Ideology in the Supreme Court:
"Ideology in the Supreme Court is the first book to analyze the process by which the ideological stances of U.S. Supreme Court justices translate into the positions they take on the issues that the Court addresses. Eminent Supreme Court scholar Lawrence Baum argues that the links between ideolo...
Gespeichert in:
Beteilige Person: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Veröffentlicht: |
Princeton ; Oxford
Princeton University Press
[2017]
|
Schlagwörter: | |
Links: | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029723719&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
Zusammenfassung: | "Ideology in the Supreme Court is the first book to analyze the process by which the ideological stances of U.S. Supreme Court justices translate into the positions they take on the issues that the Court addresses. Eminent Supreme Court scholar Lawrence Baum argues that the links between ideology and issues are not simply a matter of reasoning logically from general premises. Rather, they reflect the development of shared understandings among political elites, including Supreme Court justices. And broad values about matters such as equality are not the only source of these understandings. Another potentially important source is the justices' attitudes about social or political groups, such as the business community and the Republican and Democratic parties. The book probes these sources by analyzing three issues on which the relative positions of liberal and conservative justices changed between 1910 and 2013: freedom of expression, criminal justice, and government "takings" of property. Analyzing the Court's decisions and other developments during that period, Baum finds that the values underlying liberalism and conservatism help to explain these changes, but that justices' attitudes toward social and political groups also played a powerful role. Providing a new perspective on how ideology functions in Supreme Court decision making, Ideology in the Supreme Court has important implications for how we think about the Court and its justices. "... |
Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references and index |
Umfang: | xviii, 261 Seiten Diagramme |
ISBN: | 9780691175522 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV044320234 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20181123 | ||
007 | t| | ||
008 | 170520s2017 xxu|||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
010 | |a 016055318 | ||
020 | |a 9780691175522 |9 978-0-691-17552-2 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)990777183 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV044320234 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a xxu |c US | ||
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 |a DE-188 | ||
050 | 0 | |a KF8748 | |
082 | 0 | |a 347.73/26 |2 23 | |
084 | |a MG 70820 |0 (DE-625)122860:12212 |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Baum, Lawrence |d 1948- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)132125420 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Ideology in the Supreme Court |c Lawrence Baum |
264 | 1 | |a Princeton ; Oxford |b Princeton University Press |c [2017] | |
300 | |a xviii, 261 Seiten |b Diagramme | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index | ||
520 | |a "Ideology in the Supreme Court is the first book to analyze the process by which the ideological stances of U.S. Supreme Court justices translate into the positions they take on the issues that the Court addresses. Eminent Supreme Court scholar Lawrence Baum argues that the links between ideology and issues are not simply a matter of reasoning logically from general premises. Rather, they reflect the development of shared understandings among political elites, including Supreme Court justices. And broad values about matters such as equality are not the only source of these understandings. Another potentially important source is the justices' attitudes about social or political groups, such as the business community and the Republican and Democratic parties. The book probes these sources by analyzing three issues on which the relative positions of liberal and conservative justices changed between 1910 and 2013: freedom of expression, criminal justice, and government "takings" of property. Analyzing the Court's decisions and other developments during that period, Baum finds that the values underlying liberalism and conservatism help to explain these changes, but that justices' attitudes toward social and political groups also played a powerful role. Providing a new perspective on how ideology functions in Supreme Court decision making, Ideology in the Supreme Court has important implications for how we think about the Court and its justices. "... | ||
610 | 2 | 4 | |a United States |b Supreme Court |
610 | 2 | 7 | |a USA |b Supreme Court |0 (DE-588)35650-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 1910-2013 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / Judicial Branch |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Ideologies / General |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / History & Theory |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 7 | |a LAW / Courts |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 4 | |a Courts of last resort |z United States | |
650 | 4 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / Judicial Branch | |
650 | 4 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Ideologies / General | |
650 | 4 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / History & Theory | |
650 | 4 | |a LAW / Courts | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Gerechtigkeit |0 (DE-588)4020310-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Enteignung |0 (DE-588)4014843-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Meinungsfreiheit |0 (DE-588)4038463-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Richter |0 (DE-588)4049923-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Weltanschauung |0 (DE-588)4065348-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 4 | |a USA | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |b Supreme Court |0 (DE-588)35650-5 |D b |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Richter |0 (DE-588)4049923-6 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Weltanschauung |0 (DE-588)4065348-1 |D s |
689 | 0 | 3 | |a Meinungsfreiheit |0 (DE-588)4038463-9 |D s |
689 | 0 | 4 | |a Gerechtigkeit |0 (DE-588)4020310-4 |D s |
689 | 0 | 5 | |a Enteignung |0 (DE-588)4014843-9 |D s |
689 | 0 | 6 | |a Geschichte 1910-2013 |A z |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m LoC Fremddatenuebernahme |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029723719&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 0905 |g 73 |
942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 0904 |g 73 |
942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 0905 |g 73 |
942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 0904 |g 73 |
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029723719 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1819277418731405312 |
---|---|
adam_text | IDEOLOGY IN THE SUPREME COURT
/ BAUM, LAWRENCEYYEAUTHOR
: 2017
TABLE OF CONTENTS / INHALTSVERZEICHNIS
IDEOLOGY, ISSUES, AND GROUP AFFECT
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION
CRIMINAL JUSTICE
TAKINGS
INQUIRIES INTO OTHER ISSUES
IMPLICATIONS OF THE STUDY
DIESES SCHRIFTSTUECK WURDE MASCHINELL ERZEUGT.
|
any_adam_object | 1 |
author | Baum, Lawrence 1948- |
author_GND | (DE-588)132125420 |
author_facet | Baum, Lawrence 1948- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Baum, Lawrence 1948- |
author_variant | l b lb |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV044320234 |
callnumber-first | K - Law |
callnumber-label | KF8748 |
callnumber-raw | KF8748 |
callnumber-search | KF8748 |
callnumber-sort | KF 48748 |
callnumber-subject | KF - United States |
classification_rvk | MG 70820 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)990777183 (DE-599)BVBBV044320234 |
dewey-full | 347.73/26 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
dewey-raw | 347.73/26 |
dewey-search | 347.73/26 |
dewey-sort | 3347.73 226 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft Politologie |
era | Geschichte 1910-2013 gnd |
era_facet | Geschichte 1910-2013 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04272nam a2200709 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV044320234</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20181123 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170520s2017 xxu|||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">016055318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780691175522</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-691-17552-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)990777183</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV044320234</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KF8748</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.73/26</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MG 70820</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)122860:12212</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Baum, Lawrence</subfield><subfield code="d">1948-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)132125420</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ideology in the Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="c">Lawrence Baum</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Princeton ; Oxford</subfield><subfield code="b">Princeton University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2017]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xviii, 261 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Diagramme</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Ideology in the Supreme Court is the first book to analyze the process by which the ideological stances of U.S. Supreme Court justices translate into the positions they take on the issues that the Court addresses. Eminent Supreme Court scholar Lawrence Baum argues that the links between ideology and issues are not simply a matter of reasoning logically from general premises. Rather, they reflect the development of shared understandings among political elites, including Supreme Court justices. And broad values about matters such as equality are not the only source of these understandings. Another potentially important source is the justices' attitudes about social or political groups, such as the business community and the Republican and Democratic parties. The book probes these sources by analyzing three issues on which the relative positions of liberal and conservative justices changed between 1910 and 2013: freedom of expression, criminal justice, and government "takings" of property. Analyzing the Court's decisions and other developments during that period, Baum finds that the values underlying liberalism and conservatism help to explain these changes, but that justices' attitudes toward social and political groups also played a powerful role. Providing a new perspective on how ideology functions in Supreme Court decision making, Ideology in the Supreme Court has important implications for how we think about the Court and its justices. "...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)35650-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1910-2013</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / Judicial Branch</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Ideologies / General</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE / History & Theory</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW / Courts</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Courts of last resort</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / Judicial Branch</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Ideologies / General</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE / History & Theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">LAW / Courts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gerechtigkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020310-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Enteignung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4014843-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Meinungsfreiheit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4038463-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Richter</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4049923-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Weltanschauung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4065348-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)35650-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Richter</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4049923-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Weltanschauung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4065348-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Meinungsfreiheit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4038463-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gerechtigkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020310-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Enteignung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4014843-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1910-2013</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">LoC Fremddatenuebernahme</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029723719&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0905</subfield><subfield code="g">73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0904</subfield><subfield code="g">73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0905</subfield><subfield code="g">73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0904</subfield><subfield code="g">73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029723719</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | USA |
geographic_facet | USA |
id | DE-604.BV044320234 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-12-20T17:59:47Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780691175522 |
language | English |
lccn | 016055318 |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029723719 |
oclc_num | 990777183 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-188 |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-188 |
physical | xviii, 261 Seiten Diagramme |
publishDate | 2017 |
publishDateSearch | 2017 |
publishDateSort | 2017 |
publisher | Princeton University Press |
record_format | marc |
spellingShingle | Baum, Lawrence 1948- Ideology in the Supreme Court United States Supreme Court USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 gnd POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / Judicial Branch bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Ideologies / General bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE / History & Theory bisacsh LAW / Courts bisacsh Courts of last resort United States POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / Judicial Branch POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Ideologies / General POLITICAL SCIENCE / History & Theory LAW / Courts Gerechtigkeit (DE-588)4020310-4 gnd Enteignung (DE-588)4014843-9 gnd Meinungsfreiheit (DE-588)4038463-9 gnd Richter (DE-588)4049923-6 gnd Weltanschauung (DE-588)4065348-1 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)35650-5 (DE-588)4020310-4 (DE-588)4014843-9 (DE-588)4038463-9 (DE-588)4049923-6 (DE-588)4065348-1 |
title | Ideology in the Supreme Court |
title_auth | Ideology in the Supreme Court |
title_exact_search | Ideology in the Supreme Court |
title_full | Ideology in the Supreme Court Lawrence Baum |
title_fullStr | Ideology in the Supreme Court Lawrence Baum |
title_full_unstemmed | Ideology in the Supreme Court Lawrence Baum |
title_short | Ideology in the Supreme Court |
title_sort | ideology in the supreme court |
topic | United States Supreme Court USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 gnd POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / Judicial Branch bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Ideologies / General bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE / History & Theory bisacsh LAW / Courts bisacsh Courts of last resort United States POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / Judicial Branch POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Ideologies / General POLITICAL SCIENCE / History & Theory LAW / Courts Gerechtigkeit (DE-588)4020310-4 gnd Enteignung (DE-588)4014843-9 gnd Meinungsfreiheit (DE-588)4038463-9 gnd Richter (DE-588)4049923-6 gnd Weltanschauung (DE-588)4065348-1 gnd |
topic_facet | United States Supreme Court USA Supreme Court POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / Judicial Branch POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Ideologies / General POLITICAL SCIENCE / History & Theory LAW / Courts Courts of last resort United States Gerechtigkeit Enteignung Meinungsfreiheit Richter Weltanschauung USA |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029723719&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baumlawrence ideologyinthesupremecourt |