The EU Antitrust Damages Directive: transportation in the member states
Gespeichert in:
| Weitere beteiligte Personen: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford
Oxford University Press
2018
|
| Ausgabe: | First edition |
| Links: | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030345544&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| Umfang: | liii, 506 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9780198812760 0198812760 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV044952801 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20190222 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 180517s2018 xx |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780198812760 |9 978-0-19-881276-0 | ||
| 020 | |a 0198812760 |9 0-19-881276-0 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1190677689 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV044952801 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-M382 |a DE-19 | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The EU Antitrust Damages Directive |b transportation in the member states |c edited by Barry Rodger, Miguel Sousa Ferro, Francisco Marcos |
| 250 | |a First edition | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford |b Oxford University Press |c 2018 | |
| 300 | |a liii, 506 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Rodger, Barry J. |0 (DE-588)171401174 |4 edt | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sousa Ferro, Miguel |0 (DE-588)1164025953 |4 edt | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Marcos, Francisco |0 (DE-588)1175919217 |4 edt | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030345544&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030345544 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1819356822003253248 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CASES XXI
TABLE OF LEGISLATION XXXIII
LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS XLIX
I. EU COMPETITION LAW PRIVATE
ENFORCEMENT AND THE ANTITRUST
DAMAGES DIRECTIVE
1. DAMAGES ACTIONS IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF EU COMPETITION LAW 3
BARRY RODGER, MIGUEL SOUSA FERRO, AND FRANCISCO MARCOS
1. INTRODUCTION 3
1.1 INTRODUCTION TO EU COMPETITION LAW 4
1.2 PUBLIC ENFORCEMENT OFEU COMPETITION LAW 5
1.3 EU LAW PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT DEVELOPMENTS 7
1.4 THE EXPERIENCE OF DAMAGES ACTIONS IN THE EU 14
1.5 COLLECTIVE REDRESS 16
1.6 US ANTITRUST PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT AND EXPERIENCE 18
1.7 EU PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW RULES 20
2. CONCLUSIONS 23
2. PROMOTION AND HARMONIZATION OF ANTITRUST DAMAGES CLAIMS BY
DIRECTIVE 2014/104/EU? 24
BARRY RODGER, MIGUEL SOUSA FERRO, AND FRANCISCO MARCOS
1. INTRODUCTION 24
2. THE PATH TO THE ADOPTION OF THE DIRECTIVE 24
3. THE GOALS OF THE DIRECTIVE 27
4. THE DIRECTIVE: LEGAL GROUNDS AND RULES 28
4.1 WHY A DIRECTIVE? 28
4.2 ERODING AND ENCROACHING UPON NATIONAL REMEDIAL AUTONOMY 29
4.3 CONTENT OF THE DIRECTIVE 31
5. ASSESSMENT OF THE DIRECTIVE: SCOPE AND NATURE OF ITS RULES 45
5.1 SHORTCOMINGS AND NEGLECTED ISSUES 46
5.2 LIMITED TREATMENT 47
5.3 INHERENT BIASES 48
5.4 UNIFORM EU PLAYING FIELD? 50
6. THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DIRECTIVE 51
7. CONCLUSIONS 55
XII TABLE OF CONTENTS
II. THE MEMBER STATE REPORTS ON
TRANSPOSITION OF THE DIRECTIVE
3. BELGIUM 61
CAROLINE CAUFFMAN
1. TRANSPOSITION BACKGROUND AND PROCESS 61
2. SCOPE OF THE TRANSPOSITION MEASURE 62
2.1 SUBSTANTIVE SCOPE 62
2.2 TEMPORAL SCOPE 63
3. KEY ISSUES 63
3.1 TERMINOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE DIRECTIVE AND ITS
TRANSPOSITION 63
3.2 ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS 65
3.3 EFFECT OF DECISIONS OF COMPETITION AUTHORITIES 72
3.4 TIME-BARRING DEADLINES 72
3.5 SOLIDARY LIABILITY 74
3.6 PASSING-ON OF OVERCHARGES 76
3.7 PRESUMPTION AND QUANTIFICATION OF HARM BY CARTELS OR OTHER ANTITRUST
INFRINGEMENTS 77
3.8 CONSENSUAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION 78
3.9 COLLECTIVE ENFORCEMENT 79
3.10 PARENT COMPANY LIABILITY 79
4. CONCLUDING REMARKS 80
4. CYPRUS 82
MARIA IOANNIDOU
1. TRANSPOSITION BACKGROUND AND PROCESS 82
1.1 CYPRIOT COMPETITION REGIME 82
1.2 COMPETITION LITIGATION 84
1.3 TRANSPOSITION PROCESS 86
2. SCOPE OF THE TRANSPOSITION MEASURE 89
3. KEY ISSUES 90
3.1 DEFINITIONS 91
3.2 LIMITATION PERIODS 91
3.3 BINDING FORCE OF DECISIONS OF OTHER MEMBER STATES 92
3.4 PARENT COMPANY LIABILITY 94
3.5 PRESUMPTION AND QUANTIFICATION OF DAMAGE BY CARTELS OR OTHER
ANTITRUST INFRINGEMENTS 94
3.6 DISTRIBUTION OF LIABILITY BETWEEN CO-INFRINGERS 96
3.7 ACCESS RULES 96
3.8 SPECIFIC PROVISIONS ON COLLECTIVE ENFORCEMENT 98
3.9 JUDICIAL SYSTEM (JURISDICTION FOR PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS) 98
3.10 SPECIAL GUIDANCE 99
4. CONCLUDING REMARKS 99
5. FRANCE 101
MURIEL CHAGNY
1. TRANSPOSITION BACKGROUND AND PROCESS 101
1.1 OVERVIEW OF THE FRENCH PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT CONTEXT 101
1.2 TRANSPOSITION PROCESS 102
TABLE OF CONTENTS XIII
2. SCOPE OF THE TRANSPOSITION MEASURE 105
2.1 SUBSTANTIVE SCOPE 105
2.2 TEMPORAL SCOPE 105
3. KEY ISSUES 106
3.1 CONCEPT OF UNDERTAKING 106
3.2 BINDING EFFECT OF COMPETITION AUTHORITIES DECISIONS 107
3.3 PRESUMPTION OF HARM 110
3.4 PASSING-ON OF OVERCHARGES 111
3.5 TYPES OF HARM AND ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES 112
3.6 JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY AND RECOVERY OF CONTRIBUTION
FROM CO-INFRINGERS 114
3.7 CONSENSUAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION 116
3.8 TIME-BARRING DEADLINES 117
3.9 ACCESS TO EVIDENCE 119
3.10 CLASS ACTIONS 121
4. CONCLUDING REMARKS 122
6. GERMANY 124
CHRISTIAN KERSTING
1. TRANSPOSITION BACKGROUND AND PROCESS 124
2. SCOPE OF THE TRANSPOSITION MEASURE 127
3. KEY ISSUES 129
3.1 DEFINITIONS 129
3.2 BINDING FORCE OF DECISIONS OF OTHER MEMBER STATES 129
3.3 PARENT COMPANY LIABILITY FOR FINES 130
3.4 GROUP LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES 131
3.5 PRESUMPTION OF DAMAGES AND QUANTIFICATION 136
3.6 JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY AND RECOVERY OF CONTRIBUTION
FROM CO-INFRINGERS 137
3.7 IMMUNITY RECIPIENTS 138
3.8 SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES 140
3.9 DISCLOSURE OF EVIDENCE 143
3.10 LIMITATION PERIODS 146
3.11 ORGANISATION OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM 148
3.12 PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS IMPOSING FINES 148
3.13 PASSING-ON DEFENCE AND INDIRECT PURCHASERS 149
3.14 SETTLEMENTS 152
3.15 PERSONAL LIABILITY OF MANAGERS TOWARDS INJURED PARTIES 154
3.16 COSTS OF THIRD-PARTY NOTICES 155
4. CONCLUDING REMARKS 156
7. GREECE 158
MARIA IOANNIDOU
1. TRANSPOSITION BACKGROUND AND PROCESS 158
1.1 OVERVIEW OF THE GREEK PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT CONTEXT 158
1.2 TRANSPOSITION BACKGROUND 160
1.3 TRANSPOSITION PROCESS 161
2. SCOPE OF THE TRANSPOSITION MEASURE 163
2.1 SUBSTANTIVE SCOPE 163
2.2 TEMPORAL SCOPE 164
XIV TABLE OF CONTENTS
3. KEY ISSUES 165
3.1 LIMITATION PERIODS 165
3.2 BINDING FORCE OF DECISIONS OF ODIER MEMBER STATES 166
3.3 JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY 167
3.4 PARENT COMPANY LIABILITY 168
3.5 PRESUMPTION OF DAMAGE BY CARTELS AND QUANTIFICATION 169
3.6 METLIOD FOR QUANTIFICATION OF DAMAGES BY NATIONAL COURTS 170
3.7 PASSING-ON DEFENCE AND INDIRECT PURCHASERS 171
3.8 ACCESS RULES 172
3.9 SPECIFIC PROVISIONS ON COLLECTIVE ENFORCEMENT 176
3.10 ORGANISATION OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM 177
3.11 CONSENSUAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION 178
4. CONCLUDING REMARKS 178
8. HUNGARY 180
CSONGOR ISTVDN NAGY
1. TRANSPOSITION BACKGROUND AND PROCESS 180
2. SCOPE OF THE TRANSPOSITION MEASURE 182
2.1 SUBSTANTIVE SCOPE 182
2.2 TEMPORAL SCOPE 182
3. KEY ISSUES 183
3.1 TIME-BARRING DEADLINES 183
3.2 BINDING FORCE OF DECISIONS OF OTHER MEMBER STATES 185
3.3 PARENT COMPANY LIABILITY 185
3.4 PRESUMPTION AND QUANTIFICATION OF DAMAGES BY CARTELS OR OTHER
ANTITRUST INFRINGEMENTS 186
3.5 CRITERIA FOR PRESUMPTION OF DISTRIBUTION OF LIABILITY BETWEEN
CO-INFRINGERS AND RIGHT OF RETURN BETWEEN CO-INFRINGERS 189
3.6 ACCESS RULES 189
3.7 SPECIFIC PROVISIONS ON COLLECTIVE ENFORCEMENT 190
3.8 ORGANIZATION OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM 191
4. CONCLUDING REMARKS 191
9. IRELAND 193
MARY CATHERINE LUCEY
1. TRANSPOSITION BACKGROUND AND PROCESS 193
2. SCOPE OF THE TRANSPOSITION MEASURE 198
2.1 SUBSTANTIVE SCOPE 198
2.2 TEMPORAL SCOPE 199
3. KEY ISSUES 199
3.1 RIGHT TO FULL COMPENSATION 199
3.2 DISCLOSURE OF EVIDENCE 200
3.3 EFFECT OF NCA DECISIONS 203
3.4 LIMITATION PERIOD 205
3.5 JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY 206
3.6 PASSING ON 206
3.7 QUANTIFICATION 207
TABLE OF CONTENTS XV
3.8 CONSENSUAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION 207
3.9 INCORRECT OR INCOMPLETE TRANSPOSITION 207
4. CONCLUDING REMARKS 208
10. ITALY 209
SUSANNA LOPOPOLO
1. TRANSPOSITION BACKGROUND AND PROCESS 209
1.1 ITALIAN LEGISLATIVE AND JURISPRUDENTIAL CONTEXT 209
1.2 TRANSPOSITION PROCESS AND LOCATION QUESTION 210
2. SCOPE OF THE TRANSPOSITION MEASURE 211
2.1 SUBSTANTIVE SCOPE 212
2.2 TEMPORAL SCOPE 212
3. KEY ISSUES 213
3.1 DISCLOSURE OF EVIDENCE 213
3.2 PROTECTION OF EVIDENCE INCLUDED IN THE FILE OF A COMPETITION
AUTHORITY 216
3.3 PENALTIES 217
3.4 BINDING FORCE OFNCA DECISIONS AND JUDICIAL REVIEW 219
3.5 TIME LIMITATION RULE 221
3.6 JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY 223
3.7 PARENTAL LIABILITY 224
3.8 PASSING-ON OF OVERCHARGES 225
3.9 THE USE OF AGCM EXPERTISE IN QUANTIFYING DAMAGES 226
3.10 CONSENSUAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION 228
3.11 COLLECTIVE REDRESS 229
3.12 SPECIALISED COURTS 230
4. CONCLUDING REMARKS 230
11. LITHUANIA 232
JURGITA MALINAUSKAITE
1. TRANSPOSITION BACKGROUND AND PROCESS 232
1.1 OVERVIEW OF THE DIRECTIVE AND ASSESSMENT OF ITS IMPACT ON THE
LITHUANIAN LEGAL SYSTEM 232
1.2 THE CONSULTATION PROCESS 234
1.3 IMPACT ASSESSMENT 236
2. SCOPE OF THE TRANSPOSITION MEASURE 238
2.1 SUBSTANTIVE SCOPE 238
2.2 TEMPORAL SCOPE 240
3. KEY ISSUES 240
3.1 THE RIGHT TO FULL COMPENSATION 240
3.2 ACCESS TO EVIDENCE AND DISCLOSURE OF EVIDENCE 241
3.3 EFFECT OF NATIONAL DECISIONS AND LIMITATION PERIODS 245
3.4 JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY 247
3.5 PASSING-ON OF OVERCHARGES 248
3.6 QUANTIFICATION OF HARM 248
3.7 CONSENSUAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION 250
4. CONCLUDING REMARKS 251
XVI TABLE OF CONTENTS
12. LUXEMBOURG 253
CAROLINE CAUFFMAN
1. TRANSPOSITION BACKGROUND AND PROCESS 253
1.1 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE TRANSPOSITION PROCEDURE 253
1.2 OVERVIEW OF THE MAIN REFLECTIONS MADE BY THE RELEVANT BODIES 254
2. SCOPE OF THE TRANSPOSITION MEASURE 258
2.1 SUBSTANTIVE SCOPE 258
2.2 TEMPORAL SCOPE 259
3. KEY ISSUES 260
3.1 NOT SPECIFICALLY TRANSPOSED PROVISIONS 260
3.2 PROTECTION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 261
3.3 PRINCIPLE OF JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY 262
3.4 PROBATIVE VALUE OF DECISIONS OF NCAS OF OTHER MEMBER STATES 263
3.5 PRESUMPTION AND QUANTIFICATION OF HARM BY CARTELS 263
3.6 TIME-BARRING DEADLINES 265
3.7 SANCTIONS 265
3.8 PAYMENT OF COSTS 266
3.9 ACTIONS FOR DAMAGES BY CLAIMANTS FROM DIFFERENT LEVELS IN
THE SUPPLY CHAIN 266
3.10 CONSENSUAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION 267
3.11 PARENT COMPANY LIABILITY 267
3.12 NO SPECIFIC PROVISIONS ON COLLECTIVE ENFORCEMENT 268
4. CONCLUDING REMARKS 268
13. THE NETHERLANDS 270
JEROEN KORTMANN AND SIMON MINEUR
1. TRANSPOSITION BACKGROUND AND PROCESS 270
1.1 THE DUTCH PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT CONTEXT 270
1.2 THE DUTCH TRANSPOSITION PROCESS: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS 272
1.3 THE TRANSPOSITION OF DIRECTIVE 2014/ 104/EU INTO DUTCH LAW 272
1.4 GENERAL APPROACH: NO TRANSLATION OF THE UNTRANSLATABLE 274
2. SCOPE OF THE TRANSPOSITION MEASURE 275
3. KEY ISSUES 276
3.1 NO EXEMPTION FOR DUTCH FARMERS 276
3.2 LIMITATION PERIODS 276
3.3 EFFECTS OF NCAS FINAL INFRINGEMENT DECISIONS 279
3.4 DISCLOSURE AND PROTECTION OF DOCUMENTS 280
3.5 EVIDENTIARY PRESUMPTIONS: DAMAGE AND PASSING-ON 280
3.6 JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY 281
3.7 PARENTAL LIABILITY 282
3.8 EFFECT OF CONSENSUAL SETTLEMENTS ON SUBSEQUENT ACTIONS FOR DAMAGES
284
3.9 PREVENTION OF CONTRADICTORY JUDGMENTS AND OVERCOMPENSATION 285
3.10 COLLECTIVE REDRESS 286
3.11 NO SPECIALIZED COURT STRUCTURE 287
4. CONCLUDING REMARKS 288
TABLE OF CONTENTS XVII
14. POLAND 290
MACIEJ BERNATT ANDMACIEJ GAC
1. TRANSPOSITION BACKGROUND AND PROCESS 290
1.1 THE MAIN STAGES OF THE IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS 290
1.2 PERSONS/AUTHORITIES INVOLVED IN THE IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS 291
1.3 THE MAIN CRITICISM OF THE IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS 292
1.4 THE MAIN OBJECTIVES OF THE IMPLEMENTATION AND ITS POSSIBLE
IMPACT ON POLISH LAW AND THE ECONOMY 292
1.5 THE METHOD OF IMPLEMENTATION 293
2. SCOPE OF THE TRANSPOSITION MEASURE 293
2.1 SUBSTANTIVE SCOPE 293
2.2 TEMPORAL SCOPE 294
3. KEY ISSUES 294
3.1 NOVEL ASPECTS 294
3.2 INCORRECT TRANSPOSITION: EFFECT OF NCAS DECISIONS 297
3.3 INCOMPLETE TRANSPOSITION: PASSING-ON OF OVERCHARGES 298
3.4 PROBLEMATIC ISSUES 298
4. CONCLUDING REMARKS 300
15. PORTUGAL 304
MIGUEL SOUSA FERRO
1. TRANSPOSITION BACKGROUND AND PROCESS 304
2. SCOPE OF THE TRANSPOSITION MEASURE 307
3. KEY ISSUES 309
3.1 PRE-TRIAL DISCOVERY 309
3.2 PARTIAL CENTRALIZATION OF PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT AT THE SPECIALIZED
COURT 310
3.3 ACCESS RULES 312
3.4 TIME-BARRING 313
3.5 PROTECTING FAILED SETDEMENT TALKS 315
3.6 BINDING FORCE OF PUBLIC ENFORCEMENT DECISIONS 316
3.7 CONCEPT OFUNDERTAKING AND PARENT COMPANY LIABILITY 317
3.8 PRESUMPTION OF PROPORTION OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOINT LIABILITY 319
3.9 QUANTIFYING DAMAGES 319
3.10 PROMOTING THE PORTUGUESE OPT-OUT REGIME ( ACTIOPOPULARIS ) 320
3.11 CENTRALIZING INFORMATION ON PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT CASES AT THE PCA
322
3.12 LEGAL PRIVILEGE 323
3.13 EFFECT ON TRADE BETWEEN MEMBER STATES 323
4. CONCLUDING REMARKS 324
16. SPAIN 326
FRANCISCO MARCOS
1. TRANSPOSITION BACKGROUND AND PROCESS 326
2. SCOPE OF THE TRANSPOSITION MEASURE 329
3. KEY ISSUES 331
XVIII TABLE OF CONTENTS
3.1 JURISDICTION: COMPETENT COURTS 331
3.2 RIGHT TO FULL COMPENSATION 332
3.3 RESPONSIBILITY OFINFRINGERS: JOINT AND SEVERAL/PARENTAL LIABILITY
335
3.4 PASSING-ON OF THE HARM AND INDIRECT PURCHASERS/SUPPLIERS CLAIMS 337
3.5 LIMITATION PERIOD 339
3.6 ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION 340
3.7 MEASURES TO FACILITATE CLAIMS 342
3.8 COLLECTIVE CLAIMS AND CONSUMER REDRESS 354
4. CONCLUDING REMARKS 356
17. SWEDEN 358
LARS HENRIKSSON
1. TRANSPOSITION BACKGROUND AND PROCESS 358
1.1 NEW LEGISLATION ON ANTITRUST DAMAGES 360
2. SCOPE OF THE TRANSPOSITION MEASURE 362
3. KEY ISSUES 363
3.1 PRECONDITIONS FOR LIABILITY IN SWEDISH LAW 363
3.2 NEW RULES ON JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY 365
3.3 NEW RULES ON LIMITATION PERIODS 366
3.4 ELEMENTS OF THE RIGHT TO FULL COMPENSATION 366
3.5 NEW RULES ON INTEREST IN ARREARS ON DAMAGES AWARDED 367
3.6 QUANTIFICATION OF HARM 369
3.7 PASSING-ON OF OVERCHARGES IN SWEDISH LAW 370
3.8 THE RIGHT TO RECOVER DAMAGES FROM OTHER INFRINGERS 371
3.9 PROCEDURAL RULES FOR CASES INVOLVING ANTITRUST DAMAGES 372
3.10 RULES ON DISCLOSURE OF EVIDENCE 373
3.11 PROHIBITION AGAINST PRESENTING CERTAIN WRITTEN EVIDENCE 374
3.12 BINDING EFFECT OF NATIONAL DECISIONS 374
3.13 INCORRECT OR INCOMPLETE TRANSPOSITION 375
4. CONCLUDING REMARKS 375
18. UNITED KINGDOM 378
BARRY RODGER
1. TRANSPOSITION BACKGROUND AND PROCESS 378
1.1 OVERVIEW OF THE UK PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT CONTEXT 378
1.2 TRANSPOSITION PROCESS 380
2. SCOPE OF THE TRANSPOSITION MEASURE 382
2.1 SUBSTANTIVE SCOPE 382
2.2 TEMPORAL SCOPE 382
3. KEY ISSUES 383
3.1 LIMITATION PERIODS 383
3.2 BINDING FORCE OF COMPETITION AUTHORITY DECISIONS 388
3.3 DISCLOSURE AND PROTECTION OF DOCUMENTS/ADMISSABILITY OF EVIDENCE 390
3.4 THE PRESUMPTION OF HARM AND QUANTIFICATION OF DAMAGES 393
3.5 THE PASSING-ON DEFENCE AND INDIRECT PURCHASERS 397
3.6 JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY 398
3.7 PARENT COMPANY LIABILITY 399
3.8 CONSENSUAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION 400
3.9 COLLECTIVE REDRESS 401
TABLE OF CONTENTS XIX
3.10 LITIGATION COSTS AND FUNDING 403
3.11 SPECIALISED COURT STRUCTURE 405
CONCLUDING REMARKS 406
III. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE
TRANSPOSITION PROCESSES AND OUTCOMES
19. TRANSPOSITION CONTEXT, PROCESSES, MEASURES, AND SCOPE 411
BARRY RODGER, MIGUEL SOUSA FERRO, AND FRANCISCO MARCOS
1. INTRODUCTION 411
2. MEMBER STATES COMPETITION LITIGATION CONTEXT 411
3. IMPLEMENTATION TIMESCALE 414
4. RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIES AND STAKEHOLDERS LEVEL OF DEBATE 419
5. TRANSPOSITION MEASURE TYPE 424
6. SCOPE OF THE TRANSPOSITION MEASURES: SUBSTANTIVE AND TEMPORAL 428
6.1 SUBSTANTIVE SCOPE 428
6.2 TEMPORAL SCOPE 433
20. TRANSPOSITION: KEY ISSUES AND CONTROVERSIES 440
BARRY RODGER, MIGUEL SOUSA FERRO, AND FRANCISCO MARCOS
1. INTRODUCTION 440
2. WHO IS LIABLE AND UNDER WHICH CONDITIONS? 440
3. JOINT LIABILITY, IMMUNITY RECIPIENTS, AND SMES 444
4. ACCESS TO EVIDENCE 447
4.1 GENERAL ISSUES 447
4.2 CHANGING JUDICIAL CULTURE AND LEGAL INSTINCTS 448
4.3 VARIOUS PROCEDURAL ISSUES 449
4.4 PROTECTION OF CONFIDENTIALITY AND LIMITS TO USE OF EVIDENCE 451
4.5 SANCTIONS 453
4.6 REQUESTING DOCUMENTS FROM COMPETITION AUTHORITIES 454
5. SPECIALIZED COURTS 455
6. LIMITATION PERIODS 457
7. BINDING FORCE OF PUBLIC ENFORCEMENT DECISIONS 461
8. COMPENSATION, QUANTIFICATION, PASSING-ON, AND PRESUMPTIONS 464
8.1 COMPENSATION 464
8.2 DAMAGES, QUANTIFICATION, AND PRESUMPTIONS 465
8.3 INDIRECT DAMAGES AND PASSING-ON 468
9. CONSENSUAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION: SETTLEMENTS AND ADR 470
10. COLLECTIVE REDRESS 473
11. OTHER ISSUES 478
21. CONCLUDING REMARKS 481
BARRY RODGER, MIGUEL SOUSA FERRO, AND FRANCISCO MARCOS
INDEX 487
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author2 | Rodger, Barry J. Sousa Ferro, Miguel Marcos, Francisco |
| author2_role | edt edt edt |
| author2_variant | b j r bj bjr f m s fm fms f m fm |
| author_GND | (DE-588)171401174 (DE-588)1164025953 (DE-588)1175919217 |
| author_facet | Rodger, Barry J. Sousa Ferro, Miguel Marcos, Francisco |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV044952801 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1190677689 (DE-599)BVBBV044952801 |
| edition | First edition |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01251nam a2200313 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV044952801</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20190222 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180517s2018 xx |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780198812760</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-19-881276-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0198812760</subfield><subfield code="9">0-19-881276-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1190677689</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV044952801</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The EU Antitrust Damages Directive</subfield><subfield code="b">transportation in the member states</subfield><subfield code="c">edited by Barry Rodger, Miguel Sousa Ferro, Francisco Marcos</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">First edition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford</subfield><subfield code="b">Oxford University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">liii, 506 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rodger, Barry J.</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)171401174</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sousa Ferro, Miguel</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1164025953</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marcos, Francisco</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1175919217</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030345544&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030345544</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV044952801 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-20T18:15:08Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780198812760 0198812760 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030345544 |
| oclc_num | 1190677689 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-M382 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| owner_facet | DE-M382 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| physical | liii, 506 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Oxford University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spellingShingle | The EU Antitrust Damages Directive transportation in the member states |
| title | The EU Antitrust Damages Directive transportation in the member states |
| title_auth | The EU Antitrust Damages Directive transportation in the member states |
| title_exact_search | The EU Antitrust Damages Directive transportation in the member states |
| title_full | The EU Antitrust Damages Directive transportation in the member states edited by Barry Rodger, Miguel Sousa Ferro, Francisco Marcos |
| title_fullStr | The EU Antitrust Damages Directive transportation in the member states edited by Barry Rodger, Miguel Sousa Ferro, Francisco Marcos |
| title_full_unstemmed | The EU Antitrust Damages Directive transportation in the member states edited by Barry Rodger, Miguel Sousa Ferro, Francisco Marcos |
| title_short | The EU Antitrust Damages Directive |
| title_sort | the eu antitrust damages directive transportation in the member states |
| title_sub | transportation in the member states |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030345544&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rodgerbarryj theeuantitrustdamagesdirectivetransportationinthememberstates AT sousaferromiguel theeuantitrustdamagesdirectivetransportationinthememberstates AT marcosfrancisco theeuantitrustdamagesdirectivetransportationinthememberstates |