Availability: Proportionality and judicial activism | Technische Universität München

Proportionality and judicial activism: fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa

"The principle of proportionality is currently one of the most discussed topics in the field of comparative constitutional law. Many critics claim that courts use the proportionality test as an instrument of judicial self-empowerment. Proportionality and Judicial Activism tests this hypothesis...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Petersen, Niels 1978- (Author)
Format:	Electronic eBook
Language:	English
Published:	Cambridge, United Kingdom Cambridge University Press 2017
Subjects:	Kanada > Supreme Court Südafrika > Constitutional Court Deutschland > Bundesverfassungsgericht Political questions and judicial power > Canada Political questions and judicial power > Germany Political questions and judicial power > South Africa Proportionality in law > Canada Proportionality in law > Germany Proportionality in law > South Africa Court of last resort > Canada Court of last resort > Germany Court of last resort > South Africa Handlungsspielraum Rechtsprechung Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz Rechtsvergleich Politik Abwägung Deutschland Kanada Südafrika (Staat) Hochschulschrift
Links:	https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316823330 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316823330 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316823330 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316823330
Summary:	"The principle of proportionality is currently one of the most discussed topics in the field of comparative constitutional law. Many critics claim that courts use the proportionality test as an instrument of judicial self-empowerment. Proportionality and Judicial Activism tests this hypothesis empirically; it systematically and comparatively analyses the fundamental rights jurisprudence of the Canadian Supreme Court, the German Federal Constitutional Court and the South African Constitutional Court. The book shows that the proportionality test does give judges a considerable amount of discretion. However, this analytical openness does not necessarily lead to judicial activism. Instead, judges are faced with significant institutional constraints, as a result of which all three examined courts refrain from using proportionality for purposes of judicial activism"...
Item Description:	Based on author's thesis (Habilitation - Universität, Bonn, 2012) issued under title: Verhältnismässigkeit als Rationaliätskontrolle : eine rechtsempirische Studie verfassungsrechtlicher Rechtsprechung zu den Freiheitsgrundrechten. - Includes bibliographical references and index
Physical Description:	1 Online-Ressource
ISBN:	9781316823330
DOI:	10.1017/9781316823330

Staff View

MARC


LEADER	00000nam a2200000 c 4500
001	BV044311679
003	DE-604
005	20200629
007	cr\|uuu---uuuuu
008	170516s2017 xxk o\|\|\|\| 00\|\|\| eng d
020			\|a 9781316823330 \|9 978-1-316-82333-0
024	7		\|a 10.1017/9781316823330 \|2 doi
035			\|a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781316823330
035			\|a (OCoLC)992546309
035			\|a (DE-599)BVBBV044311679
040			\|a DE-604 \|b ger \|e rda
041	0		\|a eng
044			\|a xxk \|c GB
049			\|a DE-29 \|a DE-12 \|a DE-473
050		0	\|a K3367
082	0		\|a 342.08/5 \|2 23
084			\|a PL 625 \|0 (DE-625)137089: \|2 rvk
084			\|a PL 734 \|0 (DE-625)137270: \|2 rvk
084			\|a PL 755 \|0 (DE-625)137279: \|2 rvk
100	1		\|a Petersen, Niels \|d 1978- \|e Verfasser \|0 (DE-588)141057254 \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Proportionality and judicial activism \|b fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa \|c Niels Petersen, University of Münster, Germany
264		1	\|a Cambridge, United Kingdom \|b Cambridge University Press \|c 2017
300			\|a 1 Online-Ressource
336			\|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a Based on author's thesis (Habilitation - Universität, Bonn, 2012) issued under title: Verhältnismässigkeit als Rationaliätskontrolle : eine rechtsempirische Studie verfassungsrechtlicher Rechtsprechung zu den Freiheitsgrundrechten. - Includes bibliographical references and index
520			\|a "The principle of proportionality is currently one of the most discussed topics in the field of comparative constitutional law. Many critics claim that courts use the proportionality test as an instrument of judicial self-empowerment. Proportionality and Judicial Activism tests this hypothesis empirically; it systematically and comparatively analyses the fundamental rights jurisprudence of the Canadian Supreme Court, the German Federal Constitutional Court and the South African Constitutional Court. The book shows that the proportionality test does give judges a considerable amount of discretion. However, this analytical openness does not necessarily lead to judicial activism. Instead, judges are faced with significant institutional constraints, as a result of which all three examined courts refrain from using proportionality for purposes of judicial activism"...
534			\|c 2015
610	2	7	\|a Kanada \|b Supreme Court \|0 (DE-588)14216-5 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
610	2	7	\|a Südafrika \|b Constitutional Court \|0 (DE-588)5190126-2 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
610	2	7	\|a Deutschland \|b Bundesverfassungsgericht \|0 (DE-588)2117905-0 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
650		4	\|a Political questions and judicial power \|z Canada
650		4	\|a Political questions and judicial power \|z Germany
650		4	\|a Political questions and judicial power \|z South Africa
650		4	\|a Proportionality in law \|z Canada
650		4	\|a Proportionality in law \|z Germany
650		4	\|a Proportionality in law \|z South Africa
650		4	\|a Court of last resort \|z Canada
650		4	\|a Court of last resort \|z Germany
650		4	\|a Court of last resort \|z South Africa
650	0	7	\|a Handlungsspielraum \|0 (DE-588)4127505-6 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
650	0	7	\|a Rechtsprechung \|0 (DE-588)4115710-2 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
650	0	7	\|a Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz \|0 (DE-588)4191765-0 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
650	0	7	\|a Rechtsvergleich \|0 (DE-588)4115712-6 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
650	0	7	\|a Politik \|0 (DE-588)4046514-7 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
650	0	7	\|a Abwägung \|0 (DE-588)4141183-3 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
651		4	\|a Deutschland
651		4	\|a Kanada
651		4	\|a Südafrika (Staat)
655		7	\|8 1\p \|0 (DE-588)4113937-9 \|a Hochschulschrift \|2 gnd-content
689	0	0	\|a Deutschland \|b Bundesverfassungsgericht \|0 (DE-588)2117905-0 \|D b
689	0	1	\|a Kanada \|b Supreme Court \|0 (DE-588)14216-5 \|D b
689	0	2	\|a Südafrika \|b Constitutional Court \|0 (DE-588)5190126-2 \|D b
689	0	3	\|a Rechtsprechung \|0 (DE-588)4115710-2 \|D s
689	0	4	\|a Politik \|0 (DE-588)4046514-7 \|D s
689	0	5	\|a Handlungsspielraum \|0 (DE-588)4127505-6 \|D s
689	0	6	\|a Abwägung \|0 (DE-588)4141183-3 \|D s
689	0	7	\|a Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz \|0 (DE-588)4191765-0 \|D s
689	0	8	\|a Rechtsvergleich \|0 (DE-588)4115712-6 \|D s
689	0		\|8 2\p \|5 DE-604
775	0	8	\|i Reproduktion von \|a Petersen, Niels \|t Verhältnismässigkeit als Rationalitätskontrolle \|d Tübingen : Mohr Siebeck, 2015
776	0	8	\|i Erscheint auch als \|n Druck-Ausgabe, hardback \|z 978-1-107-17798-7
776	0	8	\|i Erscheint auch als \|n Druck-Ausgabe, paperback \|z 978-1-316-63082-2
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316823330 \|x Verlag \|z URL des Erstveröffentlichers \|3 Volltext
912			\|a ZDB-20-CBO
883	1		\|8 1\p \|a cgwrk \|d 20201028 \|q DE-101 \|u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk
883	1		\|8 2\p \|a cgwrk \|d 20201028 \|q DE-101 \|u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk
943	1		\|a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029715328
966	e		\|u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316823330 \|l DE-12 \|p ZDB-20-CBO \|q BSB_PDA_CBO_Kauf \|x Verlag \|3 Volltext
966	e		\|u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316823330 \|l DE-473 \|p ZDB-20-CBO \|q UBG_PDA_CBO \|x Verlag \|3 Volltext
966	e		\|u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316823330 \|l DE-29 \|p ZDB-20-CBO \|q UER_PDA_CBO_Kauf \|x Verlag \|3 Volltext

Record in the Search Index

_version_	1818983214819049472
any_adam_object
author	Petersen, Niels 1978-
author_GND	(DE-588)141057254
author_facet	Petersen, Niels 1978-
author_role	aut
author_sort	Petersen, Niels 1978-
author_variant	n p np
building	Verbundindex
bvnumber	BV044311679
callnumber-first	K - Law
callnumber-label	K3367
callnumber-raw	K3367
callnumber-search	K3367
callnumber-sort	K 43367
callnumber-subject	K - General Law
classification_rvk	PL 625 PL 734 PL 755
collection	ZDB-20-CBO
ctrlnum	(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781316823330 (OCoLC)992546309 (DE-599)BVBBV044311679
dewey-full	342.08/5
dewey-hundreds	300 - Social sciences
dewey-ones	342 - Constitutional and administrative law
dewey-raw	342.08/5
dewey-search	342.08/5
dewey-sort	3342.08 15
dewey-tens	340 - Law
discipline	Rechtswissenschaft
doi_str_mv	10.1017/9781316823330
format	Electronic eBook
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05164nam a2200889 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV044311679</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20200629 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr\|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170516s2017 xxk o\|\|\|\| 00\|\|\| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781316823330</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-316-82333-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/9781316823330</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781316823330</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)992546309</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV044311679</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxk</subfield><subfield code="c">GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K3367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.08/5</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PL 625</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)137089:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PL 734</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)137270:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PL 755</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)137279:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Petersen, Niels</subfield><subfield code="d">1978-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)141057254</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Proportionality and judicial activism</subfield><subfield code="b">fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa</subfield><subfield code="c">Niels Petersen, University of Münster, Germany</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, United Kingdom</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Based on author's thesis (Habilitation - Universität, Bonn, 2012) issued under title: Verhältnismässigkeit als Rationaliätskontrolle : eine rechtsempirische Studie verfassungsrechtlicher Rechtsprechung zu den Freiheitsgrundrechten. - Includes bibliographical references and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"The principle of proportionality is currently one of the most discussed topics in the field of comparative constitutional law. Many critics claim that courts use the proportionality test as an instrument of judicial self-empowerment. Proportionality and Judicial Activism tests this hypothesis empirically; it systematically and comparatively analyses the fundamental rights jurisprudence of the Canadian Supreme Court, the German Federal Constitutional Court and the South African Constitutional Court. The book shows that the proportionality test does give judges a considerable amount of discretion. However, this analytical openness does not necessarily lead to judicial activism. Instead, judges are faced with significant institutional constraints, as a result of which all three examined courts refrain from using proportionality for purposes of judicial activism"...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="534" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kanada</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)14216-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Südafrika</subfield><subfield code="b">Constitutional Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5190126-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Deutschland</subfield><subfield code="b">Bundesverfassungsgericht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)2117905-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Political questions and judicial power</subfield><subfield code="z">Canada</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Political questions and judicial power</subfield><subfield code="z">Germany</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Political questions and judicial power</subfield><subfield code="z">South Africa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Proportionality in law</subfield><subfield code="z">Canada</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Proportionality in law</subfield><subfield code="z">Germany</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Proportionality in law</subfield><subfield code="z">South Africa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Court of last resort</subfield><subfield code="z">Canada</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Court of last resort</subfield><subfield code="z">Germany</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Court of last resort</subfield><subfield code="z">South Africa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Handlungsspielraum</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4127505-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsprechung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115710-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4191765-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Politik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046514-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Abwägung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4141183-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Deutschland</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Kanada</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Südafrika (Staat)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Deutschland</subfield><subfield code="b">Bundesverfassungsgericht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)2117905-0</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Kanada</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)14216-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Südafrika</subfield><subfield code="b">Constitutional Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5190126-2</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Rechtsprechung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115710-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046514-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Handlungsspielraum</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4127505-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Abwägung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4141183-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4191765-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="775" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Reproduktion von</subfield><subfield code="a">Petersen, Niels</subfield><subfield code="t">Verhältnismässigkeit als Rationalitätskontrolle</subfield><subfield code="d">Tübingen : Mohr Siebeck, 2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, hardback</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-107-17798-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, paperback</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-316-63082-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316823330</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029715328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316823330</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO_Kauf</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316823330</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316823330</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UER_PDA_CBO_Kauf</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
genre	1\p (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content
genre_facet	Hochschulschrift
geographic	Deutschland Kanada Südafrika (Staat)
geographic_facet	Deutschland Kanada Südafrika (Staat)
id	DE-604.BV044311679
illustrated	Not Illustrated
indexdate	2024-12-20T17:59:33Z
institution	BVB
isbn	9781316823330
language	English
oai_aleph_id	oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029715328
oclc_num	992546309
open_access_boolean
owner	DE-29 DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG
owner_facet	DE-29 DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG
physical	1 Online-Ressource
psigel	ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO_Kauf ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UER_PDA_CBO_Kauf
publishDate	2017
publishDateSearch	2017
publishDateSort	2017
publisher	Cambridge University Press
record_format	marc
spelling	Petersen, Niels 1978- Verfasser (DE-588)141057254 aut Proportionality and judicial activism fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa Niels Petersen, University of Münster, Germany Cambridge, United Kingdom Cambridge University Press 2017 1 Online-Ressource txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Based on author's thesis (Habilitation - Universität, Bonn, 2012) issued under title: Verhältnismässigkeit als Rationaliätskontrolle : eine rechtsempirische Studie verfassungsrechtlicher Rechtsprechung zu den Freiheitsgrundrechten. - Includes bibliographical references and index "The principle of proportionality is currently one of the most discussed topics in the field of comparative constitutional law. Many critics claim that courts use the proportionality test as an instrument of judicial self-empowerment. Proportionality and Judicial Activism tests this hypothesis empirically; it systematically and comparatively analyses the fundamental rights jurisprudence of the Canadian Supreme Court, the German Federal Constitutional Court and the South African Constitutional Court. The book shows that the proportionality test does give judges a considerable amount of discretion. However, this analytical openness does not necessarily lead to judicial activism. Instead, judges are faced with significant institutional constraints, as a result of which all three examined courts refrain from using proportionality for purposes of judicial activism"... 2015 Kanada Supreme Court (DE-588)14216-5 gnd rswk-swf Südafrika Constitutional Court (DE-588)5190126-2 gnd rswk-swf Deutschland Bundesverfassungsgericht (DE-588)2117905-0 gnd rswk-swf Political questions and judicial power Canada Political questions and judicial power Germany Political questions and judicial power South Africa Proportionality in law Canada Proportionality in law Germany Proportionality in law South Africa Court of last resort Canada Court of last resort Germany Court of last resort South Africa Handlungsspielraum (DE-588)4127505-6 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 gnd rswk-swf Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz (DE-588)4191765-0 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd rswk-swf Politik (DE-588)4046514-7 gnd rswk-swf Abwägung (DE-588)4141183-3 gnd rswk-swf Deutschland Kanada Südafrika (Staat) 1\p (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Deutschland Bundesverfassungsgericht (DE-588)2117905-0 b Kanada Supreme Court (DE-588)14216-5 b Südafrika Constitutional Court (DE-588)5190126-2 b Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 s Politik (DE-588)4046514-7 s Handlungsspielraum (DE-588)4127505-6 s Abwägung (DE-588)4141183-3 s Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz (DE-588)4191765-0 s Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 s 2\p DE-604 Reproduktion von Petersen, Niels Verhältnismässigkeit als Rationalitätskontrolle Tübingen : Mohr Siebeck, 2015 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, hardback 978-1-107-17798-7 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, paperback 978-1-316-63082-2 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316823330 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 2\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk
spellingShingle	Petersen, Niels 1978- Proportionality and judicial activism fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa Kanada Supreme Court (DE-588)14216-5 gnd Südafrika Constitutional Court (DE-588)5190126-2 gnd Deutschland Bundesverfassungsgericht (DE-588)2117905-0 gnd Political questions and judicial power Canada Political questions and judicial power Germany Political questions and judicial power South Africa Proportionality in law Canada Proportionality in law Germany Proportionality in law South Africa Court of last resort Canada Court of last resort Germany Court of last resort South Africa Handlungsspielraum (DE-588)4127505-6 gnd Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 gnd Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz (DE-588)4191765-0 gnd Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd Politik (DE-588)4046514-7 gnd Abwägung (DE-588)4141183-3 gnd
subject_GND	(DE-588)14216-5 (DE-588)5190126-2 (DE-588)2117905-0 (DE-588)4127505-6 (DE-588)4115710-2 (DE-588)4191765-0 (DE-588)4115712-6 (DE-588)4046514-7 (DE-588)4141183-3 (DE-588)4113937-9
title	Proportionality and judicial activism fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa
title_auth	Proportionality and judicial activism fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa
title_exact_search	Proportionality and judicial activism fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa
title_full	Proportionality and judicial activism fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa Niels Petersen, University of Münster, Germany
title_fullStr	Proportionality and judicial activism fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa Niels Petersen, University of Münster, Germany
title_full_unstemmed	Proportionality and judicial activism fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa Niels Petersen, University of Münster, Germany
title_short	Proportionality and judicial activism
title_sort	proportionality and judicial activism fundamental rights adjudication in canada germany and south africa
title_sub	fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa
topic	Kanada Supreme Court (DE-588)14216-5 gnd Südafrika Constitutional Court (DE-588)5190126-2 gnd Deutschland Bundesverfassungsgericht (DE-588)2117905-0 gnd Political questions and judicial power Canada Political questions and judicial power Germany Political questions and judicial power South Africa Proportionality in law Canada Proportionality in law Germany Proportionality in law South Africa Court of last resort Canada Court of last resort Germany Court of last resort South Africa Handlungsspielraum (DE-588)4127505-6 gnd Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 gnd Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz (DE-588)4191765-0 gnd Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd Politik (DE-588)4046514-7 gnd Abwägung (DE-588)4141183-3 gnd
topic_facet	Kanada Supreme Court Südafrika Constitutional Court Deutschland Bundesverfassungsgericht Political questions and judicial power Canada Political questions and judicial power Germany Political questions and judicial power South Africa Proportionality in law Canada Proportionality in law Germany Proportionality in law South Africa Court of last resort Canada Court of last resort Germany Court of last resort South Africa Handlungsspielraum Rechtsprechung Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz Rechtsvergleich Politik Abwägung Deutschland Kanada Südafrika (Staat) Hochschulschrift
url	https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316823330
work_keys_str_mv	AT petersenniels proportionalityandjudicialactivismfundamentalrightsadjudicationincanadagermanyandsouthafrica

Availability

‌

Order via interlibrary loan Read online (BSB)

MARC

Record in the Search Index

‌

Library Card of Bavarian State Library (BSB) necessary.