Scientific controversies: case studies in the resolution and closure of disputes in science and technology
This collection of essays examines the ways in which disputes and controversies about the application of scientific knowledge are resolved. Four concrete examples of public controversy are considered in detail: the efficacy of Laetrile, the classification of homosexuality as a disease, the setting o...
Gespeichert in:
| Weitere beteiligte Personen: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
1987
|
| Schlagwörter: | |
| Links: | https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628719 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628719 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628719 |
| Zusammenfassung: | This collection of essays examines the ways in which disputes and controversies about the application of scientific knowledge are resolved. Four concrete examples of public controversy are considered in detail: the efficacy of Laetrile, the classification of homosexuality as a disease, the setting of safety standards in the workplace, and the utility of nuclear energy as a source of power. The essays in this volume show that debates about these cases are not confined to matters of empirical fact. Rather, as is seen with most scientific and technical controversies, they focus on and are structured by complex ethical, economic, and political interests. Drs. Engelhardt and Caplan have brought together a distinguished group of scholars from the sciences and humanities, who sketch a theory of scientific controversy and attempt to provide recommendations about the ways in which both scientists and the public ought to seek more informed resolutions of highly contentious issues in science and technology. Scientific Controversies is offered as a contribution to the better understanding of the roles of both science and nonscientific interests in disputes and controversies pertaining to science and technology |
| Beschreibung: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) |
| Umfang: | 1 online resource (x, 639 pages) |
| ISBN: | 9780511628719 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/CBO9780511628719 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043926764 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20170720 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 161202s1987 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780511628719 |c Online |9 978-0-511-62871-9 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/CBO9780511628719 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511628719 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)967416686 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043926764 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 303.4/83 |2 19eng | |
| 084 | |a CC 3200 |0 (DE-625)17614: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a CC 6100 |0 (DE-625)17653: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a MS 6950 |0 (DE-625)123772: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a TB 6400 |0 (DE-625)143788: |2 rvk | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Scientific controversies |b case studies in the resolution and closure of disputes in science and technology |c edited by H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr., and Arthur L. Caplan |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 1987 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (x, 639 pages) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) | ||
| 505 | 8 | 0 | |t Patterns of controversy and closure : the interplay of knowledge, values, and political forces |r H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr., and Arthur L. Caplan |t Theoretical perspectives. Ethical theory and the problem of closure |r Tom L. Beauchamp |t Scientific controversy and its termination |r Ernan McMullin |t The political anatomy of controversy in the sciences |r Everett Mendelsohn |t Controversies involving science and technology : a theoretical perspective |r Ronald N. Giere |t Politics, public policy-making, and the process of reaching closure |r Robert F. Rich |t The role of experts in scientific controversy |r Garland E. Allen |t The continental drift debate |r Henry Frankel |t How history and politics affect closure in biomedical discussions : the example of the Soviet Union |r Loren R. Graham |t Scientific disputes over policy |r Allan Mazur |t Controversies and the authority of science |r Dorothy Nelkin |t Post-Skinner and post-Freud : philosophical causes of scientific disagreements |r Alasdair MacIntyre |t Contemporary case studies. Laetrile. Resolution of the Laetrile controversy : past attempts and future prospects |r Gerald E. Markle and James C. Petersen |t Federal regulation of Laetrile |r Robert S.K. Young |t Quasi libertarianism and the Laetrile controversy |r Baruch A. Brody |t Judicial deflection of scientific questions : pushing the Laetrile controversy toward medical closure |r Robert L. Schwartz |t Homosexuality. Politics, science, and the problem of psychiatric nomenclature : a case study of the American Psychiatric Association referendum on homosexuality |r Ronald Bayer |
| 505 | 8 | 0 | |t The diagnostic status of homosexuality in DSM-III : a reformulation of the issues |r Robert L. Spitzer |t On arriving at the American Psychiatric Association decision on homosexuality |r Irving Bieber |t Safety in the workplace. Values in the debate over workplace safety and health : the rancorous rhetoric about regulation / r Gilbert S. Omenn |t The successful experiment that failed |r Marvin S. Legator |t The power of efficiency : balancing benefits and costs in regulating occupational exposure to toxic substances |r Taylor R. Durham |t Closure in occupational safety and health : the benzene and cotton dust decisions |r Mark MacCarthy |t Nuclear power. Nuclear fear : a history and an experiment |r Spencer R. Weart |t Closure and controversy : Three Mile Island |r Cora Bagley Marrett |t Understanding the nuclear power controversy |r Douglas MacLean |t Controversy, closure, and the public. The role of the mass media in scientific controversy |r Rae Goddell |t The National Commission on Human Experimentation : procedures and outcomes |r Stephen E. Toulmin |t The forms and norms of closure / Ruth Macklin |
| 520 | |a This collection of essays examines the ways in which disputes and controversies about the application of scientific knowledge are resolved. Four concrete examples of public controversy are considered in detail: the efficacy of Laetrile, the classification of homosexuality as a disease, the setting of safety standards in the workplace, and the utility of nuclear energy as a source of power. The essays in this volume show that debates about these cases are not confined to matters of empirical fact. Rather, as is seen with most scientific and technical controversies, they focus on and are structured by complex ethical, economic, and political interests. Drs. Engelhardt and Caplan have brought together a distinguished group of scholars from the sciences and humanities, who sketch a theory of scientific controversy and attempt to provide recommendations about the ways in which both scientists and the public ought to seek more informed resolutions of highly contentious issues in science and technology. Scientific Controversies is offered as a contribution to the better understanding of the roles of both science and nonscientific interests in disputes and controversies pertaining to science and technology | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Gesellschaft | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Naturwissenschaft | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Philosophie | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Science / Social aspects / Case studies | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Technology / Social aspects / Case studies | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Science / Philosophy / Case studies | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Technology / Philosophy / Case studies | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Medizinische Ethik |0 (DE-588)4074672-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kontroverse |0 (DE-588)4128337-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Wissenschaft |0 (DE-588)4066562-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Wissenssoziologie |0 (DE-588)4066615-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Gesellschaft |0 (DE-588)4020588-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Naturwissenschaften |0 (DE-588)4041421-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Beilegung |0 (DE-588)4284136-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4522595-3 |a Fallstudiensammlung |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Naturwissenschaften |0 (DE-588)4041421-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Kontroverse |0 (DE-588)4128337-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Beilegung |0 (DE-588)4284136-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 1 | 0 | |a Naturwissenschaften |0 (DE-588)4041421-8 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | 1 | |a Gesellschaft |0 (DE-588)4020588-5 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | |8 2\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 2 | 0 | |a Kontroverse |0 (DE-588)4128337-5 |D s |
| 689 | 2 | 1 | |a Wissenschaft |0 (DE-588)4066562-8 |D s |
| 689 | 2 | |8 3\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 3 | 0 | |a Medizinische Ethik |0 (DE-588)4074672-0 |D s |
| 689 | 3 | |8 4\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 4 | 0 | |a Wissenssoziologie |0 (DE-588)4066615-3 |D s |
| 689 | 4 | |8 5\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Engelhardt, Hugo Tristram |d 1941-2018 |0 (DE-588)119132419 |4 edt | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Caplan, Arthur L. |d 1950- |0 (DE-588)113811217 |4 edt | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-0-521-25565-3 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |z 978-0-521-27560-6 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628719 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 883 | 1 | |8 2\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 883 | 1 | |8 3\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 883 | 1 | |8 4\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 883 | 1 | |8 5\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029335841 | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628719 |l DE-12 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628719 |l DE-473 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBG_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1818982539793006592 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author2 | Engelhardt, Hugo Tristram 1941-2018 Caplan, Arthur L. 1950- |
| author2_role | edt edt |
| author2_variant | h t e ht hte a l c al alc |
| author_GND | (DE-588)119132419 (DE-588)113811217 |
| author_additional | H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr., and Arthur L. Caplan Tom L. Beauchamp Ernan McMullin Everett Mendelsohn Ronald N. Giere Robert F. Rich Garland E. Allen Henry Frankel Loren R. Graham Allan Mazur Dorothy Nelkin Alasdair MacIntyre Gerald E. Markle and James C. Petersen Robert S.K. Young Baruch A. Brody Robert L. Schwartz Ronald Bayer Robert L. Spitzer Irving Bieber Marvin S. Legator Taylor R. Durham Mark MacCarthy Spencer R. Weart Cora Bagley Marrett Douglas MacLean Rae Goddell Stephen E. Toulmin |
| author_facet | Engelhardt, Hugo Tristram 1941-2018 Caplan, Arthur L. 1950- |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043926764 |
| classification_rvk | CC 3200 CC 6100 MS 6950 TB 6400 |
| collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
| contents | Patterns of controversy and closure : the interplay of knowledge, values, and political forces Theoretical perspectives. Ethical theory and the problem of closure Scientific controversy and its termination The political anatomy of controversy in the sciences Controversies involving science and technology : a theoretical perspective Politics, public policy-making, and the process of reaching closure The role of experts in scientific controversy The continental drift debate How history and politics affect closure in biomedical discussions : the example of the Soviet Union Scientific disputes over policy Controversies and the authority of science Post-Skinner and post-Freud : philosophical causes of scientific disagreements Contemporary case studies. Laetrile. Resolution of the Laetrile controversy : past attempts and future prospects Federal regulation of Laetrile Quasi libertarianism and the Laetrile controversy Judicial deflection of scientific questions : pushing the Laetrile controversy toward medical closure Homosexuality. Politics, science, and the problem of psychiatric nomenclature : a case study of the American Psychiatric Association referendum on homosexuality The diagnostic status of homosexuality in DSM-III : a reformulation of the issues On arriving at the American Psychiatric Association decision on homosexuality Safety in the workplace. Values in the debate over workplace safety and health : the rancorous rhetoric about regulation / r Gilbert S. Omenn The successful experiment that failed The power of efficiency : balancing benefits and costs in regulating occupational exposure to toxic substances Closure in occupational safety and health : the benzene and cotton dust decisions Nuclear power. Nuclear fear : a history and an experiment Closure and controversy : Three Mile Island Understanding the nuclear power controversy Controversy, closure, and the public. The role of the mass media in scientific controversy The National Commission on Human Experimentation : procedures and outcomes The forms and norms of closure / Ruth Macklin |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511628719 (OCoLC)967416686 (DE-599)BVBBV043926764 |
| dewey-full | 303.4/83 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 303 - Social processes |
| dewey-raw | 303.4/83 |
| dewey-search | 303.4/83 |
| dewey-sort | 3303.4 283 |
| dewey-tens | 300 - Social sciences |
| discipline | Allgemeine Naturwissenschaft Soziologie Philosophie |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/CBO9780511628719 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>07621nam a2200877zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043926764</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20170720 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">161202s1987 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780511628719</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-511-62871-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/CBO9780511628719</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9780511628719</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)967416686</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043926764</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">303.4/83</subfield><subfield code="2">19eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CC 3200</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)17614:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CC 6100</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)17653:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MS 6950</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)123772:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">TB 6400</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)143788:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Scientific controversies</subfield><subfield code="b">case studies in the resolution and closure of disputes in science and technology</subfield><subfield code="c">edited by H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr., and Arthur L. Caplan</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">1987</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (x, 639 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2="0"><subfield code="t">Patterns of controversy and closure : the interplay of knowledge, values, and political forces</subfield><subfield code="r">H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr., and Arthur L. Caplan</subfield><subfield code="t">Theoretical perspectives. Ethical theory and the problem of closure</subfield><subfield code="r">Tom L. Beauchamp</subfield><subfield code="t">Scientific controversy and its termination</subfield><subfield code="r">Ernan McMullin</subfield><subfield code="t">The political anatomy of controversy in the sciences</subfield><subfield code="r">Everett Mendelsohn</subfield><subfield code="t">Controversies involving science and technology : a theoretical perspective</subfield><subfield code="r">Ronald N. Giere</subfield><subfield code="t">Politics, public policy-making, and the process of reaching closure</subfield><subfield code="r">Robert F. Rich</subfield><subfield code="t">The role of experts in scientific controversy</subfield><subfield code="r">Garland E. Allen</subfield><subfield code="t">The continental drift debate</subfield><subfield code="r">Henry Frankel</subfield><subfield code="t">How history and politics affect closure in biomedical discussions : the example of the Soviet Union</subfield><subfield code="r">Loren R. Graham</subfield><subfield code="t">Scientific disputes over policy</subfield><subfield code="r">Allan Mazur</subfield><subfield code="t">Controversies and the authority of science</subfield><subfield code="r">Dorothy Nelkin</subfield><subfield code="t">Post-Skinner and post-Freud : philosophical causes of scientific disagreements</subfield><subfield code="r">Alasdair MacIntyre</subfield><subfield code="t">Contemporary case studies. Laetrile. Resolution of the Laetrile controversy : past attempts and future prospects</subfield><subfield code="r">Gerald E. Markle and James C. Petersen</subfield><subfield code="t">Federal regulation of Laetrile</subfield><subfield code="r">Robert S.K. Young</subfield><subfield code="t">Quasi libertarianism and the Laetrile controversy</subfield><subfield code="r">Baruch A. Brody</subfield><subfield code="t">Judicial deflection of scientific questions : pushing the Laetrile controversy toward medical closure</subfield><subfield code="r">Robert L. Schwartz</subfield><subfield code="t">Homosexuality. Politics, science, and the problem of psychiatric nomenclature : a case study of the American Psychiatric Association referendum on homosexuality</subfield><subfield code="r">Ronald Bayer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2="0"><subfield code="t">The diagnostic status of homosexuality in DSM-III : a reformulation of the issues</subfield><subfield code="r">Robert L. Spitzer</subfield><subfield code="t">On arriving at the American Psychiatric Association decision on homosexuality</subfield><subfield code="r">Irving Bieber</subfield><subfield code="t">Safety in the workplace. Values in the debate over workplace safety and health : the rancorous rhetoric about regulation / r Gilbert S. Omenn</subfield><subfield code="t">The successful experiment that failed</subfield><subfield code="r">Marvin S. Legator</subfield><subfield code="t">The power of efficiency : balancing benefits and costs in regulating occupational exposure to toxic substances</subfield><subfield code="r">Taylor R. Durham</subfield><subfield code="t">Closure in occupational safety and health : the benzene and cotton dust decisions</subfield><subfield code="r">Mark MacCarthy</subfield><subfield code="t">Nuclear power. Nuclear fear : a history and an experiment</subfield><subfield code="r">Spencer R. Weart</subfield><subfield code="t">Closure and controversy : Three Mile Island</subfield><subfield code="r">Cora Bagley Marrett</subfield><subfield code="t">Understanding the nuclear power controversy</subfield><subfield code="r">Douglas MacLean</subfield><subfield code="t">Controversy, closure, and the public. The role of the mass media in scientific controversy</subfield><subfield code="r">Rae Goddell</subfield><subfield code="t">The National Commission on Human Experimentation : procedures and outcomes</subfield><subfield code="r">Stephen E. Toulmin</subfield><subfield code="t">The forms and norms of closure / Ruth Macklin</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This collection of essays examines the ways in which disputes and controversies about the application of scientific knowledge are resolved. Four concrete examples of public controversy are considered in detail: the efficacy of Laetrile, the classification of homosexuality as a disease, the setting of safety standards in the workplace, and the utility of nuclear energy as a source of power. The essays in this volume show that debates about these cases are not confined to matters of empirical fact. Rather, as is seen with most scientific and technical controversies, they focus on and are structured by complex ethical, economic, and political interests. Drs. Engelhardt and Caplan have brought together a distinguished group of scholars from the sciences and humanities, who sketch a theory of scientific controversy and attempt to provide recommendations about the ways in which both scientists and the public ought to seek more informed resolutions of highly contentious issues in science and technology. Scientific Controversies is offered as a contribution to the better understanding of the roles of both science and nonscientific interests in disputes and controversies pertaining to science and technology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gesellschaft</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Naturwissenschaft</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Science / Social aspects / Case studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Technology / Social aspects / Case studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Science / Philosophy / Case studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Technology / Philosophy / Case studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Medizinische Ethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4074672-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kontroverse</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4128337-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wissenschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4066562-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wissenssoziologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4066615-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gesellschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020588-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Naturwissenschaften</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4041421-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Beilegung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4284136-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4522595-3</subfield><subfield code="a">Fallstudiensammlung</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Naturwissenschaften</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4041421-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Kontroverse</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4128337-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Beilegung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4284136-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Naturwissenschaften</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4041421-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Gesellschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020588-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Kontroverse</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4128337-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Wissenschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4066562-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">3\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="3" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medizinische Ethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4074672-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">4\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Wissenssoziologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4066615-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="4" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">5\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Engelhardt, Hugo Tristram</subfield><subfield code="d">1941-2018</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)119132419</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Caplan, Arthur L.</subfield><subfield code="d">1950-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)113811217</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-521-25565-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druckausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-521-27560-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628719</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">3\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">4\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">5\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029335841</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628719</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628719</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4522595-3 Fallstudiensammlung gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Fallstudiensammlung |
| id | DE-604.BV043926764 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-20T17:48:50Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780511628719 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029335841 |
| oclc_num | 967416686 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| physical | 1 online resource (x, 639 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO |
| publishDate | 1987 |
| publishDateSearch | 1987 |
| publishDateSort | 1987 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Scientific controversies case studies in the resolution and closure of disputes in science and technology edited by H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr., and Arthur L. Caplan Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1987 1 online resource (x, 639 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015) Patterns of controversy and closure : the interplay of knowledge, values, and political forces H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr., and Arthur L. Caplan Theoretical perspectives. Ethical theory and the problem of closure Tom L. Beauchamp Scientific controversy and its termination Ernan McMullin The political anatomy of controversy in the sciences Everett Mendelsohn Controversies involving science and technology : a theoretical perspective Ronald N. Giere Politics, public policy-making, and the process of reaching closure Robert F. Rich The role of experts in scientific controversy Garland E. Allen The continental drift debate Henry Frankel How history and politics affect closure in biomedical discussions : the example of the Soviet Union Loren R. Graham Scientific disputes over policy Allan Mazur Controversies and the authority of science Dorothy Nelkin Post-Skinner and post-Freud : philosophical causes of scientific disagreements Alasdair MacIntyre Contemporary case studies. Laetrile. Resolution of the Laetrile controversy : past attempts and future prospects Gerald E. Markle and James C. Petersen Federal regulation of Laetrile Robert S.K. Young Quasi libertarianism and the Laetrile controversy Baruch A. Brody Judicial deflection of scientific questions : pushing the Laetrile controversy toward medical closure Robert L. Schwartz Homosexuality. Politics, science, and the problem of psychiatric nomenclature : a case study of the American Psychiatric Association referendum on homosexuality Ronald Bayer The diagnostic status of homosexuality in DSM-III : a reformulation of the issues Robert L. Spitzer On arriving at the American Psychiatric Association decision on homosexuality Irving Bieber Safety in the workplace. Values in the debate over workplace safety and health : the rancorous rhetoric about regulation / r Gilbert S. Omenn The successful experiment that failed Marvin S. Legator The power of efficiency : balancing benefits and costs in regulating occupational exposure to toxic substances Taylor R. Durham Closure in occupational safety and health : the benzene and cotton dust decisions Mark MacCarthy Nuclear power. Nuclear fear : a history and an experiment Spencer R. Weart Closure and controversy : Three Mile Island Cora Bagley Marrett Understanding the nuclear power controversy Douglas MacLean Controversy, closure, and the public. The role of the mass media in scientific controversy Rae Goddell The National Commission on Human Experimentation : procedures and outcomes Stephen E. Toulmin The forms and norms of closure / Ruth Macklin This collection of essays examines the ways in which disputes and controversies about the application of scientific knowledge are resolved. Four concrete examples of public controversy are considered in detail: the efficacy of Laetrile, the classification of homosexuality as a disease, the setting of safety standards in the workplace, and the utility of nuclear energy as a source of power. The essays in this volume show that debates about these cases are not confined to matters of empirical fact. Rather, as is seen with most scientific and technical controversies, they focus on and are structured by complex ethical, economic, and political interests. Drs. Engelhardt and Caplan have brought together a distinguished group of scholars from the sciences and humanities, who sketch a theory of scientific controversy and attempt to provide recommendations about the ways in which both scientists and the public ought to seek more informed resolutions of highly contentious issues in science and technology. Scientific Controversies is offered as a contribution to the better understanding of the roles of both science and nonscientific interests in disputes and controversies pertaining to science and technology Gesellschaft Naturwissenschaft Philosophie Science / Social aspects / Case studies Technology / Social aspects / Case studies Science / Philosophy / Case studies Technology / Philosophy / Case studies Medizinische Ethik (DE-588)4074672-0 gnd rswk-swf Kontroverse (DE-588)4128337-5 gnd rswk-swf Wissenschaft (DE-588)4066562-8 gnd rswk-swf Wissenssoziologie (DE-588)4066615-3 gnd rswk-swf Gesellschaft (DE-588)4020588-5 gnd rswk-swf Naturwissenschaften (DE-588)4041421-8 gnd rswk-swf Beilegung (DE-588)4284136-7 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)4522595-3 Fallstudiensammlung gnd-content Naturwissenschaften (DE-588)4041421-8 s Kontroverse (DE-588)4128337-5 s Beilegung (DE-588)4284136-7 s 1\p DE-604 Gesellschaft (DE-588)4020588-5 s 2\p DE-604 Wissenschaft (DE-588)4066562-8 s 3\p DE-604 Medizinische Ethik (DE-588)4074672-0 s 4\p DE-604 Wissenssoziologie (DE-588)4066615-3 s 5\p DE-604 Engelhardt, Hugo Tristram 1941-2018 (DE-588)119132419 edt Caplan, Arthur L. 1950- (DE-588)113811217 edt Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-0-521-25565-3 Erscheint auch als Druckausgabe 978-0-521-27560-6 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628719 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 2\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 3\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 4\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 5\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Scientific controversies case studies in the resolution and closure of disputes in science and technology Patterns of controversy and closure : the interplay of knowledge, values, and political forces Theoretical perspectives. Ethical theory and the problem of closure Scientific controversy and its termination The political anatomy of controversy in the sciences Controversies involving science and technology : a theoretical perspective Politics, public policy-making, and the process of reaching closure The role of experts in scientific controversy The continental drift debate How history and politics affect closure in biomedical discussions : the example of the Soviet Union Scientific disputes over policy Controversies and the authority of science Post-Skinner and post-Freud : philosophical causes of scientific disagreements Contemporary case studies. Laetrile. Resolution of the Laetrile controversy : past attempts and future prospects Federal regulation of Laetrile Quasi libertarianism and the Laetrile controversy Judicial deflection of scientific questions : pushing the Laetrile controversy toward medical closure Homosexuality. Politics, science, and the problem of psychiatric nomenclature : a case study of the American Psychiatric Association referendum on homosexuality The diagnostic status of homosexuality in DSM-III : a reformulation of the issues On arriving at the American Psychiatric Association decision on homosexuality Safety in the workplace. Values in the debate over workplace safety and health : the rancorous rhetoric about regulation / r Gilbert S. Omenn The successful experiment that failed The power of efficiency : balancing benefits and costs in regulating occupational exposure to toxic substances Closure in occupational safety and health : the benzene and cotton dust decisions Nuclear power. Nuclear fear : a history and an experiment Closure and controversy : Three Mile Island Understanding the nuclear power controversy Controversy, closure, and the public. The role of the mass media in scientific controversy The National Commission on Human Experimentation : procedures and outcomes The forms and norms of closure / Ruth Macklin Gesellschaft Naturwissenschaft Philosophie Science / Social aspects / Case studies Technology / Social aspects / Case studies Science / Philosophy / Case studies Technology / Philosophy / Case studies Medizinische Ethik (DE-588)4074672-0 gnd Kontroverse (DE-588)4128337-5 gnd Wissenschaft (DE-588)4066562-8 gnd Wissenssoziologie (DE-588)4066615-3 gnd Gesellschaft (DE-588)4020588-5 gnd Naturwissenschaften (DE-588)4041421-8 gnd Beilegung (DE-588)4284136-7 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4074672-0 (DE-588)4128337-5 (DE-588)4066562-8 (DE-588)4066615-3 (DE-588)4020588-5 (DE-588)4041421-8 (DE-588)4284136-7 (DE-588)4522595-3 |
| title | Scientific controversies case studies in the resolution and closure of disputes in science and technology |
| title_alt | Patterns of controversy and closure : the interplay of knowledge, values, and political forces Theoretical perspectives. Ethical theory and the problem of closure Scientific controversy and its termination The political anatomy of controversy in the sciences Controversies involving science and technology : a theoretical perspective Politics, public policy-making, and the process of reaching closure The role of experts in scientific controversy The continental drift debate How history and politics affect closure in biomedical discussions : the example of the Soviet Union Scientific disputes over policy Controversies and the authority of science Post-Skinner and post-Freud : philosophical causes of scientific disagreements Contemporary case studies. Laetrile. Resolution of the Laetrile controversy : past attempts and future prospects Federal regulation of Laetrile Quasi libertarianism and the Laetrile controversy Judicial deflection of scientific questions : pushing the Laetrile controversy toward medical closure Homosexuality. Politics, science, and the problem of psychiatric nomenclature : a case study of the American Psychiatric Association referendum on homosexuality The diagnostic status of homosexuality in DSM-III : a reformulation of the issues On arriving at the American Psychiatric Association decision on homosexuality Safety in the workplace. Values in the debate over workplace safety and health : the rancorous rhetoric about regulation / r Gilbert S. Omenn The successful experiment that failed The power of efficiency : balancing benefits and costs in regulating occupational exposure to toxic substances Closure in occupational safety and health : the benzene and cotton dust decisions Nuclear power. Nuclear fear : a history and an experiment Closure and controversy : Three Mile Island Understanding the nuclear power controversy Controversy, closure, and the public. The role of the mass media in scientific controversy The National Commission on Human Experimentation : procedures and outcomes The forms and norms of closure / Ruth Macklin |
| title_auth | Scientific controversies case studies in the resolution and closure of disputes in science and technology |
| title_exact_search | Scientific controversies case studies in the resolution and closure of disputes in science and technology |
| title_full | Scientific controversies case studies in the resolution and closure of disputes in science and technology edited by H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr., and Arthur L. Caplan |
| title_fullStr | Scientific controversies case studies in the resolution and closure of disputes in science and technology edited by H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr., and Arthur L. Caplan |
| title_full_unstemmed | Scientific controversies case studies in the resolution and closure of disputes in science and technology edited by H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr., and Arthur L. Caplan |
| title_short | Scientific controversies |
| title_sort | scientific controversies case studies in the resolution and closure of disputes in science and technology |
| title_sub | case studies in the resolution and closure of disputes in science and technology |
| topic | Gesellschaft Naturwissenschaft Philosophie Science / Social aspects / Case studies Technology / Social aspects / Case studies Science / Philosophy / Case studies Technology / Philosophy / Case studies Medizinische Ethik (DE-588)4074672-0 gnd Kontroverse (DE-588)4128337-5 gnd Wissenschaft (DE-588)4066562-8 gnd Wissenssoziologie (DE-588)4066615-3 gnd Gesellschaft (DE-588)4020588-5 gnd Naturwissenschaften (DE-588)4041421-8 gnd Beilegung (DE-588)4284136-7 gnd |
| topic_facet | Gesellschaft Naturwissenschaft Philosophie Science / Social aspects / Case studies Technology / Social aspects / Case studies Science / Philosophy / Case studies Technology / Philosophy / Case studies Medizinische Ethik Kontroverse Wissenschaft Wissenssoziologie Naturwissenschaften Beilegung Fallstudiensammlung |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628719 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT engelhardthugotristram scientificcontroversiescasestudiesintheresolutionandclosureofdisputesinscienceandtechnology AT caplanarthurl scientificcontroversiescasestudiesintheresolutionandclosureofdisputesinscienceandtechnology |