Cultural heritage protection and the reconciliation thesis:
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Paper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Abstract: | This chapter critically analyses what we label the Reconciliation Thesis, which holds that cultural heritage should be protected during armed conflict because of its instrumental use in promoting peace and reconciliation between warring groups. We begin by arguing that combatants and military decision makers have strong reasons to fight in ways that uphold the prospects of future peace. We then identify several ways in which the safeguarding of cultural heritage might plausibly contribute to post-war peacebuilding. Nevertheless, we ultimately argue that there are reasons to be sceptical of the Reconciliation Thesis, especially when it is evoked as a justification for imposing serious risks or costs on persons, or sacrificing other significant military objectives. |
| ISBN: | 978-0-19-286264-8 |
Staff View
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV049788670 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20241121 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 240719s2023 xx |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1450738416 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049788670 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-255 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Bülow, William |d 1986- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1191852253 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Cultural heritage protection and the reconciliation thesis |c William Bülow and Joshua Lewis Thomas |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a This chapter critically analyses what we label the Reconciliation Thesis, which holds that cultural heritage should be protected during armed conflict because of its instrumental use in promoting peace and reconciliation between warring groups. We begin by arguing that combatants and military decision makers have strong reasons to fight in ways that uphold the prospects of future peace. We then identify several ways in which the safeguarding of cultural heritage might plausibly contribute to post-war peacebuilding. Nevertheless, we ultimately argue that there are reasons to be sceptical of the Reconciliation Thesis, especially when it is evoked as a justification for imposing serious risks or costs on persons, or sacrificing other significant military objectives. | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kulturgüterschutz |0 (DE-588)4165975-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kulturerbe |0 (DE-588)4033560-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Krieg |0 (DE-588)4033114-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Krieg |0 (DE-588)4033114-3 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Kulturgüterschutz |0 (DE-588)4165975-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Kulturerbe |0 (DE-588)4033560-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Thomas, Joshua Lewis |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)131129371X |4 aut | |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g pages:92-112 |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |t Heritage and war / edited by William Bülow, Helen Frowe, Derek Matravers, and Joshua Lewis Thomas |b First edition |d Oxford, United Kingdom, 2023 |g Seite 92-112 |w (DE-604)BV049089559 |z 978-0-19-286264-8 |
| 941 | |s 92-112 | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035129486 | |
Record in the Search Index
| _version_ | 1820951845041864704 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| article_link | (DE-604)BV049089559 |
| author | Bülow, William 1986- Thomas, Joshua Lewis |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1191852253 (DE-588)131129371X |
| author_facet | Bülow, William 1986- Thomas, Joshua Lewis |
| author_role | aut aut |
| author_sort | Bülow, William 1986- |
| author_variant | w b wb j l t jl jlt |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV049788670 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1450738416 (DE-599)BVBBV049788670 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000naa a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049788670</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241121</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240719s2023 xx |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1450738416</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049788670</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-255</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bülow, William</subfield><subfield code="d">1986-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1191852253</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cultural heritage protection and the reconciliation thesis</subfield><subfield code="c">William Bülow and Joshua Lewis Thomas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This chapter critically analyses what we label the Reconciliation Thesis, which holds that cultural heritage should be protected during armed conflict because of its instrumental use in promoting peace and reconciliation between warring groups. We begin by arguing that combatants and military decision makers have strong reasons to fight in ways that uphold the prospects of future peace. We then identify several ways in which the safeguarding of cultural heritage might plausibly contribute to post-war peacebuilding. Nevertheless, we ultimately argue that there are reasons to be sceptical of the Reconciliation Thesis, especially when it is evoked as a justification for imposing serious risks or costs on persons, or sacrificing other significant military objectives.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kulturgüterschutz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4165975-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kulturerbe</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4033560-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Krieg</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4033114-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Krieg</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4033114-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Kulturgüterschutz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4165975-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Kulturerbe</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4033560-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Thomas, Joshua Lewis</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)131129371X</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">pages:92-112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="t">Heritage and war / edited by William Bülow, Helen Frowe, Derek Matravers, and Joshua Lewis Thomas</subfield><subfield code="b">First edition</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford, United Kingdom, 2023</subfield><subfield code="g">Seite 92-112</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV049089559</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-19-286264-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="941" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="s">92-112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035129486</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV049788670 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2025-01-11T11:30:05Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 978-0-19-286264-8 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-035129486 |
| oclc_num | 1450738416 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-255 |
| owner_facet | DE-255 |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publishDateSearch | 2023 |
| publishDateSort | 2023 |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Bülow, William 1986- Verfasser (DE-588)1191852253 aut Cultural heritage protection and the reconciliation thesis William Bülow and Joshua Lewis Thomas 2023 txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier This chapter critically analyses what we label the Reconciliation Thesis, which holds that cultural heritage should be protected during armed conflict because of its instrumental use in promoting peace and reconciliation between warring groups. We begin by arguing that combatants and military decision makers have strong reasons to fight in ways that uphold the prospects of future peace. We then identify several ways in which the safeguarding of cultural heritage might plausibly contribute to post-war peacebuilding. Nevertheless, we ultimately argue that there are reasons to be sceptical of the Reconciliation Thesis, especially when it is evoked as a justification for imposing serious risks or costs on persons, or sacrificing other significant military objectives. Kulturgüterschutz (DE-588)4165975-2 gnd rswk-swf Kulturerbe (DE-588)4033560-4 gnd rswk-swf Krieg (DE-588)4033114-3 gnd rswk-swf Krieg (DE-588)4033114-3 s Kulturgüterschutz (DE-588)4165975-2 s Kulturerbe (DE-588)4033560-4 s DE-604 Thomas, Joshua Lewis Verfasser (DE-588)131129371X aut pages:92-112 Heritage and war / edited by William Bülow, Helen Frowe, Derek Matravers, and Joshua Lewis Thomas First edition Oxford, United Kingdom, 2023 Seite 92-112 (DE-604)BV049089559 978-0-19-286264-8 |
| spellingShingle | Bülow, William 1986- Thomas, Joshua Lewis Cultural heritage protection and the reconciliation thesis Kulturgüterschutz (DE-588)4165975-2 gnd Kulturerbe (DE-588)4033560-4 gnd Krieg (DE-588)4033114-3 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4165975-2 (DE-588)4033560-4 (DE-588)4033114-3 |
| title | Cultural heritage protection and the reconciliation thesis |
| title_auth | Cultural heritage protection and the reconciliation thesis |
| title_exact_search | Cultural heritage protection and the reconciliation thesis |
| title_full | Cultural heritage protection and the reconciliation thesis William Bülow and Joshua Lewis Thomas |
| title_fullStr | Cultural heritage protection and the reconciliation thesis William Bülow and Joshua Lewis Thomas |
| title_full_unstemmed | Cultural heritage protection and the reconciliation thesis William Bülow and Joshua Lewis Thomas |
| title_short | Cultural heritage protection and the reconciliation thesis |
| title_sort | cultural heritage protection and the reconciliation thesis |
| topic | Kulturgüterschutz (DE-588)4165975-2 gnd Kulturerbe (DE-588)4033560-4 gnd Krieg (DE-588)4033114-3 gnd |
| topic_facet | Kulturgüterschutz Kulturerbe Krieg |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bulowwilliam culturalheritageprotectionandthereconciliationthesis AT thomasjoshualewis culturalheritageprotectionandthereconciliationthesis |