Gespeichert in:
| Beteilige Person: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Beograd
Pravoslavni bogoslovski fakultet, Institut za teološka istraživanja
2015
|
| Schlagwörter: | |
| Links: | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029363942&sequence=000004&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029363942&sequence=000005&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029363942&sequence=000006&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| Beschreibung: | Englische Zusammenfassung: Serbian orthodox church in the legislation of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes and the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. - Literaturverzeichnis Seite 293-299 |
| Umfang: | 307 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9788674051702 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043955170 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20170316 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 161212s2015 xx |||| 00||| srp d | ||
| 020 | |a 9788674051702 |9 978-86-7405-170-2 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)976435342 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043955170 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a srp | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-Re13 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |6 880-01 |a Novaković, Dragan |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |6 880-02 |a Srpska pravoslavna crkva u zakonodavstvu Kraljevine Srba, Hrvata i Slovenaca i Kraljevine Jugoslavije |c Dragan Novaković |
| 246 | 1 | 3 | |a Serbian orthodox church in the legislation of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes and the Kingdom of Yugoslavia |
| 264 | 1 | |6 880-03 |a Beograd |b Pravoslavni bogoslovski fakultet, Institut za teološka istraživanja |c 2015 | |
| 300 | |a 307 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Englische Zusammenfassung: Serbian orthodox church in the legislation of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes and the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. - Literaturverzeichnis Seite 293-299 | ||
| 546 | |a Text serbisch | ||
| 546 | |b Kyrillische Schrift | ||
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Serbisch-orthodoxe Kirche |0 (DE-588)80861-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 1918-1941 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Staatskirchenrecht |0 (DE-588)4056656-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Gesetzgebung |0 (DE-588)4020682-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Jugoslawien |0 (DE-588)4028966-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Jugoslawien |0 (DE-588)4028966-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Gesetzgebung |0 (DE-588)4020682-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Staatskirchenrecht |0 (DE-588)4056656-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Serbisch-orthodoxe Kirche |0 (DE-588)80861-1 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Geschichte 1918-1941 |A z |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029363942&sequence=000004&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029363942&sequence=000005&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Abstract |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029363942&sequence=000006&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 880 | 1 | |6 100-01/(N |a Новаковић, Драган |a ut | |
| 880 | 1 | 0 | |6 245-02/(N |a Српска православна црква у законодавству Краљевине Срба, Хрвата и Словенаца и Краљевине Југославије |c Драган Новаковић |
| 880 | 1 | |6 264-03/(N |a Београд |b Православни богословски факултет, Институт за теолошка истраживања |c 2015 | |
| 940 | 1 | |f sla | |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 200.9 |e 22/bsb |f 09042 |g 496 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 09043 |g 496 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 200.9 |e 22/bsb |f 09043 |g 496 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 200.9 |e 22/bsb |f 09041 |g 496 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 09042 |g 496 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 09041 |g 496 |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029363942 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1819268621028818944 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Caqpwaj
YBOJ ............................................................. 9
1. PEIÜABAHÆ BEPCKOr ÜMTAEbA TOKOM
nPBor CBETCKor pata..................................................i7
2. yCTABHO-nPABHM nOJIO KAJ D.PKABA
M BEPCKHX 3AJEflHMIJA Y HOBOJ flP KABI4 .............................., 25
2.1. OcHMBäH e MwHMCTapCTBa Bepa..................................................25
2.2. YcTaBHa pernera .................................................28
2.3. BepCKo 3aKOHOAaBCTBO .........................................-..32
2.3.1. 3aKOH o PlcnaMCKoj BepcKoj 3ajeAHnqM M3 1930. roflMHe.........36
2.3.2.3aKOH o McnaMCKoj BepcKoj 3ajeAHMu;ii M3 1936. roAMHe ........38
2.3.3. 3aKOH o eBaHrenuHKO-xpMiuhaHCKMM u,pKBaMa m o pe j)opMOBaHoj
xpmnhaHCKoj ApKBM Kpan eBMHe JyroaiaBiije.....................40
2.3.4.3aKOH o BepcKoj 3ajeflHJmn JeBpeja y Kpan eBWHM JyrocTiaBMjM ..42
2.3.5. 3ajeAHMHKe OApeAÖe.................................. ...45
2.3.5.1. flp KaBHa noMofr vl BepcKPi npnpe3..........................45
2.3.5.2. OjiaKiumje ..............................................47
2.3.5.3. Bepcxe niKone ............................................47
2.3.5.4. BepCKa HacraBa ..........................................48
2.4. PMMOKaTOTIMHKa qpKBa ............................................51
3. yjEflMFbEEbE CPnCKE nPABOCJIABHE IJPKBE
M yCnOCTAB/bAlBE nATPMJAPIIMJE .......................................65
4. M3EOP nPBOr riATPMJAPXA...............................................73
4.1. lIocTynaK M35opa naTpwjapxa......................................73
4.2. CTaBOBM KaHOHMHapa ..............................................81
5. ycnOCTABJbAEbE OPrAHM3ALJMOHOr JEßMHCTBA
CPnCKE nPABOCTIABHE UPKBE .............;..............................85
5.1. ype^Öa o qeHTpaTO3aqMjn ynpaBHe m cyACKe B7iacTM
y CpncKoj naTpujapiiiwjH ..........................................85
5.2. ypeAÖa o Cbctom apxnjepejcKOM ca6opy m Cbctom apxwjepejcKOM
cMHOAyCim .........................................................91
5.3. npaBHHHMK o noTiaraity Ap *aBHor wcnMTa 3a napoxMjcKo CBeniTeHCTBO
Ha TepMTopnjH npeí)aiiiH e KpajteBMHe LJpHe Tope, a Ha Koje ce npnMeH yje
3aKOH O HMHOBHWqMMa .........................................97
6
Caapjkaj
6.3AKOH O CPnCKOJ nPABOCTIABHOJ LÇPKBH ................................101
6.1. floHomeifce 3aKOHa..............................................101
6.2. OcHOBHe o^peflöe 3aKOHa....................................... 105
6.3. OraBOBM xaHOHMnapa..............................................109
7. M3BOP HOBOr ÜATPMJAPXA..............................................111
8. YCTAB CPnCKE nPABOCHABHE U.PKBE.....................................115
8.1. floHomeifee YcTaßa..............................................115
8.2. OcHOBHe OApeßöe............................................... 122
8.2.1. OpraHH3aiínja BnacTw, Tena u opraHa CpncKe npaßocnaBHe L(pKBe .126
8.2.2. UpKBeHe KpHBMije h Ka3He ....................................146
8.2.3. UfpKBeHa npocseTa ......................................... 147
8.2.4. UpKBeHa MMOBMHa..............................................148
8.2.5. CnpoBeflöeHa HapeAÖa 3a YcTaB CpncKe IIpaBOC/iaBHe UpKBe.......152
8.3. OraBOBM KaHOHMnapa ........................................... 157
9. HIKOJICKM CMCTEM CPÜCKE IIPABOCJ1ABHE LfPKBE .........................159
9.1. BorocnoBMje.....................................................159
9.1.1. IIpaBMTIHHK O CpnCKMM IipaBOCTiaBHMM SorOCTIOBMjaMa ...........162
9.1.2. HIkobckm 33KOH 3a yneHMKe cpncKMx npaBocnaBHMX ÖorocnoBMja.....178
9.1.3. HacraBHM nnaH 3a cpncKe npasocnaBHe öorocnoBMje................181
9.1.4. IlpaBMTia o nonaratty CTpynHor ÓorocnoBCKor McnMTa ............182
9.1.5. MHTepHaTCKa npasMna 3a cprrcxe npaßocnaBHe öorocnoBMje.........186
9.1.6. npaBHJia o eKCKyp3wjaMa yneHKica ÖorocnoBMja.................189
9.1.7. ripaBMTia (|)OHAa yneHMica ÖorocnoBMja ......................190
9.1.8. npaBMjiHMK o nonaraiby npo j)ecopcKor McnMTa 3a npo |)ecope
npaBOcnaBHMX ÖorocnoBMja m Beponayice y cpe^H MM imconaivia
y KpaJbeBHHM JyrocnaBHjn..................................... 192
9.2. BoroaioBCKM J aKynTex..........................................194
9.2.1. OpraHM3au;woHO eKcnepwMeHTMcaH e - Ype^öa M3 1921. roAHHe......195
9.2.2. OpraHH3ai*MOHa KOHConMAaijMja - Ype^öa M3 1923. roAHHe.........199
9.2.3. OpraHM3aijMOHO ycaBpmaBan e - YpeßSa m3 1935. roflMHe .........204
9.3. Bepcxa HacTaßa................................................ 208
9.3.1. Bepcxa HacraBa oa BMAOBAaHCxor ycTaßa ao npoMeHa
M3BpuieHMX jaHyapa 1929. roAMHe................................209
9.3.2. YpeI)eH e Bepcxe HacTaße AOHomeH eM OAroBapajyhMX 3axoHa ....212
10. MATEPMJAJIHM nO/IO KAJ CBELL[TEHOC7iy}KI4TEJbA.....................217
10.1. MaTepMjanHM nonoxcaj m HacTojarbe Aa ce ypeAW 3axoHOM............217
10.2. ypeAÖa o AOAaijMMa Ha cxynohy cseniTeHCTBy cbmx Yctebom
ycBojeHMX KOH })ecMja...........................................223
10.3. YpeA6a o HarpaAaMa Koje npnnaAajy napoxMjcxoM CBeiuTeHCTBy
npaBocnaBHe u¡pKBe 3a H3BpmeH e CBetiiTeHopaAH e................227
Caæpîkaj
7
10.4. YpeflÓa o npesoÇeH y oiy^KÔeHiiKa npaBocnaBHe BepcKe ynpase y
ayTOHOMHy (caMoynpaBHy) c^y^cÔy CpncKe ÜpaBOCJiaBHe IJ,pKBe .......232
10.5. Aktm HaA7ie KHiix i^pKBeHMx opraHa #oHerax y doia^y ca
3aKOHOM o CpncKoj npaBOCTiaBHoj ijpKBM m YcTaBOM CIIL3, ...........233
10.5.1. Ypeflóa o napoxMjcKOM CBeuiTeHCTBy CpncKe FLpaBocjiaBHe IJpKBe
Jí IberOBMM aKTMBHHM M neH3njcKMM npMHa^7ie KHOCTiiMa ..........234
10.5.2. Ype^öa o ijpKBeHO-jepapxMjcKMM cnyxcÓeHMijMMa CpncKe npaBocnaBHe
UpKBe m HjMxobmm npwHaflneíKHOCTMMa ............................241
10.5.3. ypeftôa o ycTaHOB7teH y noncoícaja w c7iy KÓeHMX o^Hoca ^MHOBHiiKa
m ocTanpix c;iy K5eHMKa 3a cno^Hy i^pKBeHy ynpasy h o bmxobmm
npMHaffne)KHOCTMMa .............................................244
10.5.4. Ype^Óa o neH3njaMa cny^cóeHiiKa CpncKe npaBOcnaBHe UpKBe ......247
10.5.5. OcTane ypeflóe .............................................. 249
10.6. ype^óa o CTaztHoj ^pxcaBHoj noMofrw CpncKoj ITpaBocjiaBHoj UpKBM.254
11. BPAHHI4 nPABMTIHMK CPnCKE IIPABOC7IABHE UPKBE.........................257
11.1. IJ,pKBeHM cyaoBW 3a ÓpaHHe cnopose ..............................257
11.2. EpaHHM npaBPi/EHMK CpncKe ÍIpaBOcnasHe UpKBe m3 1933. roflWHe....264
11.2.1. HacTanaK, CMeTH e, 3aópaHe m CK7iarraH»e Ópaxa ...............265
11.2.2. npasa m ftyacHOCTM ópaHHMx flpyroBa...........................270
11.2.3. ripecTaHaK öpaxa .............................................271
11.2.4. MeuioBWTPí öpaK ..............................................275
11.2.5. Pa3pemeRbe Ópaxa cKTioriTBeHor BaH npaBocnaBHe ijpKBe.........275
3AK7BYHAK ................................................................277
SUMMERY .............................................................. 285
7U4TEPATYPA ..............................................................293
3AKOHOflABHM J43BOPM .....................................................301
nO^AUM O AYTOPY
309
Dragan Novakovic
SERBIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH IN THE LEGISLATION
OF THE KINGDOM OF SERBS, CROATS AND
SLOVENES AND THE KINGDOM OF YUGOSLAVIA
SUMMARY
Solving complex religious issues during the First World War was directly
connected with the agreement of the South Slavic peoples on the establis-
hment of a common state. Opting for the survival of the Austro-Hunga-
rian Empire, Vatican openly opposed renewal of Serbian statehood and
rejected any possibility of creating a common state that would include
nations characterized by having irreconcilable cultural, religious and other
differences. Using the tolerance of the Serbian leadership and their willing-
ness to accept the abolition of the state status of their own church and the
principle of religious equality, the Yugoslav Committee was deliberately
promoting the interests of the people of the Roman Catholic faith.
The political elite that led the Kingdom of SCS, well estimated that
the overall political stability of the new state and strengthening the forces
which supported its survival depended on the proper defining of the posi-
tion of churches and religious communities. The need for timely response
to possible challenges from religious sphere, directly contributed to the
establishment of the Ministry of Religious Affairs by the Kings decree,
seven days after the formal establishment of the state. Later established
authority was characterized by interference in canonical order, the effort
to establish state control over churches and religious communities and sig-
nificant inconsistencies arisen from the absence of the Constitution as the
highest law.
Starting from the premise that the Corfu Declaration made significant
concessions and that the established religious policy could lead to dissatis-
faction of the Orthodox population, the Serbian leadership and the King,
in cooperation with the church authorities started a process of unifica-
tion of the Serbian Orthodox Church. The fulfilment of this plan involved
overcoming many obstacles the most important of which were obtaining
canonical release of the Ecumenical Patriarchate for the Metropolises from
the territories of the Kingdom and lessening the dissatisfaction of certain
provincial churches unwilling to give up the autonomous rights acquired
286
Dragan NovakoviC
through history in favour of central authorities. Carefully resolving all
disputable issues and taking into account the observance of canonical
norms, the Serbian Patriarchate, previously abolished by the Turks, was
restored.
The election of the first Patriarch of the united Serbian Orthodox
Church and establishment of the Patriarchate were marked by certain
misunderstandings and a clear attitude of the state authorities that they
were the dominant party whose standpoints and decisions must be respec-
ted. Not accepting the independent choice of the Patriarch by the Holy
Assembly of Bishops, a decree was issued, which included civilians from
all spheres of social life in the Electoral Council, thus enabling multiple
control and direct influence on the choice of supreme head. Taking into
account the balance of power and motivated by a desire to complete the
planned organization and constitution of all the bodies and institutions,
the Holy Assembly of Bishops accepted the proposed solutions. Striving to
support the Church, the Electoral Council confirmed the candidate earlier
elected by the Holy Synod of Bishops and thus prevented possible misun-
derstandings and discontinuance of harmony between state and church
authorities established during the complex negotiations on the renewal
of the Churchs unity. The election of the Patriarch enabled further stren-
gthening and stabilization of the agreements reached with the Ecumenical
Patriarchate, through bilateral contacts with the local Orthodox churches
and on the basis of canonical order.
Estimating that the Church was not powerful enough to timely esta-
blish its central institutions and thus in a canonical way eliminate the pre-
viously established differences between local churches, state authorities
centralized administrative and judicial power in the Patriarchate through
two decrees and determined the membership and jurisdiction of the Holy
Assembly of Bishops and the Synod. The effectiveness of state institutions
resulted from the implied constitutional provisions, according to which
the recognized religions, on the basis of previously adopted and issued
documents, were guaranteed equality. Using the cooperation of the episco-
pate, the state was gradually establishing control over different segments of
church life. State control mechanisms were often on the verge of violation
of the canonical order, but this assessment should be considered in light
of the fact that the Church successfully overcame difficulties, established
the organization and formed bodies able to lead it as an entity and take
responsibility for carrying out the mission and operation under new con-
ditions.
Determining the constitutional provisions was significantly more
complex, so the issue of the role of religion was carefully considered in the
Summary
287
context of previous agreements, assessment of the real situation and efforts
to follow contemporary European achievements in that sphere. Starting
from the position of the Orthodox Church carefully evolved througho-
ut 19th century, Serbian political leadership could not accept the comple-
te separation of the Church and the state. Defining the status of adopted
and recognized religions and entrusting them a part of state jurisdiction,
the Kingdom of SCS opted for compromise and middle ground solution
acceptable to all parties, in the belief that it would mitigate possible pro-
tests and encourage the leadership of churches and religious communities
to accept the newly formed country and contribute to its unity. Because of
the obvious weaknesses and expressed dissatisfaction with constitutional
provisions, the initiatives for adoption of the basic state law on the position
of religious confessions were launched, but the resistance from political
and religious spheres constitute was an insurmountable obstacle for the
preparation of the text and its subsequent presentation to the Parliament.
The coup that occurred established a new political reality marked by
promoting the concept of the state and national unity. Evident influence of
religious communities on different social strata affected the determination
of the dominant political forces to engage their potential in the realiza-
tion of the new policy. Formulation and adoption of religious law began,
owing to which the churches and religious communities, using their new
position, succeeded to significantly eliminate the influence of the state and
ensure independence in resolving all issues directly related to the conser-
vation and respect of the internal order. The general concept of law does
not entitle any party to declare itself the winner, as the regime achieved
control of confessions in an appropriate manner and eliminated the unaut-
horized concept of a state church, while retaining the position of churches
and religious communities as public institutions of special importance.
The position of the Roman Catholic Church was not being determi-
ned by the law, because complex concordat talks, burdened by many pro-
blems, were already in progress. Through this act the Holy See intended
to improve the poor relations of the Roman Catholic community with
the new state, and to provide it further international protection, while the
Kingdom recognized in the concordat the opportunity to improve rela-
tions with a powerful factor and, by ensuring the loyalty of the Catho-
lic population, consolidate its internal stability. Constantly yielding to the
Holy See and allowing the solutions which placed the Roman Catholic
Church above constitutional principles and provided it a more favourable
position compared to other churches and religious communities, the text
of the concordat was signed, which did not become effective because of
288
Dragan Novakovk!
the organized resistance led by the Serbian Orthodox Church with their
bishops, clergy and believers.
Unification of the Church as a first-rate historical and national goal
together with constitutional solutions did not did not constitute a suffi-
cient guarantee to the part of the Episcopate unprepared for separation
from the state determined to ensure equal treatment to all constitutionally
acknowledged confessions. Wishing to further guarantee the extension
of the legal continuity with the solutions of the Kingdoms of Serbia and
Montenegro, the Episcopate raised the issue of a special law on the Serbian
Orthodox Church. Its draft versions provoked many theoretical discussi-
ons about the possibility of adoption of such an act in the context of the
constitutional provisions on the position of religious confessions and thus
made a difficult exam to political decision-makers unwilling to change the
established relations and make exceptions that would have to be applied at
the request of the management of other churches and religious communi-
ties. The adopted law represented a sort of compromise between the ruling
establishment and the Episcopate as it largely guaranteed freedom to the
Serbian Orthodox Church in implementing the canonical order, but it also
provided significant mechanisms for state control of all financial affairs of
the church. Legal solutions provided the continuity with the state church
law carefully developed throughout the 19th century in the Kingdom of
SCS and preserving the tradition of close ties between the people and the
Church, who have worked together to resolve issues of general interest for
centuries.
During the ten years of work on the adoption of the Constitution of
the Serbian Orthodox Church, it was necessary to overcome and resolve
numerous complex problems that had internal church character or came
from the political sphere. Among the most dominant were different theo-
retical and canonical viewpoints regarding the body responsible to prepa-
re the text of the Constitution and the authority with full legitimacy for its
adoption. There was also the dissatisfaction of believers unwilling to give
up their rights to directly elect representatives of the self-governing church
bodies and accept increasingly striking efforts to transfer of all church affa-
irs to the Episcopate. Another kind of problems was directly related to
the current political events whose main driver was the refusal of the Ser-
bian ruling elite to accept the Constitution which would grant a greater
autonomy to the Church and eliminate state control mechanisms. After a
lengthy discussion, the compromise text was adopted, which enabled the
consolidation of the Church’s unity, the establishment of the planned orga-
nization and taking over the responsibilities of all bodies and institutions
Summary
289
envisaged by the Constitution, but also a significant influence of the state
on some important segments of church life.
Taking over a number of Seminaries from the territories now belon-
ging to the Kingdom, the civil and church authorities were faced with
numerous challenges, because these schools were operating under diffe-
rent legal orders, in countries hostile towards the Orthodox Church. It was
necessary to harmonize curricula, duration of the studies, qualifications
of teaching staff, funding modalities and other issues of particular impor-
tance for this type of specific educational institutions. Using the rights
arisen from the decision that such institutions should be state-funded, all
the necessary legislation was adopted, in which the state and church lea-
dership incorporated the vision and expectations of what these schools
should be and in what direction they should develop. Shortly afterwards,
the experiences shown that the regulations were enacted for some sort of
ideal Seminary and that their strict application would lead to the closu-
re of some schools of special importance for national and state interests.
Timely noticing these problems and showing a high degree of flexibility,
the state and the Church were changing and adapting these regulations in
accordance with the real life in the field, which led to harmonization of the
teaching process, continuous improvement of teaching staff and gradua-
tion of young priests well prepared for their service.
The unification of the provincial churches and restoration of the Patri-
archate woke creative energy and encouraged optimism that quickly resol-
ved all complex affairs connected with the establishment of the Faculty of
Theology, which would educate highly trained staff. The proclaimed religi-
ous policy allowed the equal status of the Faculty and its operation within
the University. Regulations adopted by the beginning of the Second World
War helped overcoming organizational and personnel problems and con-
solidation of the teaching process. Preoccupied with solving practical pro-
blems during the first decade of its existence, the Faculty was not actively
involved in complex processes, stemming from operating in the new state
and indecision and clergy to respond readily to the demands of their time.
Using the previously gained experience, problems were identified timely
and it was noticed that powerful new ideologies, one of which proclai-
med the idea of a classless society and utopian equality of all people, while
the other one advocated the thesis on the existence of superman and the
destruction of entire nations, had the task of changing the world accor-
ding to their forms and that their struggle for dominance would have far-
reaching consequences. Newly consolidated Faculty of Theology readily
answered the challenge by gathering the intelligence which, by means of
290
Dragan NovakoviC
newspapers, magazines, public lectures and well-attended debates, openly
came forward with the attitude of the need for revitalization of the cultu-
re based on Christianity and people capable to take responsibility arising
from the fact that they were made in Gods image. Continuously warning
and exposing the brutality of bare ideological systems, the Faculty made
a significant contribution to suppressing the process of “atheism drama”
which came like a wave flowing from the enlightened and dehumanized
West.
The issue of religious education in the Kingdom was being resolved
gradually, so there are two distinguishable periods during which the atti-
tude of the competent state authorities towards this important issue was
inconsistent. Adopted international obligations concerning the protection
of minority ethnic and religious groups and the limitations imposed by
the Vidovdan Constitution, through the provision on optional nature of
the subject matter, influenced the educational authorities cautious appro-
ach in solving this problem, with a clear intention that all issues be regu-
lated by the state without further consultation with the competent church
authorities and religious communities. The attitudes agreed upon by the
recognized religious confessions and ongoing protests by the Holy Synod
of the Serbian Orthodox Church gave partial results, so that religious edu-
cation was being gradually introduced to all schools, but with retained
jurisdiction of the Ministry of Education to propose and adopt curricula
and approve textbooks. Changes that occurred in January 1929 led to sub-
stantial differences in the way of resolving this issue, because the support
of churches and religious communities for implementing the planned poli-
cies could not be obtained without a new approach to religious education.
All the requirements made by the recognized religious confessions were
adopted through legislative regulations, so religious education became a
mandatory and fully equal subject in all public and private schools, with
the right granted to the competent church authorities to propose curricu-
lum, approve textbooks and perform regular inspection of schools.
Bearing in minds the large number of war casualties and credit for
solving the national issues, the Episcopate and clergy unanimously came
forward with a request for solving the financial status of clergy by adopting
an appropriate law. A number of drafts were submitted, but their adop-
tion did not occur because the ruling political forces had decided it was
necessary to respect the previously reaches agreements and constitutional
provisions on equality of all recognized and approved religious confessi-
ons. Taking into account the difficult financial position of the clergy of all
churches and religious communities and maintaining an attitude that the
Summary
291
adopted standards apply to all, a regulation on the high cost supplements
was adopted, which provided basic social security to all the priests and
religious officials. Having accurately determined the awards for performed
religious service, the state sent a clear message through the new regulation
that it did not intend to give up control of the Serbian Orthodox Church
and that its priests could not count on a special financial status.
Because of the state position and the established jurisdiction of the
Orthodox Church over marriage, church courts for resolving marital dis-
putes were being established with great care during the 19th century. Using
its right and consulting the competent church authorities, the state adop-
ted laws which regulated those complex and sensitive issues of particular
importance for the proper functioning of the family. The legislator made
considerable efforts to harmonize theological norms of marriage as a sac-
red secret and requirements of modern times that all the circumstances
from which an objective and fact-based judgment would stem should be
carefully examined before the divorce. Starting from the premise that any
decision in that field could produce devastating consequences, different
mechanisms of mediation between spouses and protection of children and
the injured party were provided, as well as a two-level process. Systema-
tically built-in “slow pace of justice” clearly showed that the Church was
hardly accepting divorce and that it firmly advocated the position that a
final decision could be reached only after the exhaustion of all means of
preservation of a marriage. Constitution of the Serbian Orthodox Church
passed in the Kingdom entrusted marital disputes to diocesan courts and
High Ecclesiastical Court, and subsequently adopted Marital Bylaw codi-
fied this matter and determined its importance for marriages that took
place under the auspices of the church bodies.
JIMTEPATYPA
Becega Tbéïoee Ceemocmu upunuKOM üetïKe umuponu3aufujeJ „DiacHWK
Cnnw,6poj 17,14.9.1924.
Bje/iajaq, BpaHKO, O ucmopunnocmu uanux üpomecmanmcKUX sepCKUx
3ajeguuu,a y CpSuju, TeKCT y 3ÔopHHKy „Yßap Ha Bepcxe c/ioSo^e“, A/i(})a w
OMera, Beorpa#, 2001.
BornheBwh, BojiicnaB, Mcîüopuja pa36UüiKa ochoôhux uiKona y Bochu u
XepHeïoeuHU og 1463-1918, CapajeBO, 1965.
Boija, Crecj)aH, enncxon Aa/iMaTHHCKM, Cpücxa üpxea y ffanMaiifUju u
Boku KoiüopcKoj „CpncKa npaBOC/iaBHa ijpKBa 1219-1969, cnoMeHwija o
750-roflMHiH MmM ayTOKe(|)a7iHOCTMw, H3AaH e CßeTor apxnjepejcKor CHHOAa
Cim, BeorpaA, 1969.
BeceTiMHOBMh, PajKo, McTopwja CpncKe npaBOC/iaBHe upicBe ca HapoA-
HOM MCTopwjoM, Kitura II (1766-1945), BeorpaA 1966.
BecenwHOBPih, PajKo, Tlpeïneg uciüopuje Kapnoeanxe Muîüpoüonuje og
1695. go 1919. ïogune, „CpncKa npasocnaBHa ijpKBa 1219-1969, cnoMemma
o 750-roAMniH,HU¡M ayTOKe^ajiHOCTw“, M3Aaite CßeTor apxwjepejcKor CMHo^a
CnU, BeorpaA 1969.
BeceAMHOBHh, PajKo, Tlpeïneg uciüopuje u^pKee y Cîüapoj CpSuju u Maxe-
gonuju og 1766. go 1919. ïogune, „Cpncxa npaBocnaBHa ijpKBa 1219-1969,
cnoMeHMij¡a o 750-roAMiiiH nijM ayTOKe^a/mocTii“, M3AaH e CßeTor apxnjepej-
CKor CHHOfla Cim, BeorpaA, 1969.
BecejiMHOBnft, PajKo, CpücKa üpaôocnaena u,pxea y Bocnu u Xepu,eï06u-
HUy „CpncKa npaBocnaBHa ijpKBa 1219-1969, cnoMeHwn;a o 750-roAwiHH H-
IayTOKe(J)aAHOCTMa, M3AaH e CßeTor apxwjepejcKor cMHOAa CDU,* BeorpaA,
1969.
BecenMHOBMh, Pajxo, yjeguwetbe üoKpajuncKux upxa a u eacüocmaejba-
we CpüCKe Tlaüipujaptuuje, „Cpncxa npaBoaiaBHa i^pxsa 1920-1970, cnoMe-
HHija o 50-roflMmH Mu,M BacnoeraBJbaH a Cpncxe flaTpujapmnje“, M3Aan e
Cßexor apxwjepejcKor cMHOfla CUU,, BeorpaA, 1971.
BecnuK Cpücxe u,pK6e, jyn, 1924.
ByKMheBwh, Mmtichko, Tîpuno3u 3a uctüopujy upxee IJpeoï ycîüanxa,
„BecHMK Cpncxe L(pKBeu, 1896/1-2.
rapAameBwh, B;iaroTa, Opïanu3aufuono yctüpojcülßo u 3aKonoga6ciÜ60
üpaeocnaene upxee u3Mel)y gea ceeïücxa pama, „Cpricxa npaBOcnaBHa u,pKBa
1920-1970, cnoMeHMu;a o 50-roAMmKbpmH BacnocraB7baH a Cpncxe naTpnjap-
innje“, n3AaH e CßeTor apxnjepejcKor CMHOßa cnU[, BeorpaA, 1971.
PnacnuK Cpücxe üpaeocnaene Tlaîüpujapiuuje, Ôpoj 7,1920.
294
JImtepatypa
TnacHUK Cpücice üpaeocnaßHe Flaüipujapmuje, 5poj 12,1920.
rnacHUK CpücKe üpaeocnaßHe Flaüipujapmuje, öpoj 4,1922.
TnacnuK Cpüace üpaeocnaßHe Flaüipujapmuje, öpoj 8,1926.
TnacHUK Cpüace üpaeocnaßHe Flaüipujapmuje, öpoj 11,1926.
TnacnuK Cpüace üpaeocnaßHe Ylampujapumje, öpoj 11,1929.
FnacHUK Cpüace üpaeocnaßHe Flaüipujapmuje, Öpoj 1,1930.
Foeop geicam Oaxynmema üpome Cm. M. ffuMumpujeeufta, üocne üpußu-
ea Ce. gyxa, üpunwcoM omüoHUwawa üpegaeawa na Oaxynmemy 20. get^eu-
Spa 1920. îogune, „Becmnc Cpncice ijpicBe“ jaHyap- | eÔpyap 1921.
Ipyjwh, Pa#ocjiaB, Boïocnoeujey HapoßHa eHnnK7ioneAwja Kitnra 1, oa A
AO 3,3arpeô.
Ipyjjih, Pa^oc/iaB, Fîpaeocnaena Cpüaca upncea, „Ka/iemih“ KparyjeBay,
1995.
rpyna ayTopa, ¿JpymmeeHO-üonumumcu üononcaj u üpaonu pencuu eep-
cKux ßajegnm^a y Jyïocnaeujuy MHCTïiTyT 3a caBpeMeHy ncTOpiijy, BeorpaA,
1972.
flpauiKOBMh, HeflOMMp, IFpxeene mtcone Cpüace üampujapmuje, „Cpncica
npaBocnaBHa ijpKBa 1920-1970, CnoMeHnija o 50-roAMUnbnijn: BacnocTaBjta-
H»a CpncKe naTpnjapiimje“, H3Aait e CßeTor apxnjepejcKor cMHO^a CIIL(, Eeo-
rpa#, 1971.
flpauiKOBMh, HeAOMMp. Hempgeceüi loguna Boïocnoeacoï cßaicynüiema
y Beoïpagy, „EorooiOBJBe“, maçonne EorocTioBCKor (JiaKyjiTeTa, CBecica 1 m2,
1961.
flypKOBMh-JaKmwh, JbyôoMwp, PaeeumaK oemenoï t^pneemï 3ükohu y
Ulyuaguju y üpeoj üonoeunu XIX eeicay „Kanemih“, KparyjeBaij, 2004/1.
flypKOBMh-JaKiimh, TbyôoMwp, Ygeo u,eüiuwace Muiüpoüonuje y SopSu
3a ycüocmaemawe pegoenoï cmawa y Cpüacoj üpaeocnaenoj îtpKeuy „Cpncica
npaBocjiaBHa ijpKBa 1219-1969, cnoMetnma o 750-roAmiiH MijM ayTOKe(J aji-
hocth“, M3Aaii.e CßeTor apxnjepejcKor cnHOAa CIIL(, BeorpaA, 1969.
ffyxoeue micone u üpoceeiüa Cpüace üpaeocnaßHe upnceey 1922-1923. ïogu-
HUj „BecHMK Cpncice ijpKBe“ MapT-anpnji, 1923, cenTeMÖap-oKToÖap, 1923.
Öypnh MmiinHa, Be^Ko, Bapnaea üaiüpujapx cpüacu, BeorpaA, 2009.
)KnBojiiHOBMÎi, flparaH, Ceema Cmonuu,a u cmeapan e jylocnoeencKe
gpneaee 1914-1918, „IIotihtiihkm kmbot Jyroc/iaBwje 1914-1945“, 3ÖopHHK
pajosa, Tpehn nporpaM Pa^no Beorpa^a, BeorpaA, 1974.
Vbmhy rtpeflpar, Bamwcan u cnoM Jyïocnaeuje y flpyïou ceemacoM pavüyy
BeorpaA, 1995.
M3ßetutüaj o pagy Boïocnoeujey Flpmpeuy 3a wKonacy 1922-23. togunyy
flyxoBHe niKo/ie m npocBeTa Cpncxe npaBOC/iaBHe ijpicBe y 1922-1923. roAw-
hh, „BecHHK CpncKe i^pKBe“, cenTeMÖap-OKtoöap, 1923.
JlUTEPATyPA
295
M36emmaj o pagy Ceevuot apxujepejacoï caSopa, „DiacHMK yjeAHH eHe
CpncKe npaßocnaBHe ijpKBe” 1920/3.
MMaMOBuh, MycTacJ)a, Oütutüe KapaKïüepucmuKe ejepacoï 3aKonogae-
cmea luecïüoj any apoce gwcmamype, „DiacHHK BpxoBHor wcnaMCKor CTapje-
niMHCTBa“, CapajeBO, 1991/2.
Plenum u myenumauu y BuX, CrapjeiiiMHCTBo M3 3a BmX, XpßaTCKy m
CnoBeHüjy, CapajeBO, 1977.
JaHKOBMñ, flparoenaß, JyïocnoeencKO üumawe u Kp(ßaca geicnapai^uja
1917. ïogune, Beorpafl, 1967.
JaHKOBPih, flparoaiaB, HuiUKa gexnapat^uja (naewajawe üpoïpaMa jyïo-
cnoeencKoï yjeguwenya y CpSuju 1914. ïogime), „McTopptja XX BeKa“, 3ÖopHMK
X, Beorpafl, 1969.
JepeMPih, JoBaH, Hajnoeuju nau,püi 3aKona o C/7I|, „BecHMK Cpncxe
E(pKBe“, HOBeMÖap-fteqeMÖap, 1927.
JepeMuh, JoBaH, Tlpegnoï 3aKona o Cpüacoj üpaeocnaenoj u,pKôu u weioea
epegnoem, CpeMCKm KapjioBijM, 1925.
KauiPih, flyniaH, Oceptü na ucmopujy u 3Hanaj Beoïpagace Soïocnoeuje,
„DiacHHK CpncKe npaßocjiaBHe ijpKBe“ 1961/6.
Kaiimh, flyniaH, Tloïneg y üpotunocüi Cpüace upKee, Beorpa^, 1984.
KoBaneBMh, Bo KHflap, CpücKu üampujapcu y üoenegwux üegeceiü toguna,
„CpncKa npaB0C7iaBHa ijpKBa 1920-1970, cnoMemiija o 50-ro#PimH mjpi Bac-
nocTaß^aita CpncKe IlaTpMjapiimje“, M3AaH e CßeTor apxiijepejcKor CMHO^a
dm, Eeorpaß, 1971.
KoBaneBiih, floöpocaß, Ymecuociü mepmenoï u3jegHaHaeawa üpaeoenae-
Hux Soïocnoeuja y Kpameeunu Cp5ay Xpeama u Cno6enau,a, „BecHMK Cpncice
ijpKBe“, MapT, 1923.
KocthB, UaBuhy ßenoeawe eepCKUx 3ajegHuu,a y jyïocnoôencKoj gpxcaeu y
üepuogy 1918-1945, 3ÔopHMK pa^OBa „Peflwrwja m caBpeMemi cbct“, Eeorpap;,
1987.
Kyniej, Pa^o, Bjepaca aweema y Beoïpagy u wenn saKibym^u, JByô;i aHa,
1922.
JIa3nh, MßaH. npaenu u HuwenuHuu üonoxcaj ejepaeux 3ajegnuu,a y Jyïo-
enaeuju, 30opHMK „BjepcKe 3ajeßHmje y JyrocnaBMjpi“, BnH03a, 3arpe5,1970.
TlyKwfr, B, Munucmapcmeo eepa, „BecHHK CpncKe u;pKBe“, Beorpa#, 1922.
JByÔMÔpaTwh, Caso, Hat^püi yetüaea u camoyüpaeno ypetjewe Cpüace
üpaeoenaene u,pKße, CapajeBO, 1925.
MeMoapu üaïüpujapxa Cpücxoï Taepuna, Beorpafl, 1990.
MwpKOBMh, MwpKO, BepCKu 6ug jyïocnoeencKoï üuïuaH a y moKy IJpôoï
ceeïüCKOïpama, „McTopwja XX BeKa“, 3ÓopHHK X, Beorpa#, 1972.
296
JIhtepatypa
MnpKOBnh, MnpKo, BepcKo üuïüawe y 5opSu sa ctüeapawe jyïocnoeencKe
gpwaee, „rio/inTHHKn khbot JyroaiaBnje 1914-1945“, 3ÔopHMK pa^OBa, Tpe-
frn nporpaM Pa^no Beorpafla, Beorpa,D¡, 1974.
MHTpOBMh, He^oMn/b, Tlpeu cpüCKU süKOH o gyxoenuM enacïüuMa, Beo-
rpafl, 1909.
MnmoBnh, Mn/iorn, CpücKa üpicea u KonKopgaiüaca Kpma, Beorpa^,
1983.
My^cwh, 1/lBaH, KamonuHKa üpicea y Kpajbeeunu Jyïocnaeuju, Ciuiht,
1978.
HoBaKOBMh, flparaH, Bepcxo 3aKonogaectüeo Kpajbeeune Jyïocnaeuje,
„35opHMK üpaBHor c|)aKynTeTa CBeyMHTininTa y Pnjeqn“, BonyMeH 33,2.2012.
HoBaKOBnh, flparaH, ¿Jonovuewe u ocnoena petuewa 3axona o CpücKoj
üpaeocnaenoj u,pKeu y Kpameeunu Jyïocnaeuju U3 1929. ïogune, „Tokobh hcto-
pnje“ Beorpa#, 2011/1.
HoBaKOBMh, flparaH, JJouoiuewe üpeoï yciüaea CpücKe üpaeocnaene
üpicee 1931. ïogune, ,,35opHMK MaTMije cpncice 3a ApyniTBeHe HayKe“, No. 146,
2014/1.
HoBaKOBMÎi, flparaH, Matüepujannu üonoMaj eüuacoüaïüa u ceeuiweu-
cvüea CpücKe üpaeocnaene upxee og 1804. go 1914. ïogune, „TeMe“, Maçonne 3a
ÆpyiiiTBeHe HayKe YHMBep3HTeTa y Hnrny, 2010/2.
HoBaKOBMh, flparaH, Og Haneprnanuja o gyxoenuM enacïüuMa go 3aKona
o upKeaMa u eepcicuM 3ajegnuu,aMa -170 ïoguna 3aKonogaecïüea o üpaeocnae-
uoj üpxeu y CpSujUy „Cpnoca Teojiornja y ^Ba^eceTOM BeKy - ncTpa KHBaHKM
npoô/ieMM n pe3yjrraTn“, 3ÔopHHK pa^OBa, Boroc/iOBCKn J)aKy;iTeT Beorpa^¡,
KH nra 14, Eeorpafl, 2013.
HoBaKOBnh, flparaH, TionoMaj McnaMoce eepexe sajegnui^e y Bocnu u
Xepüeïoeunu 3a epeMe aycïüpoyïapace yüpaee, „Tokobm ncTopnje“, Beorpa^,
2002/3-4.
HoBaKOBnh, flparaH, ïlonowaj Cpücice üpaeocnaene üpxeeyBocnu u Xep-
üeïoeunu 3a epeMe Aycïüpoyïapace OKyüau,ujey „McTopnjcKH 3anncn“, Ho^ro-
pnija, 2006/1-4.
HoBaKOBnh, flparaH, JlocïüyüaK mSopa üpeoï üaïüpujapxa üoene yje-
guwewa Cpüace üpaeocnaene upxee u ycüocïüaenjawa JJaïüpujapmuje 1920.
ïogune, ,,L[pKBeHe cryflnje“, LJeHTap 3a i^pKBeHe CTyflnje, Hmui, Spoj 11,2014.
HoBaKOBnh, flparaH, Petuaeawe uamepujannoï üononcaja ceemïüenu-
Ka Cpüace üpaeocnaene üpicee y Kpajbeeunu CXC/jyïocnaeuju go yceajawa
üpKeenoï yciüaea 1931. ïoguney „McTopnja 20. BeKa“, Beorpa^, No. 2,2013.
HoBaKOBMh, flparaH, Yjeguwewe Cpüace üpaeocnaene üpicee u ycüocïüa-
ejbawe [Jaïüpujapuiuje 1920. ïogune, „ÉpaTCTBo“, Maçonne flpyniTBa Cbctm
CaBa, Beorpa#, 5poj XV, 2011.
JlUTEPATypA
297
HoBaKOBMh, flparaH, ycüocmae/bawe opIanu3au,uoHot jeguncmea CpucKe
üpaeocnaene upK.ee 1920. xoguue, „noTuiTHHKa peBMja“, VoL 37, Beorpa#, No.
3, 2013.
HoBaKOBwh, flparaH, Ycmaeno u zükohcko petynucawe eepcKe nacmaee
y Kpan eeunu CXC-Jyiocnaeuju, „Ileflaromja“, nacoiiMC (PopyMa neflarora
Cp6nje m IJpHe Tope, Beorpa#, 2006/1.
Ocnoenu gpncaeuu 3cikoh o Kompecujaua, „BecHMK CpncKe ijpicBe“ opraH
CBeniTeHMMKor y^py^ceíta, jaHyap- J)e5pyap 1923,2.
naHTMh, flparaH, CpücKa üpaeocnaena utpKea y KpameeuHU Jytocnaeuju
1929-1941, Mctohho CapajeBO, 2006.
ÜepMÜ, flwMino, 3aKOHogaecüí6o Cpücice üpaeocnaene üpKee og cmea-
pawa Jylocnaeuje go noeujet epeuena - üpunol üpoynaeawy ognoca u,pKee u
gpncaee, TopoHTo, 1995.
riepwh, flMMiuo, LjpKeeno üpaeo, Beorpa#, 1999.
IleTpoBMñ, ByKaniMH - IleTpoBMti, HwKOJia, Fpatja 3a ucmopujy Kpa-
Tbe une CpBuje, epeue üpee enage Kne3a Munotua OSpenoeuha, Kwuta gpyía,
1821-1823y Beorpa/j, 1884.
IleTpoBPíñ, flyrnaH, yjeguteewe Cpüace üpKee u oónoea Flaüipujaptuu-
jey „CpncKa npaBocnaBHa ijpicBa 1219-1969, cnoMeHMija o 750-roAHKiH imM
ayTOKeíJjanHocTPi“, M3AaH e CBeTor apxwjepejcKor cHHOfta CIILI,, Beorpap,,
1969.
FIucmo Ceemoí apxujepejcKol cunoga u üatüpujapxa ffuMuiüpuja muhu-
ciüpy, „BecHMK CpncKe ijpKBe“ aBrycT, 1922.
npolpaM u üpocnaea yciüonunewa Fhetoee Ceeiüociüu Flampujapxa
fluMuiüpuja Kao apxueüucKoüa u üampujapxa üehKOt, „DiacHMK Clin“, 8poj
15,1.8.1924.
ny30BMñ, FípeApar, Botocnoeuja Ceeiüoi Joeaua Botocnoea y Buiüon yy
„CpncKa npaBocjiaBHa ijpKBa, npnno3M 3a Mcropnjy 2a, Beorpa#, 2000.
Ily30BMh, npe^par, Boiocnoecxe utKone Cpücice üpaeocnaene üpKee üpe
omeaparea Boiocnoecnoi $yaKynmevüa, „EpaTCTBo“, nacormc (H,pyuiTBa Cbctm
CaBa, IX, Beorpa#, 2005.
Ily30BMh, Ilpe^par, BolocnoecKU (fiaKynmeiü CFJLj (1920-1977), „IIpujio-
3m 3a MCTOpMjy CpncKe npaBOCTiaBHe u,pKBea, Hmiii, 1997.
ny30Bnh, npe^par, npuno3u 3a ucmopujy CIILj, Hhue, 1997.
Ily30BMh, llpeflpar, CapajeecKO-PeibeecKa Botocnoeuja, „npn;i03Pi 3a
MCTopujy CpncKe npaBoaiaBHe qpicBe“, Hmiii, 1997.
ny30Biih, Ilpep,par, CpücKa üpaeocnaena upxea, ,,npM7i03w 3a MCTopMjy“
2, Beorpaji;, 2000.
Paflwh, PaAMMTia, Bepou üpomue sepe, J4HMC, Beorpap;, 1995.
298
JlMTEPATyPA
CaBa, enwcKon myMaflMjcKM, Cpüacu jepapcu og geeemol go geagecemoi
6eKay KparyjeBaij, 1996.
CaHflo, flparoMMp, ffeeciüa toguna üpaeocnaene UypKeene üpoceeiüe y
üapíüuUyUüaUyUju nau^uonannox ncueoiüa u paga y cpüacoM uapogy, 36opHMK
paflOBa, „flBa Bexa oSpa30BaH a y Cp6njna, PlHCTmyT 3a neflaromica MCTpa-
KMBaH a, Beorpafl, 2005.
C/mjenqeBMh, T}oko, Mcvüopuja cpüace üpaeocnaene upKeey flpyra KH Mra,
MMHxeH 1966.
CMajnoBMh, AxMefl, MycnuManu y Jylocnaeujuy „DiacHMK BpxoBHor
wcnaMCKor CTapjeuiMHCTBa“, CapajeBo, 1978/6.
CTe(J)aHOBMh, JoBaH, Ognocu muetjy upxee u gpncaee, 3arpe5,1953.
GrpaH,aKOBííh, flparooiaB, Buotpafiuje Tlampujapaxa oSnoe/bene CpüCKe
üampujaptuujey „r/iacHMK CpncKe npaBOC/iaBHe ijpKBe“, Beorpafl, 1960/4.
CrpaitaKOBHh, flparocnaB, Yjeguwewe Cpüace üpaeocnaene upK.ee u
oSnoea UePiKe IIaiüpujaptuujey „DiacHMK, c;iyxc6eHM nuctm CnU[“ 1962/4.
CiüpyHna KOMueuja Munuciüapciüea eepa 3a petuewe gpncaeno-Konifiecu-
onannux üpoSneua, „BecHMK Cpncxe ijpKBe - opraH CBeuiTeHHHKor yflpyace-
H a“ jaHyap, 1922.
TpoMu¡KM, CeprMje, Bepcxa üonumuKa Kpan a yjegunuiüe7bay „JleTormc
MaTMij^e cpncKe“, KH nra 343, CBecica 1,1935.
TpoMi^KM, CeprMje, Hoeo 3aKonogaecmeo o Cpücxoj i^pKeu u n éioeu
KOuenmamopuy Beorpafl, 1932.
YHKOBMh, Bmtommp, BjepcKe 3ajegnuu,e y yejeiüUMa nacmanKa u pa3eo~
ja noee Jylocnaeuje, HeoSjaBJbeHa flOKTopaca Te3a 0fl5paH eHa Ha IIpaBHOM
4 aKy;rreTy y Beorpafly, 1986.
YhkobmJx, Bmtommp, JJpncaea u u,pKea y Jyíocnaeuju, 36opHMK paflOBa
„PenMrnja m caBpeMeHM cbct“, 1987.
Xpa5ax, BoryMMnyCiUaH)e y Bapgapcxoj MaKegonuju y jecen u3UMy 1918.
logune, „HcTopMjcKM r/iacHHK“, 1966/5.
XpumhancKU ncueoüiy 1922/5.
Xponuxa - M.3 Cpücxe u,pKee, „BecHMK CpncKe ijpKBe“, jyH-jyn, 1922.
IJepaHMÍi, IdBaH, Kontfiecuonanne 3ajegnuu,e y Jyiocnaeuju, 36opHMK
„Bjepcxe 3ajeflHMije y JyrooiaBMjH“, BMH03a, 3arpe5,1970.
LjeiüuwcKa Soiocnoeuja 1992-2002, CnoMeHMLja o fleceToroflMiiiH MiíM
oSHOBTbeHor pafla Eoroc/ioBMje CBeior IleTpa L{eTMH CKor, UeTMH e, 2002.
L[Mcap K, BpaHKo, LjpKeeno üpaeo I, (onuiTM fleo m opraHH3aijMja iípicse),
Beorpafl, 1970.
LjpKeeno 3aKonogaecíüeo CpüCKe üpaeocnaene u,pKeey cBecxa 77, KH Mra
npBa. Pl3flaBaHKa KH M)KapHMija íeije KoHa, Beorpafl, 1926.
JIhtepatypa
299
LipKeeno saKonogaeciueo CpucKe upaeocnaene t^pKee, KH wra Apyra.
I43AaBaHKa KH M^capHMu;a Ieije KoHa, BeorpaA, 1931.
UipKeeno saKonogaeciueo CpucKe upaeocnaene upK e, KH Mra Tpeha.
Pl3AaBaHKa laBJOKapHHija reu;e Kcma, BeorpaA, 1933.
niBaSiih, FlaBne, Meneiuuje Tlaenoenh, Muiupouonuui SeotpagcKu (1831-
1833), „DiacHHK npaBOCTiaBHe ijpKBe y Kpan eBMHM CpB^jw“ BeorpaA, CBecKa
3a jaHyap m (J)e5pyap, MapT m anpwn, jyH m jy/i. 1904.
IlIeTa, OepxaT, BjepcKo-upoc6jeiune upunwce MycnuMana upeg JJpyiu
cejeiucKU paiu, „rnacHHK BpxoBHor woiaMCKor CTapjeiuMHCTBa“, CapajeBO,
1991/4.
Hlexwh, HycpeT, AyutoHounu uoKpeiu MycnuMana 3a epujeue Ayciupoy-
lapcKe yupaee y Bocuu u Xepu,eIo6UHU, CapajeBo, 1980.
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Novaković, Dragan |
| author_facet | Novaković, Dragan |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Novaković, Dragan |
| author_variant | d n dn |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043955170 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)976435342 (DE-599)BVBBV043955170 |
| era | Geschichte 1918-1941 gnd |
| era_facet | Geschichte 1918-1941 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03518nam a2200613 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043955170</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20170316 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161212s2015 xx |||| 00||| srp d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9788674051702</subfield><subfield code="9">978-86-7405-170-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)976435342</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043955170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Re13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="6">880-01</subfield><subfield code="a">Novaković, Dragan</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="6">880-02</subfield><subfield code="a">Srpska pravoslavna crkva u zakonodavstvu Kraljevine Srba, Hrvata i Slovenaca i Kraljevine Jugoslavije</subfield><subfield code="c">Dragan Novaković</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Serbian orthodox church in the legislation of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes and the Kingdom of Yugoslavia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="6">880-03</subfield><subfield code="a">Beograd</subfield><subfield code="b">Pravoslavni bogoslovski fakultet, Institut za teološka istraživanja</subfield><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">307 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Englische Zusammenfassung: Serbian orthodox church in the legislation of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes and the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. - Literaturverzeichnis Seite 293-299</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text serbisch</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Kyrillische Schrift</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Serbisch-orthodoxe Kirche</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)80861-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1918-1941</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Staatskirchenrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4056656-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gesetzgebung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020682-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Jugoslawien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4028966-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Jugoslawien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4028966-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Gesetzgebung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020682-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Staatskirchenrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4056656-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Serbisch-orthodoxe Kirche</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)80861-1</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1918-1941</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029363942&sequence=000004&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029363942&sequence=000005&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029363942&sequence=000006&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="880" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="6">100-01/(N</subfield><subfield code="a">Новаковић, Драган</subfield><subfield code="a">ut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="880" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="6">245-02/(N</subfield><subfield code="a">Српска православна црква у законодавству Краљевине Срба, Хрвата и Словенаца и Краљевине Југославије</subfield><subfield code="c">Драган Новаковић</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="880" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="6">264-03/(N</subfield><subfield code="a">Београд</subfield><subfield code="b">Православни богословски факултет, Институт за теолошка истраживања</subfield><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="f">sla</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">200.9</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09042</subfield><subfield code="g">496</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09043</subfield><subfield code="g">496</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">200.9</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09043</subfield><subfield code="g">496</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">200.9</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09041</subfield><subfield code="g">496</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09042</subfield><subfield code="g">496</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09041</subfield><subfield code="g">496</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029363942</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Jugoslawien (DE-588)4028966-7 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Jugoslawien |
| id | DE-604.BV043955170 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-20T17:49:41Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9788674051702 |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029363942 |
| oclc_num | 976435342 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR |
| physical | 307 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publishDateSearch | 2015 |
| publishDateSort | 2015 |
| publisher | Pravoslavni bogoslovski fakultet, Institut za teološka istraživanja |
| record_format | marc |
| spellingShingle | Novaković, Dragan Srpska pravoslavna crkva u zakonodavstvu Kraljevine Srba, Hrvata i Slovenaca i Kraljevine Jugoslavije Serbisch-orthodoxe Kirche (DE-588)80861-1 gnd Staatskirchenrecht (DE-588)4056656-0 gnd Gesetzgebung (DE-588)4020682-8 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)80861-1 (DE-588)4056656-0 (DE-588)4020682-8 (DE-588)4028966-7 |
| title | Srpska pravoslavna crkva u zakonodavstvu Kraljevine Srba, Hrvata i Slovenaca i Kraljevine Jugoslavije |
| title_alt | Serbian orthodox church in the legislation of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes and the Kingdom of Yugoslavia |
| title_auth | Srpska pravoslavna crkva u zakonodavstvu Kraljevine Srba, Hrvata i Slovenaca i Kraljevine Jugoslavije |
| title_exact_search | Srpska pravoslavna crkva u zakonodavstvu Kraljevine Srba, Hrvata i Slovenaca i Kraljevine Jugoslavije |
| title_full | Srpska pravoslavna crkva u zakonodavstvu Kraljevine Srba, Hrvata i Slovenaca i Kraljevine Jugoslavije Dragan Novaković |
| title_fullStr | Srpska pravoslavna crkva u zakonodavstvu Kraljevine Srba, Hrvata i Slovenaca i Kraljevine Jugoslavije Dragan Novaković |
| title_full_unstemmed | Srpska pravoslavna crkva u zakonodavstvu Kraljevine Srba, Hrvata i Slovenaca i Kraljevine Jugoslavije Dragan Novaković |
| title_short | Srpska pravoslavna crkva u zakonodavstvu Kraljevine Srba, Hrvata i Slovenaca i Kraljevine Jugoslavije |
| title_sort | srpska pravoslavna crkva u zakonodavstvu kraljevine srba hrvata i slovenaca i kraljevine jugoslavije |
| topic | Serbisch-orthodoxe Kirche (DE-588)80861-1 gnd Staatskirchenrecht (DE-588)4056656-0 gnd Gesetzgebung (DE-588)4020682-8 gnd |
| topic_facet | Serbisch-orthodoxe Kirche Staatskirchenrecht Gesetzgebung Jugoslawien |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029363942&sequence=000004&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029363942&sequence=000005&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029363942&sequence=000006&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT novakovicdragan srpskapravoslavnacrkvauzakonodavstvukraljevinesrbahrvataislovenacaikraljevinejugoslavije AT novakovicdragan serbianorthodoxchurchinthelegislationofthekingdomofserbscroatsandslovenesandthekingdomofyugoslavia |