Un secol de stat unitar şi drept naţional: (1919-2018) : perspective istorice cultural-ştiinţifice
Gespeichert in:
| Beteilige Person: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Rumänisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Bucureşti
Editura Academiei Române
2018
Bucureşti Universul Juridic |
| Schlagwörter: | |
| Links: | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031428848&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031428848&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| Umfang: | 430 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9789732730065 9786063903649 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV046047271 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20191112 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 190715s2018 xx |||| 00||| rum d | ||
| 020 | |a 9789732730065 |9 978-973-27-3006-5 | ||
| 020 | |a 9786063903649 |9 978-606-39-0364-9 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1110069037 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV046047271 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a rum | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Duţu, Mircea |d 1957- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1069611425 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Un secol de stat unitar şi drept naţional |b (1919-2018) : perspective istorice cultural-ştiinţifice |c Mircea Duţu |
| 264 | 1 | |a Bucureşti |b Editura Academiei Române |c 2018 | |
| 264 | 1 | |a Bucureşti |b Universul Juridic | |
| 300 | |a 430 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 1919-2018 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Politik |0 (DE-588)4046514-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Innerstaatliches Recht |0 (DE-588)4161814-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Jurist |0 (DE-588)4029050-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Rumänien |0 (DE-588)4050939-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Rumänien |0 (DE-588)4050939-4 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Politik |0 (DE-588)4046514-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Innerstaatliches Recht |0 (DE-588)4161814-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Jurist |0 (DE-588)4029050-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Geschichte 1919-2018 |A z |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031428848&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031428848&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20191112 | |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 0904 |g 498 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 0905 |g 498 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 0905 |g 498 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 0904 |g 498 |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031428848 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1819282616496422912 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Cuprins TABLE OF CONTENTS...........................................................................13 PREFAŢĂ...................................................................................................19 I. UNIFICAREA JURIDICĂ. LEGISLATIVĂ. JUDICIARĂ. REGIMUL LEGAL AL PROFESIILOR ֊ EXPERIENŢE, IDEI, ÎNVĂŢĂMINTE................................................................ !.........................23 UN SECOL DE STAT NAŢIONAL, UNITAR ŞI INDIVIZIBIL....... 25 I. Unificarea juridică ֊ parte inseparabilă a unităţii naţionale....... 38 A. Unificarea legislativă..............................................................................39 1. Fenomenul dreptului interprovincial sau al conflictelor interprovinciale de legi..................................................................42 2. începuturile unificării şi spectrul stagnării.................................. 44 3. O dezbatere naţională: ce fel de unificare?.................................. 49 4. Rezonanţele practice ale dezbaterii................................................... 55 5. Continuarea procesului de unificare legislativă...........................57 B. Unificarea judiciară..............................................................................60 1. Reglementări ale organizării judecătoreşti.................................. 60 2. Rolul Consiliului Superior al Magistraturii în dezvoltarea unui corp de magistraţi de elită..................................................... 62 2.1. Preliminarii justificative........................................................ 62 2.2. Reglementările
fondatoare ale legii din 24 martie 1909..... 64 2.3. Modificările aduse prin legea din 23 decembrie 1916......... 66 2.4. Propuneri de modificare a statutului CSM...........................67 2.5. Consiliul Superior al Magistraturii în Legea de organizare judecătorească a României Mari (1924, Legea Mârzescu)..................................................................... 68 2.6. Perioada celor două consilii superioare ale magistraturii.............................................................................70 2.7. Revenirea la Consiliul Superior al Magistraturii unic şi desfiinţarea sa..........................................................................71 2.8. Renaşterea Consiliului Superior al Magistraturii 72 post-1989...............................................................
8 Հ* Un secol de stat unitar şi drept naţional (1918-2018) ❖ C. Crearea baroului naţional românesc................................................. 72 1. Crearea Baroului modem - parte componentă a proiectului statului naţional...............................................................................72 2. Contribuţia avocaţilor la desfăşurarea Războiului de reîntregire şi înfăptuirea României Mari...................................... 76 3. Proiectul Baroului naţional românesc.............................................. 80 4. încercări de unificare a juriştilor din România Mare..................85 II. Experienţe regionale ale unificării juridice: Dobrogea, Basarabia, Bucovina, Crişana...........................................................88 1. Integrarea Dobrogei în spaţiul juridico-statal românesc (1878-1921).......................... ’........................................................... 94 1.1. Schimb sau cedare de teritoriu? Probleme juridico-constituţionale............................................................97 1.2. Organizarea autorităţii judecătoreşti în Dobrogea................99 1.3. „Constituţia”, legea pentru organizarea Dobrogei din 8 (20) martie 1880.................................................................... 102 1.4. Legea asupra organizării judecătoreşti din Dobrogea (1886).................................................................................... 106 1.5. Acordarea drepturilor politice locuitorilor din judeţele Constanţa şi Tulcea...............................................................109 1.6. Introducerea
juriului prevăzut în art. 105 din Constituţia de la 1866............................................................111 1.7. Organizarea judecătorească (provizorie) în Dobrogea Nouă....................................................................................... 111 1.8. înfiinţarea Curţii de Apel din Constanţa............................. 114 1.9. Regimul juridic al regiunii după Primul Război Mondial..................................................................................118 1.10. „Justiţia Dobrogei”.............................................................119 2. Contribuţia basarabeană la unificarea legislativă şi dezvoltarea ştiinţei juridice româneşti interbelice......................123 2.1.0 rapidă şi necesară tranziţie judiciară............................... 126 2.2. Un proces dificil: unificarea legislaţiei............................... 130 2.3. O prioritate naţională............................................................ 132 2.4. Necesitatea introducerii rapide a Codului civil român în Basarabia............................................................................136 2.5. Contribuţii la unificarea legislaţiei penale...........................139
❖ Cuprins ❖9 2.6. Cristalizarea ştiinţei şi culturii juridice româneşti în Basarabia................................................................................143 2.7. Desăvârşirea unificării legislative........................................ 149 2.8. Concluzii................................................................................153 2.9. Revenirea Bisericii basarabene în Biserica Ortodoxă Română (1918-1944). Probleme juridice.............................156 2.9.1. Biserica Ortodoxă şi Unirea Basarabiei cu România..........................................................................158 2.9.2. Scurtă incursiune în istorie. Basarabia ca eparhie a Bisericii ruse.................................................................. 161 2.9.3. Dezagregarea bisericii ruse şi „sovietizarea” ei...........163 2.9.4. Haos şi provizorat. încercări de autonomie şi perpetuare a apartenenţei ruseşti................................... 165 2.9.5. Prima încercare de revenire în spaţiul bisericesc românesc.........................................................................166 2.9.6. Primele măsuri de îndreptare a situaţiei....................... 169 2.9.7. Dreptul revoluţionar versus tradiţia bisericească.........172 2.9.8. Bazele juridice...............................................................173 2.9.9. Unificarea statutului juridic al Bisericii Ortodoxe..... 176 2.9.10. Scurte concluzii...........................................................178 3. Curtea de Apel românească din Cernăuţi (1919-1940) şi contribuţia sa la unificarea judiciar-legislativă a
Bucovinei cu România................................................................................... 178 3.1. Diferenţele de legislaţie şi pericolul haosului legislativ.... 179 3.2. Constituirea Curţii de Apel a Bucovinei şi evoluţia sa..... 183 3.3. Contribuţia Curţii la realizarea unificării legislative cu Ţara........................................................................................ 186 3.4. Pagini Juridice (Cernăuţi, 1 mai 1932-15 mai 1940)..........189 3.5. Baroul Bucovinei.................................................................. 192 3.6. Şcoala bucovineană de drept............................................... 196 4. Participarea Curţii de Apel din Oradea la unificarea judiciar-legislativă interbelică..................................................... 205 4.1. Dificultăţi ale procesului de unificare judiciar-legislativă................................................................206 4.2. Curtea de Apel Oradea şi integrarea sa în sistemul jurisdictional românesc........................................................ 209
10 ❖ Un secol de stat unitar şi drept naţional (1918-2018) ♦♦♦ 4.3. Buletinul juridic al circumscripţiei Curţii de Apel Oradea.................................................................................... 210 4.3.1. Problemele unificării legislative.................................. 213 4.3.2. Obiective prioritare ale provinciei şi ale ţării............. 214 4.3.3. Suveranitatea naţională şi reforma administrativă..... 219 4.3.4. Congresul general al avocaţilor din România (Oradea, 5-7 septembrie 1934)..................................... 220 4.3.5. Alte probleme................................................................223 4.4. Elocinţa judiciară - o moştenire romană comună, dar diferenţiată..............................................................................224 4.5. O provocare importantă ֊ introducerea curţilor cu juraţi....................................................................................... 225 4.6. Scurte concluzii.................................................................... 226 II. ROMANITATE, NEOLATINITATE, SOLIDARITATE EUROPEANĂ. DIALOGUL JURIDIC CONTINUU ROMÂNO-ITALIAN.............................................................................. 227 ROMANITATE, NEOLATINITATE, SOLIDARITATE EUROPEANĂ.......................................................................................... 229 I. Influenţa italiană asupra dreptului român. Repere istorice....... 247 1. Influenţe în domeniul dreptului civil......................................... 252 2. Rezonanţe în planul dreptului
penal.......................................... 254 3. Reperul fundamental al dreptului comercial..............................260 4. Experienţele unificării legislative...............................................265 5. Recodificarea monista.................................................................267 6. A existat şi o influenţă juridică românească asupra dreptului italian?.............................................................................. 270 7. Andrei Rădulescu - istoric şi promotor al influenţelor şi confluenţelor juridice româno-italiene........................................... 271 8. Prezenţa juridică italiană în instituţiile academice române...... 273 II. Confluenţe juridice ştiinţifico-culturale italo-române în perioada interbelică........................................................................... 274 A. Neokantismuljuridic. Dialogulfilosofìe Del Vecchio-Djuvara ....275 1. Omagiul românilor adus profesorului Giorgio Del Vecchio, la 25 de ani de catedră universitară............................................277 I
* Cuprins ♦ 11 2. Giorgio Del Vecchio - membru de onoare al Academiei Române (1933)............................................................................279 3. Publicarea în limba română a unor lucrări reprezentative ale filosofului italian................................................................... 280 3.1. Justiţia (1936)....................................................................... 280 3.2. Etica, dreptul şi statul (1937)............................................... 282 3.3. Lecţiuni de filosofie juridică (1943). Lecţiile de filosofia dreptului..................................................................283 4. Introducerea /ř/o.sq/ie; dreptului ca disciplină de studiu universitar..................................................................................... 286 5. Comparaţii şi evaluări..................................................................287 6. Filosofia juridică românească în viziunea lui Giorgio Del Vecchio......................................................................................... 289 7. Mircea Djuvara şi opera lui Giorgio Del Vecchio....................292 8. Prezenţa lui Mircea Djuvara în Italia..........................................294 9. Moştenirea lui Giorgio Del Vecchio........................................... 296 10. Concluzii posibile...................................................................... 297 B. Transformismul natural în istoria dreptului....................................300 C. Tehnicismuljuridic penal şi rezonanţele sale................................. 303 III. CULTURA
JURIDICĂ ŞI ŞTIINŢA DREPTULUI. PENTRU O PRIVIRE CRITICĂ ŞI O MAI DREAPTĂ RECONSIDERARE.................................................................................311 A. Dilemele existenţiale ale culturiijuridice române moderne........ 313 1. O cultură juridică reprezentativă................................................ 314 2. Ignorare, subapreciere, lipsă de interes păgubitoare..................317 3. Chipul greşit de a privi cultura juridică românească şi urmările sale..................................................................................319 4. Nevoia „schimbării spre mai bine”.............................................320 5. Semnele schimbării şi progresului cultural-juridic....................320 6. Perspectivele viitorului................................................................328 B. Ştiinţa juridică românească la 100 de ani de la Marea Unire. Ceea ce a fost, unde s-a ajuns, ceea ce ar trebui să fie......................331 1. Preluare, imitaţie şi efort creator................................................332 2. Ce reacţie la integrarea şi mondializarea juridică? Excepţionalitatea neolatină......................................................... 336
12 ♦ Un secol de stat unitar şi drept naţional (1918-2018) ❖ 3. Problematica statului naţional unitar, o prioritate permanentă a cercetării juridice................................................ 338 4. Cercetarea ştiinţifică juridică. Dilemele esenţiale.....................341 5. O radiografie necesară.................................................................343 6. Exemplul francez......................................................................... 344 7. Repere posibile............................................................................ 345 8. Trei direcţii (orientări) fundamentale ale cercetării şi ştiinţei juridice româneşti............................................................ 347 C. Rolul istoric şiposibilul statut constituţional al Academiei Române... 3 51 D. Enciclopedia Juridică Română (EJR): Un vector major de cultură juridică şi ştiinţă a dreptului..................360 E. Jurişti care au „zidit” România Mare.............................................368 1. Avram lancu - avocatul drepturilor unei naţii.......................... 368 1.1. Născut, crescut şi format în spiritul dreptului....................368 1.2. Avocatul revoluţionar al epocii moderne............................369 1.3. De la „lancea” lui Horia la luptătorii „cu arma legii”....... 370 1.4. „Academia de direpturi” şi mesajul pentru viitor.............. 371 2. Vespasian Erbiceanu ֊ arhitectul revenirii Basarabiei în spaţiul juridic românesc interbelic............................................ 373 3. Vespasian V. Pella - românul ştiinţei juridice universale.............
386 3.1. Marile contribuţii teoretice..................................................387 3.2. Membru corespondent al Academiei Române................... 388 3.3. Profesorul.............................................................................. 396 3.4. Dreptul penal român, pe calea unificării.............................399 3.5. Juristul patriot.......................................................................400 3.6. Omagiul internaţional profesorului V.V. Pella pentru promovarea unificării dreptului penal................................401 3.7. Permanenta actualitate şi unanima recunoaştere a priorităţilor ştiinţifice ale lui V.V. Pella............................404 4. Paul Negulescu, precursor al dreptului administrativ global....407 5. Mircea Djuvara: filosoful kantian, avocatul cult şi consilierul juridic al Conferinţei de pace de la Paris................415
Table of contents FOREWORD................................................................................................19 I. JURIDICAL UNIFICATION. LEGAL. JUDICIARY. LEGAL REGIME OF THE PROFESSIONS ֊ EXPERIENCES, IDEAS, TEACHINGS.............................................................................................. 23 A CENTURY-OLD NATIONAL, INDIVISIBLE AND UNITARY STATE.....................................................................................25 I. Legal unification - an inseparable part of national unity.............38 A. Legislative unification........................................................................... 39 1. The phenomenon of inter-provincial law or the inter-provincial conflict of laws................................................... 42 2. The beginnings of unification and the specter of stagnation......44 3. A national debate: what kind of unification?............................... 49 4. Practical resonances of the debate................................................ 55 5. Continuation of the process of unification....................................57 B. Judiciary unification............................................................................. 60 1. Judicial organization regulations.................................................. 60 2. The role of the Supreme Council of Magistracy in the development of an elite corps of magistrates............................... 62 2.1. Justifying preliminaries..........................................................62 2.2. The founding regulations of the law of March 24, 1909.... 64
2.3. Modifications introduced by the law of December 23, 1916........................................................................................... 66 2.4. Modification proposals on the statute of the SCM............. 67 2.5. Supreme Council of Magistracy in the law regarding judicial organization of Greater Romania (1924, the “Mârzescu Law”).................................................................... 68 2.6. The period of two supreme councils of magistracy............. 70 2.7. Returning to a single Supreme Council of Magistracy and its dissolution................................................................... 71 2.8. The revival of the Supreme Council of Magistracy 72 post-1989
14 ❖ Un secol de stat unitar şi drept naţional (1918-2018) ❖ C. The creation of a Romanian national Bar Association....... ........... 72 1. Creation of the modem Bar Association - a component of the project of a national state....................................................... 72 2. Attorneys’ contribution to the War for National Reunification and the creation of Greater Romania................... 76 3. The project of a national Bar Association....................................80 4. Attempts of unification from the jurists of Greater Romania..........................................................................................85 II. Regional experiences of legal unification: Dobrogea, Bessarabia, Bucovina, Crişana...................... 88 1. The integration of Dobrogea in the state and legal space of Romania (1878-1921)................................................................... 94 1.1. Exchange or cession of territory? Constitution and legal issues............................................................................... 97 1.2. Organizing the judicial authority in Dobrogea.................... 99 1.3. “The Constituion”, the law for organizing Dobrogea of March 8 (20) 1880.................................................................102 1.4. The law on judicial organization of (1886)........................106 1.5. Giving political rights to the inhabitants of the Constanţa and Tulcea departments...................................... 109 1.6. Introducing the jury as provided by art. 105 of the 1866
Constitution..................................................................Ill 1.7. The (provisional) judicial organization in the new Dobrogea................................................................................Ill 1.8. The creation of the Constanţa Court of Appeals................ 114 1.9. The legal regime of the region after the First World War......................................................................................... 118 1.10. The Justice of Dobrogea.....................................................119 2. The Bessarabian contribution to legal unification and to the development of the internar Romanian science of law.............123 2.1. A fast and necessary judiciary transition.............................126 2.2. A difficult process: unifying the legislation....................... 130 2.3. A national priority................................................................. 132 2.4. The necessity of an urgent introduction of the Romanian Civil Code in Bessarabia.....................................136 2.5. Contributions to the unification of criminal legislation.... 139 2.6. Crystallization of the Romanian science and culture of law in Bessarabia................................................................... 143
❖ Tabte of contents ♦ 15 2.7. Perfecting the legal unification........................................... 149 2.8. Conclusions.......................................................................... 153 2.9. The return of the church of Bessarabia to the Romanian Orthodox Church (1918-1944). Legal issues.... 156 2.9.1. The Orthodox Church and the unification of Bessarabia and Romania.............................................. 158 2.9.2. A brief historical interlude. Bessarabia as a diocese of the Church of Russia....................................161 2.9.3. The disbanding the Church of Russia and its “sovietization”...............................................................163 2.9.4. Chaos and makeshift. Autonomy attempts and perpetuation of the Russian allegiance......................... 165 2.9.5. The first attempt to return to the Romanian religious space................................................................ 166 2.9.6. The first measures for a fair resolve............................ 169 2.9.7. Revolutionary law vs church tradition......................... 172 2.9.8. Legal basis..................................................................... 173 2.9.9. Unifying the legal statute of the Orthodox Church.... 176 2.9.10. Brief conclusions.........................................................178 3. The Romanian Court of Appeals in Cernăuţi (1919-1940) and its contribution to the judicial and legal unification of Bucovina and Romania...............................................................178 3.1. Legal differences and the menace of legal
chaos...............179 3.2. The Creation of the Cernăuţi Court of Appeals and it’s evolution................................................................................183 3.3. The Court’s contribution to the legal unification to the Motherland.............................................................................186 3.4. Legal Pages (Cernăuţi, May 1 1932-May 15 1940)...........189 3.5. The Bucovina Bar Association............................................ 192 3.6. The Bucovina School of Law.............................................. 196 4. The Oradea Court of Appeals’ part in the interwar judiciary and legal unification.................................................... 205 4.1. The difficulties of the process ofjudiciary and legal unification..............................................................................206 4.2. The Oradea Court of Appeals and its integration in the Romanian judiciary system.................................................. 209 4.3. The legal Bulletin of the Oradea Court of Appeals’ circumscription..................................................................... 210
16__________ ❖ Un secol de stat unitar şi drept naţional (1918-2018) ❖__________ _ 4.3.1. Issues of legal unification.............................................213 4.3.2. Priority issues for the province and for the country....214 4.3.3. National sovereignty and administrative reform.........219 4.3.4. The General Congress of Attorneys of Romania (Oradea, September 5-7, 1934)..................................... 220 4.3.5. Other issues.................................................................... 223 4.4. Judiciary eloquence - a common, but differentiated, Roman legacy........................................................................ 224 4.5. A major challenge - introducing the jury court................ 225 4.6. Scurte concluzii.................................................................... 226 II. ROMANISM, NEO-LATINITY, EUROPEAN SOLIDARITY. THE CONTINUAL JURIDICAL DIALOGUE BETWEEN ROMANIA AND ITALY........................................................................ 227 ROMANISM, NEO-LATINITY, EUROPEAN SOLIDARITY..........229 I. Italian influence on Romanian law. Historical landmarks..........247 1. Influences in the field of civil law.............................................. 252 2. Echoes in criminal law.......................... 254 3. The fundamental landmark in commercial law.........................260 4. The experiences ofjuridical unification.................................... 265 5. Monist recodification...................................................................267 6. Has there been a Romanian influence on Italian
Law?............. 270 7. Andrei Rădulescu ֊ historian and promotor of Romanian-Italian legal influences and confluences..................... 271 8. Italian juridical presence in the Romanian academic institutions........................................................................................ 273 II. Legal scientific and cultural confluences between Italy and Romania in the interwar period.......................................................274 A. Juridical neo-kantianism. del vecchio-djuvara philosophical dialogue.................................................................................................275 1. The Romanian Tribute to Professor, at 25 years of teaching.... 2 77 2. Giorgio Del Vecchio - member of honor of the Romanian Academy (1933)...........................................................................279 3. Publishing in Romanian the representative works of the Italian Philosopher........................................................................280 3.1. Justice (1936).........................................................................280 3.2. Ethics, Law, and State (1937)...............................................282
❖ Tabte of contents ♦ 17 3.3. Lessons of Legal Philosophy (1943)..................................283 4. Introducing Legal Philosophy as a university course...............286 5. Comparisons and evaluation....................................................... 287 6. Romanian legal philosophy in Giorgio Del Vecchio’s vision............................................................................................289 7. Mircea Djuvara and the works of Giorgio Del Vecchio.......... 292 8. The presence of Mircea Djuvara in Italy...................................294 9. The legacy of Giorgio Del Vecchio.................................... 296 10. Possible conclusions..................................................................297 B. Natural transformism in the history of law......................................300 C. Legal criminal technicism and its echoes........................................303 III. JURIDICAL CULTURE AND THE SCIENCE OF LAW. FOR A CRITICAL PERSPECTIVE AND A FAIRER RECONSIDERATION............................................................................ 311 A. The existential dilemmas of modern Romanian juridical culture.................................................................................................. 313 1. A representative legal culture..................................................... 314 2. Ignorance, underappreciation, a detrimental lack of interest.... 317 3. The wrong way of seeing Romanian juridical culture and its consequences........................................................................... 319 4. The need for a
“change towards the better”............................... 320 5. The signs of cultural and juridical change and progress........... 320 6. Perspectives for the ftiture.......................................................... 328 B. Romanian science of law at 100 years since the Great Unification. What has been, what was accomplished, what it should be...................................................................................................331 1. Taking over, imitation, and creative effort.................................332 2. Which reaction to juridical integration and globalization? The Neo-Latin Exceptionality......................................................336 3. The problematics of a national, unitary State, the permanent priority of legal research........................................... 338 4. Legal scientific research. Essential dilemmas........................... 341 5. A necessary radiogram................................................................ 343 6. The French example.................................................................... 344 7. Possible landmarks.......................................................................345
18 ❖ Un secol de stat unitar şi drept naţional (1918-2018) ♦ 8. Three fondamental directions (orientations) of fondamental research and of the Romanian science of law.............................347 C. The historical role and the possible constitutional position of the Romanian Academy.....................................................................351 D. The Romanian Legal Encyclopedia: a major vector of juridical culture and science of law................................................. 360 E. Jurists who “built” Greater Romania.............................................368 1. Avram lancu - the lawyer advocating for the rights of a Nation............................................................................................... 368 1.1. Bom and raised in the spirit of law.....................................368 1.2. The revolutionary lawyer of a modem age........................ 369 1.3. From Horea’s “lance”, to the warriors “with the weapon of law”.....................................................................370 1.4. “The Academy of Rights” and its message for the foture......................................................................................371 2. Vespasian Erbiceanu - the architect of the return of Bessarabia to the interwar Romanianlegal space...................... 373 3. Vespasian V. Pella - the Romanian of the universal science of law.................................................................................................386 3.1. Great theoretical contributions.............................................387 3.2. Corresponding
member of the Romanian Academy.......... 388 3.3. The Professor........................................................................ 396 3.4. Romanian criminal law on the ways of unification........... 399 3.5. The patriot jurist................................................................... 400 3.6. An international tribute to Professor V.V. Pella for promoting the unification of criminal law.......................... 401 3.7. The permanent actuality and the unanimous recognition of the scientific priorities of V.V. Pella..........404 4. Paul Negulescu, a precursor of global administrative law........407 5. Mircea Djuvara: Kantian philosopher, cultivated lawyer, and legal counsel of the ParisPeace Conference.........................415
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Duţu, Mircea 1957- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1069611425 |
| author_facet | Duţu, Mircea 1957- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Duţu, Mircea 1957- |
| author_variant | m d md |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV046047271 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1110069037 (DE-599)BVBBV046047271 |
| era | Geschichte 1919-2018 gnd |
| era_facet | Geschichte 1919-2018 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02280nam a2200517 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV046047271</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20191112 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">190715s2018 xx |||| 00||| rum d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789732730065</subfield><subfield code="9">978-973-27-3006-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9786063903649</subfield><subfield code="9">978-606-39-0364-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1110069037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV046047271</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">rum</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Duţu, Mircea</subfield><subfield code="d">1957-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1069611425</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Un secol de stat unitar şi drept naţional</subfield><subfield code="b">(1919-2018) : perspective istorice cultural-ştiinţifice</subfield><subfield code="c">Mircea Duţu</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Bucureşti</subfield><subfield code="b">Editura Academiei Române</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Bucureşti</subfield><subfield code="b">Universul Juridic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">430 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1919-2018</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Politik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046514-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Innerstaatliches Recht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4161814-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Jurist</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4029050-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rumänien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4050939-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rumänien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4050939-4</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Politik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046514-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Innerstaatliches Recht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4161814-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Jurist</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4029050-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1919-2018</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031428848&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 25 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031428848&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20191112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0904</subfield><subfield code="g">498</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0905</subfield><subfield code="g">498</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0905</subfield><subfield code="g">498</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0904</subfield><subfield code="g">498</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031428848</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Rumänien (DE-588)4050939-4 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Rumänien |
| id | DE-604.BV046047271 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-20T18:41:46Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9789732730065 9786063903649 |
| language | Romanian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-031428848 |
| oclc_num | 1110069037 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 430 Seiten |
| psigel | BSB_NED_20191112 |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Editura Academiei Române Universul Juridic |
| record_format | marc |
| spellingShingle | Duţu, Mircea 1957- Un secol de stat unitar şi drept naţional (1919-2018) : perspective istorice cultural-ştiinţifice Politik (DE-588)4046514-7 gnd Innerstaatliches Recht (DE-588)4161814-2 gnd Jurist (DE-588)4029050-5 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4046514-7 (DE-588)4161814-2 (DE-588)4029050-5 (DE-588)4050939-4 |
| title | Un secol de stat unitar şi drept naţional (1919-2018) : perspective istorice cultural-ştiinţifice |
| title_auth | Un secol de stat unitar şi drept naţional (1919-2018) : perspective istorice cultural-ştiinţifice |
| title_exact_search | Un secol de stat unitar şi drept naţional (1919-2018) : perspective istorice cultural-ştiinţifice |
| title_full | Un secol de stat unitar şi drept naţional (1919-2018) : perspective istorice cultural-ştiinţifice Mircea Duţu |
| title_fullStr | Un secol de stat unitar şi drept naţional (1919-2018) : perspective istorice cultural-ştiinţifice Mircea Duţu |
| title_full_unstemmed | Un secol de stat unitar şi drept naţional (1919-2018) : perspective istorice cultural-ştiinţifice Mircea Duţu |
| title_short | Un secol de stat unitar şi drept naţional |
| title_sort | un secol de stat unitar si drept national 1919 2018 perspective istorice cultural stiintifice |
| title_sub | (1919-2018) : perspective istorice cultural-ştiinţifice |
| topic | Politik (DE-588)4046514-7 gnd Innerstaatliches Recht (DE-588)4161814-2 gnd Jurist (DE-588)4029050-5 gnd |
| topic_facet | Politik Innerstaatliches Recht Jurist Rumänien |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031428848&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=031428848&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dutumircea unsecoldestatunitarsidreptnational19192018perspectiveistoriceculturalstiintifice |