European consensus and the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights:
Gespeichert in:
| Beteilige Person: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge Univ. Press
2015
|
| Ausgabe: | 1. publ. |
| Schlagwörter: | |
| Links: | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027836124&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027836124&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| Beschreibung: | Hier auch später erschienene, unveränderte Nachdrucke |
| Umfang: | XXIV, 229 S. graph. Darst. |
| ISBN: | 9781107041035 9781107678019 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV042400432 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20170215 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 150310s2015 xx d||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 016 | 7 | |a 017036904 |2 DE-101 | |
| 020 | |a 9781107041035 |c hbk. : £65.00 |9 978-1-107-04103-5 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781107678019 |c 1. pb. ed. |9 978-1-107-67801-9 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)914367036 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ426532953 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-703 |a DE-12 |a DE-11 |a DE-29 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 341.48094 | |
| 084 | |a PS 4140 |0 (DE-625)139835: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin |d ca. 20./21. Jh. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1050015118 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a European consensus and the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights |c Kanstantsin Dzehtsiarou |
| 250 | |a 1. publ. | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge Univ. Press |c 2015 | |
| 300 | |a XXIV, 229 S. |b graph. Darst. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Hier auch später erschienene, unveränderte Nachdrucke | ||
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte |0 (DE-588)1003803-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäischer Gerichtshof |0 (DE-588)5103273-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 630 | 0 | 7 | |a Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention |f 1950 November 4 |0 (DE-588)4015727-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Legitimität |0 (DE-588)4035043-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Menschenrecht |0 (DE-588)4074725-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Konsens |0 (DE-588)4010504-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte |0 (DE-588)1003803-6 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Legitimität |0 (DE-588)4035043-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Konsens |0 (DE-588)4010504-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 1 | 0 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |D b |
| 689 | 1 | 1 | |a Menschenrecht |0 (DE-588)4074725-6 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | 2 | |a Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention |f 1950 November 4 |0 (DE-588)4015727-1 |D u |
| 689 | 1 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 2 | 0 | |a Europäischer Gerichtshof |0 (DE-588)5103273-9 |D b |
| 689 | 2 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027836124&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Klappentext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027836124&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027836124 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1820972223159074816 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
EUROPEAN CONSENSUS AND THE
LEGITIMACY OF THE EUROPEAN
COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
In order to be effective, international tribunals should be perceived as
legitimate adjudicators. European Consensus and the Legitimacy of
the European Court of Human Rights provides in-depth analyses on
whether European consensus is capable of enhancing the legitimacy of
the European Court of Human Rights. Focusing on the method and value
of European consensus, it examines the practicalities of consensus identi-
fication and application and discusses whether State counting is appro-
priate in human rights adjudication. With over 30 interviews from judges
of the European Court of Human Rights and qualitative analyses of the
case law, this book gives readers access to first-hand and up-to-date
information and provides an understanding of how the European Court
of Human Rights in Strasbourg interprets the European Convention on
Human Rights.
kanstantsin dzehtsiarou is a Senior Lecturer in law at the University
of Surrey and Visiting Professor at the European Humanities University in
Vilnius, Lithuania.
CONTENTS^
L is t of figu res page xi
Foreword xiii
Acknowledgements xvi
Table of cases xviii
Abbreviations xxiv
1 Introduction 1
2 The concept of European consensus 9
2.1 Introduction 9
2.2 Definition of European consensus 10
2.2.1 Terminology 10
2.2.2 Level of consensus 14
2.2.2.1 Consensus at the level of rules 15
2.2.2.2 Consensus at the level of principles 16
2.3 Spread of European consensus 17
2.3.1 Importance of consensus 17
2.3.2 Reasons for limited deployment of consensus 21
2.4 Application of European consensus 23
2.4.1 European consensus in action 24
2.4.2 Limits of application of the European consensus
argument 30
2.4.2.1 Text of the convention and protocols 30
2.4.2.2 Historical and political justification 32
2.4.2.3 Moral sensitivity of the matter at issue 34
2.5 Conclusion 36
3
Vll
Types of consensus
3.1 Introduction
38
38
Vlll
CONTENTS
3.2 Typology of consensus 39
3.2.1 Consensus based on comparative analysis
of the laws and practices of the Contracting Parties 40
3.2.2 European consensus based on international treaties 45
3.2.3 Internal consensus within the respondent State 49
3.2.4 Consensus among experts 55
3.3 Interactions between different types of
consensus 56
3.3.1 Interaction between European consensus based on
comparative law and European consensus based on
international treaties 57
3.3.2 Interaction between European consensus and internal
consensus 60
3.3.3 European consensus and international trends 65
3.4 Conclusion 71
4 Behind the scenes: Comparative analysis within
the Court 72
4.1 introduction 72
4.2 Purposes of comparative law 74
4.2.1 Fit and vision 74
4.2.2 Information and persuasion 77
4.3. What is wrong with comparison? Criticism of
comparative legal research conducted by the
Court 78
4.4 Evolution of comparative legal research 82
4.4.1 Limited factual justification 82
4.4.2 Recourse to previous findings 84
4.4.3 Comparative law research prepared
by the ECtHR 86
4.4.4 Comparative research conducted by third parties 97
4.5 Key challenges 101
4.5.1 Comprehensive comparative research 102
4.5.2 Legal provisions in context 105
4.5.3 Subject matter of comparison 109
4.5.4 Translation of legal terms 111
4.6 Conclusion 114
CONTENTS
IX
5 Criticism of European consensus 115
5.1 Introduction 115
5.2 ‘Anti-majoritarian argument’ against
consensus 116
5.3 The minority rights challenge 122
5.4 Criticism of European consensus as a determinant of
evolutive interpretation and the margin of
appreciation 129
5.4.1 Criticism of evolutive interpretation and the margin of
appreciation 130
5.4.2 European consensus: Between margin of appreciation and
evolutive interpretation 132
5.4.2.1 European consensus and the margin of
appreciation 132
5.4.2.2 European consensus and evolutive
interpretation 138
5.5 Conclusion 142
6 Legitimacy of the Court and legitimacy of its
judgments 143
6.1 Introduction 143
6.2 Lost legitimacy? 144
6.3 International constitutional challenges 149
6.3.1 State consent 149
6.3.2 Dialogue between the ECtHR and the Contracting
Parties 155
6.3.3 Consensus as a source of international law 158
6.3.4 Subsidiarity 165
6.4 National constitutional challenges 167
6.5 Conclusion 175
7 European consensus: Perceptions of the ECtHR
judges 177
7.1 Introduction 177
7.2 Research design and methodology 178
X
CONTENTS
7.3 Why does the Court use European consensus? 182
7.4 How persuasive is European consensus? 189
7.5 How satisfactory is comparative research that leads
to European consensus? 196
7.6 Criticism from within the palace walls 201
7.7 Conclusion 206
8 Conclusion 207
Appendix 1:List of interviewees 212
Appendix 2: List of the Grand Chamber judgments
with international or comparative law 215
Index 225 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin ca. 20./21. Jh |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1050015118 |
| author_facet | Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin ca. 20./21. Jh |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin ca. 20./21. Jh |
| author_variant | k d kd |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV042400432 |
| classification_rvk | PS 4140 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)914367036 (DE-599)BSZ426532953 |
| dewey-full | 341.48094 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 341 - Law of nations |
| dewey-raw | 341.48094 |
| dewey-search | 341.48094 |
| dewey-sort | 3341.48094 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| edition | 1. publ. |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV042400432</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20170215</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">150310s2015 xx d||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="016" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">017036904</subfield><subfield code="2">DE-101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781107041035</subfield><subfield code="c">hbk. : £65.00</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-107-04103-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781107678019</subfield><subfield code="c">1. pb. ed.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-107-67801-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)914367036</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BSZ426532953</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">341.48094</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PS 4140</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139835:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin</subfield><subfield code="d">ca. 20./21. Jh.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1050015118</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">European consensus and the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights</subfield><subfield code="c">Kanstantsin Dzehtsiarou</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. publ.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge Univ. Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXIV, 229 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">graph. Darst.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hier auch später erschienene, unveränderte Nachdrucke</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1003803-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäischer Gerichtshof</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5103273-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="630" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention</subfield><subfield code="f">1950 November 4</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015727-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Legitimität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4035043-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Menschenrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4074725-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Konsens</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4010504-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1003803-6</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Legitimität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4035043-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Konsens</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4010504-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Menschenrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4074725-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention</subfield><subfield code="f">1950 November 4</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015727-1</subfield><subfield code="D">u</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europäischer Gerichtshof</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5103273-9</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027836124&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Klappentext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027836124&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027836124</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV042400432 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2025-01-11T16:53:59Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781107041035 9781107678019 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027836124 |
| oclc_num | 914367036 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-703 DE-12 DE-11 DE-29 |
| owner_facet | DE-703 DE-12 DE-11 DE-29 |
| physical | XXIV, 229 S. graph. Darst. |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publishDateSearch | 2015 |
| publishDateSort | 2015 |
| publisher | Cambridge Univ. Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin ca. 20./21. Jh. Verfasser (DE-588)1050015118 aut European consensus and the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights Kanstantsin Dzehtsiarou 1. publ. Cambridge Cambridge Univ. Press 2015 XXIV, 229 S. graph. Darst. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Hier auch später erschienene, unveränderte Nachdrucke Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd rswk-swf Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (DE-588)1003803-6 gnd rswk-swf Europäischer Gerichtshof (DE-588)5103273-9 gnd rswk-swf Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention 1950 November 4 (DE-588)4015727-1 gnd rswk-swf Legitimität (DE-588)4035043-5 gnd rswk-swf Menschenrecht (DE-588)4074725-6 gnd rswk-swf Konsens (DE-588)4010504-0 gnd rswk-swf Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (DE-588)1003803-6 b Legitimität (DE-588)4035043-5 s Konsens (DE-588)4010504-0 s DE-604 Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 b Menschenrecht (DE-588)4074725-6 s Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention 1950 November 4 (DE-588)4015727-1 u Europäischer Gerichtshof (DE-588)5103273-9 b Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027836124&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Klappentext Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027836124&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin ca. 20./21. Jh European consensus and the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (DE-588)1003803-6 gnd Europäischer Gerichtshof (DE-588)5103273-9 gnd Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention 1950 November 4 (DE-588)4015727-1 gnd Legitimität (DE-588)4035043-5 gnd Menschenrecht (DE-588)4074725-6 gnd Konsens (DE-588)4010504-0 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)5098525-5 (DE-588)1003803-6 (DE-588)5103273-9 (DE-588)4015727-1 (DE-588)4035043-5 (DE-588)4074725-6 (DE-588)4010504-0 |
| title | European consensus and the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights |
| title_auth | European consensus and the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights |
| title_exact_search | European consensus and the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights |
| title_full | European consensus and the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights Kanstantsin Dzehtsiarou |
| title_fullStr | European consensus and the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights Kanstantsin Dzehtsiarou |
| title_full_unstemmed | European consensus and the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights Kanstantsin Dzehtsiarou |
| title_short | European consensus and the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights |
| title_sort | european consensus and the legitimacy of the european court of human rights |
| topic | Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (DE-588)1003803-6 gnd Europäischer Gerichtshof (DE-588)5103273-9 gnd Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention 1950 November 4 (DE-588)4015727-1 gnd Legitimität (DE-588)4035043-5 gnd Menschenrecht (DE-588)4074725-6 gnd Konsens (DE-588)4010504-0 gnd |
| topic_facet | Europäische Union Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte Europäischer Gerichtshof Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention 1950 November 4 Legitimität Menschenrecht Konsens |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027836124&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027836124&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dzehtsiaroukanstantsin europeanconsensusandthelegitimacyoftheeuropeancourtofhumanrights |