APA (7th ed.) Citation

Power, R. (1770). A comparative state of the two rejected money bills, in 1692 and 1769: With some observations on poynings act, and the explanatory statute of Philip and Mary. By a Barrister (The second edition, with additions.). Printed for James Williams, at No. 5, in Skinner-Row.

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Power, Richard. A Comparative State of the Two Rejected Money Bills, in 1692 and 1769: With Some Observations on Poynings Act, and the Explanatory Statute of Philip and Mary. By a Barrister. The second edition, with additions. Dublin: Printed for James Williams, at No. 5, in Skinner-Row, 1770.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Power, Richard. A Comparative State of the Two Rejected Money Bills, in 1692 and 1769: With Some Observations on Poynings Act, and the Explanatory Statute of Philip and Mary. By a Barrister. The second edition, with additions. Printed for James Williams, at No. 5, in Skinner-Row, 1770.

Warning: These citations may not always be 100% accurate.