Direct Democracy and Resource Allocation: Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan
Direct democracy is designed to better align public resource allocation decisions with citizen preferences. Using a randomized field experiment in 250 villages across Afghanistan, this paper compares outcomes of secret-ballot referenda with those of consultation meetings, which adhere to customary d...
Gespeichert in:
Beteilige Person: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Veröffentlicht: |
Washington, D.C
The World Bank
2012
|
Links: | https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6133 |
Zusammenfassung: | Direct democracy is designed to better align public resource allocation decisions with citizen preferences. Using a randomized field experiment in 250 villages across Afghanistan, this paper compares outcomes of secret-ballot referenda with those of consultation meetings, which adhere to customary decision-making practices. Elites are found to exert influence over meeting outcomes, but not over referenda outcomes, which are driven primarily by citizen preferences. Referenda are also found to improve public satisfaction, whereas elite domination of allocation processes has a negative effect. The results indicate that the use of direct democracy in public resource allocation results in more legitimate outcomes than those produced by customary processes |
Umfang: | 1 Online-Ressource (26 p) |
DOI: | 10.1596/1813-9450-6133 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV048265568 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220609s2012 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1596/1813-9450-6133 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-1-WBA)NLM010332251 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1075967247 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVNLM010332251 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-521 |a DE-573 |a DE-523 |a DE-Re13 |a DE-19 |a DE-355 |a DE-703 |a DE-91 |a DE-706 |a DE-29 |a DE-M347 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-20 |a DE-739 |a DE-1043 |a DE-863 |a DE-862 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Beath, Andrew |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Direct Democracy and Resource Allocation |b Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan |c Andrew Beath |
264 | 1 | |a Washington, D.C |b The World Bank |c 2012 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (26 p) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Direct democracy is designed to better align public resource allocation decisions with citizen preferences. Using a randomized field experiment in 250 villages across Afghanistan, this paper compares outcomes of secret-ballot referenda with those of consultation meetings, which adhere to customary decision-making practices. Elites are found to exert influence over meeting outcomes, but not over referenda outcomes, which are driven primarily by citizen preferences. Referenda are also found to improve public satisfaction, whereas elite domination of allocation processes has a negative effect. The results indicate that the use of direct democracy in public resource allocation results in more legitimate outcomes than those produced by customary processes | ||
700 | 1 | |a Beath, Andrew |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Christia, Fotini |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Enikolopov, Ruben |4 oth | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Andrew Beath |a Direct Democracy and Resource Allocation |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6133 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-1-WBA | ||
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033645762 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
DE-BY-TUM_katkey | 2816790 |
---|---|
_version_ | 1821937172581711873 |
any_adam_object | |
author | Beath, Andrew |
author_facet | Beath, Andrew |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Beath, Andrew |
author_variant | a b ab |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV048265568 |
collection | ZDB-1-WBA |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-1-WBA)NLM010332251 (OCoLC)1075967247 (DE-599)GBVNLM010332251 |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1596/1813-9450-6133 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02022nam a2200349zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048265568</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2012 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1596/1813-9450-6133</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-1-WBA)NLM010332251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1075967247</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVNLM010332251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-523</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Re13</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-706</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M347</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1043</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-862</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Beath, Andrew</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Direct Democracy and Resource Allocation</subfield><subfield code="b">Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan</subfield><subfield code="c">Andrew Beath</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Washington, D.C</subfield><subfield code="b">The World Bank</subfield><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (26 p)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Direct democracy is designed to better align public resource allocation decisions with citizen preferences. Using a randomized field experiment in 250 villages across Afghanistan, this paper compares outcomes of secret-ballot referenda with those of consultation meetings, which adhere to customary decision-making practices. Elites are found to exert influence over meeting outcomes, but not over referenda outcomes, which are driven primarily by citizen preferences. Referenda are also found to improve public satisfaction, whereas elite domination of allocation processes has a negative effect. The results indicate that the use of direct democracy in public resource allocation results in more legitimate outcomes than those produced by customary processes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Beath, Andrew</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Christia, Fotini</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Enikolopov, Ruben</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Andrew Beath</subfield><subfield code="a">Direct Democracy and Resource Allocation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6133</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-WBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033645762</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV048265568 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-12-20T19:40:06Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033645762 |
oclc_num | 1075967247 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-12 DE-521 DE-573 DE-523 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-703 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-706 DE-29 DE-M347 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-20 DE-739 DE-1043 DE-863 DE-BY-FWS DE-862 DE-BY-FWS |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-521 DE-573 DE-523 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-703 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-706 DE-29 DE-M347 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-20 DE-739 DE-1043 DE-863 DE-BY-FWS DE-862 DE-BY-FWS |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (26 p) |
psigel | ZDB-1-WBA |
publishDate | 2012 |
publishDateSearch | 2012 |
publishDateSort | 2012 |
publisher | The World Bank |
record_format | marc |
spellingShingle | Beath, Andrew Direct Democracy and Resource Allocation Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan |
title | Direct Democracy and Resource Allocation Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan |
title_auth | Direct Democracy and Resource Allocation Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan |
title_exact_search | Direct Democracy and Resource Allocation Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan |
title_full | Direct Democracy and Resource Allocation Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan Andrew Beath |
title_fullStr | Direct Democracy and Resource Allocation Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan Andrew Beath |
title_full_unstemmed | Direct Democracy and Resource Allocation Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan Andrew Beath |
title_short | Direct Democracy and Resource Allocation |
title_sort | direct democracy and resource allocation experimental evidence from afghanistan |
title_sub | Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan |
url | https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6133 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beathandrew directdemocracyandresourceallocationexperimentalevidencefromafghanistan AT christiafotini directdemocracyandresourceallocationexperimentalevidencefromafghanistan AT enikolopovruben directdemocracyandresourceallocationexperimentalevidencefromafghanistan |