Natural language, knowledge representation, and logical form:
Gespeichert in:
Beteilige Person: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Veröffentlicht: |
Rochester, NY
1991
|
Schriftenreihe: | University of Rochester <Rochester, NY> / Department of Computer Science: Technical report
367 |
Schlagwörter: | |
Abstract: | Abstract: "Current natural language understanding systems generally maintain a strict division between the parsing processes and the representation that supports general reasoning about the world. This paper examines why these two forms of processing are separated, determines the current advantages and limitations of this approach, and identifies the inherent limitations of the approach. I will point out some fundamental problems with the models as they are defined today and suggest some important directions of research in natural language and knowledge representation In particular, I will argue that one of the crucial issues facing future natural language systems is the development of knowledge representation formalisms that can effectively handle ambiguity. |
Umfang: | 30 S. |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV008974830 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | t| | ||
008 | 940206s1991 xx |||| 00||| eng d | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)24448790 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV008974830 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-29T | ||
100 | 1 | |a Allen, James F. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Natural language, knowledge representation, and logical form |c James F. Allen |
264 | 1 | |a Rochester, NY |c 1991 | |
300 | |a 30 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a University of Rochester <Rochester, NY> / Department of Computer Science: Technical report |v 367 | |
520 | 3 | |a Abstract: "Current natural language understanding systems generally maintain a strict division between the parsing processes and the representation that supports general reasoning about the world. This paper examines why these two forms of processing are separated, determines the current advantages and limitations of this approach, and identifies the inherent limitations of the approach. I will point out some fundamental problems with the models as they are defined today and suggest some important directions of research in natural language and knowledge representation | |
520 | 3 | |a In particular, I will argue that one of the crucial issues facing future natural language systems is the development of knowledge representation formalisms that can effectively handle ambiguity. | |
650 | 4 | |a Künstliche Intelligenz | |
650 | 4 | |a Artificial intelligence | |
650 | 4 | |a Natural language processing (Computer science) | |
810 | 2 | |a Department of Computer Science: Technical report |t University of Rochester <Rochester, NY> |v 367 |w (DE-604)BV008902697 |9 367 | |
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005926360 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1818951141079121920 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Allen, James F. |
author_facet | Allen, James F. |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Allen, James F. |
author_variant | j f a jf jfa |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV008974830 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)24448790 (DE-599)BVBBV008974830 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01853nam a2200325 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV008974830</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">940206s1991 xx |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)24448790</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV008974830</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-29T</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Allen, James F.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Natural language, knowledge representation, and logical form</subfield><subfield code="c">James F. Allen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Rochester, NY</subfield><subfield code="c">1991</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">30 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">University of Rochester <Rochester, NY> / Department of Computer Science: Technical report</subfield><subfield code="v">367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract: "Current natural language understanding systems generally maintain a strict division between the parsing processes and the representation that supports general reasoning about the world. This paper examines why these two forms of processing are separated, determines the current advantages and limitations of this approach, and identifies the inherent limitations of the approach. I will point out some fundamental problems with the models as they are defined today and suggest some important directions of research in natural language and knowledge representation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In particular, I will argue that one of the crucial issues facing future natural language systems is the development of knowledge representation formalisms that can effectively handle ambiguity.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Künstliche Intelligenz</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Artificial intelligence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Natural language processing (Computer science)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="810" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Department of Computer Science: Technical report</subfield><subfield code="t">University of Rochester <Rochester, NY></subfield><subfield code="v">367</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV008902697</subfield><subfield code="9">367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005926360</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV008974830 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-12-20T09:29:46Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-005926360 |
oclc_num | 24448790 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-29T |
owner_facet | DE-29T |
physical | 30 S. |
publishDate | 1991 |
publishDateSearch | 1991 |
publishDateSort | 1991 |
record_format | marc |
series2 | University of Rochester <Rochester, NY> / Department of Computer Science: Technical report |
spelling | Allen, James F. Verfasser aut Natural language, knowledge representation, and logical form James F. Allen Rochester, NY 1991 30 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier University of Rochester <Rochester, NY> / Department of Computer Science: Technical report 367 Abstract: "Current natural language understanding systems generally maintain a strict division between the parsing processes and the representation that supports general reasoning about the world. This paper examines why these two forms of processing are separated, determines the current advantages and limitations of this approach, and identifies the inherent limitations of the approach. I will point out some fundamental problems with the models as they are defined today and suggest some important directions of research in natural language and knowledge representation In particular, I will argue that one of the crucial issues facing future natural language systems is the development of knowledge representation formalisms that can effectively handle ambiguity. Künstliche Intelligenz Artificial intelligence Natural language processing (Computer science) Department of Computer Science: Technical report University of Rochester <Rochester, NY> 367 (DE-604)BV008902697 367 |
spellingShingle | Allen, James F. Natural language, knowledge representation, and logical form Künstliche Intelligenz Artificial intelligence Natural language processing (Computer science) |
title | Natural language, knowledge representation, and logical form |
title_auth | Natural language, knowledge representation, and logical form |
title_exact_search | Natural language, knowledge representation, and logical form |
title_full | Natural language, knowledge representation, and logical form James F. Allen |
title_fullStr | Natural language, knowledge representation, and logical form James F. Allen |
title_full_unstemmed | Natural language, knowledge representation, and logical form James F. Allen |
title_short | Natural language, knowledge representation, and logical form |
title_sort | natural language knowledge representation and logical form |
topic | Künstliche Intelligenz Artificial intelligence Natural language processing (Computer science) |
topic_facet | Künstliche Intelligenz Artificial intelligence Natural language processing (Computer science) |
volume_link | (DE-604)BV008902697 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT allenjamesf naturallanguageknowledgerepresentationandlogicalform |