The Role of the Court of Justice in EU Labour Law: A Case Study on the Transfer of Undertakings Directive
Gespeichert in:
| Beteilige Person: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Alphen aan den Rijn
Wolters Kluwer Law International
2023
|
| Ausgabe: | 1st ed |
| Schriftenreihe: | Bulletin of Comparative Labour Relations Series
v.112 |
| Links: | https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/hwr/detail.action?docID=30558343 |
| Beschreibung: | Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources |
| Umfang: | 1 Online-Ressource (444 Seiten) |
| ISBN: | 9789403530062 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zcb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV049020388 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230626s2023 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9789403530062 |9 978-94-035-3006-2 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-30-PQE)EBC30558343 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-30-PAD)EBC30558343 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-89-EBL)EBL30558343 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1381093620 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049020388 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-2070s | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Rainone, Silvia |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The Role of the Court of Justice in EU Labour Law |b A Case Study on the Transfer of Undertakings Directive |
| 250 | |a 1st ed | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Alphen aan den Rijn |b Wolters Kluwer Law International |c 2023 | |
| 264 | 4 | |c ©2023 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (444 Seiten) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Bulletin of Comparative Labour Relations Series |v v.112 | |
| 500 | |a Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a Intro -- Half-Title Page -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Table of Contents -- Preface -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- 1 Exploring the Role of the Court of Justice in Defining Labour Law -- 2 The First Analytical Layer: The Court from a Labour Law's Doctrinal Perspective -- 3 The Second Analytical Layer: The Court from a Judicial Lawmaking Perspective -- 4 Research Questions, Methodology and Structure -- 4.1 Research Aim and Questions -- 4.2 Structure -- 4.3 Methodology -- 4.4 The Limitations of the Research -- Chapter 1 Theoretical and Normative Framework -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Labour Law's Origins and Its Transformation -- 2.1 Three Fundamental Principles of Labour Law -- 2.1.1 Fundamental Principle 1: Addressing the Uneven Distribution in the Bargaining Power -- 2.1.2 Fundamental Principle 2: Labour Law Is Not (Just) a Commodity -- 2.1.3 Fundamental Principle 3: Workers' Rights Shall Coexist with the Market Economy -- 2.2 The Functions of Labour Law -- 2.2.1 The Protective Function -- 2.2.2 Uplifting Workers' Bargaining Power -- 2.2.3 Reconciling Economic and Social Progress -- 2.2.4 Labour Law as Labour Market Regulation -- 3 The Court of Justice and the Purposive Approach to Labour Law: Myth or Reality? -- 3.1 The Alemo-Herron Case -- 3.2 The Aget Iraklis Case -- 4 Concluding Remarks -- Chapter 2 Labour Law in EU Policymaking -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Historical Overview of the EU's Approach to Labour Law -- 2.1 The Origins: Dual Polity -- 2.2 Parenthesis of Upward Harmonisation -- 2.3 New Challenges and Completion of the Internal Market -- 2.4 Labour Policy Consolidates as a Dimension of the Internal Market -- 2.5 The Role of Labour Law in the Modern 'Social Market Economy' -- 2.6 EU Social Policy in Time of Economic Crisis -- 2.6.1 The EU Strategy for a Deeper EMU -- 2.6.2 'Social Triple A' as an Economic Necessity | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 3 The EPSR: A Paradigm Shift? -- 3.1 Again a Social Agenda for Economic Growth? -- 3.2 Structure and Content of the EPSR -- 3.3 The Implementation of the EPSR -- 3.3.1 Implementation Through the European Semester -- 3.3.2 Implementation Through EU Law -- 4 The EU Response to COVID-19: A Game Changer? -- 4.1 The Immediate Reaction to the COVID-19 Outbreak -- 4.2 The Next Generation EU -- 5 Concluding Remarks -- Chapter 3 The Court of Justice and Labour Law: A Case Study on the Transfer of Undertakings Directive -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Directive 2001/23/EC on Acquired Rights in Case of Transfer of Undertaking -- 3 Margin of Generalisation of the Case Study -- 3.1 The Court Can 'Choose' Between Different Functions -- 3.2 Normative Indeterminacy -- 3.3 A Rich Body of Case Law -- 3.4 Debate on the Purposive Approach by the Court -- 4 Case Study's Structure and Methodology -- 5 The Case Studies -- 5.1 The Scope of Application -- 5.1.1 Legal Transfer -- 5.1.2 Transfer of a Business -- 5.2 Workers' Rights -- 6 The Court's Approach to Labour Law -- 7 Concluding Considerations: A First Definition of the Role of the Court -- Chapter 4 The Court of Justice as a Judicial Policymaker -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Judicial Activism and EU Policymaking -- 1.2 Structure and Goals -- 2 Political Inclination and Neofunctionalist Theory -- 2.1 The Two Postulates of Neofunctionalism -- 2.1.1 Enforcing EU Law Through Individuals and National Courts -- 2.1.2 Development of Non-internal Market-Related Policies -- 2.2 The Relevance of a Collaborative Relationship with National Courts -- 2.3 Limits of the Neofunctionalist Theory -- 3 The Court of Justice as the Trustee of EU Integration: The Integrationalist Theory -- 3.1 The Court as the Guardian of the Treaties -- 3.2 Integrationalism in the Court of Justice's Reasoning -- 3.2.1 The Creation of a Sui Generis Legal System | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 3.2.2 Widening the EU Competences -- 3.2.2.1 The Deepening of the Internal Market via Negative Integration -- 3.2.2.2 The Expansive Approach to the Principle of Non-discrimination -- 3.3 Informal Partnership with the European Commission -- 3.4 Weak Aspects of the Integrationalist Theory -- 4 Concluding Remarks -- Chapter 5 The Relevance of the National Context in the Reasoning of the Court -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Intergovernmentalism -- 2.1 The Realist and the Neorational Variants -- 2.2 Member States' Interests in the Court's Reasoning -- 2.3 Amicus Briefs -- 2.4 The Ability of National Governments to Redirect the Court's Jurisprudence -- 2.5 Weaknesses of the Intergovernmental Theory -- 3 The Relevance of National Legal Systems in the Court's Reasoning -- 3.1 The Common Constitutional Traditions of the Member States -- 3.2 The Majoritarian Approach -- 3.2.1 Examples of the Majoritarian Approach -- 3.2.2 Implications of the Majoritarian Approach for the Court's Policymaking -- 3.2.3 The Critical Aspects of the Majoritarian Theory -- 3.3 The Pluralistic Approach -- 3.3.1 The Heterarchical Understanding of the EU Legal Order -- 3.3.2 The Origins of the Pluralist Approach -- 3.3.3 Constitutional Pluralism in the Court of Justice's Case Law -- 3.3.4 But How Pluralistic Is the Court Really? -- 4 Trans-judicial Dialogue -- 4.1 The Trans-judicial Dialogue as an Instrument of Contamination Between European and National Legal Systems -- 4.2 The Preliminary Ruling Procedure -- 4.2.1 The Establishment of the Dialogical Relationship and the 'Hidden Dialogue' -- 4.2.2 Superior and Lower Courts: A Different Kind of Dialogue -- 4.2.3 Establishing the Dialogue and 'Preemptive Opinions' of National Courts -- 4.3 The Limits of the Court's Discretion -- 4.3.1 Limits from Within the EU Legal System -- 4.3.2 Dialectical Limits -- 4.4 The Counter-Limits | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 4.4.1 The Inviolable Constitutional Principles of the National Legal System -- 4.4.1.1 Italy -- 4.4.1.2 Germany -- 4.4.1.3 The Court's Reactions and National Counteractions -- 4.4.1.4 The Normalisation of the Counter-Limits -- 4.4.2 Kompetenz-Kompetenz -- 4.4.3 The Spread of Counter-Limits in National Constitutional Jurisprudence -- 4.5 Trans-judicial Dialogue in Action -- 4.5.1 The Judicial Activism of the Court of Justice -- 4.5.2 The Reaction of National Courts -- 4.5.3 The Effects of Trans-judicial Dialogue on the Court of Justice's Reasoning -- 4.5.4 Case Law Challenging the Trans-judicial Dialogue Narrative -- 5 Concluding Remarks -- Chapter 6 What's Behind the Decision-Making of the Court of Justice? A Case Study on Directive 2001/23/EC -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Objects, Structure and Methodology of the Case Study -- 2.1 Objects -- 2.2 Structure -- 2.3 Methodology -- 3 A Purposive Approach Behind Labour Law Adjudication -- 3.1 Neofunctionalism -- 3.2 Integrationalism -- 4 Influences from the National Context -- 4.1 Intergovernmentalism -- 4.2 Influence of National Legal Traditions -- 4.3 Trans-judicial Dialogue -- 4.3.1 Preemptive Opinions -- 4.3.2 Margin of Appreciation -- 4.3.3 The Court's Approach to National Jurisprudence -- 5 Concluding Remarks on the Judicial Lawmaking Logics -- 5.1 The Prevailing Judicial Lawmaking Logics -- 5.2 Concluding Remarks -- Conclusion -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Main Findings -- 3 Reshaping the Perception of the Court of Justice in Relation to Labour Law -- Annex: Case Study Figures for Chapter 6 -- Bibliography -- Table of Cases -- Table of AG Opinions -- Table of Policy Documents -- Index -- Series | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |a Rainone, Silvia |t The Role of the Court of Justice in EU Labour Law |d Alphen aan den Rijn : Wolters Kluwer Law International,c2023 |z 9789403528960 |
| 912 | |a ZDB-30-PQE | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034283295 | |
| 966 | e | |u https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/hwr/detail.action?docID=30558343 |l DE-2070s |p ZDB-30-PQE |q HWR_PDA_PQE |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1818990703823290368 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Rainone, Silvia |
| author_facet | Rainone, Silvia |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Rainone, Silvia |
| author_variant | s r sr |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV049020388 |
| collection | ZDB-30-PQE |
| contents | Intro -- Half-Title Page -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Table of Contents -- Preface -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- 1 Exploring the Role of the Court of Justice in Defining Labour Law -- 2 The First Analytical Layer: The Court from a Labour Law's Doctrinal Perspective -- 3 The Second Analytical Layer: The Court from a Judicial Lawmaking Perspective -- 4 Research Questions, Methodology and Structure -- 4.1 Research Aim and Questions -- 4.2 Structure -- 4.3 Methodology -- 4.4 The Limitations of the Research -- Chapter 1 Theoretical and Normative Framework -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Labour Law's Origins and Its Transformation -- 2.1 Three Fundamental Principles of Labour Law -- 2.1.1 Fundamental Principle 1: Addressing the Uneven Distribution in the Bargaining Power -- 2.1.2 Fundamental Principle 2: Labour Law Is Not (Just) a Commodity -- 2.1.3 Fundamental Principle 3: Workers' Rights Shall Coexist with the Market Economy -- 2.2 The Functions of Labour Law -- 2.2.1 The Protective Function -- 2.2.2 Uplifting Workers' Bargaining Power -- 2.2.3 Reconciling Economic and Social Progress -- 2.2.4 Labour Law as Labour Market Regulation -- 3 The Court of Justice and the Purposive Approach to Labour Law: Myth or Reality? -- 3.1 The Alemo-Herron Case -- 3.2 The Aget Iraklis Case -- 4 Concluding Remarks -- Chapter 2 Labour Law in EU Policymaking -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Historical Overview of the EU's Approach to Labour Law -- 2.1 The Origins: Dual Polity -- 2.2 Parenthesis of Upward Harmonisation -- 2.3 New Challenges and Completion of the Internal Market -- 2.4 Labour Policy Consolidates as a Dimension of the Internal Market -- 2.5 The Role of Labour Law in the Modern 'Social Market Economy' -- 2.6 EU Social Policy in Time of Economic Crisis -- 2.6.1 The EU Strategy for a Deeper EMU -- 2.6.2 'Social Triple A' as an Economic Necessity 3 The EPSR: A Paradigm Shift? -- 3.1 Again a Social Agenda for Economic Growth? -- 3.2 Structure and Content of the EPSR -- 3.3 The Implementation of the EPSR -- 3.3.1 Implementation Through the European Semester -- 3.3.2 Implementation Through EU Law -- 4 The EU Response to COVID-19: A Game Changer? -- 4.1 The Immediate Reaction to the COVID-19 Outbreak -- 4.2 The Next Generation EU -- 5 Concluding Remarks -- Chapter 3 The Court of Justice and Labour Law: A Case Study on the Transfer of Undertakings Directive -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Directive 2001/23/EC on Acquired Rights in Case of Transfer of Undertaking -- 3 Margin of Generalisation of the Case Study -- 3.1 The Court Can 'Choose' Between Different Functions -- 3.2 Normative Indeterminacy -- 3.3 A Rich Body of Case Law -- 3.4 Debate on the Purposive Approach by the Court -- 4 Case Study's Structure and Methodology -- 5 The Case Studies -- 5.1 The Scope of Application -- 5.1.1 Legal Transfer -- 5.1.2 Transfer of a Business -- 5.2 Workers' Rights -- 6 The Court's Approach to Labour Law -- 7 Concluding Considerations: A First Definition of the Role of the Court -- Chapter 4 The Court of Justice as a Judicial Policymaker -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Judicial Activism and EU Policymaking -- 1.2 Structure and Goals -- 2 Political Inclination and Neofunctionalist Theory -- 2.1 The Two Postulates of Neofunctionalism -- 2.1.1 Enforcing EU Law Through Individuals and National Courts -- 2.1.2 Development of Non-internal Market-Related Policies -- 2.2 The Relevance of a Collaborative Relationship with National Courts -- 2.3 Limits of the Neofunctionalist Theory -- 3 The Court of Justice as the Trustee of EU Integration: The Integrationalist Theory -- 3.1 The Court as the Guardian of the Treaties -- 3.2 Integrationalism in the Court of Justice's Reasoning -- 3.2.1 The Creation of a Sui Generis Legal System 3.2.2 Widening the EU Competences -- 3.2.2.1 The Deepening of the Internal Market via Negative Integration -- 3.2.2.2 The Expansive Approach to the Principle of Non-discrimination -- 3.3 Informal Partnership with the European Commission -- 3.4 Weak Aspects of the Integrationalist Theory -- 4 Concluding Remarks -- Chapter 5 The Relevance of the National Context in the Reasoning of the Court -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Intergovernmentalism -- 2.1 The Realist and the Neorational Variants -- 2.2 Member States' Interests in the Court's Reasoning -- 2.3 Amicus Briefs -- 2.4 The Ability of National Governments to Redirect the Court's Jurisprudence -- 2.5 Weaknesses of the Intergovernmental Theory -- 3 The Relevance of National Legal Systems in the Court's Reasoning -- 3.1 The Common Constitutional Traditions of the Member States -- 3.2 The Majoritarian Approach -- 3.2.1 Examples of the Majoritarian Approach -- 3.2.2 Implications of the Majoritarian Approach for the Court's Policymaking -- 3.2.3 The Critical Aspects of the Majoritarian Theory -- 3.3 The Pluralistic Approach -- 3.3.1 The Heterarchical Understanding of the EU Legal Order -- 3.3.2 The Origins of the Pluralist Approach -- 3.3.3 Constitutional Pluralism in the Court of Justice's Case Law -- 3.3.4 But How Pluralistic Is the Court Really? -- 4 Trans-judicial Dialogue -- 4.1 The Trans-judicial Dialogue as an Instrument of Contamination Between European and National Legal Systems -- 4.2 The Preliminary Ruling Procedure -- 4.2.1 The Establishment of the Dialogical Relationship and the 'Hidden Dialogue' -- 4.2.2 Superior and Lower Courts: A Different Kind of Dialogue -- 4.2.3 Establishing the Dialogue and 'Preemptive Opinions' of National Courts -- 4.3 The Limits of the Court's Discretion -- 4.3.1 Limits from Within the EU Legal System -- 4.3.2 Dialectical Limits -- 4.4 The Counter-Limits 4.4.1 The Inviolable Constitutional Principles of the National Legal System -- 4.4.1.1 Italy -- 4.4.1.2 Germany -- 4.4.1.3 The Court's Reactions and National Counteractions -- 4.4.1.4 The Normalisation of the Counter-Limits -- 4.4.2 Kompetenz-Kompetenz -- 4.4.3 The Spread of Counter-Limits in National Constitutional Jurisprudence -- 4.5 Trans-judicial Dialogue in Action -- 4.5.1 The Judicial Activism of the Court of Justice -- 4.5.2 The Reaction of National Courts -- 4.5.3 The Effects of Trans-judicial Dialogue on the Court of Justice's Reasoning -- 4.5.4 Case Law Challenging the Trans-judicial Dialogue Narrative -- 5 Concluding Remarks -- Chapter 6 What's Behind the Decision-Making of the Court of Justice? A Case Study on Directive 2001/23/EC -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Objects, Structure and Methodology of the Case Study -- 2.1 Objects -- 2.2 Structure -- 2.3 Methodology -- 3 A Purposive Approach Behind Labour Law Adjudication -- 3.1 Neofunctionalism -- 3.2 Integrationalism -- 4 Influences from the National Context -- 4.1 Intergovernmentalism -- 4.2 Influence of National Legal Traditions -- 4.3 Trans-judicial Dialogue -- 4.3.1 Preemptive Opinions -- 4.3.2 Margin of Appreciation -- 4.3.3 The Court's Approach to National Jurisprudence -- 5 Concluding Remarks on the Judicial Lawmaking Logics -- 5.1 The Prevailing Judicial Lawmaking Logics -- 5.2 Concluding Remarks -- Conclusion -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Main Findings -- 3 Reshaping the Perception of the Court of Justice in Relation to Labour Law -- Annex: Case Study Figures for Chapter 6 -- Bibliography -- Table of Cases -- Table of AG Opinions -- Table of Policy Documents -- Index -- Series |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-30-PQE)EBC30558343 (ZDB-30-PAD)EBC30558343 (ZDB-89-EBL)EBL30558343 (OCoLC)1381093620 (DE-599)BVBBV049020388 |
| edition | 1st ed |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>08833nam a2200421zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049020388</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230626s2023 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789403530062</subfield><subfield code="9">978-94-035-3006-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-30-PQE)EBC30558343</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-30-PAD)EBC30558343</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-89-EBL)EBL30558343</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1381093620</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049020388</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-2070s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rainone, Silvia</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The Role of the Court of Justice in EU Labour Law</subfield><subfield code="b">A Case Study on the Transfer of Undertakings Directive</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1st ed</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Alphen aan den Rijn</subfield><subfield code="b">Wolters Kluwer Law International</subfield><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (444 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bulletin of Comparative Labour Relations Series</subfield><subfield code="v">v.112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Intro -- Half-Title Page -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Table of Contents -- Preface -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- 1 Exploring the Role of the Court of Justice in Defining Labour Law -- 2 The First Analytical Layer: The Court from a Labour Law's Doctrinal Perspective -- 3 The Second Analytical Layer: The Court from a Judicial Lawmaking Perspective -- 4 Research Questions, Methodology and Structure -- 4.1 Research Aim and Questions -- 4.2 Structure -- 4.3 Methodology -- 4.4 The Limitations of the Research -- Chapter 1 Theoretical and Normative Framework -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Labour Law's Origins and Its Transformation -- 2.1 Three Fundamental Principles of Labour Law -- 2.1.1 Fundamental Principle 1: Addressing the Uneven Distribution in the Bargaining Power -- 2.1.2 Fundamental Principle 2: Labour Law Is Not (Just) a Commodity -- 2.1.3 Fundamental Principle 3: Workers' Rights Shall Coexist with the Market Economy -- 2.2 The Functions of Labour Law -- 2.2.1 The Protective Function -- 2.2.2 Uplifting Workers' Bargaining Power -- 2.2.3 Reconciling Economic and Social Progress -- 2.2.4 Labour Law as Labour Market Regulation -- 3 The Court of Justice and the Purposive Approach to Labour Law: Myth or Reality? -- 3.1 The Alemo-Herron Case -- 3.2 The Aget Iraklis Case -- 4 Concluding Remarks -- Chapter 2 Labour Law in EU Policymaking -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Historical Overview of the EU's Approach to Labour Law -- 2.1 The Origins: Dual Polity -- 2.2 Parenthesis of Upward Harmonisation -- 2.3 New Challenges and Completion of the Internal Market -- 2.4 Labour Policy Consolidates as a Dimension of the Internal Market -- 2.5 The Role of Labour Law in the Modern 'Social Market Economy' -- 2.6 EU Social Policy in Time of Economic Crisis -- 2.6.1 The EU Strategy for a Deeper EMU -- 2.6.2 'Social Triple A' as an Economic Necessity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3 The EPSR: A Paradigm Shift? -- 3.1 Again a Social Agenda for Economic Growth? -- 3.2 Structure and Content of the EPSR -- 3.3 The Implementation of the EPSR -- 3.3.1 Implementation Through the European Semester -- 3.3.2 Implementation Through EU Law -- 4 The EU Response to COVID-19: A Game Changer? -- 4.1 The Immediate Reaction to the COVID-19 Outbreak -- 4.2 The Next Generation EU -- 5 Concluding Remarks -- Chapter 3 The Court of Justice and Labour Law: A Case Study on the Transfer of Undertakings Directive -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Directive 2001/23/EC on Acquired Rights in Case of Transfer of Undertaking -- 3 Margin of Generalisation of the Case Study -- 3.1 The Court Can 'Choose' Between Different Functions -- 3.2 Normative Indeterminacy -- 3.3 A Rich Body of Case Law -- 3.4 Debate on the Purposive Approach by the Court -- 4 Case Study's Structure and Methodology -- 5 The Case Studies -- 5.1 The Scope of Application -- 5.1.1 Legal Transfer -- 5.1.2 Transfer of a Business -- 5.2 Workers' Rights -- 6 The Court's Approach to Labour Law -- 7 Concluding Considerations: A First Definition of the Role of the Court -- Chapter 4 The Court of Justice as a Judicial Policymaker -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Judicial Activism and EU Policymaking -- 1.2 Structure and Goals -- 2 Political Inclination and Neofunctionalist Theory -- 2.1 The Two Postulates of Neofunctionalism -- 2.1.1 Enforcing EU Law Through Individuals and National Courts -- 2.1.2 Development of Non-internal Market-Related Policies -- 2.2 The Relevance of a Collaborative Relationship with National Courts -- 2.3 Limits of the Neofunctionalist Theory -- 3 The Court of Justice as the Trustee of EU Integration: The Integrationalist Theory -- 3.1 The Court as the Guardian of the Treaties -- 3.2 Integrationalism in the Court of Justice's Reasoning -- 3.2.1 The Creation of a Sui Generis Legal System</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3.2.2 Widening the EU Competences -- 3.2.2.1 The Deepening of the Internal Market via Negative Integration -- 3.2.2.2 The Expansive Approach to the Principle of Non-discrimination -- 3.3 Informal Partnership with the European Commission -- 3.4 Weak Aspects of the Integrationalist Theory -- 4 Concluding Remarks -- Chapter 5 The Relevance of the National Context in the Reasoning of the Court -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Intergovernmentalism -- 2.1 The Realist and the Neorational Variants -- 2.2 Member States' Interests in the Court's Reasoning -- 2.3 Amicus Briefs -- 2.4 The Ability of National Governments to Redirect the Court's Jurisprudence -- 2.5 Weaknesses of the Intergovernmental Theory -- 3 The Relevance of National Legal Systems in the Court's Reasoning -- 3.1 The Common Constitutional Traditions of the Member States -- 3.2 The Majoritarian Approach -- 3.2.1 Examples of the Majoritarian Approach -- 3.2.2 Implications of the Majoritarian Approach for the Court's Policymaking -- 3.2.3 The Critical Aspects of the Majoritarian Theory -- 3.3 The Pluralistic Approach -- 3.3.1 The Heterarchical Understanding of the EU Legal Order -- 3.3.2 The Origins of the Pluralist Approach -- 3.3.3 Constitutional Pluralism in the Court of Justice's Case Law -- 3.3.4 But How Pluralistic Is the Court Really? -- 4 Trans-judicial Dialogue -- 4.1 The Trans-judicial Dialogue as an Instrument of Contamination Between European and National Legal Systems -- 4.2 The Preliminary Ruling Procedure -- 4.2.1 The Establishment of the Dialogical Relationship and the 'Hidden Dialogue' -- 4.2.2 Superior and Lower Courts: A Different Kind of Dialogue -- 4.2.3 Establishing the Dialogue and 'Preemptive Opinions' of National Courts -- 4.3 The Limits of the Court's Discretion -- 4.3.1 Limits from Within the EU Legal System -- 4.3.2 Dialectical Limits -- 4.4 The Counter-Limits</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">4.4.1 The Inviolable Constitutional Principles of the National Legal System -- 4.4.1.1 Italy -- 4.4.1.2 Germany -- 4.4.1.3 The Court's Reactions and National Counteractions -- 4.4.1.4 The Normalisation of the Counter-Limits -- 4.4.2 Kompetenz-Kompetenz -- 4.4.3 The Spread of Counter-Limits in National Constitutional Jurisprudence -- 4.5 Trans-judicial Dialogue in Action -- 4.5.1 The Judicial Activism of the Court of Justice -- 4.5.2 The Reaction of National Courts -- 4.5.3 The Effects of Trans-judicial Dialogue on the Court of Justice's Reasoning -- 4.5.4 Case Law Challenging the Trans-judicial Dialogue Narrative -- 5 Concluding Remarks -- Chapter 6 What's Behind the Decision-Making of the Court of Justice? A Case Study on Directive 2001/23/EC -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Objects, Structure and Methodology of the Case Study -- 2.1 Objects -- 2.2 Structure -- 2.3 Methodology -- 3 A Purposive Approach Behind Labour Law Adjudication -- 3.1 Neofunctionalism -- 3.2 Integrationalism -- 4 Influences from the National Context -- 4.1 Intergovernmentalism -- 4.2 Influence of National Legal Traditions -- 4.3 Trans-judicial Dialogue -- 4.3.1 Preemptive Opinions -- 4.3.2 Margin of Appreciation -- 4.3.3 The Court's Approach to National Jurisprudence -- 5 Concluding Remarks on the Judicial Lawmaking Logics -- 5.1 The Prevailing Judicial Lawmaking Logics -- 5.2 Concluding Remarks -- Conclusion -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Main Findings -- 3 Reshaping the Perception of the Court of Justice in Relation to Labour Law -- Annex: Case Study Figures for Chapter 6 -- Bibliography -- Table of Cases -- Table of AG Opinions -- Table of Policy Documents -- Index -- Series</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Rainone, Silvia</subfield><subfield code="t">The Role of the Court of Justice in EU Labour Law</subfield><subfield code="d">Alphen aan den Rijn : Wolters Kluwer Law International,c2023</subfield><subfield code="z">9789403528960</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-30-PQE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034283295</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/hwr/detail.action?docID=30558343</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-2070s</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-30-PQE</subfield><subfield code="q">HWR_PDA_PQE</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV049020388 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-20T19:58:35Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9789403530062 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034283295 |
| oclc_num | 1381093620 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-2070s |
| owner_facet | DE-2070s |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (444 Seiten) |
| psigel | ZDB-30-PQE ZDB-30-PQE HWR_PDA_PQE |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publishDateSearch | 2023 |
| publishDateSort | 2023 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Law International |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Bulletin of Comparative Labour Relations Series |
| spelling | Rainone, Silvia Verfasser aut The Role of the Court of Justice in EU Labour Law A Case Study on the Transfer of Undertakings Directive 1st ed Alphen aan den Rijn Wolters Kluwer Law International 2023 ©2023 1 Online-Ressource (444 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Bulletin of Comparative Labour Relations Series v.112 Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources Intro -- Half-Title Page -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Table of Contents -- Preface -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- 1 Exploring the Role of the Court of Justice in Defining Labour Law -- 2 The First Analytical Layer: The Court from a Labour Law's Doctrinal Perspective -- 3 The Second Analytical Layer: The Court from a Judicial Lawmaking Perspective -- 4 Research Questions, Methodology and Structure -- 4.1 Research Aim and Questions -- 4.2 Structure -- 4.3 Methodology -- 4.4 The Limitations of the Research -- Chapter 1 Theoretical and Normative Framework -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Labour Law's Origins and Its Transformation -- 2.1 Three Fundamental Principles of Labour Law -- 2.1.1 Fundamental Principle 1: Addressing the Uneven Distribution in the Bargaining Power -- 2.1.2 Fundamental Principle 2: Labour Law Is Not (Just) a Commodity -- 2.1.3 Fundamental Principle 3: Workers' Rights Shall Coexist with the Market Economy -- 2.2 The Functions of Labour Law -- 2.2.1 The Protective Function -- 2.2.2 Uplifting Workers' Bargaining Power -- 2.2.3 Reconciling Economic and Social Progress -- 2.2.4 Labour Law as Labour Market Regulation -- 3 The Court of Justice and the Purposive Approach to Labour Law: Myth or Reality? -- 3.1 The Alemo-Herron Case -- 3.2 The Aget Iraklis Case -- 4 Concluding Remarks -- Chapter 2 Labour Law in EU Policymaking -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Historical Overview of the EU's Approach to Labour Law -- 2.1 The Origins: Dual Polity -- 2.2 Parenthesis of Upward Harmonisation -- 2.3 New Challenges and Completion of the Internal Market -- 2.4 Labour Policy Consolidates as a Dimension of the Internal Market -- 2.5 The Role of Labour Law in the Modern 'Social Market Economy' -- 2.6 EU Social Policy in Time of Economic Crisis -- 2.6.1 The EU Strategy for a Deeper EMU -- 2.6.2 'Social Triple A' as an Economic Necessity 3 The EPSR: A Paradigm Shift? -- 3.1 Again a Social Agenda for Economic Growth? -- 3.2 Structure and Content of the EPSR -- 3.3 The Implementation of the EPSR -- 3.3.1 Implementation Through the European Semester -- 3.3.2 Implementation Through EU Law -- 4 The EU Response to COVID-19: A Game Changer? -- 4.1 The Immediate Reaction to the COVID-19 Outbreak -- 4.2 The Next Generation EU -- 5 Concluding Remarks -- Chapter 3 The Court of Justice and Labour Law: A Case Study on the Transfer of Undertakings Directive -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Directive 2001/23/EC on Acquired Rights in Case of Transfer of Undertaking -- 3 Margin of Generalisation of the Case Study -- 3.1 The Court Can 'Choose' Between Different Functions -- 3.2 Normative Indeterminacy -- 3.3 A Rich Body of Case Law -- 3.4 Debate on the Purposive Approach by the Court -- 4 Case Study's Structure and Methodology -- 5 The Case Studies -- 5.1 The Scope of Application -- 5.1.1 Legal Transfer -- 5.1.2 Transfer of a Business -- 5.2 Workers' Rights -- 6 The Court's Approach to Labour Law -- 7 Concluding Considerations: A First Definition of the Role of the Court -- Chapter 4 The Court of Justice as a Judicial Policymaker -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Judicial Activism and EU Policymaking -- 1.2 Structure and Goals -- 2 Political Inclination and Neofunctionalist Theory -- 2.1 The Two Postulates of Neofunctionalism -- 2.1.1 Enforcing EU Law Through Individuals and National Courts -- 2.1.2 Development of Non-internal Market-Related Policies -- 2.2 The Relevance of a Collaborative Relationship with National Courts -- 2.3 Limits of the Neofunctionalist Theory -- 3 The Court of Justice as the Trustee of EU Integration: The Integrationalist Theory -- 3.1 The Court as the Guardian of the Treaties -- 3.2 Integrationalism in the Court of Justice's Reasoning -- 3.2.1 The Creation of a Sui Generis Legal System 3.2.2 Widening the EU Competences -- 3.2.2.1 The Deepening of the Internal Market via Negative Integration -- 3.2.2.2 The Expansive Approach to the Principle of Non-discrimination -- 3.3 Informal Partnership with the European Commission -- 3.4 Weak Aspects of the Integrationalist Theory -- 4 Concluding Remarks -- Chapter 5 The Relevance of the National Context in the Reasoning of the Court -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Intergovernmentalism -- 2.1 The Realist and the Neorational Variants -- 2.2 Member States' Interests in the Court's Reasoning -- 2.3 Amicus Briefs -- 2.4 The Ability of National Governments to Redirect the Court's Jurisprudence -- 2.5 Weaknesses of the Intergovernmental Theory -- 3 The Relevance of National Legal Systems in the Court's Reasoning -- 3.1 The Common Constitutional Traditions of the Member States -- 3.2 The Majoritarian Approach -- 3.2.1 Examples of the Majoritarian Approach -- 3.2.2 Implications of the Majoritarian Approach for the Court's Policymaking -- 3.2.3 The Critical Aspects of the Majoritarian Theory -- 3.3 The Pluralistic Approach -- 3.3.1 The Heterarchical Understanding of the EU Legal Order -- 3.3.2 The Origins of the Pluralist Approach -- 3.3.3 Constitutional Pluralism in the Court of Justice's Case Law -- 3.3.4 But How Pluralistic Is the Court Really? -- 4 Trans-judicial Dialogue -- 4.1 The Trans-judicial Dialogue as an Instrument of Contamination Between European and National Legal Systems -- 4.2 The Preliminary Ruling Procedure -- 4.2.1 The Establishment of the Dialogical Relationship and the 'Hidden Dialogue' -- 4.2.2 Superior and Lower Courts: A Different Kind of Dialogue -- 4.2.3 Establishing the Dialogue and 'Preemptive Opinions' of National Courts -- 4.3 The Limits of the Court's Discretion -- 4.3.1 Limits from Within the EU Legal System -- 4.3.2 Dialectical Limits -- 4.4 The Counter-Limits 4.4.1 The Inviolable Constitutional Principles of the National Legal System -- 4.4.1.1 Italy -- 4.4.1.2 Germany -- 4.4.1.3 The Court's Reactions and National Counteractions -- 4.4.1.4 The Normalisation of the Counter-Limits -- 4.4.2 Kompetenz-Kompetenz -- 4.4.3 The Spread of Counter-Limits in National Constitutional Jurisprudence -- 4.5 Trans-judicial Dialogue in Action -- 4.5.1 The Judicial Activism of the Court of Justice -- 4.5.2 The Reaction of National Courts -- 4.5.3 The Effects of Trans-judicial Dialogue on the Court of Justice's Reasoning -- 4.5.4 Case Law Challenging the Trans-judicial Dialogue Narrative -- 5 Concluding Remarks -- Chapter 6 What's Behind the Decision-Making of the Court of Justice? A Case Study on Directive 2001/23/EC -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Objects, Structure and Methodology of the Case Study -- 2.1 Objects -- 2.2 Structure -- 2.3 Methodology -- 3 A Purposive Approach Behind Labour Law Adjudication -- 3.1 Neofunctionalism -- 3.2 Integrationalism -- 4 Influences from the National Context -- 4.1 Intergovernmentalism -- 4.2 Influence of National Legal Traditions -- 4.3 Trans-judicial Dialogue -- 4.3.1 Preemptive Opinions -- 4.3.2 Margin of Appreciation -- 4.3.3 The Court's Approach to National Jurisprudence -- 5 Concluding Remarks on the Judicial Lawmaking Logics -- 5.1 The Prevailing Judicial Lawmaking Logics -- 5.2 Concluding Remarks -- Conclusion -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Main Findings -- 3 Reshaping the Perception of the Court of Justice in Relation to Labour Law -- Annex: Case Study Figures for Chapter 6 -- Bibliography -- Table of Cases -- Table of AG Opinions -- Table of Policy Documents -- Index -- Series Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Rainone, Silvia The Role of the Court of Justice in EU Labour Law Alphen aan den Rijn : Wolters Kluwer Law International,c2023 9789403528960 |
| spellingShingle | Rainone, Silvia The Role of the Court of Justice in EU Labour Law A Case Study on the Transfer of Undertakings Directive Intro -- Half-Title Page -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Table of Contents -- Preface -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- 1 Exploring the Role of the Court of Justice in Defining Labour Law -- 2 The First Analytical Layer: The Court from a Labour Law's Doctrinal Perspective -- 3 The Second Analytical Layer: The Court from a Judicial Lawmaking Perspective -- 4 Research Questions, Methodology and Structure -- 4.1 Research Aim and Questions -- 4.2 Structure -- 4.3 Methodology -- 4.4 The Limitations of the Research -- Chapter 1 Theoretical and Normative Framework -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Labour Law's Origins and Its Transformation -- 2.1 Three Fundamental Principles of Labour Law -- 2.1.1 Fundamental Principle 1: Addressing the Uneven Distribution in the Bargaining Power -- 2.1.2 Fundamental Principle 2: Labour Law Is Not (Just) a Commodity -- 2.1.3 Fundamental Principle 3: Workers' Rights Shall Coexist with the Market Economy -- 2.2 The Functions of Labour Law -- 2.2.1 The Protective Function -- 2.2.2 Uplifting Workers' Bargaining Power -- 2.2.3 Reconciling Economic and Social Progress -- 2.2.4 Labour Law as Labour Market Regulation -- 3 The Court of Justice and the Purposive Approach to Labour Law: Myth or Reality? -- 3.1 The Alemo-Herron Case -- 3.2 The Aget Iraklis Case -- 4 Concluding Remarks -- Chapter 2 Labour Law in EU Policymaking -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Historical Overview of the EU's Approach to Labour Law -- 2.1 The Origins: Dual Polity -- 2.2 Parenthesis of Upward Harmonisation -- 2.3 New Challenges and Completion of the Internal Market -- 2.4 Labour Policy Consolidates as a Dimension of the Internal Market -- 2.5 The Role of Labour Law in the Modern 'Social Market Economy' -- 2.6 EU Social Policy in Time of Economic Crisis -- 2.6.1 The EU Strategy for a Deeper EMU -- 2.6.2 'Social Triple A' as an Economic Necessity 3 The EPSR: A Paradigm Shift? -- 3.1 Again a Social Agenda for Economic Growth? -- 3.2 Structure and Content of the EPSR -- 3.3 The Implementation of the EPSR -- 3.3.1 Implementation Through the European Semester -- 3.3.2 Implementation Through EU Law -- 4 The EU Response to COVID-19: A Game Changer? -- 4.1 The Immediate Reaction to the COVID-19 Outbreak -- 4.2 The Next Generation EU -- 5 Concluding Remarks -- Chapter 3 The Court of Justice and Labour Law: A Case Study on the Transfer of Undertakings Directive -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Directive 2001/23/EC on Acquired Rights in Case of Transfer of Undertaking -- 3 Margin of Generalisation of the Case Study -- 3.1 The Court Can 'Choose' Between Different Functions -- 3.2 Normative Indeterminacy -- 3.3 A Rich Body of Case Law -- 3.4 Debate on the Purposive Approach by the Court -- 4 Case Study's Structure and Methodology -- 5 The Case Studies -- 5.1 The Scope of Application -- 5.1.1 Legal Transfer -- 5.1.2 Transfer of a Business -- 5.2 Workers' Rights -- 6 The Court's Approach to Labour Law -- 7 Concluding Considerations: A First Definition of the Role of the Court -- Chapter 4 The Court of Justice as a Judicial Policymaker -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Judicial Activism and EU Policymaking -- 1.2 Structure and Goals -- 2 Political Inclination and Neofunctionalist Theory -- 2.1 The Two Postulates of Neofunctionalism -- 2.1.1 Enforcing EU Law Through Individuals and National Courts -- 2.1.2 Development of Non-internal Market-Related Policies -- 2.2 The Relevance of a Collaborative Relationship with National Courts -- 2.3 Limits of the Neofunctionalist Theory -- 3 The Court of Justice as the Trustee of EU Integration: The Integrationalist Theory -- 3.1 The Court as the Guardian of the Treaties -- 3.2 Integrationalism in the Court of Justice's Reasoning -- 3.2.1 The Creation of a Sui Generis Legal System 3.2.2 Widening the EU Competences -- 3.2.2.1 The Deepening of the Internal Market via Negative Integration -- 3.2.2.2 The Expansive Approach to the Principle of Non-discrimination -- 3.3 Informal Partnership with the European Commission -- 3.4 Weak Aspects of the Integrationalist Theory -- 4 Concluding Remarks -- Chapter 5 The Relevance of the National Context in the Reasoning of the Court -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Intergovernmentalism -- 2.1 The Realist and the Neorational Variants -- 2.2 Member States' Interests in the Court's Reasoning -- 2.3 Amicus Briefs -- 2.4 The Ability of National Governments to Redirect the Court's Jurisprudence -- 2.5 Weaknesses of the Intergovernmental Theory -- 3 The Relevance of National Legal Systems in the Court's Reasoning -- 3.1 The Common Constitutional Traditions of the Member States -- 3.2 The Majoritarian Approach -- 3.2.1 Examples of the Majoritarian Approach -- 3.2.2 Implications of the Majoritarian Approach for the Court's Policymaking -- 3.2.3 The Critical Aspects of the Majoritarian Theory -- 3.3 The Pluralistic Approach -- 3.3.1 The Heterarchical Understanding of the EU Legal Order -- 3.3.2 The Origins of the Pluralist Approach -- 3.3.3 Constitutional Pluralism in the Court of Justice's Case Law -- 3.3.4 But How Pluralistic Is the Court Really? -- 4 Trans-judicial Dialogue -- 4.1 The Trans-judicial Dialogue as an Instrument of Contamination Between European and National Legal Systems -- 4.2 The Preliminary Ruling Procedure -- 4.2.1 The Establishment of the Dialogical Relationship and the 'Hidden Dialogue' -- 4.2.2 Superior and Lower Courts: A Different Kind of Dialogue -- 4.2.3 Establishing the Dialogue and 'Preemptive Opinions' of National Courts -- 4.3 The Limits of the Court's Discretion -- 4.3.1 Limits from Within the EU Legal System -- 4.3.2 Dialectical Limits -- 4.4 The Counter-Limits 4.4.1 The Inviolable Constitutional Principles of the National Legal System -- 4.4.1.1 Italy -- 4.4.1.2 Germany -- 4.4.1.3 The Court's Reactions and National Counteractions -- 4.4.1.4 The Normalisation of the Counter-Limits -- 4.4.2 Kompetenz-Kompetenz -- 4.4.3 The Spread of Counter-Limits in National Constitutional Jurisprudence -- 4.5 Trans-judicial Dialogue in Action -- 4.5.1 The Judicial Activism of the Court of Justice -- 4.5.2 The Reaction of National Courts -- 4.5.3 The Effects of Trans-judicial Dialogue on the Court of Justice's Reasoning -- 4.5.4 Case Law Challenging the Trans-judicial Dialogue Narrative -- 5 Concluding Remarks -- Chapter 6 What's Behind the Decision-Making of the Court of Justice? A Case Study on Directive 2001/23/EC -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Objects, Structure and Methodology of the Case Study -- 2.1 Objects -- 2.2 Structure -- 2.3 Methodology -- 3 A Purposive Approach Behind Labour Law Adjudication -- 3.1 Neofunctionalism -- 3.2 Integrationalism -- 4 Influences from the National Context -- 4.1 Intergovernmentalism -- 4.2 Influence of National Legal Traditions -- 4.3 Trans-judicial Dialogue -- 4.3.1 Preemptive Opinions -- 4.3.2 Margin of Appreciation -- 4.3.3 The Court's Approach to National Jurisprudence -- 5 Concluding Remarks on the Judicial Lawmaking Logics -- 5.1 The Prevailing Judicial Lawmaking Logics -- 5.2 Concluding Remarks -- Conclusion -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Main Findings -- 3 Reshaping the Perception of the Court of Justice in Relation to Labour Law -- Annex: Case Study Figures for Chapter 6 -- Bibliography -- Table of Cases -- Table of AG Opinions -- Table of Policy Documents -- Index -- Series |
| title | The Role of the Court of Justice in EU Labour Law A Case Study on the Transfer of Undertakings Directive |
| title_auth | The Role of the Court of Justice in EU Labour Law A Case Study on the Transfer of Undertakings Directive |
| title_exact_search | The Role of the Court of Justice in EU Labour Law A Case Study on the Transfer of Undertakings Directive |
| title_full | The Role of the Court of Justice in EU Labour Law A Case Study on the Transfer of Undertakings Directive |
| title_fullStr | The Role of the Court of Justice in EU Labour Law A Case Study on the Transfer of Undertakings Directive |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Role of the Court of Justice in EU Labour Law A Case Study on the Transfer of Undertakings Directive |
| title_short | The Role of the Court of Justice in EU Labour Law |
| title_sort | the role of the court of justice in eu labour law a case study on the transfer of undertakings directive |
| title_sub | A Case Study on the Transfer of Undertakings Directive |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rainonesilvia theroleofthecourtofjusticeineulabourlawacasestudyonthetransferofundertakingsdirective |