERSISTENT OBJECTOR AND CONSENSUAL THEORIES 64 4. IS
REFERENCE TO INDIVIDUAL CONSENT NECESSARY OR MERELY COSMETIC? 65 4.1. A
POLITICAL STRATEGY ARGUMENT 66 4.2. AN ARGUMENT BASED ON THE COURT S
FUNCTION 66 4.3. A JUDICIAL ECONOMY ARGUMENT 67 4.4. A BELT AND
BRACES ARGUMENT 70 5. EVIDENCE OF A PRESUMPTION OF UNIVERSAL ACCEPTANCE
OF A GENERAL RULE 70 5.1.THEPARTOFDISSENT 71 5.1.1. THE OPERATIONAL
PROBLEM 72 5.1.2. THE LEGAL PROBLEM 73 5.1.3. THE CONCEPTUAL PROBLEM 74
5.1.4. THE POLICY PROBLEM 75 5.1.5. CONCLUSION 78 5.2. THE PART OF THE
REQUIREMENT OF GENERALITY 78 5.3. CONSENT OR EXPECTATIONS? 82 6.
CONCLUSION ON THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE WORLD COURT 84 CHAPTER IV THE
ROLE OF INDIVIDUAL CONSENT IN OTHER TRIBUNALS 85 1. NATIONAL COURTS 85
1.1. PARAMOUNTCY OF DOMESTIC LAW CONSIDERATIONS 85 1.2. JUDICIAL
LEGISLATION 86 1.3. OTHER PROBLEMS 88 1.4. THE CLEAR CASES 90 1.5.
CONCLUSION 91 2. OTHER INTERNATIONAL DECISIONS 92 TABLE OF CONTENTS VII
CHAPTER V THE ROLE OF INDIVIDUAL CONSENT IN THE PRACTICE OF STATES 95 1.
THE RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LAW-MAKING PROCESS 95 2. THE REQUIREMENT
OF CONSENT 97 2.1. THE ARGUMENT FROM OPINIO JURIS 106 2.2. THE ARGUMENT
FROM INTERNAL CONSISTENCY 108 2.3. THE ARGUMENT FROM EXTERNAL UNIFORMITY
110 2.4. THE ARGUMENT FROM AMBIGUITY: DUTIES VERSUS LIBERTIES IN THE LAW
110 3. CONCLUSIONS 112 CHAPTER VI THE SCOPE OF CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL
LAW 115 1. A TYPOLOGICAL DIFFERENCE? 115 1.1. PARTICIPATION OR OTHER
EXPRESSION OF CONSENT 115 1.2. (SPECIAL) INTEREST IN THE SUBJECT-MATTER
OF THE CUSTOM 116 1.3. GEOGRAPHY 118 1.4. THE INDETERMINACY OF
INTERNATIONAL ACTS AND CLAIMS 119 1.5. CONCLUSION 121 2. THE SUBSTANCE
OF THE PROBANDUM 121 2.1. THE VIEW THAT THE REQUIREMENT OF CONSENT IS
DICTATED BY THE NATURE OF PARTICULAR (AS DISTINCT FROM GENERAL) CUSTOM
123 2.1.1. JUDGE AMMOUN 123 2.1.2. PROFESSOR D AMATO 125 2.2. THE VIEW
THAT CONSENT IS NOT REQUIRED FOR EITHER KIND OF CUSTOM 126 2.3.
CONCLUSION 127 3. THE BUERDEN OF PROOF 128 4. CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW
AS PARTICULAR LAW MULTIPLIED 130 5. CONCLUSION 134 CHAPTER VE NEW STATES
AND PRE-EXISTING CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW 135 1. THE DECISIONS OF
TRIBUNALS 135 1.1. THE WORLD COURT 135 1.2. MUNICIPAL DECISIONS 139 2.
STATE PRACTICE 142 3. A DEFENCE OF THE CLASSIC CONSENSUALISTS 149 4.
CONCLUSIONS 151 CHAPTER JURISTIC OPINION ON THE ROLE OF CONSENT 153 1.
OBJECTIONS TO THE CONSENSUAL THEORY 153 1.1. THE PROBLEM OF THE VICIOUS
CIRCLE 153 1.2. SYSTEMIC AS DISTINCT FROM INDIVIDUAL CONSENT 154 1.3.
THE PROBLEM OF NEWLY INDEPENDENT STATES 155 1.4. THE PROBLEM OF STATES
NEW TO A PRACTICE 15 8 1.5. THE PROBLEM OF THE PACTUM TACITUM 162 VIII
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.6. THE CHARGE THAT THE REQUIREMENT OF CONSENT IS
FICTIONAL 162 1.7. THE PROBLEM OF MORALITY 164 1.8. CONCLUSION 164 2.
THE MERITS OF THE CONSENSUAL THEORY 165 2.1. ANALYTICAL ADVANTAGES 165
2.2. CONTEMPORARY INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY 167 3. GENERAL CONCLUSIONS ON
THE ROLE OF CONSENT 168 PART TWO: OTHER SOURCES CHAPTER IX THE
INTERNATIONAL LEX SCRIPTA: A MORE ATTRACTIVE OPTION? 173 1. THE
ATTRACTION OF TREATIES 174 L.L.PRECISION 174 1.1.1. RULE-FORMULATION AND
RULE-FOLLOWING 176 1.1.2. SYLLOGISM AND THE TREATY PROCESS 176 1.1.3.
THE INHERENT INDETERMINACY OF LANGUAGE 178 1.1.4. LAW AND FACT 180 1.2.
PARTICIPATION 182 1.2.1. PARTICIPATION AND CO-OPERATION 182 1.2.2.
TREATIES AND CUSTOM 185 1.3. CONCLUSION 187 2. LAW, POLITICS AND THE
PARADOX OF TREATY LAW-MAKING 187 3. CONCLUSIONS 189 CHAPTER X THE
PARADOX OF CONSENSUALISM IN INTERNATIONAL LAW 193 1. THE NATURE OF
DISAGREEMENT IN INTERNATIONAL LEGAL DISPUTES 193 1.1. EMPIRICAL
DISAGREEMENT 194 1.2. THEORETICAL DISAGREEMENT 194 2. THE PARADOX 195
2.1. AN ILLUSORY PROBLEM? 196 2.2. A DISTINCTION BETWEEN EMPIRICAL AND
THEORETICAL DISAGREEMENT 197 2.3. DOES CONSENT TO JURISDICTION INCLUDE
CONSENT TO SUBSTANTIVE LAW? 198 3. CONCLUSIONS 202 CHAPTER XI THE
NON-CONSENSUAL SOURCES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 205 1. THE DISTINCTION
BETWEEN THE CONSENSUAL AND THE NON-CONSENSUAL SOURCES 206 2. GENERAL
PRINCIPLES OF LAW 208 2.1. NATIONAL LAW PRINCIPLES 208 2.1.1. THE
DISTINCTION BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL LAW 209 2.1.2. WHICH
NATIONAL LAW PRINCIPLES QUALIFY FOR INTERNATIONAL- LAW APPLICATION? 211
2.1.3. THE PARADOX 214 TABLE OF CONTENTS IX 2.2. PRINCIPLES DICTATED BY
AN INTER-STATE SYSTEM 216 2.3. PRINCIPLES DICTATED BY LEGAL LOGIC 218
2.4. INCHOATE CUSTOM 221 2.5. PRINCIPLES DICTATED BY JUSTICE 223 2.5.1.
THE LIMITED ROLE OF NATURAL LAW AND JUSTICE 223 2.5.2. A SPECIAL CASE -
EQUITY IN INTERNATIONAL LAW 225 2.5.2.1. IS EQUITY DIFFERENT FROM LAW ?
THE DIMENSION OF PRINCIPLE 225 2.5.2.2. IS EQUITY DIFFERENT FROM LAW?
THE DIMENSION OF PRACTICE 225 2.6. CONCLUSION 229 3. SOFT LAW 230 4.
CONCLUSIONS 232 PART THREE: A UNMED LEGAL ORDER? CHAPTER XH THE
EXPANDING INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ORDER 237 1. THE EXTENT OF NON-STATE
PARTICIPATION: AN OVERVIEW 237 2. STATES AS THE ULTIMATE LAW-GIVERS? 240
2.1. COLONIAL AND INDIGENOUS PEOPLES 242 2.2. INTERNATIONAL
ORGANIZATIONS 244 2.3. TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS 245 3. THE
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL LAW AND NATIONAL LAW 249 4.
CONCLUSIONS 253 CHAPTER XIN THE BASIS OF OBLIGATION IN INTERNATIONAL LAW
255 1. THE MYTH OF ABSOLUTE SOVEREIGNTY 255 2. THE BASIS OF LEGAL
OBLIGATION 258 2.1. THE LOGICAL INDETERMINACY OF POSITIVE LEGAL
CONCEPTIONS: STATE SOVEREIGNTY AS A CLUSTER CONCEPT 258 2.1.1. LOGICAL
VAGUENESS 259 2.1.2. THE LIMITS OF INDUCTIVE REASONING 260 2.2.
CONSTITUTIONAL CO-ORDINATION AND CONVENTION AT THE FOUNDATIONS OF THE
INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ORDER: THE PROPER PLACE OF STATE SOVEREIGNTY 261
2.3. THE LIMITS TO LEGITIMATE CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE 264 2.3.1 THE
REQUIREMENT OF SOCIAL-FACTUAL QUALITY 264 2.3.2 THE REQUIREMENT OF
CRITICAL NORMATIVITY 265 3. SOME OBJECTIONS 266 4. ONE BASIC RULE 268 5.
THE BASIC RULE, SOURCE OF THE LAW, LAW AND JUSTICIABILITY
DISTINGUISHED 270 6. CONCLUSIONS 275 CHAPTER XIV VALUES, POSITIVE LAW
AND WORLD ORDER 279 1. BETWEEN RULE-SCEPTICISM AND LEGAL FUNDAMENTALISM
279 X TABLE OF CONTENTS 2. POSITIVE LAW, REALIST POLITICS, AND
MORAL-POLITICAL VALUES 281 3. THE CONCLUSIVENESS OF IMPARTIAL LEGAL
SOLUTIONS 283 3.1. THE LAW S CLAIM TO AUTHORITY 284 3.2. LOGICAL
VAGUENESS 285 3.3. THE PLACE OF VALUES: THE CRITIQUE OF LAW AS A SYSTEM
OF RULES 286 3.4. SOME OBJECTIONS 288 4. THE SCOPE OF INTERNATIONAL
LEGAL DISPUTES 289 5. DOES INTERNATIONAL LAW PROMOTE ANY GLOBAL
VALUES? 293 6. IS THERE A MORAL POINT TO INTERNATIONAL LAW? 295
BIBLIOGRAPHY AND CASES 297 INDEX 317
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Elias, Olufemi A. Lim, C. L. 1947- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)129642282 (DE-588)129642290 |
| author_facet | Elias, Olufemi A. Lim, C. L. 1947- |
| author_role | aut aut |
| author_sort | Elias, Olufemi A. |
| author_variant | o a e oa oae c l l cl cll |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV011850901 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KZ1262 |
| callnumber-raw | KZ1262.C65E44 1998 |
| callnumber-search | KZ1262.C65E44 1998 |
| callnumber-sort | KZ 41262 C65 E44 41998 |
| callnumber-subject | KZ - Law of Nations |
| classification_rvk | PR 2180 PR 2200 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)37806167 (DE-599)BVBBV011850901 |
| dewey-full | 341 34121 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 341 - Law of nations |
| dewey-raw | 341 341 21 |
| dewey-search | 341 341 21 |
| dewey-sort | 3341 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02201nam a2200589 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV011850901</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20130812 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">980325s1998 ne |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9041105166</subfield><subfield code="9">90-411-0516-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)37806167</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV011850901</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ne</subfield><subfield code="c">XA-NL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KZ1262.C65E44 1998</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">341</subfield><subfield code="2">21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">341 21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PR 2180</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139518:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PR 2200</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139520:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elias, Olufemi A.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)129642282</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The paradox of consensualism in international law</subfield><subfield code="c">O. A. Elias and C. L. Lim</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">The Hague [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Kluwer Law Internat.</subfield><subfield code="c">1998</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XIX, 322 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Developments in international law</subfield><subfield code="v">31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Consensus</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Consentement (Droit)</subfield><subfield code="2">ram</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Droit international</subfield><subfield code="2">ram</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationaal recht</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvorming</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Staten</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Internationales Recht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Consent (Law)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Völkergewohnheitsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4188476-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Konsens</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4010504-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Völkerrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4063693-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Völkerrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4063693-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Konsens</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4010504-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Völkergewohnheitsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4188476-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Konsens</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4010504-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lim, C. L.</subfield><subfield code="d">1947-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)129642290</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Developments in international law</subfield><subfield code="v">31</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV021463578</subfield><subfield code="9">31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">GBV Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=008004216&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-008004216</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV011850901 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-20T10:19:58Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9041105166 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-008004216 |
| oclc_num | 37806167 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-739 DE-12 DE-521 DE-11 DE-188 |
| owner_facet | DE-739 DE-12 DE-521 DE-11 DE-188 |
| physical | XIX, 322 S. |
| publishDate | 1998 |
| publishDateSearch | 1998 |
| publishDateSort | 1998 |
| publisher | Kluwer Law Internat. |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Developments in international law |
| series2 | Developments in international law |
| spellingShingle | Elias, Olufemi A. Lim, C. L. 1947- The paradox of consensualism in international law Developments in international law Consensus gtt Consentement (Droit) ram Droit international ram Internationaal recht gtt Rechtsvorming gtt Staten gtt Internationales Recht International law Consent (Law) Völkergewohnheitsrecht (DE-588)4188476-0 gnd Konsens (DE-588)4010504-0 gnd Völkerrecht (DE-588)4063693-8 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4188476-0 (DE-588)4010504-0 (DE-588)4063693-8 |
| title | The paradox of consensualism in international law |
| title_auth | The paradox of consensualism in international law |
| title_exact_search | The paradox of consensualism in international law |
| title_full | The paradox of consensualism in international law O. A. Elias and C. L. Lim |
| title_fullStr | The paradox of consensualism in international law O. A. Elias and C. L. Lim |
| title_full_unstemmed | The paradox of consensualism in international law O. A. Elias and C. L. Lim |
| title_short | The paradox of consensualism in international law |
| title_sort | the paradox of consensualism in international law |
| topic | Consensus gtt Consentement (Droit) ram Droit international ram Internationaal recht gtt Rechtsvorming gtt Staten gtt Internationales Recht International law Consent (Law) Völkergewohnheitsrecht (DE-588)4188476-0 gnd Konsens (DE-588)4010504-0 gnd Völkerrecht (DE-588)4063693-8 gnd |
| topic_facet | Consensus Consentement (Droit) Droit international Internationaal recht Rechtsvorming Staten Internationales Recht International law Consent (Law) Völkergewohnheitsrecht Konsens Völkerrecht |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=008004216&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV021463578 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT eliasolufemia theparadoxofconsensualismininternationallaw AT limcl theparadoxofconsensualismininternationallaw |